User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 9:26:53 AM EST
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Seeing Graham in this photo made me wonder if he is dragging his feet as head of the Senate Judiciary Committee because he is covering for some of his own actions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 9:37:28 AM EST
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yea, Brian Cates can: Brian Cates Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Can anyone tell me why they think Lindsey Graham is indeed taking the steps necessary to get to the bottom of what he said he would get to the bottom of? Thanks
Well it's simple, Charlie.
THAT Lindsey Graham doesn't need to go to the trouble of holding his own hearings to try to 'find out' what happened. Horowitz, Barr & Durham are going to BRING IT ALL TO HIM. We'll just have to be patient a bit longer. In the meantime Lindsey Graham is not doing anything he said he was going to do. Waiting for someone to "bring it to him" it's not the same as Lindsey doing his own "deep dive" into these matters like he said he would do. Lindsey is not even wearing his diving suit. It better be the triple lindy, and not a belly flop when he gets around to his deep dive. At least some in the media or taking notice and calling him out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 9:38:30 AM EST
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 9:52:06 AM EST
[#4]
Just ran across this, I think it's from Jim.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 9:56:37 AM EST
[#5]
From an anon
Anonymous "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers."An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917 "I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. ... It's importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda ... Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class (Elite). The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 10:00:56 AM EST
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Seeing Graham in this photo made me wonder if he is dragging his feet as head of the Senate Judiciary Committee because he is covering for some of his own actions. Just make a lot talk, but don't ever actually do anything. We like a lot of real serious talk. It pacifies us while we continue to wait. Like last night when Lindsey said he was issuing a resolution to condemn the dems impeachment sham. I'll bet the condemnation is going to be issued in the harshest terms allowable too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 10:01:49 AM EST
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just ran across this, I think it's from Jim.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 10:26:09 AM EST
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What’s known about the Acting Ambassador Bill Taylor? He replaced Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch when she was shown the door. The article sure attempts to show a quid pro quo. What a mess... Fox News Story Diplomat Bill Taylor testifies Trump used Ukraine aid, White House meeting as leverage for probes By Gregg Re | Fox News Acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor testified unequivocally Tuesday that President Trump pushed Ukraine to investigate both election interference and a company linked to former Vice President Joe Biden's son -- and was willing to hold up military aid and a White House meeting to get a public announcement from the country that the probes were underway. In his opening remarks to House lawmakers obtained by Fox News, Taylor voiced his apparent frustration that the Trump administration was undercutting his personal policy preference for providing robust aid to Ukraine. Among Taylor's colorful claims were that then-national security adviser John Bolton furiously warned that a Trump phone call with Ukraine's leader would be a "disaster," and that Taylor nearly didn't take the job leading Ukraine's embassy out of concerns the U.S. wouldn't be sufficiently helpful to Ukraine. Republicans, however, have countered that military aid to Ukraine was released in September, and that there has been no evidence Ukrainians were aware that the aid was being withheld as part of any implicit quid pro quo. Ukrainian officials have denied that there was any undue pressure from the White House. But Taylor went on to describe the existence of an "irregular" communications channel with Ukraine led by Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and a "weird combination of encouraging, confusing, and ultimately alarming circumstances" once he arrived in Kiev. The statement confirmed previous reporting of Taylor's remarks by Fox News. "During this same phone call I had with [National Security Council aide Tim] Morrison, he went on to describe a conversation [United States E.U.] Ambassador [Gordon] Sondland had with Mr. Yermak at Warsaw," Taylor testified, referring to a July 28 conversation. "Ambassador Sondland told [top Ukraine aide Andriy] Yermak that security assistance money would not come until President [Volodymyr] Zelenskyy committed to pursue the Burisma investigation." Burisma Holdings is the Ukrainian natural gas company where Biden’s son Hunter was employed in a lucrative role despite no relevant expertise. Taylor continued: "I was alarmed by what Mr. Morrison told me about the Sondland-Yermak conversation. This was the first time I had heard that the security assistance not just the White House meeting — was conditioned on the investigations." That same day, Taylor said, he sent Sondland a text message asking if security assistance and a White House meeting "are conditioned on investigations," prompting Sondland to request Taylor call him. Although those texts have previously been released, the contents of Taylor's call have been unclear. FIGHT "During that phone call, Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelenskyy to state publicly that Ukrain will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election," Taylor testified. “By mid-July it was becoming clear to me that the meeting President Zelenskyy wanted was conditioned on the investigations of Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections,” Taylor testified. Also in his opening statement, Taylor described his commitment to providing support to Ukraine as so strong that he nearly threatened not to accept Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's offer for him to lead the U.S. Embassy in Kiev. Taylor, a retired diplomat, had been chosen to run the embassy after the administration abruptly ousted Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch. Taylor had served as U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine from 2006 to 2009, but because he was not yet reconfirmed by the Senate, his official title was to be Chargé d 'Affaires ad interim. A former Army officer, Taylor had been serving as executive vice president at the U.S. Institute of Peace — which has described itself as a nonpartisan think tank founded by Congress — when he was appointed to run the embassy. "I could be effective only if the U.S. policy of strong support for Ukraine, strong diplomatic support along with robust security, economic, and technical assistance — were to continue and if I had the backing of the secretary of state to implement that policy," Taylor said. "During my meeting with Secretary Pompeo on May 28, I made clear to him and the others present that if U.S. policy toward Ukraine changed, he would not want me posted there and I could not stay," Taylor continued. "He assured me that the policy of strong support for Ukraine would continue and that he would support me in defending that policy." The White House, meanwhile, fired back Tuesday over Taylor's testimony: "President Trump has done nothing wrong — this is a coordinated smear campaign from far-left lawmakers and radical unelected bureaucrats waging war on the Constitution. There was no quid pro quo," White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said. Only Taylor's opening statement has been released at this point. However, lawmakers emerging after hours of the private deposition said Taylor relayed a "disturbing" account, including establishing a "direct line" to the quid pro quo at the center of Democrats' impeachment inquiry. Lawmakers said Taylor recalled events that filled in gaps from the testimony of other witnesses, particularly Sondland, who testified last week and whose statements now are being called into question by Taylor's account. They said Taylor kept records of conversations and documents. "The testimony is very disturbing," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., used the same word. Asked why, he said, "Because it's becoming more distinct." Taylor's appearance was among the most-watched because of a text message, released by House investigators earlier in the probe, in which he called Trump's attempt to hold back military aid to Ukraine "crazy." The account called into question the testimony from Sondland, a wealthy businessman who donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration, who told Congress last week he did not fully remember some details of the events. Sondland may be asked to return to Congress after he testified that, among other things, he was initially unaware that the gas company was tied to the Bidens. Rep. Ami Bera, D-Calif., said Taylor, a career civil servant, had a better recall of details than Sondland. Fox News has learned that House investigators have started to winnow the list of witnesses coming in for closed-door interviews or depositions and that the parade of witnesses expected for interviews could start to slow next week or the week after. That’s because the "universe" of witnesses knowledgable about a possible quid pro quo was limited. Democrats also wanted to narrow their probe to Ukraine and not let it stray too far afield, Fox News learned. Acting Assistant Secretary of European and Eurasian Affairs Philip Reeker is scheduled for a closed-door interview Saturday morning. That has been delayed due to funeral services for the late Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md. Fox News is told the odds of Reeker showing up are "50-50." There also have been questions as to whether there will be more than a smattering of members coming to the Saturday meeting because of other commitments. Fox News is told members believed staff should be able to handle Reeker’s deposition because he's not a primary witness. "There's a hierarchy," one source close to the interviews said. "Reeker's like the sprinkles on the cake." When asked about the importance of Reeker, another source told Fox News, "There’s a reason [he's] scheduled for Saturday." Fox News' Kellianne Jones, Chad Pergram, Mike Emanuel, Alex Pappas and The Associated Press contributed to this report. A) Previous administrations negligently failed to uphold the law, and by giving corrupt foreign powers money, as this is an act that is contrary to the interest of US Citizens (i.e. we don’t knowingly support corrupt foreign leaders) B) In the alternative previous administrations intentionally failed to uphold the law by supporting such corrupt foreign leaders b/c they were corrupt and such corruption dovetailed into US plans (aka Benghazi / Iran / El Salvador / Viet Nam / Turkey ......). Ambassador Taylor - your ‘policy preferences’ mean exactly jack shit - you are a representative of the United States of America. Lastly, Sonland is PDX native with a less than stellar reputation even amongst the shitbags that call PDX home. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 10:56:53 AM EST
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 10:58:10 AM EST
[#10]
https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottThuman/status/1187023336255250433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Twitter embed not working again |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:03:17 AM EST
[#11]
Demanding Transparency Presser live
 DEMANDING TRANSPARENCY: Jim Jordan DEMANDS Impeachment Transparency Hearings eta; sorry guys...not live, but good to see a little f'n cohesion among the R's. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:04:49 AM EST
[#12]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:05:42 AM EST
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottThuman/status/1187023336255250433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Twitter embed not working again
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:08:19 AM EST
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'll be honest. I am having my doubts that Durham is going to hand a silver platter with the heads of the those we wish most to go down to Lindsey graham when the report it concluded. In the meantime Lindsey Graham is not doing anything he said he was going to do. Waiting for someone to "bring it to him" it's not the same as Lindsey doing his own "deep dive" into these matters like he said he would do. Lindsey is not even wearing his diving suit. It better be the triple lindy, and not a belly flop when he gets around to his deep dive. At least some in the media or taking notice and calling him out. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Can anyone tell me why they think Lindsey Graham is indeed taking the steps necessary to get to the bottom of what he said he would get to the bottom of? Thanks
Well it's simple, Charlie.
THAT Lindsey Graham doesn't need to go to the trouble of holding his own hearings to try to 'find out' what happened. Horowitz, Barr & Durham are going to BRING IT ALL TO HIM. We'll just have to be patient a bit longer. In the meantime Lindsey Graham is not doing anything he said he was going to do. Waiting for someone to "bring it to him" it's not the same as Lindsey doing his own "deep dive" into these matters like he said he would do. Lindsey is not even wearing his diving suit. It better be the triple lindy, and not a belly flop when he gets around to his deep dive. At least some in the media or taking notice and calling him out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:17:23 AM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottThuman/status/1187023336255250433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Twitter embed not working again Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottThuman/status/1187023336255250433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Twitter embed not working again
 This reminds me a LOT about the numerous "Fake Video" warnings. Nothing has been proposed in the US officially yet, it's far better than the currently security free system, BUT 'something might be wrong with it'. Value of bitcoin suggests otherwise. 
Blockchain Voting Is Vulnerable to Hackers, Software Glitches and Bad ID Photos – Among Other Problems Blockchain technology can address some weaknesses in voting systems, but not all of them – and it opens new potential vulnerabilities, too. A developing technology called “blockchain” has gotten attention from election officials, startups and even Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang as a potential way to boost voter turnout and public trust in election results. I study blockchain technology and its potential use in fighting fraud, strengthening cybersecurity and securing voting. I see promising signs that blockchain-based voting could make it more convenient for people to vote, thereby boosting voter turnout. And blockchain systems can be effective at strengthening the security of devices, networks and critical systems like electricity grids, as well as protecting personal privacy. The few small-scale tests run so far have identified problems and vulnerabilities in the digital systems and government administrative procedures that must be resolved before blockchain-based voting can be considered safe and trustworthy. Therefore I don’t see clear evidence that it can prevent, or even detect, election fraud. How it works There are a few steps in a blockchain-based voting system, which uses technology to mirror the process of in-person voting. First, the system needs to verify a voter’s identity – often by having the user upload a photo of a government-issued ID and then a photo or video self-portrait. The system confirms the ID’s validity, and facial recognition software makes sure the person in the self-portrait is the person on the ID. Then the user is authenticated as eligible to cast a vote. Only at that point does blockchain technology actually enter the process. The system gives each authenticated voter a digital token that represents the person’s vote and a list of the digital addresses to which he or she can send that token. Each address indicates a vote for a particular candidate or an answer to a ballot question. The tokens don’t indicate who cast them, so votes remain anonymous. When a voter sends a token, a record of that act is stored simultaneously on several different computers, making it much harder for hackers to alter the vote records. After casting the ballot by sending the token, the user receives a unique code that they can use to look at the anonymized online vote tally to confirm their vote was counted as they intended. Small-scale trials, so far Early results show that blockchain systems may increase voter turnout, though it’s not yet clear why. Many of the tests have been for informal ballots, like student government groups and community projects. However, several election officials in the U.S. have held small-scale trials of blockchain voting, allowing members of the military who are stationed overseas to vote electronically, rather than by mail. In the November 2018 congressional elections, West Virginia allowed 144 voters living overseas to cast ballots from 31 different countries using an app developed by a private company called Voatz, which is involved in many of these trials. Another 200 voters overseas expressed interest in using the system, but their home counties in West Virginia weren’t set up to do so. Based on the results, West Virginia says it plans to continue and expand the trial in the 2020 presidential election. Denver, Colorado, had 119 voters who were overseas use a Voatz system to cast their ballots in municipal primary elections in May. In the city’s June runoff election, 112 voters did so online through a blockchain system. In August, 24 voters cast their ballots from overseas using a Voatz app in a Utah County, Utah, election. A big test in Moscow The most recent – and largest – use of a blockchain-based voting system was in the city council election in Moscow, Russia, on Sept. 8. Because of concerns that the system was not set up securely, only three of the city’s 20 electoral precincts allowed voters to use a blockchain-based mobile voting app to cast their ballot from anywhere with an internet connection. Again, the evidence showed a boost in voter turnout: The city’s overall turnout rate was around 17% of registered voters. That includes a 90% turnout among the voters who had registered to use the system. However, technological complications barred some people from voting, which led at least one losing candidate to object that he would have won if everything had worked properly. That’s the sort of problem that is most worrying for people who hope using mathematical principles and computerized encryption will help the public have trust in election outcomes. Key challenges unsolved There are several obstacles in the way of blockchain ever becoming useful for large-scale, legally binding voting. One is that most people have little understanding of how blockchain systems work. Another, equally vital, is that even experts don’t have a way to identify every possible irregularity in online voting. Voting on paper, by contrast, is well studied and easily verified and audited. One crucial aspect of a blockchain voting system is the method by which the computer system verifies voters’ identities. When a verified voter establishes an account on the system, that process creates a digital key that identifies them securely when casting a ballot. A more complex key is harder to hack, but also takes more computing resources to verify. It will be important to find a way to protect the integrity of the voting process, without exhausting government budgets buying advanced computing power. The computational power required may make blockchain systems inefficient for voting on a nationwide scale – or even statewide, in populous states like California and Texas. The Moscow election system, for instance, initially assigned keys that were too easily hacked. That opened the possibility of voter impersonation, which is bad enough. But that weakness also violated the principle of a secret ballot by letting outsiders know how each person voted. (Continued at link...) |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:29:07 AM EST
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Change mobile.twitter.com to www.twitter.com and remove the ? and everything after it at the end. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/41058/scissors-1036353.png This reminds me a LOT about the numerous "Fake Video" warnings. Nothing has been proposed in the US officially yet, it's far better than the currently security free system, BUT 'something might be wrong with it'. Value of bitcoin suggests otherwise.
Blockchain Voting Is Vulnerable to Hackers, Software Glitches and Bad ID Photos – Among Other Problems  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:33:49 AM EST
[#17]
Glad to see this. Much different than everyone was saying earlier and/or expecting. Hope the # stays low.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:37:41 AM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottThuman/status/1187023336255250433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Twitter embed not working again 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:39:35 AM EST
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Louie Gohmert rocks and he had something in mind, for sure.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1186840155732238336.html "The Judge has a purpose for asking about Ciaramella, he knows something and is clearly fishing for answers. Curious to see where that develops. Jaresko is now on the Financial Oversight Board of Puerto Rico. Jaresko has been a frequent member of conferences organized by Victor Pinchuk. With all the financial corruption in the Ukraine, they now have this woman on the financial oversight of Puerto Rico, which has its own embedded levels of corruption? WTF? https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/12/meet-greet-natalie-jaresko-us-government-employee-ukraine-finance-minister.html? Looks to me like they have the fox watching the hen house. Is there no end to the level of corruption. Jaresko was the Ukrainian Minister of Finance from December 2014 till April 2016, when billions of USAID was going into Ukraine banks and disappearing, with no accountability. ? Does anyone see anything particularly wrong with this woman now being in charge of oversight in Puerto Rico, where again billions of dollars in USAID are going in and disappearing? @realDonaldTrump where is the accountability of our tax dollars in USAID going?" ? The 3rd video is the money shot. So what we get out of this is that we had a dual US/Ukraine citizen testify that they were in charge of the money during the (staged) revolution and collapse of the Ukraine - she would have been key to looting the Ukrainian treasury with each failed coup. Secondly we have her testifying that she got her next post in the PR and in charge of the money as they swirl the bowl - b/c of a 3rd party recruitment firm advising the advisors to PR. I wonder which headhunter shop that is and what circle they travel in - gotta be like the Perkins Coie of headhunters in its relationship to WS. The PR is a great example of missing U$AID, but moreso it gets us back to the issue of banking and control, too big to fail, and who is really screwing who. Wall street went to the corrupt in the PR and sold them on the idea of monetizing everything - infrastructure included. Now those bonds are stinky and people are arguing about who is going to get the worst haircut on the deal. Enter this chick...... Which sort of dovetails into a couple of other interesting things I saw a few days ago. Like Who Owns the Central Banks of the World?. That is well worth the read. Things that stuck out - ownership is not the same as control / several central banks changed from Privately held to Publicly held in the wake of WW2 / the FED makes 6% on on paid in capital or @ $1.9 billion a year. (Remember too b/c of fractional reserve banking, paid in capital is free money to begin with). End of the day the same scams presented in The Creature from Jekyll Island, seem to be recycled b/c the masses are generally ignorant of what is going on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:57:17 AM EST
[#20]
Just had a thought about Amb Bill Taylor. Wasn't he in Iraq where he would have been a part of the reconstruction group overseeing finances?
Just curious how much or many times he ever reported abuse, misuse, and corruption of funds during that little escapade, cause we all know it was/is rampant. Especially in comparison to this "no quo" in the accused quid pro quo. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 11:59:17 AM EST
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Change mobile.twitter.com to www.twitter.com and remove the ? and everything after it at the end. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/41058/scissors-1036353.png This reminds me a LOT about the numerous "Fake Video" warnings. Nothing has been proposed in the US officially yet, it's far better than the currently security free system, BUT 'something might be wrong with it'. Value of bitcoin suggests otherwise.
Blockchain Voting Is Vulnerable to Hackers, Software Glitches and Bad ID Photos – Among Other Problems |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 12:09:20 PM EST
[#22]
One other thing has bothered me about this Ukraine business. President Zelensky dissolved parliament and held a parliamentary election on 21 July 2019...just a few days before the call with POTUS Trump.
I see the results of that election being announced/published anywhere from 26 July to 2 August 2019. It has always seemed quite reasonable for POTUS and the US .gov to see whether Zelensky ended up with a majority or minority parliament. It seems that the election could have made/will make a huge difference in just how much corruption would be rooted out (or not). I just haven't seen anyone else mention this so far. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 12:12:08 PM EST
[#23]
Capital Paid In
Quote HistoryBanks that are members of the Federal Reserve System make payments for Federal Reserve Bank capital stock. Each member is required by law to become a shareholder and subscribe to shares of its district Reserve Bank in an amount equal to 6 percent of its own paid-in capital and surplus. Of this amount, half must be paid to the Federal Reserve and half remains subject to call by the Board of Governors. When a member's capital or surplus changes, its holdings of Reserve Bank stock must be adjusted accordingly. Quote HistoryBanks that are members of the Federal Reserve System make payments for Federal Reserve Bank capital stock. Each member is required by law to become a shareholder and subscribe to shares of its district Reserve Bank in an amount equal to 6 percent of its own paid-in capital and surplus. Of this amount, half must be paid to the Federal Reserve and half remains subject to call by the Board of Governors. When a member's capital or surplus changes, its holdings of Reserve Bank stock must be adjusted accordingly. Quoted: Great find. The 3rd video is the money shot. So what we get out of this is that we had a dual US/Ukraine citizen testify that they were in charge of the money during the (staged) revolution and collapse of the Ukraine - she would have been key to looting the Ukrainian treasury with each failed coup. Secondly we have her testifying that she got her next post in the PR and in charge of the money as they swirl the bowl - b/c of a 3rd party recruitment firm advising the advisors to PR. I wonder which headhunter shop that is and what circle they travel in - gotta be like the Perkins Coie of headhunters in its relationship to WS. The PR is a great example of missing U$AID, but moreso it gets us back to the issue of banking and control, too big to fail, and who is really screwing who. Wall street went to the corrupt in the PR and sold them on the idea of monetizing everything - infrastructure included. Now those bonds are stinky and people are arguing about who is going to get the worst haircut on the deal. Enter this chick...... Which sort of dovetails into a couple of other interesting things I saw a few days ago. Like Who Owns the Central Banks of the World?. That is well worth the read. Things that stuck out - ownership is not the same as control / several central banks changed from Privately held to Publicly held in the wake of WW2 / the FED makes 6% on on paid in capital or @ $1.9 trillion a year. (Remember too b/c of fractional reserve banking, paid in capital is free money to begin with). End of the day the same scams presented in The Creature from Jekyll Island, seem to be recycled b/c the masses are generally ignorant of what is going on. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 12:15:58 PM EST
[#24]
The Federal Reserve remits ALL earnings after paying the 6% preferred dividend on the ~$32 billion, or $32,000,000,000 x .06 = $1,920,000,000 ($1.921 billion annually)
The fundamental issue is that the entire system is a ponzi. The value is not in the dividend, it is in the power to hypothecate money. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 12:42:28 PM EST
[#25]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 12:44:23 PM EST
[#26]
Hope this little bitch gets his asshole widened too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 12:53:49 PM EST
[#27]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:04:16 PM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The Federal Reserve remits ALL earnings after paying the 6% preferred dividend on the ~$32 billion, or $32,000,000,000 x .06 = $1,920,000,000 ($1.921 billion annually) The fundamental issue is that the entire system is a ponzi. The value is not in the dividend, it is in the power to hypothecate money. and 100% on the bold |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:05:39 PM EST
[#29]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:06:04 PM EST
[#30]
Click date for video.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:13:10 PM EST
[#31]
Quote History |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:13:35 PM EST
[#32]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:15:50 PM EST
[#33]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:19:49 PM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ScottThuman/status/1187023336255250433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Twitter embed not working again
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:38:04 PM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This looks interesting. Search Twitter: And the 800 member "army of northern Virginia" ...very interesting, and another tweeter: From wiki: Quote HistoryQuoted:
This looks interesting. Search Twitter: And the 800 member "army of northern Virginia" ...very interesting, and another tweeter: From wiki: https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Army_Spec_Ops_unit__andamp__34_The_Army_of_Northern_Virginiaandamp__34_/5-553769/ And this https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-secret-america-a-look-at-the-militarys-joint-special-operations-command/2011/08/30/gIQAvYuAxJ_story.html CIA operatives have imprisoned and interrogated nearly 100 suspected terrorists in their former secret prisons around the world, but troops from this other secret organization have imprisoned and interrogated 10 times as many, holding them in jails that it alone controls in Iraq and Afghanistan. The president has given JSOC the rare authority to select individuals for its kill list and then to kill, rather than capture, them. Critics charge that this individual man-hunting mission amounts to assassination, a practice prohibited by U.S. law. JSOC's list is not usually coordinated with the CIA, which maintains a similar but shorter roster of names. They have hidden behind various nicknames: the Secret Army of Northern Virginia, Task Force Green, Task Force 11, Task Force 121. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:39:22 PM EST
[#36]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:45:05 PM EST
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:52:09 PM EST
[#38]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 1:55:31 PM EST
[#39]
Seems were nearing the climax of the movie and it's about to blow.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:01:25 PM EST
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:06:13 PM EST
[#41]
Pure Awesome is Louie Gohmert & pals munching on Chik sammiches and waffle fries while blocking the Dem committee room doors...yelling we are not locked in with you all, you all are now locked in with US!!!
Can you picture it in your mind? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:09:04 PM EST
[#42]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:16:19 PM EST
[#43]
I really want to see a list of the 30 house Republicans.
Mine isn't twittering about it, but he's mostly spineless. I don't expect him to be with them. Still, a list would be nice, so we can thank the ones with a spine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:24:19 PM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
@Holes From 12/2018: I copied these from Praying Medic's twatter. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
8Kun update from CodeMonkeyZ (Ron).
From 12/2018: I copied these from Praying Medic's twatter. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:28:22 PM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why can’t we just pull all funding from the see eye A? Just shutter it. Sure there would be some consequences. But it certainly is better than allowing a rogue department with that much control to continue operating. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:44:19 PM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Out of curiosity... Why can't we just pull all funding from the see eye A? Just shutter it. Sure there would be some consequences. But it certainly is better than allowing a rogue department with that much control to continue operating.  Game of Thrones - Petyr Baelish scene |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:48:44 PM EST
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I really want to see a list of the 30 house Republicans. Mine isn't twittering about it, but he's mostly spineless. I don't expect him to be with them. Still, a list would be nice, so we can thank the ones with a spine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 2:51:31 PM EST
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Seeing Graham in this photo made me wonder if he is dragging his feet as head of the Senate Judiciary Committee because he is covering for some of his own actions. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Seeing Graham in this photo made me wonder if he is dragging his feet as head of the Senate Judiciary Committee because he is covering for some of his own actions. But you don’t become friends with someone with the ethics and morals of mcstain, and end up clean and innocent yourself |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 3:27:56 PM EST
[#49]
The second half and the Flynn section is much more interesting.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2019 3:46:54 PM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Out of curiosity... Why can't we just pull all funding from the see eye A? Just shutter it. Sure there would be some consequences. But it certainly is better than allowing a rogue department with that much control to continue operating. Do you think they stopped? Do you think they don't know how to start if they did? How do you think they secretly "pay" the people out in the field running ops? Government check and W-2? There's likely a lot of money laundering / criminal enterprises twisted up in the stuff they do. Enough they could (and have) spin off to run private organizations outside of the hierarchy of a legit government. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File