User Panel
this is the video from the Tweet
https://imgur.com/MeTkobD |
|
|
Can't vouch for authenticity of this. I seem to remember some suspicion of the 3Days3Nights account and how it came out of nowhere to having 40k followers.
Do your own research on this one. Attached File Take anything Q related with a grain of salt for a few days. I see the potential for some major White Hat / Black Hat disinfo. |
|
Quick summary of Neonrevolt: Brennan has issues stemming from his disability, his perception of his father, has possibly transference issues with Watkins as a father figure. Brennans not that good a coder, has failure issues, and to make it polite, maintained a heavily used chan which offered child porn which Watkins shut down.
Brennan is behind most of the current efforts to deplatform 8kun using, basically, a bunch of lies directed at platform owners who all cucked out. He claimed 8kun might host child porn - and Brennan would know. The result is a much more resilient and resistant 8kun that is not going to be easily damaged. El Chapo: Tweets earlier this year were posted online which stated at the end of his trial he was making statements in open court as to who he had paid off. Issue being, whether he said it or others, were they valid statements? Pics of Pelosi, Beto, etc meeting with the previous President of Mexico who is also reputed to be the middle man for offering the money were associated with that information. It also was an examination of how did they get the money in their names when Pelosi, in particular, could not have earned it from her position in the Government, and her husbands company (IIRC is in international trade) may not have been the sole source. All in the older thread and thru monitoring about two dozen tweeters plus posts here and elsewhere from the chans over the last two years. |
|
Quoted:
Can't vouch for authenticity of this. I seem to remember some suspicion of the 3Days3Nights account and how it came out of nowhere to having 40k followers. Do your own research on this one. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/309598/0408F842-B557-4279-8E0B-E4652CB148B7_jpeg-1146753.JPG Take anything Q related with a grain of salt for a few days. I see the potential for some major White Hat / Black Hat disinfo. View Quote
|
|
Attached File
Attached File |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote They've told so many lies they cannot remember them all. |
|
|
Posting tweets is still not working for me. The links I'm getting are about 10 times longer than the examples posted in the last two pages.
FINALLY figured it out. When I hit "embed tweet", I briefly see the actual link I need to copy and then it's covered by a "copy code" button that copies a HUGE string of crap. I just figured out if I scroll back up, it brings back the actual link I need to copy. WTF? Is it my computer or Twitter? |
|
Quoted:
MUST SEE: Judge Jeanine and Dr. Baden May Have Just Found the Proof that Epstein was Murdered! (VIDEO) @JudgeJeanine https://t.co/ltWH1OkMLP via View Quote https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/must-see-judge-jeanine-and-dr-baden-may-have-just-found-the-found-the-proof-that-epstein-was-murdered-video/ Attached File |
|
Even if Epstein’s death is still considered a suicide there should still be an investigation into the guards who ‘fell asleep’ during his murder/suicide. I hope their finances and phone/internet records are being examined with a fine tooth comb.
|
|
Quoted:
Holy Shit!!!!! #WeAreTheNewsNow Edit: FIFY
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
#WeAreTheNewsNow Edit: FIFY
Nice! |
|
Quoted: is it this Tweet ? https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/must-see-judge-jeanine-and-dr-baden-may-have-just-found-the-found-the-proof-that-epstein-was-murdered-video/ https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/jga1_png-1146830.JPG View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/BXAcOWS.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Q is back. View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted: View Quote There's still plenty of scared folks who would like to hamstring Q, from throwing pissy little barbs here and there, -----to disrupting the entire platform. With all the attacks, the 'Q Operation' has been eminently successful, to date. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
#WeAreTheNewsNow Edit: FIFY
Nice! |
|
Just a random thought about Q’s posting the link to the YouTube video showing our flag...
I wonder if they were tracking the views to see how many views that random link could generate in a specific amount of time (or setting a benchmark for when 8kun went live). If they are about to drop some info via YouTube they would want to know about how many people could view/save it before it was removed. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
July 27 to Nov 2 is 98 days. "I said no camels, that's five camels." thanks edit: this has been clarified. Thanks |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted: Its a little more than kabuki theater. Read the CTH article on what they are trying to do. Its a very quick read and CTH position is Team Trump is not in a position to counter this move. In essence Pelosi/Schif et al. are trying to get legal subpoena power without holding a vote on impeachment. This is coming off the tail end of a ruling by a judge last week that creates a new possibility. If I try to explain further ill just butcher it. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/28/pelosi-calls-house-vote-to-affirm-speaker-impeachment-inquiry-the-house-never-authorized/ View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Even if Epstein's death is still considered a suicide there should still be an investigation into the guards who 'fell asleep' during his murder/suicide. I hope their finances and phone/internet records are being examined with a fine tooth comb. View Quote |
|
Winning
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
https://i.imgur.com/NpZl1Eh.jpg View Quote |
|
You ever wonder how some Twitter accounts get so many followers so fast! Or how a tweet can get innumerable posts up trashing it?
Phones. Phones everywhere: https://twitter.com/SevereAnon/status/1190265922172395520 Literally a bank of phones connected to post on Twitter. It's really not that hard. All it takes is Soros money grants from his charity fund. IIRC, he put what, 3 billion into it? We saw the cash, it was being handed out 10k at a time at caravan rally sites for indigent "refugees" who "walked" to the border on top of trains, buses, and trucks. That money is real - those phone banks are real. Those numbers are real. Those people behind them? Just a few corrupt political operators. Any way, rig for red, Q is posting up. 8kun is operational. It might get interesting today. Make sure your phone is charged and you have data. |
|
Back when I was a PM of a team building mobile apps we would have software that runs on a PC but simulates the xOS or Android (pick your flavor) operating systems. We could create virtual machines to simulate volume stress testing. This same technology could easily be used to create an army of twitter followers to shape public opinion.
|
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Back when I was a PM of a team building mobile apps we would have software that runs on a PC but simulates the xOS or Android (pick your flavor) operating systems. We could create virtual machines to simulate volume stress testing. This same technology could easily be used to create an army of twitter followers to shape public opinion. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
View Quote |
|
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot.
Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. |
|
Thread on yesterday's 8kun happenings.
I'm surprised that Q (aledgedly) started posting on the 8kun go-live date. I would have thought there would have been a period of observation/testing first. To me it possibly demonstrates: - Sense of urgency by Q Team. - Lack of preparation (is 8kun secure enough as to not capture digital signatures/footprints of those posting)? - Evidence of behind-the-scenes Q-8kun coordination (not sure how this could occur while adhering to the "no outside comms" policy). |
|
Quoted:
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot. Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. View Quote |
|
Quoted: I looked at a couple and the amount of redaction was ridiculous. Might as well have released blank pages. Don't want to be discouraging, but this is BS View Quote |
|
Quoted:
I know there’s at least one troll, probably more, who want this topic moved back to GD so they can come in again to make a hash of it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot. Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. This wasn't kosher in GD, is it going to be allowed here? |
|
Quoted:
Q may have a separate path into the site. There's still plenty of scared folks who would like to hamstring Q, from throwing pissy little barbs here and there, -----to disrupting the entire platform. With all the attacks, the 'Q Operation' has been eminently successful, to date. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There's still plenty of scared folks who would like to hamstring Q, from throwing pissy little barbs here and there, -----to disrupting the entire platform. With all the attacks, the 'Q Operation' has been eminently successful, to date. |
|
Quoted:
@brass This wasn't kosher in GD, is it going to be allowed here? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot. Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. This wasn't kosher in GD, is it going to be allowed here? Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. |
|
Quoted: Which part isn't kosher Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. View Quote It is interesting that with all the nation-state resources... Q's com path couldn't be determined, or if it was, it wasn't made public or never seemed compromised. |
|
Quoted:
Which part isn't kosher Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot. Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. This wasn't kosher in GD, is it going to be allowed here? Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. |
|
For What it’s Worth the “Eppstein didn’t kill himself” thing is viral and taking on a life of it’s own.
|
|
Quoted:
Thread on yesterday's 8kun happenings. I'm surprised that Q (aledgedly) started posting on the 8kun go-live date. I would have thought there would have been a period of observation/testing first. To me it possibly demonstrates: - Sense of urgency by Q Team. - Lack of preparation (is 8kun secure enough as to not capture digital signatures/footprints of those posting)? - Evidence of behind-the-scenes Q-8kun coordination (not sure how this could occur while adhering to the "no outside comms" policy). View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Which part isn't kosher Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot. Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. This wasn't kosher in GD, is it going to be allowed here? Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. All who do evil fear the light. |
|
Quoted:
Those people were warned, formally. The ones labeling any/all dissent as trolling were responsible for the lock of the original thread after being told multiple times by staff that disagreement is not trolling. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Note for self: ask AI to alter writing style as it's detected I'm a bot. Someone posted in another subforum that Q was posting and it immediately turned into a shitshow. Confirming exactly what we know, there is a serious push to kill this subject by any means. And with our collective anecdotal experience, along with some who deliberately hotlinked direct to DU, the paid opposition deliberately targets those posts, and even killed the original thread. Whether naive or deliberate, there are people/machines which do want this discussion to stop. Of course, tho, if it's just a LARP, a nothing burger, a nobody basement dweller with no creds whatsoever, then why go to the effort? There are thousands of others doing much the same. Why would the NY Times even trash talk POTUS over his tweets referencing Q? It's all conspiracy bullshit, whacko idiots with no credibility. Yet the onslaught to shut it down by any means goes on. It should be obvious something about the subject has the attention of some very wealthy people who do not want any further dissemination or alternative thinking to occur. What are they afraid of? There are good reasons to leave the thread here, at least for the time being. And, if DECLAS, 33,000 emails dumped, the IG report issued, etc all occur, then in the long run, you will be reading it on the front pages in depth, just like Watergate. With actual trials and incarceration, or worse, for the perpetrators. Freedom of speech is nice, but if you really want it, you have to let others speak things with an open forum. Not attacking every word per Alinsky. It's a hard course to follow. This wasn't kosher in GD, is it going to be allowed here? Trolling the thread or accusing someone of trolling the thread You know there were certain people who were intentionally trying to derail the GD thread. Notice how we can disagree with things now that the thread was moved and we don't have the same issues |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.