User Panel
|
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. View Quote @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. |
|
Thomas Sowell has a lot of great quotes, this is no exception.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By tranzformer: @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By Wildfowler: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. Sorry, not happening. |
|
Originally Posted By mancow: Sorry, not happening. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mancow: Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By Wildfowler: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. Sorry, not happening. Sorry, it will happen. |
|
Originally Posted By tranzformer: Sorry, it will happen. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By mancow: Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By Wildfowler: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. Sorry, not happening. Sorry, it will happen. Part of me thinks it won't until after the election so they can't cry "Political power wielded to win", and another part of me worries that if something doesn't happen, people will just skip voting and let the mail in decide our fate. Either way, enjoy the summer while we have peace and plenty. Look how fast Venezuela went downhill, we're not immune. Be prepared for anything and always keep head on a swivel. That is another way in which strong local ties can help a group/city through something they wouldn't otherwise continue if breads/circuses and selfish natures win out. |
|
Originally Posted By brass: Part of me thinks it won't until after the election so they can't cry "Political power wielded to win", and another part of me worries that if something doesn't happen, people will just skip voting and let the mail in decide our fate. Either way, enjoy the summer while we have peace and plenty. Look how fast Venezuela went downhill, we're not immune. Be prepared for anything and always keep head on a swivel. That is another way in which strong local ties can help a group/city through something they wouldn't otherwise continue if breads/circuses and selfish natures win out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By mancow: Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By Wildfowler: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. Sorry, not happening. Sorry, it will happen. Part of me thinks it won't until after the election so they can't cry "Political power wielded to win", and another part of me worries that if something doesn't happen, people will just skip voting and let the mail in decide our fate. Either way, enjoy the summer while we have peace and plenty. Look how fast Venezuela went downhill, we're not immune. Be prepared for anything and always keep head on a swivel. That is another way in which strong local ties can help a group/city through something they wouldn't otherwise continue if breads/circuses and selfish natures win out. These criminals and traitors spied on Trump, spied on his family, have made verbal threats of violence, threats of prison to him and his family. If he doesn't bring these criminals justice during his time in office, it is curtains for him and his family when he is out of office. They will keep coming after him. Trump has to know this. There is zero chance I see a smart and accomplished man come to be POTUS in a huge upset, to take zero salary and take the daily abuse just to then take the same abuse and threats when he eventually leaves office. No way. That isn't the Don way. I agree the big names of Obama or Biden or HRC might need to wait until his second term. But guys like Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, Brennan....etc. are fair game leading up to November. Have to built a case somewhere. Start with the same fish and work up to the big fish at the top. |
|
Originally Posted By tranzformer: These criminals and traitors spied on Trump, spied on his family, have made verbal threats of violence, threats of prison to him and his family. If he doesn't bring these criminals justice during his time in office, it is curtains for him and his family when he is out of office. They will keep coming after him. Trump has to know this. There is zero chance I see a smart and accomplished man come to be POTUS in a huge upset, to take zero salary and take the daily abuse just to then take the same abuse and threats when he eventually leaves office. No way. That isn't the Don way. I agree the big names of Obama or Biden or HRC might need to wait until his second term. But guys like Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, Brennan....etc. are fair game leading up to November. Have to built a case somewhere. Start with the same fish and work up to the big fish at the top. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By brass: Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By mancow: Originally Posted By tranzformer: Originally Posted By Wildfowler: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. Sorry, not happening. Sorry, it will happen. Part of me thinks it won't until after the election so they can't cry "Political power wielded to win", and another part of me worries that if something doesn't happen, people will just skip voting and let the mail in decide our fate. Either way, enjoy the summer while we have peace and plenty. Look how fast Venezuela went downhill, we're not immune. Be prepared for anything and always keep head on a swivel. That is another way in which strong local ties can help a group/city through something they wouldn't otherwise continue if breads/circuses and selfish natures win out. These criminals and traitors spied on Trump, spied on his family, have made verbal threats of violence, threats of prison to him and his family. If he doesn't bring these criminals justice during his time in office, it is curtains for him and his family when he is out of office. They will keep coming after him. Trump has to know this. There is zero chance I see a smart and accomplished man come to be POTUS in a huge upset, to take zero salary and take the daily abuse just to then take the same abuse and threats when he eventually leaves office. No way. That isn't the Don way. I agree the big names of Obama or Biden or HRC might need to wait until his second term. But guys like Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, Brennan....etc. are fair game leading up to November. Have to built a case somewhere. Start with the same fish and work up to the big fish at the top. That is how I see it as well, but we have zero control over that, remember, we're watching a movie. |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
View Quote .gov needs to contact 419Eater Though this may be one of the few Nigerian scams that is actually investigated/prosecuted. |
|
|
|
https://apnews.com/f72faf42a0b5a6afa51ab26fe9b6b216 Click To View Spoiler WASHINGTON (AP) — A group of 15 Republican state attorneys general filed an amicus brief Monday supporting the Justice Department’s motion to drop its case against former Trump administration national security adviser Michael Flynn.
The group, led by Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, argues that U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan should immediately grant the Justice Department’s motion to dismiss all charges against Flynn because “the federal judiciary has no authority to make the executive branch pursue (or continue to pursue) a criminal conviction,” the filing says. The attorneys general also argue that Sullivan should drop the case without commentary “because such punditry disrobes the judiciary of its cloak of impartiality,” according to the filing. Flynn pleaded guilty in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation to lying to the FBI about conversations with the then-Russian ambassador to the United States during the presidential transition period. The Justice Department filed a motion earlier this month to dismiss the Flynn case, saying that the FBI had insufficient basis to question Flynn in the first place and that statements he made during the interview were not material to the broader counterintelligence investigation into ties between Russia and the Trump campaign. Sullivan has signaled resistance to swiftly accepting the Justice Department’s motion and appointed a retired jurist last week to act as a friend of the court and evaluate whether Flynn should be held in criminal contempt. The former judge, John Gleeson, has asked to file his first brief in June. “There was no reason to issue these orders because this Court has no say in the federal government’s decision not to prosecute,” the state attorneys general argue. “Simply put, the decision not to pursue a criminal conviction is vested in the executive branch alone — and neither the legislature nor the judiciary has any role in the executive’s making of that decision.” In addition to Yost, the brief was signed by attorneys general from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia. |
|
This seems important
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Herdman |
|
|
|
Interesting thread...worth the read
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1261853647647969283.html |
|
FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz
Failed To Load Title |
|
Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA View Quote earlier today there was a Thread in GD about this I had no idea that we can be forced into getting Vaccinated https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Vaccines-Can-Be-Mandated/5-2329585/ |
|
Originally Posted By Fantomas:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/tdw1-1422988.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/tdw2-1422990.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/tdw3-1423013.jpg https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/222783/tdw4-1423014.jpg View Quote Oof That's gonna leave a mark... |
|
Attached File
regarding what barr said yesterday, what did he actually say? LOOK AND THINK Attached File how many times has potus/q been proven correct when something appears the other way at first-----then give it 3 days and ............................ I am more of a Attached File kind of guy |
|
Originally Posted By wgjhsafT: He's shady. Remember the failed Venezuela operation last year? Yeah, he was deep into that one. He was also the guy paying for the original Fusion GPS research on Trump (hidden through the proxy of the Washington Free Beacon). IMO he's as compromised as Burr. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By wgjhsafT: Originally Posted By POINTMAN380: Originally Posted By Cecenrse: Burr's replacement
He's shady. Remember the failed Venezuela operation last year? Yeah, he was deep into that one. He was also the guy paying for the original Fusion GPS research on Trump (hidden through the proxy of the Washington Free Beacon). IMO he's as compromised as Burr. all of this makes him an asset to be used now-... |
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Dhillon1-1423132.jpg View Quote acting people have more room to stretch their legs, or something like that.................. |
|
Quoted: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA View Quote Quoted: earlier today there was a Thread in GD about this I had no idea that we can be forced into getting Vaccinated https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Vaccines-Can-Be-Mandated/5-2329585/ View Quote Is this part of the plan to save the world too? Wonder what the strategic thinkers here will say if Trump and/or Q shift towards telling us that we need to take the vaccine? Ask yourself what information regarding the virus do we actually have from Q? |
|
Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA View Quote How about a HELL no. My body my right !!!!! |
|
Originally Posted By Klee: How about a HELL no. My body my right !!!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Klee: Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA How about a HELL no. My body my right !!!!! Attached File |
|
Quoted: Part of me thinks it won't until after the election so they can't cry "Political power wielded to win", and another part of me worries that if something doesn't happen, people will just skip voting and let the mail in decide our fate. Either way, enjoy the summer while we have peace and plenty. Look how fast Venezuela went downhill, we're not immune. Be prepared for anything and always keep head on a swivel. That is another way in which strong local ties can help a group/city through something they wouldn't otherwise continue if breads/circuses and selfish natures win out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This is all I've been able to track down of the Tom Fitton segment on Lou Dobbs tonight.
I didn't hear Tom say anything I didn't agree with. I would welcome and love to hear some other opinions on why this may not be what's really going on. edit: in case it is not known by everyone here by now there are videos in the tweets if you click the date to pull them up. Thanks. @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. Sorry, not happening. Sorry, it will happen. Part of me thinks it won't until after the election so they can't cry "Political power wielded to win", and another part of me worries that if something doesn't happen, people will just skip voting and let the mail in decide our fate. Either way, enjoy the summer while we have peace and plenty. Look how fast Venezuela went downhill, we're not immune. Be prepared for anything and always keep head on a swivel. That is another way in which strong local ties can help a group/city through something they wouldn't otherwise continue if breads/circuses and selfish natures win out. I've said almost the exact same thing before. If things happen, it will happen after the election. The level of happening will depend on who wins. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Dhillon1-1423132.jpg View Quote Awesome so Barr is filling the DOJ with his swampy snake buddies. Lol. |
|
Quoted: Interesting thread...worth the read
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1261853647647969283.html View Quote Good thread. My suspicion on Flynn is he was never "out" of the IC and was running ops as a private citizen. The same goes for his involvement in Turkey. This obviously cut both ways. The same goes for Carter Page (CIA asset burned by CIA and the FBI) and would anyone doubt Manafort wasn't part of an operation to monitor things in the Ukraine with Podesta and Tad Devine (Bernie's campaign manager from 2016)? I'm not saying he was monitoring Podesta et-al but that they were all doing their jobs and feeding intel back to the US on the activities of Yanukovych, Further back in time Manafort was close to known-to-play both sides because both sides want him to Oleg Deripaska and worked to setup McCain in 2007/2008. Just about everyone caught up in this was in some way shape or form an intelligence asset of some type. By doing what they are doing they are silencing them and also putting them in a precarious spot of revealing their jobs and work which may be far more dangerous to them and their families. |
|
Originally Posted By togadelic: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/c9bf432d095278aafda2343764a9314ea3dc573d-1423260.JPG View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By togadelic: Originally Posted By Klee: Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA How about a HELL no. My body my right !!!!! https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/c9bf432d095278aafda2343764a9314ea3dc573d-1423260.JPG this is my hill |
|
Chuck Grassley is doing corn code!
https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1262359546862940160 Decodes up to but not including Chuck: https://youtu.be/bAM7364u9oM |
|
Originally Posted By CATPOCALYPSE16: this is my hill View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By CATPOCALYPSE16: Originally Posted By togadelic: Originally Posted By Klee: Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA How about a HELL no. My body my right !!!!! https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/152525/c9bf432d095278aafda2343764a9314ea3dc573d-1423260.JPG this is my hill I think that is going to be a lot of peoples hill.....I know Trump is pushing for a vaccine...does he support forced vaccination from the Man made virus? |
|
Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Awesome so Barr is filling the DOJ with his swampy snake buddies. Lol. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Dhillon1-1423132.jpg Awesome so Barr is filling the DOJ with his swampy snake buddies. Lol. I'm sure there's alot we don't know. Why is everything always bad in your opinion? Think beyond what you see at the surface, and consider they have more information than you and the decisions are based on the information YOU dont have.
|
|
Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: I'm sure there's alot we don't know. Why is everything always bad in your opinion? Think beyond what you see at the surface, and consider they have more information than you and the decisions are based on the information YOU dont have.
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Dhillon1-1423132.jpg Awesome so Barr is filling the DOJ with his swampy snake buddies. Lol. I'm sure there's alot we don't know. Why is everything always bad in your opinion? Think beyond what you see at the surface, and consider they have more information than you and the decisions are based on the information YOU dont have.
I read he was dishonest with Trump regarding Comey....what more do you need? Barr has a swampy history of protecting bad FBI agents...absolute fact. |
|
Originally Posted By chadjetlag: I read he was dishonest with Trump regarding Comey....what more do you need? Barr has a swampy history of protecting bad FBI agents...absolute fact. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Dhillon1-1423132.jpg Awesome so Barr is filling the DOJ with his swampy snake buddies. Lol. I'm sure there's alot we don't know. Why is everything always bad in your opinion? Think beyond what you see at the surface, and consider they have more information than you and the decisions are based on the information YOU dont have.
I read he was dishonest with Trump regarding Comey....what more do you need? Barr has a swampy history of protecting bad FBI agents...absolute fact. Have you read a transcript proving he lied or do you believe some random dude on Twitter? and reportedly misled Trump about needing cause to fire Comey, |
|
|
Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: Have you read a transcript proving he lied or do you believe some random dude on Twitter? and reportedly misled Trump about needing cause to fire Comey, View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: Originally Posted By chadjetlag: Originally Posted By Cecenrse:
https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/406377/Dhillon1-1423132.jpg Awesome so Barr is filling the DOJ with his swampy snake buddies. Lol. I'm sure there's alot we don't know. Why is everything always bad in your opinion? Think beyond what you see at the surface, and consider they have more information than you and the decisions are based on the information YOU dont have.
I read he was dishonest with Trump regarding Comey....what more do you need? Barr has a swampy history of protecting bad FBI agents...absolute fact. Have you read a transcript proving he lied or do you believe some random dude on Twitter? and reportedly misled Trump about needing cause to fire Comey, That Fair assessment...I have not read the transcripts. Given Barr’s history I do not trust ANYTHING he does as correct for “swamp draining“ or justice. Hope to be wrong...But so far... |
|
Originally Posted By jimmyheadgear: No really, it's OK because HE read it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By jimmyheadgear: Originally Posted By Got_Nukes: Have you read a transcript proving he lied or do you believe some random dude on Twitter? and reportedly misled Trump about needing cause to fire Comey, No really, it's OK because HE read it. Lol, i read it at the link provided. Barr has a history of protecting FBI swamp killers....random twitter guy does not. One is already more credible than the other....then add in Sherwin worked for Eric Holder....should be at least some concern. At least swampy Shea gets to go on and head up the dea. |
|
In the last several days this thread has devolved into a bash Trump, bash Barr by a couple of notables one of which I have had blocked for quite some time.
Oddly enough, these attacks have increased significantly with incontrovertible evidence that the Zero admin was spying. This is more of the "nothings gonna happen" shit just using different terms. It is distracting from the entire thread, and there is plenty of places in GD to go polish their hard on for Trump and Barr @Brass |
|
Originally Posted By chadjetlag: I think that is going to be a lot of peoples hill.....I know Trump is pushing for a vaccine...does he support forced vaccination from the Man made virus? View Quote Since he has announced several times that he does not take the flu vaccine "I don't like putting bad things in my body" I'm going to guess he won't even consider mandatory vaccines. I think he's just talking about the vaccine to calm down all the nervous nancys and get the economy back on track. |
|
there are a couple of things I'd like to point out with this original post. this is not a tweet from some previously unknown Q follower that someone has just discovered and starts posting random tweets from here on a weekly basis. If this Twitter users blue checkmark is accurate he is a reporter for the Huffington post. I would normally not read the Huffington post and expect anything to be written in a factual unbiased manner. So the fact that it's coming from the Huffington post makes me skeptical of It's accuracy. I can't think of a reason in my mind why a writer for the Huffington post would want to mislead us into thinking this individual is a black hat if he is in fact a white hat? Maybe It's just that simple and that is the MSM's new angle? To get us to discredit ourselves. I did a cursory search for Mr. Dhillon and came up with nothing but references to the fact he was just appointed.. Thanks |
|
Quoted: In the last several days this thread has devolved into a bash Trump, bash Barr by a couple of notables one of which I have had blocked for quite some time. Oddly enough, these attacks have increased significantly with incontrovertible evidence that the Zero admin was spying. This is more of the "nothings gonna happen" shit just using different terms. It is distracting from the entire thread, and there is plenty of places in GD to go polish their hard on for Trump and Barr @Brass View Quote Since the recent information has been D class I have been as giddy as a schoolgirl and I think it's quite evident. what I'm pissed off with is how barr has come on and shut down any notion that he has seen anything to think that Obama and Biden are going away for a long time. We certainly don't have all the information that barr has, but the information that we became made aware of recently is obviously not criminal in nature, based on his comments. I am generally skeptical of everyone at all times until proven otherwise. I'm still hopeful that some people here could share their original opinions on what Tom Fitton had to say last night on Lou Dobbs. So far, crickets. Thanks |
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler: I think you may be mistaken about the timing and intent of the discord you are perceiving. Since the recent information has been D class I have been as giddy as a schoolgirl and I think it's quite evident. what I'm pissed off with is how barr has come on and shut down any notion that he has seen anything to think that Obama and Biden are going away for a long time. We certainly don't have all the information that barr has, but the information that we became made aware of recently is obviously not criminal in nature, based on his comments. I am generally skeptical of everyone at all times until proven otherwise. I'm still hopeful that some people here could share their original opinions on what Tom Fitton had to say last night on Lou Dobbs. So far, crickets. Thanks View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Originally Posted By bgenlvtex: In the last several days this thread has devolved into a bash Trump, bash Barr by a couple of notables one of which I have had blocked for quite some time. Oddly enough, these attacks have increased significantly with incontrovertible evidence that the Zero admin was spying. This is more of the "nothings gonna happen" shit just using different terms. It is distracting from the entire thread, and there is plenty of places in GD to go polish their hard on for Trump and Barr @Brass Since the recent information has been D class I have been as giddy as a schoolgirl and I think it's quite evident. what I'm pissed off with is how barr has come on and shut down any notion that he has seen anything to think that Obama and Biden are going away for a long time. We certainly don't have all the information that barr has, but the information that we became made aware of recently is obviously not criminal in nature, based on his comments. I am generally skeptical of everyone at all times until proven otherwise. I'm still hopeful that some people here could share their original opinions on what Tom Fitton had to say last night on Lou Dobbs. So far, crickets. Thanks We get it, we heard you the first 427 times. ETA : I have not blocked you because you do seem capable of honest discourse. That said, in the current political climate, with Barr and Durham under attack. With POTUS under attack, it makes absolutely no sense at all to raise the specter of investigating Zero or Biden directly at this time. Focus on the other players, allow Zero and Biden misdeeds to come to light organically during that investigation, and then is circumstances present themselves move to an investigation of them. There is absolutely no benefit from promoting an "We're going after Obama/Biden" agenda at this point. None. |
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler:
there are a couple of things I'd like to point out with this original post. this is not a tweet from some previously unknown Q follower that someone has just discovered and starts posting random tweets from here on a weekly basis. If this Twitter users blue checkmark is accurate he is a reporter for the Huffington post. I would normally not read the Huffington post and expect anything to be written in a factual unbiased manner. So the fact that it's coming from the Huffington post makes me skeptical of It's accuracy. I can't think of a reason in my mind why a writer for the Huffington post would want to mislead us into thinking this individual is a black hat if he is in fact a white hat? Maybe It's just that simple and that is the MSM's new angle? To get us to discredit ourselves. I did a cursory search for Mr. Dhillon and came up with nothing but references to the fact he was just appointed.. Thanks View Quote I brought this up earlier, it was not well accepted by the Group...in fact it appears I was reported. To have a discussion about what is going on one must discuss failures as well as victories or it isn’t a discussion. It appears many here do not want a true discussion.....only a echo chamber of “its happening” |
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler: I'm still hopeful that some people here could share their original opinions on what Tom Fitton had to say last night on Lou Dobbs. So far, crickets. Thanks View Quote @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. |
|
Quoted: @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. View Quote can you remind me what Huber did for us during his investigation that helped. His conclusions were actually criticized by Durham if I recall? my concern is not focused whether or not Brennan has been questioned by Durham. I am seeking opinions of the totality of what Tom Fitton said yesterday. He and Lou Dobbs put it much more eloquently than I have been able to my exact feelings. to answer that specific question about questioning Brennan, don't they do it all the time including to general Flynn? He was questioned without being read his rights or arrested or even allowed to think that he was the subject of an investigation. They almost got away with it too. Tom Fitton has been viewed as a patriot here whole time if I'm not mistaken. Thanks. |
|
Originally Posted By Crazy_Diamond: FORCED Vaccinations: "You Have NO RIGHT to NOT be Vaccinated" Alan Dershowitz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7l1gU0_eyA View Quote Maybe the clip was taken out of context, but it doesn't even make sense. I don't think anybody is claiming a vaccine will prevent you from spreading a virus to someone else; only that it will prevent you from becoming ill. Also, there has been talk about a "certificate of immunity" that you could presumably get by being previously testing positive for antibodies. The CV-19 tests don't seem to be very accurate, so I can't see a lot of value in the certificate. Also, Mark Cuban wants to create a contact tracing army of millions (as well as UBI).
0.5% of the populatioon tests positive. You want an army of people that will visit and talk to the infected and then go out and visit and talk to the potentially uninfected. What could go wrong? I think this Q post sums it up. Attached File Outside of this thread, a lot of people don't seem to get it. |
|
Unmasking story explained why the timeline when Flynn WASNT being unmasked is interesting.
https://news.yahoo.com/unmasking-real-story-flynn-not-103037120.html Anyone have info/links on the coordination or direct connection to the people on the unmasking request list ? How did they communicate/share info? Who/how directed such a diverse group? Once unmasked could multi people log on to a system to see the info? |
|
Originally Posted By bgenlvtex: We get it, we heard you the first 427 times. ETA : I have not blocked you because you do seem capable of honest discourse. That said, in the current political climate, with Barr and Durham under attack. With POTUS under attack, it makes absolutely no sense at all to raise the specter of investigating Zero or Biden directly at this time. Focus on the other players, allow Zero and Biden misdeeds to come to light organically during that investigation, and then is circumstances present themselves move to an investigation of them. There is absolutely no benefit from promoting an "We're going after Obama/Biden" agenda at this point. None. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By bgenlvtex: Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Originally Posted By bgenlvtex: In the last several days this thread has devolved into a bash Trump, bash Barr by a couple of notables one of which I have had blocked for quite some time. Oddly enough, these attacks have increased significantly with incontrovertible evidence that the Zero admin was spying. This is more of the "nothings gonna happen" shit just using different terms. It is distracting from the entire thread, and there is plenty of places in GD to go polish their hard on for Trump and Barr @Brass Since the recent information has been D class I have been as giddy as a schoolgirl and I think it's quite evident. what I'm pissed off with is how barr has come on and shut down any notion that he has seen anything to think that Obama and Biden are going away for a long time. We certainly don't have all the information that barr has, but the information that we became made aware of recently is obviously not criminal in nature, based on his comments. I am generally skeptical of everyone at all times until proven otherwise. I'm still hopeful that some people here could share their original opinions on what Tom Fitton had to say last night on Lou Dobbs. So far, crickets. Thanks We get it, we heard you the first 427 times. ETA : I have not blocked you because you do seem capable of honest discourse. That said, in the current political climate, with Barr and Durham under attack. With POTUS under attack, it makes absolutely no sense at all to raise the specter of investigating Zero or Biden directly at this time. Focus on the other players, allow Zero and Biden misdeeds to come to light organically during that investigation, and then is circumstances present themselves move to an investigation of them. There is absolutely no benefit from promoting an "We're going after Obama/Biden" agenda at this point. None. You are absolutely correct. Barr's words. "I have today." Doesn't rule out anything |
|
Originally Posted By Wildfowler: You asked me the exact same question yesterday. can you remind me what Huber did for us during his investigation that helped. His conclusions were actually criticized by Durham if I recall? my concern is not focused whether or not Brennan has been questioned by Durham. I am seeking opinions of the totality of what Tom Fitton said yesterday. He and Lou Dobbs put it much more eloquently than I have been able to my exact feelings. to answer that specific question about questioning Brennan, don't they do it all the time including to general Flynn? He was questioned without being read his rights or arrested or even allowed to think that he was the subject of an investigation. They almost got away with it too. Tom Fitton has been viewed as a patriot here whole time if I'm not mistaken. Thanks. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Wildfowler: Originally Posted By tranzformer: @Wildfowler Why would you interview the target of your investigation? If you have a solid case, you don't need to interview them until after their indictment is unsealed and they are arrested. And see if they wave their 5th or want to talk. You don't interview them and tip them off. You let them think they are safe. Durham and Huber are both serious criminal investigations. can you remind me what Huber did for us during his investigation that helped. His conclusions were actually criticized by Durham if I recall? my concern is not focused whether or not Brennan has been questioned by Durham. I am seeking opinions of the totality of what Tom Fitton said yesterday. He and Lou Dobbs put it much more eloquently than I have been able to my exact feelings. to answer that specific question about questioning Brennan, don't they do it all the time including to general Flynn? He was questioned without being read his rights or arrested or even allowed to think that he was the subject of an investigation. They almost got away with it too. Tom Fitton has been viewed as a patriot here whole time if I'm not mistaken. Thanks. I asked you the same question yesterday because you asked the same question yesterday. I don't have any issues with Tom Fitton. I think he is a good guy. I get a little tired of his whining that "the DOJ won't give me documents through FOIA of an ongoing investigation! Corruption!!!!" That is basically what it boils down to. I appreciate he is fighting for truth and getting as much information as he can. But you can't FOIA information from an ongoing and current investigation. That much is clear. Doesn't matter who you are. That doesn't equal corruption, hiding of information, protecting the swamp or whatever other terms want to be thrown out. An ongoing investigation is just that. Also, what our side does (white hats/those that believe in the Constitution/those that want to protect this Republic/those that want true rule of law/or whatever other terminology you want to use) doesn't operate like the enemy. The enemy/bad guys do their thing. They try to entrap. They try to go back in time and look for crimes that were committed instead of working the crime and seeing who did it. The bad guys exploit the rule of law. They exploit the system and leak information. They exploit the system to protect their own. The fact that Barr/Wray issued a search warrant for Sen. Burr is a positive side. They aren't protecting the swamp, either one of them. The fact that they went after a ('R') after his name, means they don't care what political party letter you have after your name. I don't either. Equal justice under the law. Start in our own house first and clean that up, then go after those with a 'D' or 'I' after their name. Party affiliation doesn't matter in this Great Awakening. We need to clean up all of DC, regardless of party. So again, the fact that Durham didn't interview Clapper or Brennan doesn't mean anything. As in RICO cases, which this one is in my opinion as I would agree with Rudy Giuliani on this, you start at the bottom and mid levels and then work your way up. Durham can build a great case without ever needing to talk to Clapper or Brennan before they are arrested when the sealed indictments are unsealed. Clapper and Brennan will have their time to speak with Durham and his prosecutors when the time is right. Now regarding what Huber is up to? I remember fake news media (the Washington Post) put out a fake news report back in January of this year, that Huber was all done and that the investigation into the Clintons closed with nothing. Well, that was never confirmed by Huber or Barr, that the Huber investigation was done. So let's just be patient and let that work its way out. These investigations don't happen overnight. Huber and Barr people refused to go on the record or confirm the investigation was now over, so it was most likely a fake news report by WP with another one of their anonymous/BS sources. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.