User Panel
So I'm reloading for the. 45-70 which takes 0.458 diameter cartridges. I want to grab some rounds made for then 450 Bushmaster that are 500 grains and load those for my BFR
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone. I have a question. Do muzzle devices made for 5.56 with a thread pitch of 1/2x28 also work on ar9 with same thread pitch ?
|
|
|
Listening to boomer opinions about baseball got me like ....
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Have you tried the “shut it old man or I’ll break your hip” line yet? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Listening to boomer opinions about baseball got me like .... Have you tried the “shut it old man or I’ll break your hip” line yet? That's what I had to tell compass's cousin down in Texas. Not kidding |
|
|
|
I went looking on YT for my BFR video but I think its been deleted..
5 rounds of 325 Hornady FTX, round 4 knocks my camera down. |
|
Quoted: That's what I had to tell compass's cousin down in Texas. Not kidding View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Listening to boomer opinions about baseball got me like .... Have you tried the “shut it old man or I’ll break your hip” line yet? That's what I had to tell compass's cousin down in Texas. Not kidding |
|
7.5 inch Magnum Research BFR in .45-70 |
|
Different video, same gun & ammo... The HSM Bear Loads are hell on the wrist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Are there Black Russians? yes. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/45/fe/a6/45fea616023b90b14ab1be066dc1c216.jpg That’s racist! |
|
Quoted: It was always a crippling flaw due to the autoloader carousel design The Soviets figured that the T72 was heavily armored enough that its peers could not penetrate the armor from the front, and the advantages of the autoloader were worth the trade off to crew safety. That all changed for the worse when the T72 was capable of being penetrated by our next generation of MBTs. The T64 was the more complicated and advanced precursor to the T72 and so the T72 interited the same problem because it used the T64 style autoloader. You can easily google how many T64s lost their turrets in the Ukrainian war and T72s in the Gulf War View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: My old nemesis, the Soviet T72 This was our main enemy during the cold war even though the T80 was in full service and was a better tank (and the same technological generation as the Abrams). We were definitely going to meet the T80 but there were a zillion times more T72s built and they were used by far more countries. The Abrams completely overmatched all versions of the T72 back then The base tank was easy to identify, but so many versions had explosive reactive armor that eventually it became really hard to tell what model you were looking at https://21stcenturyasianarmsrace.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/russian-t-72-v4.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/3281/5858243975_3586168360_b.jpg There was even a version called the Dolly Parton, because of those two tig ol bitties on the front of the turret face https://img.ifunny.co/images/eb1c040d76972d091cc0d3e8a09c1f19c4b504e7e7eac796dbe3916fe5e969a2_1.jpg https://www.overtdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/T-72B1-Modernized-Nicaragua-17-1.jpg Add in modernization programs and changes in ERA design, and sometimes you had no fucking idea what you were looking at other than you knew it was Russian https://phototass2.cdnvideo.ru/width/1200_4ce85301/tass/m2/en/uploads/i/20210301/1304695.jpg https://nationalinterest.org/sites/default/files/styles/desktop__1260_/public/main_images/army2016demo-038_1.jpg?itok=gkO0RU5l Turret would still pop off if you hit it, export models were crap, doubt the "real" versions were much better. The Soviets figured that the T72 was heavily armored enough that its peers could not penetrate the armor from the front, and the advantages of the autoloader were worth the trade off to crew safety. That all changed for the worse when the T72 was capable of being penetrated by our next generation of MBTs. The T64 was the more complicated and advanced precursor to the T72 and so the T72 interited the same problem because it used the T64 style autoloader. You can easily google how many T64s lost their turrets in the Ukrainian war and T72s in the Gulf War I look at it more from the Chieftain and Challenger perspective then the M60 and M1 perspective but either way armor on armor in the 70's/80's the commies would have been fucked long distance in a fulda gap scenario but raw numbers would have carried them forward and IMO it would have gone chemical first then theater nuclear. |
|
My son has another game down in Morgantown WV this morning. Need to get the fam on the road at 0700.
|
|
|
|
I left my binos in my truck. Someone please bring them to me?
|
|
|
Quoted: Im all out of these, need tho make some more https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/199178/20181104_193359-731351.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Been a while since I did any loading. Need to do that again. Im all out of these, need tho make some more https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/199178/20181104_193359-731351.jpg BLOOP |
|
Quoted: Sad...... Kinda reminds me of how the site has changed over the last couple of years. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Sad...... Kinda reminds me of how the site has changed over the last couple of years. Yup |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I'll be the next one with car troubles in thread. I'm currently awaiting a jump from Romeo because my Jeep is dead. Something electrical. It’s the battery It was, in fact. $200 later BTDT too many times to count |
|
|
|
Quoted: I look at it more from the Chieftain and Challenger perspective then the M60 and M1 perspective but either way armor on armor in the 70's/80's the commies would have been fucked long distance in a fulda gap scenario but raw numbers would have carried them forward and IMO it would have gone chemical first then theater nuclear. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: My old nemesis, the Soviet T72 This was our main enemy during the cold war even though the T80 was in full service and was a better tank (and the same technological generation as the Abrams). We were definitely going to meet the T80 but there were a zillion times more T72s built and they were used by far more countries. The Abrams completely overmatched all versions of the T72 back then The base tank was easy to identify, but so many versions had explosive reactive armor that eventually it became really hard to tell what model you were looking at https://21stcenturyasianarmsrace.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/russian-t-72-v4.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/3281/5858243975_3586168360_b.jpg There was even a version called the Dolly Parton, because of those two tig ol bitties on the front of the turret face https://img.ifunny.co/images/eb1c040d76972d091cc0d3e8a09c1f19c4b504e7e7eac796dbe3916fe5e969a2_1.jpg https://www.overtdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/T-72B1-Modernized-Nicaragua-17-1.jpg Add in modernization programs and changes in ERA design, and sometimes you had no fucking idea what you were looking at other than you knew it was Russian https://phototass2.cdnvideo.ru/width/1200_4ce85301/tass/m2/en/uploads/i/20210301/1304695.jpg https://nationalinterest.org/sites/default/files/styles/desktop__1260_/public/main_images/army2016demo-038_1.jpg?itok=gkO0RU5l Turret would still pop off if you hit it, export models were crap, doubt the "real" versions were much better. The Soviets figured that the T72 was heavily armored enough that its peers could not penetrate the armor from the front, and the advantages of the autoloader were worth the trade off to crew safety. That all changed for the worse when the T72 was capable of being penetrated by our next generation of MBTs. The T64 was the more complicated and advanced precursor to the T72 and so the T72 interited the same problem because it used the T64 style autoloader. You can easily google how many T64s lost their turrets in the Ukrainian war and T72s in the Gulf War I look at it more from the Chieftain and Challenger perspective then the M60 and M1 perspective but either way armor on armor in the 70's/80's the commies would have been fucked long distance in a fulda gap scenario but raw numbers would have carried them forward and IMO it would have gone chemical first then theater nuclear. "Quantity has a quality all its own" - Some Commie motherfuckers that's burning in Hell. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.