User Panel
|
Honestly it's the one thing I agree with democrats about at this point
We neither have the votes nor the balls in the GOP to undo to last 50+ years of government interference in healthcare. There is zero chance we will every reduce health insurance or premium costs in any reasonable way with the government controlled insurance system. It's just a fact at this point that m4a is a better deal for everyone. The taxes would be cheaper than premiums. You'd no longer be held hostage at a job you hate because you have good insurance. You could demand raises in place of what your premiums were which would be more than the tax you'd pay for m4a. Yes care is rationed sometimes but never for serious issues in places where they have it. Plus it's already rationed to some extent because people can't fucking afford it by the millions and we have been driven Into high deductible plans that still make us come out of pocket thousands of dollars on top of the thousands we spend for premiums We lost the fight on affordable free market healthcare a long time ago and there's no going back to it. For sure it would be better than m4a but it's never gonna fucking happen and m4a is better than the shit show we have now. A larger number of people realize this every year as premiums keep rising and plans get shittier. M4a will happen within a decade or two. When you see it coming be a part of making it responsible otherwise the democrats will write all the rules of it and it won't be as good as it could be |
|
Quoted: Honestly it's the one thing I agree with democrats about at this point We neither have the votes nor the balls in the GOP to undo to last 50+ years of government interference in healthcare. There is zero chance we will every reduce health insurance or premium costs in any reasonable way with the government controlled insurance system. It's just a fact at this point that m4a is a better deal for everyone. The taxes would be cheaper than premiums. You'd no longer be held hostage at a job you hate because you have good insurance. You could demand raises in place of what your premiums were which would be more than the tax you'd pay for m4a. Yes care is rationed sometimes but never for serious issues in places where they have it. Plus it's already rationed to some extent because people can't fucking afford it by the millions and we have been driven Into high deductible plans that still make us come out of pocket thousands of dollars on top of the thousands we spend for premiums We lost the fight on affordable free market healthcare a long time ago and there's no going back to it. For sure it would be better than m4a but it's never gonna fucking happen and m4a is better than the shit show we have now. A larger number of people realize this every year as premiums keep rising and plans get shittier. M4a will happen within a decade or two. When you see it coming be a part of making it responsible otherwise the democrats will write all the rules of it and it won't be as good as it could be View Quote So who's gonna tell this guy the truth? Or should we let him live in la-la land? |
|
Quoted: People who are pushing the socialist healthcare bullshit? Apparently health insurance companies are all a scam. Medicare will save everyone with no downsides. I could roll my eyes so hard my neck would break. View Quote It sounds like something that someone that had never dealt with medicare would say. Then I would give them examples from my dad's last few months. |
|
Quoted: Personally I don't believe in an absolute form of society/government. Some socialist elements can be effective, just as some areas are more conducive to a completely free-market solution. Healthcare is an area where I think socialist principles could be a benefit. I just got out of a 4 day hospital stay, I had a rhinovirus that caused my own immune system to attack my lungs. I have great insurance, but my CoPay is still going to be north of $6k. I'm lucky in that I can afford it, though it's not exactly comfortable, but for a lot of people that could be a life-altering bill. There's got to be some middle ground on these issues, whether it's government funded research to reduce the eventual costs of medications and treatments, or some other kind of coexistence between the government and the free market, but healthcare isn't always something you can just do without if you can't afford it. I don't know what the right answer is, but it isn't what we have now, and it isn't on either extreme either. View Quote If you max out of pocket is north of 6k, you don't have great insurance. IIRC mine is 3-3.5k range. |
|
Quoted: Tbh, I don't care anymore, Healthcare`s sucked for over a decade now. It'll probably continue sucking regardless of the system in place. I don't get in debates about it. View Quote This is where I’m at. I’d rather have single-payer than the abortion of the system we have now. Obamacare worked exactly as intended. I’d be more angry, but the insurance companies were in bed with .gov and were just too stupid to realize what they were supporting. It’s not like it matters anyway in terms of spending. The dollar will get inflated into oblivion eventually; just a matter of timing. |
|
Quoted: What do i say? As a surgeon, i say: i personally know 6 surgeons who left Canada because their patients’ wait for appropriate care was so poor, they left; I also ask if they really want the USA like many European & Scandinavian countries that make physicians “holiday” for 2 months so only true emergencies are done? Penultimate, are they as patients ready to wait? Non-urgent/ non-emergent cases are put off for weeks to months in socialized settings. Lastly, are they willing to sign over their lives & healthcare to algorithms set by non-physicians? For example: in most socialized medicine, anyone older than 75y cannot have a screening colonoscopy every decade. People regularly live to 100+yrs. In general, colon cancer grows so slowly, it’s not worth the risk of complication from a colonoscopy, which occurs roughly 1/1000 cases. So, if you have a colon polyp that started at age 73 that could have been removed by a simple colonoscopy AND PREVENTED COLON CANCER—you now die at 80y to 83y from a preventable cancer, or now need an operation for something that was preventable. Well—those rules only apply to others—not entitled Americans, right? My decades of dealing with Medicaid & Medicare patients who don’t take care if themselves, is that when the results of their choices lead to bad outcomes—they now want everything possible done. They’ll quit smoking….lose weight….have the procedure they refused for 10 years…. Yes—socialized medicine and Dr Google FTW! View Quote None of the idiots wanting socialized medicine actually want socialized medicine. They want the system we have now. But more of it. And faster. For free. The want the magical Elysium medical that is just sitting waiting for anyone that evil greedy top 1% surgeons like you are keeping to themselves. |
|
Simple. Going to the doctor should be exactly like going to the DMV. And if you have any ability to pay, you get to pay for three or four other people. That's socialized medicine.
There was some notable Canadian provincial minister that was put on a 6 month waitlist for heart surgery. He flew to Miami and waited only 4 days before they operated on him. |
|
I'd say that, collectively, Americans are paying more for health care in-total than any nation on the planet but we still have a shitton of Americans who can't afford health care. I'd say that if we just spent the money we already spend on health care, but did it intelligently, we could provide health care to all, no problem. I'd say our failure to provide health care to all is costing all of us a huge amount of money in increased premiums, lost productivity and an generally inefficient, ineffective health care system. I'd say the ONLY people who support our ridiculous system are the people getting rich on it. That's what I would say.
|
|
Quoted: I'd say that, collectively, Americans are paying more for health care in-total than any nation on the planet but we still have a shitton of Americans who can't afford health care. I'd say that if we just spent the money we already spend on health care, but did it intelligently, we could provide health care to all, no problem. I'd say our failure to provide health care to all is costing all of us a huge amount of money in increased premiums, lost productivity and an generally inefficient, ineffective health care system. I'd say the ONLY people who support our ridiculous system are the people getting rich on it. That's what I would say. View Quote Yup. Competition and limitations on liability would go a long way towards reducing costs. |
|
Quoted: Yup. Competition and limitations on liability would go a long way towards reducing costs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'd say that, collectively, Americans are paying more for health care in-total than any nation on the planet but we still have a shitton of Americans who can't afford health care. I'd say that if we just spent the money we already spend on health care, but did it intelligently, we could provide health care to all, no problem. I'd say our failure to provide health care to all is costing all of us a huge amount of money in increased premiums, lost productivity and an generally inefficient, ineffective health care system. I'd say the ONLY people who support our ridiculous system are the people getting rich on it. That's what I would say. Yup. Competition and limitations on liability would go a long way towards reducing costs. |
|
Quoted: Honestly it's the one thing I agree with democrats about at this point We neither have the votes nor the balls in the GOP to undo to last 50+ years of government interference in healthcare. There is zero chance we will every reduce health insurance or premium costs in any reasonable way with the government controlled insurance system. It's just a fact at this point that m4a is a better deal for everyone. The taxes would be cheaper than premiums. You'd no longer be held hostage at a job you hate because you have good insurance. You could demand raises in place of what your premiums were which would be more than the tax you'd pay for m4a. Yes care is rationed sometimes but never for serious issues in places where they have it. Plus it's already rationed to some extent because people can't fucking afford it by the millions and we have been driven Into high deductible plans that still make us come out of pocket thousands of dollars on top of the thousands we spend for premiums We lost the fight on affordable free market healthcare a long time ago and there's no going back to it. For sure it would be better than m4a but it's never gonna fucking happen and m4a is better than the shit show we have now. A larger number of people realize this every year as premiums keep rising and plans get shittier. M4a will happen within a decade or two. When you see it coming be a part of making it responsible otherwise the democrats will write all the rules of it and it won't be as good as it could be View Quote No, just no. It would not be cheaper and we would all have shitty insurance unless you could get a supplemental policy, that would cost you. Case in point of medicare stupidity. My dad was in the hospital and diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. They needed to confirm if some spots showing up on his liver were cancer which would make it stage 4. To do this they use something called a PET scan. There was on the floor just below his room. Medicare required it be done in an out patient setting. So, he went to a nursing home and we got him in 2 or 3 weeks later. |
|
Quoted: 2. Universal Healthcare is nice in theory, but when they have to wait a month or more to be seen along with substandard care, people will start to think otherwise. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Taking money from younger, poorer, healthier people and distributing it to older, people who end their careers typically making the most money in their lives, unhealthy people seems like boomer socialist shit. Either Medicare for all or just get rid of it View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: People who are pushing the socialist healthcare bullshit? Apparently health insurance companies are all a scam. Medicare will save everyone with no downsides. I could roll my eyes so hard my neck would break. Taking money from younger, poorer, healthier people and distributing it to older, people who end their careers typically making the most money in their lives, unhealthy people seems like boomer socialist shit. Either Medicare for all or just get rid of it Yeah but what happens when there is a decrease in the younger generation, and an increase in life span of the older generation, in many countries aound the world and the USA; this is happening big time, most notable is Japan, followed closely by China. |
|
Quoted: People who are pushing the socialist healthcare bullshit? Apparently health insurance companies are all a scam. Medicare will save everyone with no downsides. I could roll my eyes so hard my neck would break. View Quote I tell them about the incredibly limited and substandard care that my mother received (at good hospitals) because she had medicare. And how medicare would repeatedly tell her "That's covered" for various medical devices that she needed... only to find out that their "covered" amount is only a fraction of the cost. And how when she needed a short bit in a physical rehab facility after major surgery, medicare paid so little that she could only be in the very cheapest ones... where service was not exactly stellar. Even after her supplemental medicare insurance, she still ended up paying a lot out of pocket for everything she needed done. So yeah... "free insurance", but it sucks, and you still have to get supplemental insurance on top of it, and you still have to pay a lot out of pocket. Doesn't seem like such of a dream when you look at it that way, now, does it? |
|
Quoted: If your max out of pocket is north of 6k, you don't have great insurance. IIRC mine is 3-3.5k range. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Personally I don't believe in an absolute form of society/government. Some socialist elements can be effective, just as some areas are more conducive to a completely free-market solution. Healthcare is an area where I think socialist principles could be a benefit. I just got out of a 4 day hospital stay, I had a rhinovirus that caused my own immune system to attack my lungs. I have great insurance, but my CoPay is still going to be north of $6k. I'm lucky in that I can afford it, though it's not exactly comfortable, but for a lot of people that could be a life-altering bill. There's got to be some middle ground on these issues, whether it's government funded research to reduce the eventual costs of medications and treatments, or some other kind of coexistence between the government and the free market, but healthcare isn't always something you can just do without if you can't afford it. I don't know what the right answer is, but it isn't what we have now, and it isn't on either extreme either. If your max out of pocket is north of 6k, you don't have great insurance. IIRC mine is 3-3.5k range. This. |
|
Remind them government run healthcare has already been tried here in the form of the VA.
|
|
Quoted: I'd say that, collectively, Americans are paying more for health care in-total than any nation on the planet but we still have a shitton of Americans who can't afford health care. I'd say that if we just spent the money we already spend on health care, but did it intelligently, we could provide health care to all, no problem. I'd say our failure to provide health care to all is costing all of us a huge amount of money in increased premiums, lost productivity and an generally inefficient, ineffective health care system. I'd say the ONLY people who support our ridiculous system are the people getting rich on it. That's what I would say. View Quote I'd say that you're delusional if you think switching to a single payer system will make any of that better. I do believe in a perfect world, it could work. But we are such a far cry from it that it's a pipe dream. |
|
I am a 70yr old boomer and see a crowd of young people drawing disability for things like sore elbows. It ain't about just boomers drawing off a toooo liberal system. Been paying into this system for 55yrs and most whiners I see are only in their 20's. Yes it needs a fix but if you take a good look around there is bigger fish to fry.
|
|
Quoted: Enjoy your big brother government. View Quote Expecting a toothless Federal government because you think that states should dominate the political marketplace is not realistic. It has nothing to do with big brother government. It has to do with government having the resources and funding it needs to function to perform the tasks that society expects it to perform. A Federal government chopped down in size by 80% would not be able to perform its taskings. You might not like a lot of what the Feds do, or any level of government for that matter, but society as a whole has said that they expect government to fulfill certain functions. |
|
I think a lot people who lean towards are people who have had a bad experience being burdened with medical bills.
I'll give a recent example . I had to go and get the series of rabies vaccines . I have health insurance but I can imagine if you had a poor plan or none at all . The total bill for the shots and ER visit because that's the only place in a hospital they do it was $13, 545 .00 My insurance paid something like $12,400.00 but you receive separate bills in the mail. ER, lab, room fee which I was in for 30 minutes Then doctor fee . It was a bunch You think the billing is done then every week you receive another bill in the mail . I have no clue how much receiving a rabies vaccine should cost but I googled what is used in it and it's pretty close to the same one my dog gets for $80 dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Personally I don't believe in an absolute form of society/government. Some socialist elements can be effective, just as some areas are more conducive to a completely free-market solution. Healthcare is an area where I think socialist principles could be a benefit. I just got out of a 4 day hospital stay, I had a rhinovirus that caused my own immune system to attack my lungs. I have great insurance, but my CoPay is still going to be north of $6k. I'm lucky in that I can afford it, though it's not exactly comfortable, but for a lot of people that could be a life-altering bill. There's got to be some middle ground on these issues, whether it's government funded research to reduce the eventual costs of medications and treatments, or some other kind of coexistence between the government and the free market, but healthcare isn't always something you can just do without if you can't afford it. I don't know what the right answer is, but it isn't what we have now, and it isn't on either extreme either. View Quote Horse shit |
|
i make note of who they are then i walk away and avoid their stupid socialist ass from then on, being in the presence of stupid people will make you stupid
|
|
It's a bad idea to turn healthcare over to the entity responsible for most of the problems and high costs of healthcare. If you're unaware of how that entity is largely to blame, then you haven't done your homework. Let's also not forget that the only legitimate role of govt in healthcare is contract enforcement (this includes dealing with malpractice).
|
|
50% of healthcare bullshit could be solved by using urgent care instead of the ER if you don’t have insurance. If they want to subsidize or provide something, do that.
|
|
Quoted: People who are pushing the socialist healthcare bullshit? Apparently health insurance companies are all a scam. Medicare will save everyone with no downsides. I could roll my eyes so hard my neck would break. View Quote I just ask them back "Can you not see any scenario, with a lack of accountability in our government, where they don't fuck this up? Who you gonna complain to? How quickly do you think it would be fixed? " |
|
Quoted: I think a lot people who lean towards are people who have had a bad experience being burdened with medical bills. I'll give a recent example . I had to go and get the series of rabies vaccines . I have health insurance but I can imagine if you had a poor plan or none at all . The total bill for the shots and ER visit because that's the only place in a hospital they do it was $13, 545 .00 My insurance paid something like $12,400.00 but you receive separate bills in the mail. ER, lab, room fee which I was in for 30 minutes Then doctor fee . It was a bunch You think the billing is done then every week you receive another bill in the mail . I have no clue how much receiving a rabies vaccine should cost but I googled what is used in it and it's pretty close to the same one my dog gets for $80 dollars View Quote My niece got bit by a monkey while traveling somewhere in southeast Asia (no, she really did, and I don't remember what country). She had to get a series of rabies shots. She got all but one of the shots overseas but had to come home before she was scheduled for the last shot. I don't recall the exact details, but I remember her saying the cost difference between the first shots and the one she got in the United States was unreal. I'm making the numbers up but it seemed like she said the first three or four shots (or however many there were) cost her like $100 each, but the one shot shot she got in the U.S. was in the thousands. Again, I don't remember the details but I clearly remember her describing a HUGE price difference. |
|
|
Quality adjusted life years.
People think rationing won’t happen. It will. |
|
Quoted: And how would you fund government operations? And spare us the suggestion that a huge sales tax would be adequate View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I'd be all for getting rid of all taxes and fees that the government levies onto us. And how would you fund government operations? And spare us the suggestion that a huge sales tax would be adequate I wouldn't fund probably over half of them. |
|
I don't say anything to them.
They've just clearly demonstrated their lack of intelligence and ignorance. I don't waste my time trying to educate the stupid out of ID10Ts that can't add. |
|
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: These questions. Have they seen the VA ? How will you pay for it ? There is no right to healthcare. This. Untuck the VA first. Wouldn’t need much of a VA if we didn’t send our young men & women to fight For profit wars. |
|
Quoted: If you max out of pocket is north of 6k, you don't have great insurance. IIRC mine is 3-3.5k range. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Personally I don't believe in an absolute form of society/government. Some socialist elements can be effective, just as some areas are more conducive to a completely free-market solution. Healthcare is an area where I think socialist principles could be a benefit. I just got out of a 4 day hospital stay, I had a rhinovirus that caused my own immune system to attack my lungs. I have great insurance, but my CoPay is still going to be north of $6k. I'm lucky in that I can afford it, though it's not exactly comfortable, but for a lot of people that could be a life-altering bill. There's got to be some middle ground on these issues, whether it's government funded research to reduce the eventual costs of medications and treatments, or some other kind of coexistence between the government and the free market, but healthcare isn't always something you can just do without if you can't afford it. I don't know what the right answer is, but it isn't what we have now, and it isn't on either extreme either. If you max out of pocket is north of 6k, you don't have great insurance. IIRC mine is 3-3.5k range. Medicare doesn’t have a maximum out of pocket. Many folks miss this little aspect. |
|
The answer is to remove govt completely and enact tort reform.
|
|
|
Quoted: I dunno, I've never had issues with mine. I pay more for my car insurance and co-pays are all $20, which are rare anyway. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Well, health insurance companies are a scam, in collusion with the .gov and the hospitals and pharmas. I dunno, I've never had issues with mine. I pay more for my car insurance and co-pays are all $20, which are rare anyway. Who pays the rest of your healthcare? |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Of course it's not realistic to just delete 80% of the government. It sure is desirable though! No, not really. Yes, really. And this was over 2 years ago: https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/438242-the-federal-government-is-the-largest-employer-in-the-nation |
|
Devil's Advocate: If you work and have health insurance you are ALREADY paying for healthcare for all. Just in a very inefficient way.
|
|
Quoted: My niece got bit by a monkey while traveling somewhere in southeast Asia (no, she really did, and I don't remember what country). She had to get a series of rabies shots. She got all but one of the shots overseas but had to come home before she was scheduled for the last shot. I don't recall the exact details, but I remember her saying the cost difference between the first shots and the one she got in the United States was unreal. I'm making the numbers up but it seemed like she said the first three or four shots (or however many there were) cost her like $100 each, but the one shot shot she got in the U.S. was in the thousands. Again, I don't remember the details but I clearly remember her describing a HUGE price difference. View Quote I believe it because when you walk into a hospital everyone has their hand out . Pay ME! Imagine if going to get your car fixed was like that. Here's your bill , you're like okay you pay it then another person walks over ,Hey I operated the lift here's your bill , then another person walks over I brought the lift done here's a bill for that and so on. That's a hospital visit |
|
Quoted: Honestly it's the one thing I agree with democrats about at this point We neither have the votes nor the balls in the GOP to undo to last 50+ years of government interference in healthcare. There is zero chance we will every reduce health insurance or premium costs in any reasonable way with the government controlled insurance system. It's just a fact at this point that m4a is a better deal for everyone. The taxes would be cheaper than premiums. You'd no longer be held hostage at a job you hate because you have good insurance. You could demand raises in place of what your premiums were which would be more than the tax you'd pay for m4a. Yes care is rationed sometimes but never for serious issues in places where they have it. Plus it's already rationed to some extent because people can't fucking afford it by the millions and we have been driven Into high deductible plans that still make us come out of pocket thousands of dollars on top of the thousands we spend for premiums We lost the fight on affordable free market healthcare a long time ago and there's no going back to it. For sure it would be better than m4a but it's never gonna fucking happen and m4a is better than the shit show we have now. A larger number of people realize this every year as premiums keep rising and plans get shittier. M4a will happen within a decade or two. When you see it coming be a part of making it responsible otherwise the democrats will write all the rules of it and it won't be as good as it could be Sorry, but you are incorrect when you say "We lost the fight on affordable free market healthcare a long time ago." Research Direct Primary Care. For specialists, there are plenty of "opted out" providers that you can negotiate with. The reason that Federal involvement in healthcare is problematic is the same reason that federal government involvement with secondary and post-secondary education. The majority of money (82%) goes to administrative burden. Medicare forces every hospital that receives Medicare reimbursement to meet every administrative demand, or risk losing all funding. That is simply wrong. Healthcare should be regulated at the State level. Ever wonder why states are allowed to administer the Medicaid programs, while the Federal government refuses to give up Medicare authority to states? Demographics.... View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.