User Panel
Posted: 3/27/2019 8:23:54 AM EST
I dont have any braces myself as i SBR'D all the things. I think braces are awesome though. Apparently the dems have caught on to them. When the dems take power again, you will be ass deep in new antigun laws. Ammunition registration, universal background cgecks, probanly a ban on mail order ammo / reloading supplies like california and new york already have... Not to mention a nice fat assault weapon ban that targets tactical rifles, semi shotguns, and rifle caliber pistols and braces.
The time to stock up is now. https://www.guns.com/news/2019/01/10/dems-introduce-new-federal-assault-weapon-ban-that-includes-pistol-braces Besides outlawing 205 gun models by name — Feinstein’s original 1994 ban only listed around 20 specific models — the proposal would also define an “assault weapon” as a semi-automatic with a detachable magazine that included one of a list of cosmetic features that are deemed “military characteristics” such as a threaded barrel, pistol grip or folding stock. This is less lenient than the previous ban which allowed a “features test” that included two such characteristics.
In addition, the measure would expand federal law to ban adjustable stocks, Thordsen-style stocks such as used in “featureless rifles” marketed in states like California, “assault pistols” that weight more than 50-ounces when unloaded, and popular pistol stabilizing braces that have become widespread in recent years. Detachable magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds would be prohibited from transfer and guns grandfathered when the ban takes effect would be required to be locked up when not in use. A background check would be mandatory for future sale or gifting of grandfathered guns, even between two private parties. View Quote |
|
We know, but the assault weapons ban in question ain't going nowhere. I'm doubtful it would even pass with a dem president. It didn't last time, even after the knee jerk emotional response of 20 children getting killed at school. I see no reason to believe it could not be stopped again even with a regime change. We'll just have to work for it again like we did last time.
|
|
Carolyn McCarthy |
|
Quoted:
I dont have any braces myself as i SBR'D all the things. I think braces are awesome though. Apparently the dems have caught on to them. When the dems take power again, you will be ass deep in new antigun laws. Ammunition registration, universal background cgecks, probanly a ban on mail order ammo / reloading supplies like california and new york already have... Not to mention a nice fat assault weapon ban that targets tactical rifles, semi shotguns, and rifle caliber pistols and braces. The time to stock up is now. https://www.guns.com/news/2019/01/10/dems-introduce-new-federal-assault-weapon-ban-that-includes-pistol-braces Besides outlawing 205 gun models by name — Feinstein’s original 1994 ban only listed around 20 specific models — the proposal would also define an “assault weapon” as a semi-automatic with a detachable magazine that included one of a list of cosmetic features that are deemed “military characteristics” such as a threaded barrel, pistol grip or folding stock. This is less lenient than the previous ban which allowed a “features test” that included two such characteristics.
In addition, the measure would expand federal law to ban adjustable stocks, Thordsen-style stocks such as used in “featureless rifles” marketed in states like California, “assault pistols” that weight more than 50-ounces when unloaded, and popular pistol stabilizing braces that have become widespread in recent years. Detachable magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds would be prohibited from transfer and guns grandfathered when the ban takes effect would be required to be locked up when not in use. A background check would be mandatory for future sale or gifting of grandfathered guns, even between two private parties. View Quote View Quote ...wait. |
|
Quoted:
We know, but the assault weapons ban in question ain't going nowhere. I'm doubtful it would even pass with a dem president. It didn't last time, even after the knee jerk emotional response of 20 children getting killed at school. I see no reason to believe it could not be stopped again even with a regime change. We'll just have to work for it again like we did last time. View Quote If you are not, I apologize, but I warn you. This is the mindset they want and will attempt to cultivate. Be ever vigilant and never,ever trust the democrats. |
|
This is the shit they are going to try and slam through as a "National Emergency" if they ever get back in power.
|
|
They are discriminating on disabled people. How very tolerant of them.
|
|
Who didn't see this coming..
The assholes are learning. Shits coming. Soon. |
|
all they need to do is redefine them by weight like was done in 1994
semi-automatic pistols with a detachable magazine and at least two of these features: a magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip, a threaded barrel, a barrel shroud, or an unloaded weight of 50 ounces or more. |
|
It’s no surprise they’ll propose banning everything. Stay vigilant. Do the best you can at the ballot box. Do not comply.
|
|
Quoted:
all they need to do is redefine them by weight like was done in 1994 semi-automatic pistols with a detachable magazine and at least two of these features: a magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip, a threaded barrel, a barrel shroud, or an unloaded weight of 50 ounces or more. View Quote |
|
Braces are the next bumpstock.
They are allowed based on an ATF letter. That can change overnight. I love my braces, but... shit, I know I won't be an old man and still have them. |
|
Like 30 round magazines pistol braces are just a gimmicky toy. Even if it passes Congress Trump will veto it and protect pistol brace owners.
|
|
I'm thinking braces can be cited as ADA accommodations. That said, we should really rally Antifa against the Dems. They're young, unemployed (for the most part) and have time to waste protesting at the elected representative's office.
|
|
Quoted:
We know, but the assault weapons ban in question ain't going nowhere. I'm doubtful it would even pass with a dem president. It didn't last time, even after the knee jerk emotional response of 20 children getting killed at school. I see no reason to believe it could not be stopped again even with a regime change. We'll just have to work for it again like we did last time. View Quote |
|
|
The Dem politicians themselves have no idea about anything gun related, but unfortunately the bastards who write their bills for them do know what they are doing.
|
|
Quoted:
they will be followed by the "30 rounders are a gimmicky toy" crowd View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
After all that complicated stuff that ban gets down to simply banning the receivers of assault rifles.
They'd probably end up interpreting that like ATF 'always a pistol' but who knows. |
|
|
If they get braces they'll get SBRs and supressors and NVD and everything else.
One piece at a time. |
|
Considering that the ADA is a democratic policy it will be hard for them to push for a total ban on braces because they do serve a legitimate purpose for one of their favored demographics. They may be able to force "some" of the braces off the market that function poorly as an actual brace but it will be hard to ban all braces when some, such as the tailhook, actually do a good job of allowing the pistol to be fired with one hand.
|
|
|
Quoted:
all they need to do is redefine them by weight like was done in 1994 semi-automatic pistols with a detachable magazine and at least two of these features: a magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip, a threaded barrel, a barrel shroud, or an unloaded weight of 50 ounces or more. View Quote Feinstein switched her bills to 'any one of these features', instead of 'at least two of these features', over a decade ago. |
|
|
|
Lol. People will generally comply with giving up one thing, maybe two. But when you outlaw someone's entire collection, I'm pretty sure there will be non-compliance, and even conversions to even illegal-er configurations because fuck it, at that point.
What a bunch of dipshits. |
|
|
Sorry, I think I am going to ignore that unconstitutional law.
Wonder how bad it will be with no NRA around helping gun owners? |
|
Quoted:
We know, but the assault weapons ban in question ain't going nowhere. I'm doubtful it would even pass with a dem president. It didn't last time, even after the knee jerk emotional response of 20 children getting killed at school. I see no reason to believe it could not be stopped again even with a regime change. We'll just have to work for it again like we did last time. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
There will be a few. There's always a few that will comply, hoping that it will save them from what will obviously come next. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
This is the shit they are going to try and slam through as a "National Emergency" if they ever get back in power. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
We know, but the assault weapons ban in question ain't going nowhere. I'm doubtful it would even pass with a dem president. It didn't last time, even after the knee jerk emotional response of 20 children getting killed at school. I see no reason to believe it could not be stopped again even with a regime change. We'll just have to work for it again like we did last time. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
This is the shit they are going to try and slam through as a "National Emergency" if they ever get back in power. View Quote "IF"? They'll be back in power either in two years or six years. Whenever Trump's term is done. Once they are back in power shits going fuller retard and they're going to show you what tyrany is. There is no "IF". |
|
|
I have an investment property under contract. I can't wait to get the cash.
|
|
|
Everythings a machine gun and will be banned by royal decree soon anyways.
|
|
|
|
The way gun owners are divided and with no help from the NRA we are one mass shooting away from having everything banned. It will not matter if you do not comply. Try enjoying you bump stock at the range. Don't even let your neighbor see you loading your Brace that looks like a short rifle in your trunk. Yes, we are fucked even if you save your family's life in a legal shoot using a brace, you will go to jail. I wish we as gun owners will change but I just don't see it.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.