Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
2/16/2013 3:13:10 PM EDT
Finally got to the range with my Ruger 556 to zero my Magpul MBUS in. At 100yrds, using a rest, I was able to put 10 7 in a 3.25 in group, 11 8 with a flyer that put the group out to 4.1 or so.

Ammo was PMC Bronze 223A 55gr FMJ-BT.

I was not trying for super small group, just getting it on the paper. It was windy as all get out and cold.

I know it won't win no match or anything but... is it acceptable??

ETA: Picture / and I can't count
2/16/2013 3:15:25 PM EDT
[#1]
That's just fine with average ammo
2/16/2013 3:15:59 PM EDT
[#2]
its more than good enough for a defensive carbine.
2/16/2013 3:16:27 PM EDT
[#3]
Acceptable accuracy is a personal decision.
2/16/2013 3:16:41 PM EDT
[#4]
It's minute of dead guy.
2/16/2013 3:17:14 PM EDT
[#5]
Depending on the conditions, and since you were using irons instead of optics, I'd definitely say that's acceptable accuracy.  
-SleeperShooter
2/16/2013 3:17:56 PM EDT
[#6]
Run it.
2/16/2013 3:18:19 PM EDT
[#7]
Many thanks... I can't wait to get back out when I have the time, and the ammo, to tighten my groups up. Where we went they have matches I want to try.
2/16/2013 3:18:42 PM EDT
[#8]
Acceptable accuracy is hitting a target.  I have yet to see a target that is larger then a man, so you should be good to go.
2/16/2013 3:23:03 PM EDT
[#9]
Probably not too bad considering the ammo....

PMC 55gr from my 1:9 16" gives 2.5-3" @100yds.  My home-rolled 77 Noslers over TAC are just over 1.5".  Both with a 2 MOA AimPoint PRO.

John
2/16/2013 3:25:26 PM EDT
[#10]
2/16/2013 3:25:30 PM EDT
[#11]
Quoted:
its more than good enough for a defensive carbine.


this.

J-
2/16/2013 3:29:04 PM EDT
[#12]
Here it is without the flyer calculated in...
2/16/2013 3:31:44 PM EDT
[#13]
2/16/2013 3:36:20 PM EDT
[#14]


I wasn't jerking/slapping the trigger... the factory trigger does leave a little to to desired...
2/16/2013 3:37:05 PM EDT
[#15]
Sounds good, especially considering the ammo.
2/16/2013 3:53:58 PM EDT
[#16]
Quoted:
Acceptable accuracy is a personal decision.


Exactly.  I would not be happy with a 100 yd. group that size but you did say it was windy, and windy with a .223 means bullet dispersion will be greater than with bigger calibers/bullets.  Try it again some day when the wind is down.

My S&W M&P 15 (5.45X39) shoots 4" X 6" groups at 300 yds. with Russian surplus.  It wasn't windy, just kind of damp/misty.  I'm happy with that one.  To be honest, I've not shot any of the other AR15's at anything past 25 yds.  But the good ones will shoot dime sized groups for 5 to 10 rounds at 25 yds.  I need to shoot some of them farther out.

2/16/2013 4:02:52 PM EDT
[#17]
Wind, MBUS and ammo...looks about right.
2/16/2013 4:05:21 PM EDT
[#18]



Quoted:



Quoted:

Acceptable accuracy is a personal decision.




Exactly.  I would not be happy with a 100 yd. group that size but you did say it was windy, and windy with a .223 means bullet dispersion will be greater than with bigger calibers/bullets.  Try it again some day when the wind is down.



My S&W M&P 15 (5.45X39) shoots 4" X 6" groups at 300 yds. with Russian surplus.  It wasn't windy, just kind of damp/misty.  I'm happy with that one.  To be honest, I've not shot any of the other AR15's at anything past 25 yds.  But the good ones will shoot dime sized groups for 5 to 10 rounds at 25 yds.  I need to shoot some of them farther out.





500 yds from the offhand with iron sights for me. But each to their own.

 
2/16/2013 4:18:50 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:

Quoted:
Quoted:
Acceptable accuracy is a personal decision.


Exactly.  I would not be happy with a 100 yd. group that size but you did say it was windy, and windy with a .223 means bullet dispersion will be greater than with bigger calibers/bullets.  Try it again some day when the wind is down.

My S&W M&P 15 (5.45X39) shoots 4" X 6" groups at 300 yds. with Russian surplus.  It wasn't windy, just kind of damp/misty.  I'm happy with that one.  To be honest, I've not shot any of the other AR15's at anything past 25 yds.  But the good ones will shoot dime sized groups for 5 to 10 rounds at 25 yds.  I need to shoot some of them farther out.


500 yds from the offhand with iron sights for me. But each to their his own.  




2/16/2013 4:35:01 PM EDT
[#20]
Acceptable to Ruger. My Dad sent a Model-77  7mm Mag. back to them saying it wouldn't group any brand of bullet better than 4" at 100yds. They sent rifle back saying it was within their acceptable accuracy standards. He sold it off saying he would never buy another Ruger product.
Try it again on a calm day.
2/16/2013 4:39:43 PM EDT
[#21]


I think this is for pistol.

billy boy
2/16/2013 4:40:57 PM EDT
[#22]
I have owned 7 ARs and find 3-4 inches with irons to be normal at that distance.

I'm not a tier 1 winged ninja salad shooter like the other guys here, though.  If you can't put 50 rounds in a penny from a moving MRAP you ain't shit.
2/16/2013 4:43:43 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:


I think this is for pistol.

billy boy


My understanding too.
2/16/2013 4:46:13 PM EDT
[#24]
Will do the job
2/16/2013 4:54:23 PM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
Quoted:


I think this is for pistol.

billy boy


My understanding too.


And "Sights not zeroed" is not on there.
2/16/2013 4:57:27 PM EDT
[#26]
100 yds resting my elbows zeroing a new PRO

PMC bronze 55 gr on the left, Prvi M193 on the right. 20 round patterns.



So yeah, I'd say with PMC you're doing good.
2/16/2013 4:58:11 PM EDT
[#27]
I would not be happy with that accuracy or grouping.
2/16/2013 6:14:59 PM EDT
[#28]
Quoted:
Quoted:


I think this is for pistol.

billy boy


My understanding too.


2/16/2013 6:19:35 PM EDT
[#29]
4 MOA is what you need for Appleseed Rifleman.
2/16/2013 6:21:39 PM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
I have owned 7 ARs and find 3-4 inches with irons to be normal at that distance.

I'm not a tier 1 winged ninja salad shooter like the other guys here, though.  If you can't put 50 rounds in a penny from a moving MRAP you ain't shit.




pfftt....try thru a rolling 1/4 inch washer..amatuers...


read siggy...

2/16/2013 6:28:30 PM EDT
[#31]

an retired army dude taught me a trick that helped me..
he said to sight the front sight wings where they touch the sides of the back ring vs. lining them up in the middle and trying to get the same spacing on each side.
this cuts down on your field of vision when looking thru back sight but it helped my group greatly.
2/16/2013 6:29:06 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
4 MOA is what you need for Appleseed Rifleman.


At what minimum distance?
2/16/2013 6:33:10 PM EDT
[#33]
Quoted:
Depending on the conditions, and since you were using irons instead of optics, I'd definitely say that's acceptable accuracy.  
-SleeperShooter


I agree.

2/16/2013 6:39:28 PM EDT
[#34]
I'd say that is pretty good with open sights and typical ammo.

Here's a 100 and 200 yard target using surplus 5.56mm and an ACOG 4x (Colt 16" Carbine). So your target looks pretty good to me.

2/16/2013 6:44:04 PM EDT
[#35]
Quoted:
Quoted:
4 MOA is what you need for Appleseed Rifleman.


At what minimum distance?


2 yards.

That's also 4 moa at 2000 yards.
2/16/2013 6:44:26 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
Quoted:
4 MOA is what you need for Appleseed Rifleman.


At what minimum distance?

MOA is an angular measurement.
Distance is irrelevant.
For example-1MOA= 1inch @ 100 yards, 2 inches @ 200 yards, 3 inches @ 300 yards,  1/2 inch@50 yards, 1/4 inch @25 yards etc., ad infinitum...
2/16/2013 6:55:34 PM EDT
[#37]
I'm going to go against the grain and say I wouldn't be satisfied with that.  With a new rifle I want to see exactly how tight the barrel is capable of shooting.
2/16/2013 6:57:22 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
I'm going to go against the grain and say I wouldn't be satisfied with that.  With a new rifle I want to see exactly how tight the barrel is capable of shooting.


You would have to put it on a BR rifle for that.
2/16/2013 6:59:47 PM EDT
[#39]
2/16/2013 7:19:07 PM EDT
[#40]
If I was trying to get a dime sized group I would not be happy... today was the first I had shot that rifle and only put 30 rounds through it. I think with better ammo and better conditions I could do better. I am OK with today's results.
2/16/2013 8:02:08 PM EDT
[#41]
I couldn't shoot that good with good eyes.
2/16/2013 8:06:54 PM EDT
[#42]
Come on now, what sort of rifle gave that dime-sized group? And 10 round groups are the accepted standard for an AR. Hell, I posted 20 rd groups and the one with the basic Prvi I could pick out a close up of 3 rounds in one ragged hole.
2/16/2013 8:48:22 PM EDT
[#43]
For the 100 yards using an MBUIS, I call that acceptable.  They are called "back up" sights for good reason, but that is just fine for the sight system and range you were shooting.

As was said earlier. "Minute of bad guy accuracy."
2/16/2013 8:51:16 PM EDT
[#44]
"That little guy? I wouldn't worry about that little guy..."


2/16/2013 8:54:05 PM EDT
[#45]
Looks good to me. But i'm a H, L, K shooter
2/16/2013 8:59:30 PM EDT
[#46]
I've shot my Wilson AR15 several times in the last few weeks. 55 grain fmjbt shot about like yours. Handloads with Sierra 69 grain bthp bullets shot about an
inch at 200 yards. Seven power scope and 70 year old eyes.
2/16/2013 10:11:21 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm going to go against the grain and say I wouldn't be satisfied with that.  With a new rifle I want to see exactly how tight the barrel is capable of shooting.


You would have to put it on a BR rifle for that.


I have a $300 muzzle loader that easily shoots 1 inch groups at 100.  It's no BR rifle.   Like someone else stated acceptable accuracy is a matter of opinion and after a 4 + inch group I'm trying to figure out whats wrong.
2/16/2013 10:18:48 PM EDT
[#48]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm going to go against the grain and say I wouldn't be satisfied with that.  With a new rifle I want to see exactly how tight the barrel is capable of shooting.


You would have to put it on a BR rifle for that.


I have a $300 muzzle loader that easily shoots 1 inch groups at 100.  It's no BR rifle.   Like someone else stated acceptable accuracy is a matter of opinion and after a 4 + inch group I'm trying to figure out whats wrong.


1" groups do not represent the ultimate in accuracy, sorry.

You said you wanted to see exactly what the barrel was capable of, not how still you can hold it with your hands.
2/16/2013 10:24:41 PM EDT
[#49]
4 MOA with irons, cheap ammo, and a rack grade rifle is fine...  if shooting from an unsupported field position.

From the bench, slow fire, which removes much human error, I'd prefer to see a significantly tighter group, more like ~2 MOA.

The problem with that group is that it is not very consistent or circular in shape.  It is slanted low-left.  Assuming you are a right handed shooter, that could be "heeling" the rifle which is basically pushing forward a bit with your firing hand just as the shot goes off.  It could also be pushing the shoulder forward in anticipation of recoil, too.  Try ball & dummy drills and see if the group gets more consistent and tighter.

I would not actually make any sight adjustments with that target, especially with the "flyer;" unless you called it bad when you fired, it might be more heeling or bucking going on.  If I couldn't shoot another group and had to make sight adjustments based on that target, I might go 1.5 MOA right and 1 MOA up (assuming you want a 100 yard zero... :-\), but I'd much prefer to get a more consistent group first.
2/16/2013 10:28:06 PM EDT
[#50]
Three-ish inch groups with irons in less than ideal conditions is about all the ammo/barrel/trigger was designed to do. I've been shooting all my life and I'm fine with that off a rest for a stock AR with iron sights.  You now know that the rifle/ammo combo will do pretty much what is was designed to.
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page