[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Anderson lower critics (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 12/11/2014 2:51:41 PM EDT
|
Also, I haven't seen many people complain about these things. Great reviews on Buds where they have sold a million of them. They are made of the right stuff and the 7 I've worked with all made solid rifles.
Is this about that one guy with the out of spec upper who raised a hissy fit? Sometimes an inexpensive product gets a bad rep just because it's inexpensive. |
|
Quoted:
I believe you're mistaken. You are probably referring to the Colt rifles sold by Wal-Mart. Quoted:
Quoted:
They're made from 80% forgings produced in China from recycled Natty Light cans. I believe you're mistaken. You are probably referring to the Colt rifles sold by Wal-Mart. this, everyone knows Anderson uses only the finest PBR cans. |
|
Quoted:
Also, I haven't seen many people complain about these things. Great reviews on Buds where they have sold a million of them. They are made of the right stuff and the 7 I've worked with all made solid rifles. Is this about that one guy with the out of spec upper who raised a hissy fit? Sometimes an inexpensive product gets a bad rep just because it's inexpensive. Was it just one guy here? I thought a read quite a few negative things about them, maybe the other reviews I read were on different sites. |
|
In my limited experience, Anderson lowers are of acceptable quality.
Their dishonest business practices on the other hand...
I swore a long time ago that they'd never see a dime of my money, I'm sure most of you know what I'm talking about. At last check, that guy still worked there too. |
|
Quoted:
In my limited experience, Anderson lowers are of acceptable quality. Their dishonest business practices on the other hand...
I swore a long time ago that they'd never see a dime of my money, I'm sure most of you know what I'm talking about. At last check, that guy still worked there too. Was that the deal where the guy came on here as a neutral observer touting the brand? That was bullshit but at least he was called out on here. |
|
If your lower doesn't have a horse with a raging boner, it's not tier one, it's not spec, and you WILL die.
Possibly from aids. If you do survive, you will be celibate. Other animals on lowers, like a pissed off cat or snake are only good for trunk guns. If it has just a bunch of letters on it, you might as well just send it to me, I will throw it in the aluminum scrap bin for you. |
|
Quoted:
If your lower doesn't have a horse with a raging boner, it's not tier one, it's not spec, and you WILL die. Possibly from aids. If you do survive, you will be celibate. Other animals on lowers, like a pissed off cat or snake are only good for trunk guns. If it has just a bunch of letters on it, you might as well just send it to me, I will throw it in the aluminum scrap bin for you. Mine has a rabid possum on it sodomizing a skunk. What is this lower good for? |
|
Quoted:
Yes, but how is the color match? Is it an exact match for Knights or Noveske? If not, you'll never be operator enough. Accuracy will diminish, and you'll probably develop post nasal drip. Hmmm...what if he gets a tomahawk? According to the Tier 1 Manual, a tomahawk makes all shit tier 1... |
|
Quoted:
I've got two Andersons completely built. <a href="http://s21.photobucket.com/user/skidman/media/Retro-2_zpsa783522c.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b259/skidman/Retro-2_zpsa783522c.jpg</a> <a href="http://s21.photobucket.com/user/skidman/media/Anderson-BushmasterAR15-1_zpsf7c23e16.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b259/skidman/Anderson-BushmasterAR15-1_zpsf7c23e16.jpg</a> And three more Andersons in progress.... The top complete lower in the picture is an Eagle Arms. I see no problem with the Andersons. <a href="http://s21.photobucket.com/user/skidman/media/NextFour_zps21416765.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b259/skidman/NextFour_zps21416765.jpg</a> huh did they change their logo? the bottom pics looks different than mine. Looks like smaller lettering and roll mark which I would much prefer |






