User Panel
Quoted: There are two things that I have trouble comprehending. In the grand scale of the universe they're small things, but for some reason they cause my mind to lock up. A small warhead like the W88 carried by the Trident that in a flash turns into a 475 kiloton thermonuclear blast. E=MC2 indeed. This https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-682d1e449cb16aef4d564820fdd845be.webp Becomes this https://cnduk.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Atomic-Bomb.jpg The others are pics of nebulas that measure 5 lightyears across. What was once a star about the size of our solar system is now nearly twice the diameter of the distance from Earth to Proxima Centauri. This https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/uxdsce4CMFwqPDRKEKvbX4-1200-80.jpeg Becomes this https://www.go-astronomy.com/images/nebula/big/nebula-140.jpg We can't even begin to truly comprehend the size of the biggest things. View Quote |
|
Quoted: It was the best pic I could find that showed scale. You're the last person here I want to argue with about this sort of thing, but... According to Wiki they're actually Mark 12A re-entry vehicles containing W62 warheads, each with a nominal yield of 170 kT. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/31267/w62_warhead-2553827.png Most people (myself included) wouldn't know a W88 from a W76 from W62 from a snow cone maker. The Spaghetti Nebula pic is actually 140-200 LY across. I'll edit my original post. View Quote I guess if you want to get specific the 78 is the A. I can't tell the difference from the outside. I can tell the difference between an 88 and a toaster thankfully. Eta 2 and it's easy to tell the difference between and SLBM bus and an ICBM bus. SLBM's ran out of room for the RB's See 11th pic from the top here |
|
Quoted: Okay.... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/100_1590_JPG-2553359.JPG This one always throws people, because they can't get past the classified line to read the fine print. Yes, these are what you think they are. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Okay.... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/100_1590_JPG-2553359.JPG This one always throws people, because they can't get past the classified line to read the fine print. Yes, these are what you think they are. Also, there are lock nuts that would pay a ton for those keys. Even if they were trainer keys. You should seriously hook that panel up to get dial tone. Quoted: There are two things that I have trouble comprehending. In the grand scale of the universe they're small things, but for some reason they cause my mind to lock up. A small warhead like the You think that's small? Go look at the W79! If you can get past what they are for, the engineering that went into these systems are absolutely, completely fascinating. Dirt. Essentially dirt, molded and shaped and refined. Quoted: Those are W-78's before we de-mirved the minuteman You.... certain of that? lol Quoted: You're the last person here I want to argue with about this sort of thing, but... I'll do it! W87's: W78: W62: W88: Quoted: Ah yes could be 62s. They both use Mk12A's. I guess if you want to get specific the 78 is the A. I can't tell the difference from the outside. I can tell the difference between an 88 and a toaster thankfully. Eta 2 and it's easy to tell the difference between and SLBM bus and an ICBM bus. SLBM's ran out of room for the RB's See 11th pic from the top here Technically.... If that's the exhibit I am thinking about, those are actually traffic cones painted black. lol seriously. Let me see if I can find a better picture... Edit: I went back and counted. You picked out the Trident pic. Easy to tell because they decided to put a rocket motor IN BETWEEN all the wh's / penaids. |
|
Quoted: The SAS pics are exceptionally cool. What an amazing memento! Also, there are lock nuts that would pay a ton for those keys. Even if they were trainer keys. You should seriously hook that panel up to get dial tone. You think that's small? Go look at the W79! If you can get past what they are for, the engineering that went into these systems are absolutely, completely fascinating. Dirt. Essentially dirt, molded and shaped and refined. You.... certain of that? lol I'll do it! W87's: https://minutemanmissile.com/images/W87Warhead3B.jpg W78: https://minutemanmissile.com/images/Mk12AReentryVehicle.jpg W62: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEO1-22XcAA2G1r.jpg W88: https://www.sandia.gov/app/uploads/sites/165/2022/03/ND4-4-572x450.jpg Technically.... If that's the exhibit I am thinking about, those are actually traffic cones painted black. lol seriously. Let me see if I can find a better picture... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Okay.... https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/100_1590_JPG-2553359.JPG This one always throws people, because they can't get past the classified line to read the fine print. Yes, these are what you think they are. Also, there are lock nuts that would pay a ton for those keys. Even if they were trainer keys. You should seriously hook that panel up to get dial tone. Quoted: There are two things that I have trouble comprehending. In the grand scale of the universe they're small things, but for some reason they cause my mind to lock up. A small warhead like the You think that's small? Go look at the W79! If you can get past what they are for, the engineering that went into these systems are absolutely, completely fascinating. Dirt. Essentially dirt, molded and shaped and refined. Quoted: Those are W-78's before we de-mirved the minuteman You.... certain of that? lol Quoted: You're the last person here I want to argue with about this sort of thing, but... I'll do it! W87's: https://minutemanmissile.com/images/W87Warhead3B.jpg W78: https://minutemanmissile.com/images/Mk12AReentryVehicle.jpg W62: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DEO1-22XcAA2G1r.jpg W88: https://www.sandia.gov/app/uploads/sites/165/2022/03/ND4-4-572x450.jpg Quoted: Ah yes could be 62s. They both use Mk12A's. I guess if you want to get specific the 78 is the A. I can't tell the difference from the outside. I can tell the difference between an 88 and a toaster thankfully. Eta 2 and it's easy to tell the difference between and SLBM bus and an ICBM bus. SLBM's ran out of room for the RB's See 11th pic from the top here Technically.... If that's the exhibit I am thinking about, those are actually traffic cones painted black. lol seriously. Let me see if I can find a better picture... LOL. Now I can't unsee it. |
|
|
Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried?
|
|
Quoted: I was wrong. It wasn't MM, but their Trident display: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/Trident_warheads.jpg So, LX, what is that TS/Crypto device? I have never seen it before. Weird not to have a /TSEC on it View Quote Trainer SDU keying variable. Used to encrypt/decrypt comms between LF and LCC. But since it's an MPT simulation, it's just a block of aluminum milled to the same dimensions and therefore unclass. I just like watching my friends who used to have clearances start to twitch when they read the first line. |
|
|
Quoted: ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried? ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. Shows how much I know, I thought both were the same, i.e. ICBM. Thank you for the answer. |
|
Quoted: Shows how much I know, I thought both were the same, i.e. ICBM. Thank you for the answer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried? ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. Shows how much I know, I thought both were the same, i.e. ICBM. Thank you for the answer. Your average American doesn't even know we have either, so you're already a step ahead. In 2003 I had a conversation with an active duty USAF one star who didn't know we still had ICBMs on alert. He thought they went away with the end of the Cold War. |
|
|
Quoted: Your average American doesn't even know we have either, so you're already a step ahead. In 2003 I had a conversation with an active duty USAF one star who didn't know we still had ICBMs on alert. He thought they went away with the end of the Cold War. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried? ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. Shows how much I know, I thought both were the same, i.e. ICBM. Thank you for the answer. Your average American doesn't even know we have either, so you're already a step ahead. In 2003 I had a conversation with an active duty USAF one star who didn't know we still had ICBMs on alert. He thought they went away with the end of the Cold War. Just think, that one star is probably a lobbyist making big $ helping drive defense policy. It's not what you know, it's who you know. |
|
Quoted: ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried? ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. Wtf I knew we retired the Peacekeeper due to the MIRV capability but I thought our minutemen still had MIRVs |
|
|
Quoted: Wtf I knew we retired the Peacekeeper due to the MIRV capability but I thought our minutemen still had MIRVs View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried? ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. Wtf I knew we retired the Peacekeeper due to the MIRV capability but I thought our minutemen still had MIRVs |
|
Quoted: Sucks to be the only ones in the world that abide by our treaties. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Either I overlooked it or it wasn't discussed, but do we have any MIRV warheads in our ICBM fleet or did they all go away because the communists cried? ICBMs, no. All single-bangers. SLBMs, all are party packs. Wtf I knew we retired the Peacekeeper due to the MIRV capability but I thought our minutemen still had MIRVs An Ohio class will definitely fuck up somebody's day though |
|
|
Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg View Quote I want to see a nuclear test documented with modern day camera equipment really bad. Edit: Everything. 4k resolution, slow motion capture, infrared, etc etc |
|
Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg View Quote currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. |
|
Quoted: 87-1 FPU isn't till about 2030 and that's optimistic See here currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. I’m curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. |
|
|
Animated Flight Sequence of a Minuteman III ICBM - Produced by Northrop Grumman (2007) MM3 flight including reentry, but no big boom at the end. The upside down black ice cream cones do make a big splash at the end. Can't wait to see comment's from the SME's on this one. |
|
This one is interesting too, never seen it before.
History of ICBMs and the Description of Minuteman III System Produced by Northrop Grumman (2007) |
|
Quoted: I'm curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. I'm curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. |
|
Quoted: A LOT of Eggs (Warheads) in a few baskets (missile). SALT limited total warheads. If you have a lot of warheads on very few missiles, you'd better pray that the enemy doesn't knock out those very few missiles or else you might feel the need to "launch on warning" USE instead of LOSE your Missiles. But the risk is that your radar scopes shows Russian missiles incoming (which may be system or operator error thus eventually turning out NOT to have been Russian missiles incoming ) and You launched on warning when the warning was false ... Oops!! Also if you sneakily launch a few missiles with lots of warheads, you could quickly saturate Russian C3 sites in a potential decapitation strike. (But these days SLBM MIRV / MARV with depressed trajectory launches are closer to targets and faster to hit - reducing reaction time. Also - A neat factoid is that the MX was a COLD Launch ICMB (First for the USA) Atlas, Titan & Minuteman ICBMs would Hot Launch & thus burn out the interior of the silo so you couldn't just quickly throw another new missile in the old silo after launching. I'm sure LimaXray will have more / better insight. Bigger_Hammer View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: So why did we get rid of the Peacemakers again? SALT? Too high a warhead to vehicle ratio? I have vague memories of when that happened as a kid. A LOT of Eggs (Warheads) in a few baskets (missile). SALT limited total warheads. If you have a lot of warheads on very few missiles, you'd better pray that the enemy doesn't knock out those very few missiles or else you might feel the need to "launch on warning" USE instead of LOSE your Missiles. But the risk is that your radar scopes shows Russian missiles incoming (which may be system or operator error thus eventually turning out NOT to have been Russian missiles incoming ) and You launched on warning when the warning was false ... Oops!! Also if you sneakily launch a few missiles with lots of warheads, you could quickly saturate Russian C3 sites in a potential decapitation strike. (But these days SLBM MIRV / MARV with depressed trajectory launches are closer to targets and faster to hit - reducing reaction time. Also - A neat factoid is that the MX was a COLD Launch ICMB (First for the USA) Atlas, Titan & Minuteman ICBMs would Hot Launch & thus burn out the interior of the silo so you couldn't just quickly throw another new missile in the old silo after launching. I'm sure LimaXray will have more / better insight. Bigger_Hammer The silo-based version of Atlas had to be raised to the surface for launch. Same with Titan I. |
|
Quoted: I’m curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. I’m curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. With the current crop of leftists in all 4 branches of government, the 4th being the massive bureaucracy branch? Not fucking likely. In fact they are more than likely helping China and even Russia expand and better their arsenals. |
|
Quoted: I'm curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Me too. And the Columbia class SSBN starting construction has less tubes than Ohio, carries less warheads. I don't get it, seems like we need more missiles and warheads not less given that China is not party to any of the treaties, let alone the Russians violating them. You know, peace through strength. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. I'm curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. What's the X37 doing up there? Those scientific experiments sure take a long time. It sometimes just flies around up there for two years, just doing experiments. |
|
Quoted: What if we didn't stop playing? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/1616603739161-1878312.png View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Some people in congress are starting to wake up to the fact that the arms race of the Cold War didn't really stop, we just stopped playing. It's time to stop kicking the can down the road. There will be no can left at some point. It will depend on whether congress funds replacement delivery systems appropriately and whether NNSA successfully re-establishes pit production. What if we didn't stop playing? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/1616603739161-1878312.png |
|
Quoted: Then I want to live in that time line cuz this one sucks View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Some people in congress are starting to wake up to the fact that the arms race of the Cold War didn't really stop, we just stopped playing. It's time to stop kicking the can down the road. There will be no can left at some point. It will depend on whether congress funds replacement delivery systems appropriately and whether NNSA successfully re-establishes pit production. What if we didn't stop playing? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/1616603739161-1878312.png We tend to see the advances in military tech during or after the conflict |
|
Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg View Quote Actually a mix of 12As and 21s. Good solution to the "all the eggs in one basket" problem of having only one for the entire force, and after all, we had all these Peacekeeper RVs just laying around.... |
|
Quoted: Actually a mix of 12As and 21s. Good solution to the "all the eggs in one basket" problem of having only one for the entire force, and after all, we had all these Peacekeeper RVs just laying around.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg Actually a mix of 12As and 21s. Good solution to the "all the eggs in one basket" problem of having only one for the entire force, and after all, we had all these Peacekeeper RVs just laying around.... I'm really curious what our arsenal would like with no treaties. Probably something crazy like a mix of tactical nukes and just country destroying 900kt warheads on a missile with like 24 MIRVs |
|
Hardtack Teak outer space detonation
Scientists scramble from the detonation of Hardtack TEAK. Teak was a 3.8 Megaton nuclear test detonated on August 1, 1958 nearly 50 miles above the earth and launched from Johnston Island aboard a Redstone rocket. Hardtack Teak outer space detonation Attached File |
|
Quoted: Some people in congress are starting to wake up to the fact that the arms race of the Cold War didn't really stop, we just stopped playing. It's time to stop kicking the can down the road. There will be no can left at some point. It will depend on whether congress funds replacement delivery systems appropriately and whether NNSA successfully re-establishes pit production. View Quote We also desperately need to resume nuclear testing (especially of Livermore designed warheads...) |
|
|
1946 atomic bomb test operation crossroads
HD 1946 atomic bomb test operation crossroads Able shot in color Attached File |
|
|
|
I always enjoy these threads. I didn't get the chance to work on the big missiles, only bombs and small missiles, thus staying out of it. Truly amazing science, engineering and technology.
|
|
Quoted: What if we didn't stop playing? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/1616603739161-1878312.png View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: What if we didn't stop playing? https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/425212/1616603739161-1878312.png Quoted: We tend to see the advances in military tech during or after the conflict That doesn't scale to nukes. It's like being tied down by ant using a thousand tiny threads all while they advance their own science. Disgusting. Quoted: Actually a mix of 12As and 21s. Good solution to the "all the eggs in one basket" problem of having only one for the entire force, and after all, we had all these Peacekeeper RVs just laying around.... I think a mix is smart. I hope it extends to the innards, so that a common failure doesn't red tag the entire triad, which has been very alarming considering the discussion of the common warhead concept. Quoted: Sucks to be the only ones in the world that abide by our treaties. yes it does! It's like leaving a game of tetris playing only to come back and realize how badly you've fucked yourself. Quoted: We also desperately need to resume nuclear testing (especially of Livermore designed warheads...) Fuck yes we (they, not me. I would, but they don't let stupids near the interesting things) do. I actually wrote President Trump about this. I said that if he did an AGT on a single system, it would zero out our National debt. (Just the PPV rights alone.) Everyone would be happy. People like me could witness it. People that need to be reminded what they can do could witness it. People that hate them would finally have something real and tangible to go protest over, and not imagined or long-ago wrongs. Branding, merchandising, gambling? yuuuuuge Quoted: I can't comment on that but I'd love to hear why you say that about the LLNL designs Why can't you? You didn't ask me, but my reading tends to make me believe that LANL is the cult of 'round is beautiful' to the point that oranges could not be left out on desks, while all the risky, edge-of-the-margin stuff came out of LLNL. I believe LANL invested more time in perfecting the wheel than re-inventing it. I think neither shop would fare well in a real shootoff if a new design was authorized. It's been too long, and I have trouble believing there's anybody left with that 50's spark of genius, just a generation raised in the safety and conservative design culture. I would love to see some new designs. Look at all the advances in materials science and computer guessery. The body of knowledge on shock physics alone, much less energy transfer for inertial confinement fusion... it's been around 30 years since the current designs were finalized. What could the sharpest tools in the kitchen come up with? What designs are languishing in a VTR somewhere that could be more robust and safer for the people that have to work with them but still meet criteria for their delivery vehicles? Plus they could finally clear the air on some of the pit processing techniques. I still believe the Rocky Flats use of old-world wrought techniques were superior to casting to near-net shapes, but looking at how current aerospace products are created, I wonder what's possible now. Quoted: I always enjoy these threads. I didn't get the chance to work on the big missiles, only bombs and small missiles, thus staying out of it. Truly amazing science, engineering and technology. Thank you for your efforts, just the same! I hate how those career fields got folded in due to politics. Quoted: Trainer SDU keying variable. Used to encrypt/decrypt comms between LF and LCC. Ah, ok. I just like watching my friends who used to have clearances start to twitch when they read the first line. I share your enthusiasm! |
|
Quoted: Why can't you? You didn't ask me, but my reading tends to make me believe that LANL is the cult of 'round is beautiful' to the point that oranges could not be left out on desks, while all the risky, edge-of-the-margin stuff came out of LLNL. I believe LANL invested more time in perfecting the wheel than re-inventing it. I think neither shop would fare well in a real shootoff if a new design was authorized. It's been too long, and I have trouble believing there's anybody left with that 50's spark of genius, just a generation raised in the safety and conservative design culture. I would love to see some new designs. Look at all the advances in materials science and computer guessery. The body of knowledge on shock physics alone, much less energy transfer for inertial confinement fusion... it's been around 30 years since the current designs were finalized. What could the sharpest tools in the kitchen come up with? What designs are languishing in a VTR somewhere that could be more robust and safer for the people that have to work with them but still meet criteria for their delivery vehicles? Plus they could finally clear the air on some of the pit processing techniques. I still believe the Rocky Flats use of old-world wrought techniques were superior to casting to near-net shapes, but looking at how current aerospace products are created, I wonder what's possible now. View Quote |
|
Quoted: Because I like my clearance and would like to keep it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Fair enough. The W93 has been authorized and consumes a lot of our time. I expect that funding will likely continue and if the R's take congress might get appropriate funding. I didn't think this one made it out of Phase I? A lot of the old guys say the guards at Rocky should have followed the verbiage on the signs when the FBI rolled up. Probably also not a great idea to leave rad waste in cardboard boxes outside for a few years. I've read a lot of the books written by the people there on all the sides. I wouldn't have wanted to be on either side of that exchange. Far as RW, I've read about stupider things. A lot of shit blew across the fence at Mound before they figured it out, too. K25 had its' issues, too. Y12 had days where a river of mercury would flow out the south doors. Then, there's Burlington, where they assembled weapons for years, but no one seems to know it. |
|
Quoted: Fair enough. I didn't think this one made it out of Phase I? I've read a lot of the books written by the people there on all the sides. I wouldn't have wanted to be on either side of that exchange. Far as RW, I've read about stupider things. A lot of shit blew across the fence at Mound before they figured it out, too. K25 had its' issues, too. Y12 had days where a river of mercury would flow out the south doors. Then, there's Burlington, where they assembled weapons for years, but no one seems to know it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Because I like my clearance and would like to keep it. Fair enough. The W93 has been authorized and consumes a lot of our time. I expect that funding will likely continue and if the R's take congress might get appropriate funding. I didn't think this one made it out of Phase I? A lot of the old guys say the guards at Rocky should have followed the verbiage on the signs when the FBI rolled up. Probably also not a great idea to leave rad waste in cardboard boxes outside for a few years. I've read a lot of the books written by the people there on all the sides. I wouldn't have wanted to be on either side of that exchange. Far as RW, I've read about stupider things. A lot of shit blew across the fence at Mound before they figured it out, too. K25 had its' issues, too. Y12 had days where a river of mercury would flow out the south doors. Then, there's Burlington, where they assembled weapons for years, but no one seems to know it. |
|
How is it going to get past that without changing a lot of legal stuff?
Can't develop a novel NEP, so it will have to be a warmed-over previous design, with newer components. (Needs to be a new design from the inside out) |
|
Quoted: How is it going to get past that without changing a lot of legal stuff? Can't develop a novel NEP, so it will have to be a warmed-over previous design, with newer components. (Needs to be a new design from the inside out) View Quote |
|
Quoted: What are the big watermelon shaped structures? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: This is now a gratuitous missile porn thread. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/mmlcc3_jpg-2543170.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/Minuteman-2_jpg-2543171.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/EzcHBExX0AIA7DS_jpg-2543173.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/090108-F-1234P-015_jpg-2543178.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/30315/MAFpict_jpg-2543181.JPG What are the big watermelon shaped structures? Recipe storage. |
|
Quoted: Me too. And the Columbia class SSBN starting construction has less tubes than Ohio, carries less warheads. I don't get it, seems like we need more missiles and warheads not less given that China is not party to any of the treaties, let alone the Russians violating them. You know, peace through strength. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: What our current ICBM looks like. W87 warhead, Blast yield: 300 kt (W87-0) 475 kt (W87-1) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3GAIvtX0AAf0Os.jpg:large http://nuclearactive.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/JuneACT2020Warhead.jpg currently we field both W78's (LANL) and W87's (LLNL) on minuteman III's. I'm curious if the US gov is going to re-eval force structure given that China is working on deploying 3,000 strategic warheads, and Russia actively deploying new delivery systems and violating existing treaty commitments. Just because Ohio class has 24 tubes doesn't mean they're all loaded with war shots. Treaty limitations and target packages determine the loadout. Some of those tubes probably have ballast cans in them. Someone determined that Columbia can do the mission with 8 less tubes per hull. That saves on maintenance and logistics for unneeded tubes. The 41 for Freedom boats only had 16 tubes. |
|
Quoted: There are two things that I have trouble comprehending. In the grand scale of the universe they're small things, but for some reason they cause my mind to lock up. A small warhead like the This https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-682d1e449cb16aef4d564820fdd845be.webp [size=6] View Quote I'm assuming that's a trainer. Otherwise their adherence to the Two Man Rule sucks. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.