Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/7/2003 9:00:53 AM EDT
Is it just me, or does anyone else out there have a problem with the titles politicians have taken upon themselves?  Terms such as, “The Honorable _________”, or, His/Her Honor”, or “The Esteemed or Distinguished Gentleman/Lady”?  I do, and I don’t care about the tradition behind the practice.  I refuse to participate.  When I write my elected representatives, I refer to them as such, and nothing more.  I even balk at the term, elected “leaders”.  They do not lead.  They should be following the constituency that sent them.  These people have been dispatched to do OUR will.  They work for us.  We are not their subjects.

I understand that it is necessary to be polite.  My parents raised (at least they tried   [;D] ) me well.  But I will never bow my head, or bend my knee before a government official.  The above terms are too close to the titles worn by kings, queens, and the self proclaimed aristocracies of history.  These would-be “nobles” populating our current government can kiss my ass.
3/7/2003 9:02:21 AM EDT
[#1]
You monkey, I curse your mustache!

Have you seen parliments in Australia, England, and best of all Taiwan? They're wild.
3/7/2003 9:02:58 AM EDT
[#2]
PS: Nice signature line diverdown!
3/7/2003 9:03:56 AM EDT
[#3]
I'm with you.  I have no problem with calling the President sir, or Mr. President.  But all these other senators and judges should realize they are not gods.  The only reason they are in the position they are in is because they were ELECTED into office.
3/7/2003 9:07:49 AM EDT
[#4]
Also, the annoying habit of referring to ex-elected officials by their elected title, such as "Atorney General".
Smacks of "titles of Nobility" prohibited by the Constitution.

The worst one: [b]Esquire[/b].

A simple "Mr." or "Ms." will do just fine.
3/7/2003 9:08:22 AM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
PS: Nice signature line diverdown!
View Quote



Aw shucks..thanks.   [:I]