Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/23/2015 2:01:49 PM EDT
I work in IT. I have been spoiled by Broadband for as long as I can remember. I currently have Charter 60/5 service and its great.

However, I really want to move out of town and that would mean my only option is Hughesnet.  At first, I thought no DSL or Cable would be a complete dealbreaker for me, but I'm starting to warm up to the idea of satellite.. pending some reviews and feedback of course.

I know 10 years ago, it was pretty poor. Anyone using their "Gen4" service? They are advertising 5mb down/1mb up  with 10Gbs total bandwidth per month for $60...

I don't use a lot of streaming services (Netflix, etc) because I have a NAS with most of my media content. I could also do large downloads at work to keep my data cap in check.

I'm mostly looking for feedback on general usability surfing/loading complex webpages, YouTube, Pr0n, etc.
12/23/2015 2:13:30 PM EDT
[#1]
You could check DSLreports.com or another site like that .   They have good feedbacks by actual users and a large forum section.
12/23/2015 2:18:34 PM EDT
[#2]
Any WISPs in your area?

Not sure about how up to date this is: http://www.wispdirectory.com/
12/23/2015 2:18:58 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
I work in IT. I have been spoiled by Broadband for as long as I can remember. I currently have Charter 60/5 service and its great.

However, I really want to move out of town and that would mean my only option is Hughesnet.  At first, I thought no DSL or Cable would be a complete dealbreaker for me, but I'm starting to warm up to the idea of satellite.. pending some reviews and feedback of course.

I know 10 years ago, it was pretty poor. Anyone using their "Gen4" service? They are advertising 5mb down/1mb up  with 10Gbs total bandwidth per month for $60...

I don't use a lot of streaming services (Netflix, etc) because I have a NAS with most of my media content. I could also do large downloads at work to keep my data cap in check.

I'm mostly looking for feedback on general usability surfing/loading complex webpages, YouTube, Pr0n, etc.
View Quote


12/23/2015 2:19:25 PM EDT
[#4]
My internet is faster and so is my bike!
12/23/2015 2:20:11 PM EDT
[#5]
I used it at a part time job I used to have.  It was absolutely horrible.  On an overcast day it was almost useless.  
12/23/2015 2:20:49 PM EDT
[#6]
Youtube will kill it pretty quick.

Funny how you say you don't use streaming services then talk about youtube and pr0n.


Anyways, it hasn't changed much. The speed may have improved but the latency will still be horrid.

Look into tethering.
12/23/2015 2:23:01 PM EDT
[#7]
I am sending you this reply on it.  It's like every other satellite service.  They suck in a hard rain, or thick overcast.  If you have to have a technician come out because their equipment fucks up, they like to charge
12/23/2015 2:25:02 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote History
Quoted:

Funny how you say you don't use streaming services then talk about youtube and pr0n.

View Quote



I guess I should clarify I don't use Netflix much. I know some friends that are running 50Gbs a month just thru Netflix. I'm well aware of the relationship between streaming video and bandwidth.
12/23/2015 2:26:57 PM EDT
[#9]
How about using your cell service? I know a lot of places where I live do not have access to high speed but can still get LTE.
12/23/2015 2:29:13 PM EDT
[#10]
In for the education.
It won't support VOIP yet will it?
You might look into wireless service I have had good luck with that.
12/23/2015 2:31:07 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote History
Quoted:
I used it at a part time job I used to have.  It was absolutely horrible.  On an overcast day it was almost useless.  
View Quote


You're system wasn't pointed right, then. It takes a good thunderstorm to lose signal it it's set up right.
12/23/2015 2:51:07 PM EDT
[#12]
My mom has it at her place. Service is good for email, Facebook and surfing. If you let YouTube buffer long enough you can watch a movie. Ping response time range from 500-1220ms.

Speeds down can be good...but typically are in the 256kb range.
12/23/2015 3:03:43 PM EDT
[#13]
I had their service for about 7 years.

First, let me say that it is impressive that something like this even works. The idea that you are bouncing a terrestrial based signal off of a geosynchronous satellite for your internet service is pretty cool.

I only had outages during heavy thunderstorms or snow storms, and even then they were temporary.

Like what has been said before... the latency will kill you.  I had a 1.6mb connection, and I never got that, so don't expect to get what they sell you.  Even if I did get the full 1.6mb speed, you are still looking at about 1500m/s to get the signal up to the satellite and then back down to the internet.  Then you have to wait for the return trip.  As a someone who is also in the software engineering field/IT work, this will drive you nuts.  I just had to remind myself that I could shoot from any window in my house in any direction, and that was the price for that luxury.

The real killer is that HughesNet uses a proprietary form of NAT, so you can forget about any port forwarding. This wasn't really disclosed when I got the service, but it wouldn't have mattered, because LTE wireless didn't really exist yet. I was also never really able to get Youtube to work with the service, and forget about Netflix or VoIP. It will not work.

We have since dumped HughesNet for an LTE based service where I am getting about 22mb based on speed tests.  A local WISP is the best option, but we don't have one here.
12/23/2015 3:10:41 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote History
Quoted:
I had their service for about 7 years.

First, let me say that it is impressive that something like this even works. The idea that you are bouncing a terrestrial based signal off of a geosynchronous satellite for your internet service is pretty cool.

I only had outages during heavy thunderstorms or snow storms, and even then they were temporary.

Like what has been said before... the latency will kill you.  I had a 1.6mb connection, and I never got that, so don't expect to get what they sell you.  Even if I did get the full 1.6mb speed, you are still looking at about 1500m/s to get the signal up to the satellite and then back down to the internet.  Then you have to wait for the return trip.  As a someone who is also in the software engineering field/IT work, this will drive you nuts.  I just had to remind myself that I could shoot from any window in my house in any direction, and that was the price for that luxury.

The real killer is that HughesNet uses a proprietary form of NAT, so you can forget about any port forwarding. This wasn't really disclosed when I got the service, but it wouldn't have mattered, because LTE wireless didn't really exist yet. I was also never really able to get Youtube to work with the service, and forget about Netflix or VoIP. It will not work.

We have since dumped HughesNet for an LTE based service where I am getting about 22mb based on speed tests.  A local WISP is the best option, but we don't have one here.
View Quote



Good post. Thank you.

Unfortunately, a cellular option isn't in the cards either. There is basic cell service, but no 3G/4G.
12/23/2015 3:11:18 PM EDT
[#15]
My uncle has it on the family farm.  Ok for checking email and static websites, but otherwise sucks.

If horrid latency meaning no gaming or remote control (work usage?), and limited data caps (unless you are up at 2am-5am ish) are ok, then it might work for you.

Any flash/html5 video will kill your data cap.
12/23/2015 3:16:39 PM EDT
[#16]


I actually had Gen 4 for the last 3 years. In all honesty for two people who use the internet it wasn't all that bad. However, Netfilx would buffer constantly and the picture quality sucked. I just switched to broadband and have no issues at all.

FYI, if you HAVE to go with Gen 4, I suggest buying your dish outright. I did and after 2 years there isn't a cancelation fee. I think the dish was 200 bucks outright or 50 a month. Kind of a no brainer.
12/23/2015 3:18:37 PM EDT
[#17]
DO NOT order HughesNet.  Order Exede; it's actually pretty good.  Only issue is ~ 2000ms lag, but that's par for the course with satellite internet.
12/23/2015 3:24:53 PM EDT
[#18]

Quote History
Quoted:
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

I work in IT. I have been spoiled by Broadband for as long as I can remember. I currently have Charter 60/5 service and its great.



However, I really want to move out of town and that would mean my only option is Hughesnet.  At first, I thought no DSL or Cable would be a complete dealbreaker for me, but I'm starting to warm up to the idea of satellite.. pending some reviews and feedback of course.



I know 10 years ago, it was pretty poor. Anyone using their "Gen4" service? They are advertising 5mb down/1mb up  with 10Gbs total bandwidth per month for $60...



I don't use a lot of streaming services (Netflix, etc) because I have a NAS with most of my media content. I could also do large downloads at work to keep my data cap in check.



I'm mostly looking for feedback on general usability surfing/loading complex webpages, YouTube, Pr0n, etc.




It sucks

 



When I had it you had 1 gb a day and if you went over you were throttled for 24 hrs to dialup speed




It sucks




Did I mention it sucks, I would rather jerk of with sandpaper than use

Hughes net again.




I would literally sell my barrett to have a T-1 installed and get a second job

To pay for it, over dealing with Hughes et and their incompetent

Tech support
12/23/2015 3:27:47 PM EDT
[#19]
It's utter rubbish in my area.  I have not met one happy customer when I moved here so I ignored the 2x a month Hughes mailer to sign up.
12/23/2015 3:32:07 PM EDT
[#20]
I would check with the wireless companies that provide service to the oil fields.
I had high speed up and down and low latency for $60.
I had to pay for the directional antenna on a pole that had line of site to a tower 22 miles away but it worked great.
12/23/2015 4:20:08 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote History
Quoted:

Did I mention it sucks, I would rather jerk of with sandpaper than use
Hughes net again.


I would literally sell my barrett to have a T-1 installed and get a second job
To pay for it, over dealing with Hughes et and their incompetent
Tech support
View Quote



Damn... this was kind of my take when I first started humoring the idea...  
12/23/2015 4:30:16 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote History
Quoted:


You're system wasn't pointed right, then. It takes a good thunderstorm to lose signal it it's set up right.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I used it at a part time job I used to have.  It was absolutely horrible.  On an overcast day it was almost useless.  


You're system wasn't pointed right, then. It takes a good thunderstorm to lose signal it it's set up right.

Sat blows compared to the DSL we have now, but it took a lot to make it lose the signal. We've actually had more reliability problems with our DSL.