Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 11
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:35:12 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Boeing DEI really paying off again.
View Quote

Starliner Teammates Reflect on Their Journey to Upcoming Crew Flight Test

Nah, @The_Like_Button Boeing has hired the BEST!
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:39:32 AM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/28/boeing-nasa-delays-starliner-further.html
...they need to test the thrusters on the ground to figure out how to get the astronauts back safely...
NASA and Boeing
are further extending the first Starliner crewed flight but are not yet setting a new target date for returning the capsule to Earth, the organizations announced on Friday.

Boeing’s Starliner capsule “Calypso” will stay at the International Space Station into next month while the company and NASA conduct new testing back on the ground. Boeing’s crew flight test represents the first time Starliner is carrying people, flying NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams.

Officials say the Starliner team is starting a test campaign of the spacecraft’s thruster technology at White Sands, New Mexico – testing that will be completed before Starliner returns to Earth.
View Quote



Oof. Spaceship named “Calypso” who strands crew on ISS …

Per wiki… In Greek mythology, Calypso (/k?'l?pso?/; Greek: ?a???? 'she who conceals')[1] was a nymph who lived on the island of Ogygia, where, according to Homer's Odyssey, she detained Odysseus for seven years. She promised Odysseus immortality if he would stay with her, but Odysseus preferred to return home.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:43:42 AM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you are stuck on Gilligan's Island with Mary Ann and Ginger are you stranded or lucky?

Sunita is not MaryAnn.  
https://www.livemint.com/lm-img/img/2024/06/27/600x338/AP05-07-2024-000131B-0_1719507438080_1719507491215.jpg


Don’t mistake Boeing’s incompetence with her qualifications. The lady is a badass.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:43:53 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That happens when you book Spirit Starlines.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
That happens when you book Spirit Starlines.

Quoted:
More like South West ??

"Space, the final Frontier..."
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:46:55 AM EST
[#5]
They aren't stranded. Musk could go get them tomorrow in a Dragon. But Nasa and Boeing can't allow those optics.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:46:56 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Don’t mistake Boeing’s incompetence with her qualifications. The lady is a badass.
View Quote

Fact

She has been a steadfast and effective astronaut for many years. She was not a DEI hire.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:48:11 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They aren't stranded. Musk could go get them tomorrow in a Dragon. But Nasa and Boeing can't allow those optics.
View Quote

Boeing and NASA will most likely have to allow those optics to get them home.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 7:50:01 AM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Boeing and NASA's DEI really paying off again.
View Quote



FIFY


Link Posted: 7/1/2024 8:23:20 AM EST
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Don’t mistake Boeing’s incompetence with her qualifications. The lady is a badass.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:

If you are stuck on Gilligan's Island with Mary Ann and Ginger are you stranded or lucky?

Sunita is not MaryAnn.  
https://www.livemint.com/lm-img/img/2024/06/27/600x338/AP05-07-2024-000131B-0_1719507438080_1719507491215.jpg


Don’t mistake Boeing’s incompetence with her qualifications. The lady is a badass.


One of the problems when you start to DEI hire is that the competent hires who are in the DEI group hires get lumped into the same classification as the incompetent hires. Had a VG boss who happened to be Black who had issues with that himself. He felt it was an insult but also understood, because he had to work with DEI incompetents himself, why others initially felt that way.

God help you if you are a competent minority because the company will ask/beg you to join their DEI teams to push and recruit non competent minorities you know aren't good hires for a position and so will activist minority groups that have sprung up in each little DEI group a company hires. Gays, women, minorities of color, and so on.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 8:27:15 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I am familiar with the F16 EPU which doesn’t carry an oxidizer. I thought the RCS systems were similar.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Hypergolic is two chemicals - a fuel and an oxidizer.  They spontaneously ignite on a catalyst and require no ignition system.  

Hydrazine and other such fuels are often used on earth by reacting them with ambient air.  On a spacecraft you have to carry your oxidizer with you.  

I am familiar with the F16 EPU which doesn’t carry an oxidizer. I thought the RCS systems were similar.


Not always so kinda yes and no.
Shuttle APUs had a catalyst bed on that ignited N2H4 and the RCS/OMS used MMH and N2O4.
Orion CM uses N2H4 and a catalyst ignition thruster (no OX propellant) and the Orion SM uses MMH and N2O4 in the thrusters.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 8:48:16 AM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Boeing and NASA will most likely have to allow those optics to get them home.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
They aren't stranded. Musk could go get them tomorrow in a Dragon. But Nasa and Boeing can't allow those optics.

Boeing and NASA will most likely have to allow those optics to get them home.


NASA can bring them home on Starliner at any convenient time -  the results of testing so far have made them confident that it will be fine for de-orbit and reentry.  The vast majority of the testing/troubleshooting being done is to isolate the problem well enough that they can fix the problem so that it doesn't occur on future service modules.  Whether Boeing should build any more is a different question, of course, and one which will have to be answered.

Mike
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 8:59:36 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


One of the problems when you start to DEI hire is that the competent hires who are in the DEI group hires get lumped into the same classification as the incompetent hires. Had a VG boss who happened to be Black who had issues with that himself. He felt it was an insult but also understood, because he had to work with DEI incompetents himself, why others initially felt that way.

God help you if you are a competent minority because the company will ask/beg you to join their DEI teams to push and recruit non competent minorities you know aren't good hires for a position and so will activist minority groups that have sprung up in each little DEI group a company hires. Gays, women, minorities of color, and so on.
View Quote


Just because someone is competent doesn't mean they weren't hired ahead of more competent applicants due to DEI/affirmative action. That is also a problem with DEI, that the actually competent ones may not realize that they are still there only due to DEI/affirmative action policy and not free competition of applicants.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 9:48:42 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


NASA can bring them home on Starliner at any convenient time -  the results of testing so far have made them confident that it will be fine for de-orbit and reentry.  The vast majority of the testing/troubleshooting being done is to isolate the problem well enough that they can fix the problem so that it doesn't occur on future service modules.  Whether Boeing should build any more is a different question, of course, and one which will have to be answered.

Mike
View Quote


Sounds like a good "story" to buy time, maybe true, maybe not. I don't trust Boeing or NASA.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 10:01:39 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


NASA can bring them home on Starliner at any convenient time -  the results of testing so far have made them confident that it will be fine for de-orbit and reentry.  The vast majority of the testing/troubleshooting being done is to isolate the problem well enough that they can fix the problem so that it doesn't occur on future service modules.  Whether Boeing should build any more is a different question, of course, and one which will have to be answered.

Mike
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They aren't stranded. Musk could go get them tomorrow in a Dragon. But Nasa and Boeing can't allow those optics.

Boeing and NASA will most likely have to allow those optics to get them home.


NASA can bring them home on Starliner at any convenient time -  the results of testing so far have made them confident that it will be fine for de-orbit and reentry.  The vast majority of the testing/troubleshooting being done is to isolate the problem well enough that they can fix the problem so that it doesn't occur on future service modules.  Whether Boeing should build any more is a different question, of course, and one which will have to be answered.

Mike
Do they have to be in the ship when it comes back? If Starliner has to stay docked until Nasa and Boeing are done with their tests, why not go ahead and send a Dragon for them? Is there only one dock or something?
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 10:13:19 AM EST
[#15]
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 10:18:02 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Do they have to be in the ship when it comes back? If Starliner has to stay docked until Nasa and Boeing are done with their tests, why not go ahead and send a Dragon for them? Is there only one dock or something?
View Quote


SpaceX doesn’t have a Dragon ready to go.

According the NASA, there are 6 docked at the ISS currently, that includes the Boeing pos.

There are six docks total, so the ISS is full. I get the impression that some docks can only work with certain spacecraft.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 10:19:07 AM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


NASA can bring them home on Starliner at any convenient time -  the results of testing so far have made them confident that it will be fine for de-orbit and reentry.  The vast majority of the testing/troubleshooting being done is to isolate the problem well enough that they can fix the problem so that it doesn't occur on future service modules.  Whether Boeing should build any more is a different question, of course, and one which will have to be answered.

Mike
View Quote
If they were confident, the craft would be home already. The fact that they are delaying for unplanned, extra tests, shows they are anything but confident.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 11:32:51 AM EST
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Orion CM uses N2H4 and a catalyst ignition thruster (no OX propellant) and the Orion SM uses MMH and N2O4 in the thrusters.
View Quote

Interesting, I had to go googling for more info and discovered this is correct - monopropellant on the crew module.  
The service module (where the leaks and "thruster problem" are) uses fuel/oxidizer and does all the maneuvering until it is jettisoned prior to reentry.  The crew module thrusters are (obviously) tiny and only used to maintain attitude during reentry, so monopropellant is very feasible for them.  
The service module can carry adequate helium/fuel to reach lunar orbit.  Assuming it was launched with a full load of fuel/helium any leaks large enough to compromise an earth orbiting mission would have to be massive.  

Found info online that says:
The helium leaks are in the service module plumbing/manifolding, so that 395psi/min leak rate is presumably for a small volume of plumbing, not from the supply tanks.  
The thruster concern is related to a service module oxidizer isolation valve that is not reporting that it is closed when it is commanded to close.  

One aspect I didn't consider is that the service module will be jettisoned and burn up - so you can't examine it after flight to determine what caused a problem.  Found some info online that they are disassembling the next service module and inspecting for any clues as to the source of the leak(defective parts, bad assembly procedures, incorrect execution of procedures, etc).  If there is any chance of getting more details about the problem then delaying the return is probably worthwhile.  

Significantly, news says that NASA has begun stating that starliner is not "stranded" over the weekend so they are at least aware of the public perception.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 11:43:11 AM EST
[#19]
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 12:01:09 PM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Ya just can't yeet that bitch.  The damn thing could hit the ISS as the orbits cross back and forth.  It has to carefully back away, lower the orbit and then conduct the reentry burns.  There is a huge zone around the ISS that all craft much execute actions perfectly before they are allowed within it and they have to be functioning perfectly to be released.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Do they still have that fancy arm on the ISS? Use that and launch the hunk of crap away from the station and let it burn up. The lightshow is about the only thing that capsule is good for at this point.

Ya just can't yeet that bitch.  The damn thing could hit the ISS as the orbits cross back and forth.  It has to carefully back away, lower the orbit and then conduct the reentry burns.  There is a huge zone around the ISS that all craft much execute actions perfectly before they are allowed within it and they have to be functioning perfectly to be released.

The ISS yeets things all the time.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 12:03:27 PM EST
[#21]
if it's Boeing, you're not going
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 12:49:49 PM EST
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The ISS yeets things all the time.
View Quote

Not capsules
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 1:21:11 PM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Intentionally reporting leak rate as psi/minute is incompetence.  A reporter writing that indicates "not competent to report".

The leaks should be reported as pounds-mass per minute, or seconds, or hours.  And not constant without pumping something into the tanks to maintain pressure.
View Quote

We already covered this a week or two ago.  The consensus was that the pressure was from a sensor somewhere in the plumbing.  This was backed up by the reporting that the subsequent leaks were discovered after they closed isolation valves and the plumbing system began to lose pressure.  Presumably they calculated the volume of the plumbing (if they didn't already know) so that they could translate the pressure rate into a mass rate to make the information useful.

It's not like the media is directly interviewing engineers - the information is passed on by multiple people: from engineers to managers to PR people to the media.  
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 1:31:20 PM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Suits are not compatible.

If I were Musk, a team would have already been tasked to contact Boeing for enough interface requirements to design and build modified seats, and when Boeing balks due to IP, contact NASA for the information since it belongs to the tax payers.


View Quote


Not having a coming spacesuit Interface seems like a wasted opportunity for additional safety.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 1:53:04 PM EST
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

We already covered this a week or two ago.  The consensus was that the pressure was from a sensor somewhere in the plumbing.  This was backed up by the reporting that the subsequent leaks were discovered after they closed isolation valves and the plumbing system began to lose pressure.  Presumably they calculated the volume of the plumbing (if they didn't already know) so that they could translate the pressure rate into a mass rate to make the information useful.

It's not like the media is directly interviewing engineers - the information is passed on by multiple people: from engineers to managers to PR people to the media.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Intentionally reporting leak rate as psi/minute is incompetence.  A reporter writing that indicates "not competent to report".

The leaks should be reported as pounds-mass per minute, or seconds, or hours.  And not constant without pumping something into the tanks to maintain pressure.

We already covered this a week or two ago.  The consensus was that the pressure was from a sensor somewhere in the plumbing.  This was backed up by the reporting that the subsequent leaks were discovered after they closed isolation valves and the plumbing system began to lose pressure.  Presumably they calculated the volume of the plumbing (if they didn't already know) so that they could translate the pressure rate into a mass rate to make the information useful.

It's not like the media is directly interviewing engineers - the information is passed on by multiple people: from engineers to managers to PR people to the media.  
Actually I think it's something else. Someone in this thread mentioned that there was a lower limit to the pressure that was needed to reliably push propellant and oxidizer to the thrusters against the chamber pressure. If the total system pressure drops too low, then the back-pressure would keep the thruster from firing.
So in this case, it's not a leak concerning volume, it's a leak concerning pressure. The two are related of course, but they are more interested in how much pressure is reaching the end of the pipe.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 2:42:57 PM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Not having a coming spacesuit Interface seems like a wasted opportunity for additional safety.
View Quote



Not when NASA and the Feds hate everything Musk stands for. They’ll put lives at unneeded risk to give him the finger.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 2:50:16 PM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Not when NASA and the Feds hate everything Musk stands for. They’ll put lives at unneeded risk to give him the finger.
View Quote


NASA just awarded SpaceX the contract to build them the de-orbit vehicle for the ISS.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 2:59:20 PM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

NASA just awarded SpaceX the contract to build them the de-orbit vehicle for the ISS.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not when NASA and the Feds hate everything Musk stands for. They’ll put lives at unneeded risk to give him the finger.

NASA just awarded SpaceX the contract to build them the de-orbit vehicle for the ISS.


SpaceX has also had the contract to build the new lunar lander for years now.

And to launch Europa Clipper. And a pile of other stuff.

I don't know how much friction there is between NASA and SpaceX but they have been working together for years and will continue to work together for the foreseeable future. If they were forced to divorce for some, probably stupid political reason it would hurt both entities badly. But it would probably hurt NASA worse than SpaceX.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:05:54 PM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Suits are not compatible.

If I were Musk, a team would have already been tasked to contact Boeing for enough interface requirements to design and build modified seats, and when Boeing balks due to IP, contact NASA for the information since it belongs to the tax payers.


View Quote

Incorrect. The starliner does not belong to the taxpayer anymore than the seat you ride in on Delta belongs to you. NASA is just paying for a ride.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:07:32 PM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Not capsules
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The ISS yeets things all the time.

Not capsules

True. But they yeeted a pallet of batteries so the point stands that they could just yeet starliner.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:09:43 PM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Someone in this thread mentioned that there was a lower limit to the pressure that was needed to reliably push propellant and oxidizer to the thrusters against the chamber pressure.
So in this case, it's not a leak concerning volume, it's a leak concerning pressure.
View Quote

That was me and that was clearly labelled as me speculating.  Helium is always a gas at the pressures we are talking about(that's why it's used) so if you lose 1/2 the mass of gas you have 1/2 the pressure.
From the reporting that is out there, the leak is in the plumbing and the tanks themselves are not leaking when the valves are closed.  

Surely there is some concern, but absent more details we can only speculate about what their concerns are.  

You don't test fire engines of a spaceship while it is in orbit and make it wait until your testing is complete before you give a greenlight for it to return - you do that before the spaceship takes off.  So they are clearly concerned about something.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:16:38 PM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

That was me and that was clearly labelled as me speculating.  Helium is always a gas at the pressures we are talking about(that's why it's used) so if you lose 1/2 the mass of gas you have 1/2 the pressure.
From the reporting that is out there, the leak is in the plumbing and the tanks themselves are not leaking when the valves are closed.  

Surely there is some concern, but absent more details we can only speculate about what their concerns are.  

You don't test fire engines of a spaceship while it is in orbit and make it wait until your testing is complete before you give a greenlight for it to return - you do that before the spaceship takes off.  So they are clearly concerned about something.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Someone in this thread mentioned that there was a lower limit to the pressure that was needed to reliably push propellant and oxidizer to the thrusters against the chamber pressure.
So in this case, it's not a leak concerning volume, it's a leak concerning pressure.

That was me and that was clearly labelled as me speculating.  Helium is always a gas at the pressures we are talking about(that's why it's used) so if you lose 1/2 the mass of gas you have 1/2 the pressure.
From the reporting that is out there, the leak is in the plumbing and the tanks themselves are not leaking when the valves are closed.  

Surely there is some concern, but absent more details we can only speculate about what their concerns are.  

You don't test fire engines of a spaceship while it is in orbit and make it wait until your testing is complete before you give a greenlight for it to return - you do that before the spaceship takes off.  So they are clearly concerned about something.
Cool. I was just trying to explain why they are reporting in PSI instead of liters per minute or whatever volume measure.
If you have a pipe that is capable of delivering 100 gallons per minute but you only need 5 gallons per minute at 50 psi and the venturi is leaking, you might be getting 5 gallons per minute but at only 25 psi. That doesn't work for what you need. You'd report that as a 25 psi leak, because you're still getting the volume you wanted.
Edited for clarity.
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:41:30 PM EST
[#33]
Starliner is currently like the Biden Presidency?
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:44:33 PM EST
[#34]
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:50:56 PM EST
[#35]
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:50:57 PM EST
[#36]
Link Posted: 7/1/2024 3:52:51 PM EST
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It could be named as an homage to Cousteau's famous ship (... which was presumably named after the nymph).
View Quote


It is, Suni is a big fan of Cousteau.
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 8:04:42 AM EST
[#38]
GM, Boeing Starliner still at ISS?

Link Posted: 7/2/2024 8:13:13 AM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Can you hear me, Major Tom?
View Quote


For here am I sitting in a tin can
Far above the world
Planet Earth is blue
And there's nothing I can do
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 9:42:41 AM EST
[#40]
They are going to wait out the news cycle and let the fiasco disappear and then fetch the crew with a Dragon.

As far as what they will do with the capsule.

It will limp away from the ISS, the deorbit burn will fail and it will be a mostly peaceful but fiery return.
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 9:51:42 AM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
We'll just call it an extended stay.
View Quote



AmericanPeople, that you?
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 9:53:24 AM EST
[#42]
I wonder if secretly, the crew is refusing to ride that bitch down.
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 11:29:23 AM EST
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:  They are going to wait out the news cycle and let the fiasco disappear and then fetch the crew with a Dragon.

As far as what they will do with the capsule.

It will limp away from the ISS, the deorbit burn will fail and it will be a mostly peaceful but fiery return.
View Quote


It's not like the deorbit burn can fail.  It's deorbiting now w/ the ISS very, very slowly, which is why the ISS has to be reboosted periodically.

It's that the deorbit process can take too long w/ the very little bit of aerobraking currently occurring at that altitude, meaning if it was crewed at the time they'd need rescuing before they ran out of O2.

If we believe NASA/Boeing's claim that it could be used to deorbit right now in an emergency b/c the ISS suddenly became uninhabitable b/c something the size of a crew capsule crashed into it, then there are enough thrusters they're confident in working to do the deorbit burn.  But no matter what, Boeing's not going to get the service module w/ the failing thrusters back, so they're trying to figure out the problem w/ this service module while it still exists.

If we don't believe Boeing, NASA's not letting it depart the ISS for fear the astronauts might get stranded, or worse, it might impact the ISS on departure, meaning NASA might have to pay SpaceX sooner to deorbit the ISS b/c of a Boeing fuckup.
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 1:18:46 PM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


....snip....

If we don't believe Boeing, NASA's not letting it depart the ISS for fear the astronauts might get stranded, or worse, it might impact the ISS on departure, meaning NASA might have to pay SpaceX sooner to deorbit the ISS b/c of a Boeing fuckup.
View Quote

I'm now picturing SpaceX performing an Interstellar docking scene with the ISS only backwards
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 1:27:58 PM EST
[#45]
Elon should explain he'd really like to help, but can't for various reasons. But Joe could pick up the phone and call Putin and ask him for a solid.
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 1:28:55 PM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I wonder if secretly, the crew is refusing to ride that bitch down.
View Quote

I would be.
Link Posted: 7/2/2024 1:29:15 PM EST
[#47]
https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-boeing-test-flight-crew-to-discuss-starliner-mission-from-space/

Media are invited to hear from NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test astronauts discussing their mission during an Earth to space call at 11 a.m. EDT Wednesday, July 10. NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams will participate in the news conference from aboard the International Space Station in low Earth orbit.

NASA will stream the event on NASA+, NASA Television, the NASA app, YouTube, and the agency’s website. Learn how to stream NASA TV through a variety of platforms including social media.

Media interested in participating must RSVP no later than 5 p.m., Tuesday, July 9, to the newsroom at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston at 281-483-5111 or [email protected]. To ask questions, reporters must dial into the news conference no later than 10 minutes before the start of the call.

Wilmore and Williams have been living and working aboard the station since docking on June 6, contributing to the expedition crew’s research and maintenance activities, while helping ground teams collect critical data for long-duration Starliner flights to the orbiting complex.
Learn more about space station operations at:

https://www.nasa.gov/station
View Quote
Link Posted: 7/6/2024 9:26:47 AM EST
[#48]
July 4th CO2 sensor issue, #Boeing.

"CAPCOM update from this morning.  The CO2 sensor in Starliner, apparently there is only one, behaved erratically overnight before finally failing off scale high and has been suppressed.  Sunny was instructed to alter any possible future safe haven procedures to insert installation of lithium hydroxide scrubber canisters earlier. Sunny acknowledged and asked which canisters to use.  4 were used during launch/docking, 4 during the last safe haven and 8 remain.  This exchange was at about 7 am eastern.  The Starliner team was already off console and they did not inform the crew directly before departing."

Transcript:

00:00:01 Houston
Station Houston on two for Butch or Sunny at your convenience, go ahead.
00:00:08 Houston
All right, Butch. I wanted to pass on one configuration change we made to CST overnight. We started seeing the CO2 sensor actor radically. It was jumping between a nominal value and an off scale high. It eventually tripped the fault for the PPCO2 high. So there's some tones and lights and alarm and.
00:00:28 Houston
CST ecom has inhibited defaults associated and we'll continue looking into it.
00:00:35 Houston
If that all makes sense, I do have 1D for your safe haven procedure. When you're ready to copy.
00:00:43 Butch
So that was a single erratic sensor, just one sensor.
00:00:48 Houston
That's correct. And that sensor is for CO2.
00:00:53 Butch
I'll be ready to copy the delta.
00:00:56 Houston
OK. So while we have these faults inhibited, if we were in another safe haven case, you would not receive a message for high PPCO2.
00:01:06 Houston
And so as a result, we recommend that sunny perform the Liao steps.
00:01:12 Houston
Before entering step 8, which is the first step in her column of the procedure.
00:01:20 Butch
Right. So the Lyle steps, I think was at 13 before she does step 8.
00:01:28 Butch
Yeah, sounds wise. Well, we find ourselves in that situation. We will definitely do that. Thank you.
00:01:35 Houston
Absolutely.
00:01:37 Sunny
Hey, just got a question too. Is there a CST ecom in the house?
00:01:42 Houston
There is no longer one in the house. They were there a couple of hours ago. I can takedown a question, though, if you.
00:01:49 Sunny
Quick question, if we by chance do safe Haven again, I'm just curious about what lyo canisters they'd want us to use, and we used four on the way here. I put 4 fresh ones in during safe haven. We've got eight more fresh ones.
00:02:09 Sunny
But in case there's a safe haven event, would they want us to use the ones we used for less safe haven or break open for more?
00:02:17 Houston
Copy the question. I'll pass it along. Might be able to get you an answer doing Houston business hours today, but would Friday be all?
00:02:25 Houston
Right.
00:02:26 Sunny
Yeah, that's great. I just, you know, just thinking ahead about what you just mentioned about the sensors and us putting it in there pretty quickly. So just curious about which would be the right ones to use?
00:02:38 Houston
Yeah, I copied the question. All makes sense.
00:02:40 Sunny
OK. Thanks.

View Quote
Link Posted: 7/6/2024 9:36:29 AM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Maybe they can catch a ride home on SpaceX and kick their junker to the curb.
View Quote

The ISS crew can get a twofer by packing the defective capsule full of trash and dropping the whole thing into the Indian Ocean.
Link Posted: 7/6/2024 9:39:12 AM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
They aren't stranded. Musk could go get them tomorrow in a Dragon. But Nasa and Boeing can't allow those optics.
View Quote

The optics of a spacecraft breaking up on reentry as a fireball across the sky didn't work on NASA's favor either
Page / 11
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top