CNN, MSNOW and Politico banned from White House (Page 7 of 8)
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: And where was all the outrage from the left when Trump was banned from social media sites? Yeah, but that was different.
|
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
|
Originally Posted By Kihn: Yeah, but that was different. https://gifdb.com/images/high/exasperated-krysten-ritter-jmghad7re8p2vukl.webp It actually is VERY different. It also has nothing to do with the fact that this EO doesn’t comply with Constitutional law. It will be overturned, rightfully so, and then you’ll complain about activist judges.
|
|
Originally Posted By Marie: How would you like it if a Dem White House banned Fox News? Remember, if one side can do it, so can the other. Same / Same I don’t get my news from any of them. Fuck Fox and fuck CNN. All uniparty fucks. |
Tick: Egad. I hope not. That's where I keep all my stuff.
|
Originally Posted By MattyMattel: Except the Whitehouse property is We The People's property. Originally Posted By MattyMattel: Originally Posted By gotigers: good And this is NOT a 1stA violation. They can cover the whitehouse from the street. No constitutional guarantee to be on the whitehouse property. Except the Whitehouse property is We The People's property. Fine. So hold the press briefings in lefty Davis's barn and if Lefty throws CNN out then tough shit. |
Vote "YES" on 'NO'!
For Captain Erick Foster, Wexford, PA KIA 29 Aug, 07.
Rangers lead the way.
Inspected by #26
I was checking out this midget porn website....
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: And where was all the outrage from the left when Trump was banned from social media sites? Yup. |
Vote "YES" on 'NO'!
For Captain Erick Foster, Wexford, PA KIA 29 Aug, 07.
Rangers lead the way.
Inspected by #26
I was checking out this midget porn website....
|
FLASHBACK: Biden also changed White House press pool, cutting off more than 440 reporters' credentials In 2023, more than 440 reporters lost press credentials after President Joe Biden’s White House modified its rules for eligibility for permanent passes. Credentialed White House press members dropped from 1,417 members to 975 members after the White House unveiled new standards requiring an annual renewal of hard passes, Politico reported in 2023. Journalists without hard passes were still authorized to apply for day passes to the White House. The Biden White House policy was launched in May 2023 and required reporters to prove employment with "an organization whose principal business is news dissemination" and show that they have "accessed the White House campus at least once during the prior six months for work, or have proof of employment within the last three months to cover the White House." Biden admin wanted to determine who were legitimate press and who were not. |
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: So? His stated explicitly that he's doing so because he doesn't like their coverage. Just like a little petulant bitch would. If he doesn't like the coverage then he can sack up and counter their coverage. And drawing attention to the reason just may give liberals and NTs a good sized headache, don't you think?
|
-Somebody that's been there.
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: It actually is VERY different. It also has nothing to do with the fact that this EO doesn’t comply with Constitutional law. It will be overturned, rightfully so, and then you’ll complain about activist judges. ![]() Ahh, so violating his First Amendment rights was just fine, even worse they tried to silence a sitting president, got it! |
Call sign:Radio Silence
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: Ahh, so violating his First Amendment rights was just fine, even worse they tried to silence a sitting president, got it! Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: It actually is VERY different. It also has nothing to do with the fact that this EO doesn’t comply with Constitutional law. It will be overturned, rightfully so, and then you’ll complain about activist judges. ![]() Ahh, so violating his First Amendment rights was just fine, even worse they tried to silence a sitting president, got it! Most people learn in civics class that the First Amendment only applies to the government, not private businesses. |
|
Originally Posted By Glock031: Yup it's so predictable. And if the right keeps congress this fall they will probably disappear for a while. No they won't. |
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
|
Originally Posted By Thrasymachus: And he can put his big boy pants on and counter them. Only an intellectual coward would want to only get questions they like. The MSM doesn't report his responses, just their interpretation of his responses. |
|
Attached File The big five networks |
The impossible takes a little longer
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: 1A puts a restriction on government, not private entities. ![]() Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: 1A puts a restriction on government, not private entities. ![]() And yet it was fine when Biden administration did it. The Biden Administration Waged War on Free Speech with 57 Censorship Initiatives https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tim-kilcullen-dan-schneider-michael-morris/2025/03/13/biden-administration-waged And can’t forget how the news media and all the main stream networks push the propaganda during covid while trying to silence and ignoring alternative opinions. Including celebrities and news “journalist” wanting camps and complete lockdowns for us proles. They aren’t your friends man. |
Call sign:Radio Silence
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: And yet it was fine when Biden administration did it. https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tim-kilcullen-dan-schneider-michael-morris/2025/03/13/biden-administration-waged And can’t forget how the news media and all the main stream networks push the propaganda during covid while trying to silence and ignoring alternative opinions. Including celebrities and news “journalist” wanting camps and complete lockdowns for us proles. They aren’t your friends man. You’re right, they aren’t. I don’t think I said there were or even supported them with anything I said. Yeah, media has a problem with bias. They all do and have for a long time. That doesn’t make these actions legal. It’s entirely possible to believe more than one thing at once. |
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: You’re right, they aren’t. I don’t think I said there were or even supported them with anything I said. Yeah, media has a problem with bias. They all do and have for a long time. That doesn’t make these actions legal. It’s entirely possible to believe more than one thing at once. Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: And yet it was fine when Biden administration did it. https://mrcfreespeechamerica.org/blogs/free-speech/tim-kilcullen-dan-schneider-michael-morris/2025/03/13/biden-administration-waged And can’t forget how the news media and all the main stream networks push the propaganda during covid while trying to silence and ignoring alternative opinions. Including celebrities and news “journalist” wanting camps and complete lockdowns for us proles. They aren’t your friends man. You’re right, they aren’t. I don’t think I said there were or even supported them with anything I said. Yeah, media has a problem with bias. They all do and have for a long time. That doesn’t make these actions legal. It’s entirely possible to believe more than one thing at once. Back in the day (old fart speaking) the news was a 30 minute show every evening at 6pm. That was just the news. The problem with ALL news networks now is that it’s 24/7/365 news AND commentary. That usually works out to 1% news and 99% commentary. If you have one simple news story, the commentary between MSNOW and FOX is night and day. |
|
Originally Posted By Kihn: FLASHBACK: Biden also changed White House press pool, cutting off more than 440 reporters' credentials Biden admin wanted to determine who were legitimate press and who were not. Originally Posted By Kihn: FLASHBACK: Biden also changed White House press pool, cutting off more than 440 reporters' credentials In 2023, more than 440 reporters lost press credentials after President Joe Biden’s White House modified its rules for eligibility for permanent passes. Credentialed White House press members dropped from 1,417 members to 975 members after the White House unveiled new standards requiring an annual renewal of hard passes, Politico reported in 2023. Journalists without hard passes were still authorized to apply for day passes to the White House. The Biden White House policy was launched in May 2023 and required reporters to prove employment with "an organization whose principal business is news dissemination" and show that they have "accessed the White House campus at least once during the prior six months for work, or have proof of employment within the last three months to cover the White House." Biden admin wanted to determine who were legitimate press and who were not. That was a direct response to who was it? The cameroon press guy giving that idiot kjp someshit about her lying? |
|
Originally Posted By gettysburg30: That was a direct response to who was it? The cameroon press guy giving that idiot kjp someshit about her lying? Sexism and racism was involved. Because. Cameroon dude was kewl in confronting her about systemic pressroom discrimination. ![]() Jean-Pierre storms out of briefing room, African journalist accused KJP of discrimination |
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
|
Originally Posted By MrHold: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/27570/IMG_2910_jpeg-3830554.JPG The big five networks And just like that, Trump fixed the fake news problem...
|
|
Originally Posted By Marie: How would you like it if a Dem White House banned Fox News? Remember, if one side can do it, so can the other. Uhm.. https://www.rcfp.org/white-house-attempted-shut-out-fox-news-reporter/ CNN and others protested the attempted ban. This is why Fox News doesn't like the ban targeting CNN and others because news organizations bitched when Obama tried to ban Fox News from one event. |
![]() Should Democrats let Fox News host a debate? |
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
|
Originally Posted By realwar: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2026-09-21_at_08-39-14__1__Th-3830604.JPG wonder if their standing in solidarity has anything to do with this? |
| [tweet]https://x.com/mazemoore/status/2101316732862247250/video/1 [/tweet] |
Esteemed grain-grower & reactionary defender of True Justice, in a death struggle with the Karen quo.
*Do not Karen-tinize the Eschaton!!!*
|
Originally Posted By realwar: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2026-09-21_at_08-39-14__1__Th-3830604.JPG
|
|
Since these are now empty we should clear these out and plant a rose garden. Attached File Attached File Attached File |
Attached File
![]() Vance: "He's not banning media outlets" |
|
Originally Posted By Marie: How would you like it if a Dem White House banned Fox News? Remember, if one side can do it, so can the other. |
When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot. Confucius
|
What's so special about these propaganda outlets that they deserve special privileges over any other outlet? They're certainly not as relevant as they were 20 years ago, but even so, the White House has always decided who they hand out press credentials to. If these leftist muckrakers deserve access by simply existing, then every so-called journalist should be able to attend as well. No, choices are made as to who can attend, because there's not enough room for everyone, and the president has decided to take out the woke trash. If another leftist tyrant gets elected, it can choose to exclude Fox News or any other outlet that they've tried to, and often succeeded in, cancelling before. It's only a problem this time, because it's THEM. |
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: 1A puts a restriction on government, not private entities. ![]() Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: Ahh, so violating his First Amendment rights was just fine, even worse they tried to silence a sitting president, got it! 1A puts a restriction on government, not private entities. ![]() |
When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot. Confucius
|
Originally Posted By realwar: Since these are now empty we should clear these out and plant a rose garden. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/HSv58_hXcAAvmix_jpg-3830628.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2026-09-21_at_09-42-00__5__Ka-3830631.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2026-09-21_at_09-41-50__5__Ma-3830632.JPG Since CNN isn't using them... Attached File |
|
It didn't take long to blame it on Natalie Harp. Attached File https://www.tmz.com/2026/09/21/natalie-harp-convinced-trump-to-ban-cnn-ms-now-politico/ Attached File
|
|
Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: It actually is VERY different. It also has nothing to do with the fact that this EO doesn’t comply with Constitutional law. It will be overturned, rightfully so, and then you’ll complain about activist judges. ![]() Where in the constitution does it guarantee specific outlets from having direct access to the White House? |
|
Originally Posted By nightstalker: What happens when government (provably) asks corporations to shut down free speech? Or do you think it is inherently unprovable. Wouldn't government asking FB to censor speech against the official covid narrative be a violation of civil rights? Then there's that pesky Laptop debacle . The one where .gov got media to censor a story that indirectly effected a national election . Did they complain about the 1st Amendment or "what if the story is true" ? |
| The guiding light of these press conferences is the transparency of gate-keeping DUE PROCESS. One set of rules for everyone. Of course for these conferences to be viable there needs to be some order and decorum, good faith dialog, not name-calling, innuendo, false claims etc. Trump will never be able to avoid headlines like "USAID policy reversals will kill millions of poor people in Africa". But I think he's fine calling out false headlines and fake news. Remember, lots of Presidential EO's come about from lack of appropriate congressional action. |
When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot. Confucius
|
Originally Posted By whiskey_bravo: sure Originally Posted By whiskey_bravo: Originally Posted By Never_A_Wick: Sigh. Been covered. Read the thread. sure |
When words lose their meaning, a people can move neither hand nor foot. Confucius
|
Originally Posted By Gunslinger808: Ahh, so violating his First Amendment rights was just fine, even worse they tried to silence a sitting president, got it! Twitter wasn’t a government agency. They can’t violate anyone’s First Amendment rights. Trump also owns his own website. He isn’t obliged to allow Democrats to use Truth Social. |
|
Originally Posted By realwar: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2026-09-21_at_08-39-14__1__Th-3830604.JPG Oh great. State TV, just like Putin has. |
CNN, MSNOW and Politico banned from White House (Page 7 of 8)
Join the Community
Your next conversation starts here.
Create your free account to join discussions, share your experience, save topics, and connect with the AR15.COM community.
- Join discussions
- Follow topics and replies
- Connect with fellow enthusiasts
Already a member? Sign in
Stay informed by subscribing to our Newsletter



