Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/6/2007 10:03:22 PM EDT
why cant the US start seeding terrorists with faulty equipment and arms?


ready made munitions that are defective or even with bad small arms ammo, RPGs and mortars that blow up on the user ?

6/6/2007 10:11:27 PM EDT
[#1]
They already have a large supply of munitions.

We could probably plant such stuff in caches, but it wouldn't take them long to figure out what was going on. Eventually, they would boobytrap every cache that they couldn't provide security for and stop using anything that they could not determine a source for.
6/6/2007 10:11:48 PM EDT
[#2]
bump.

better yet..... munitions that have GPS locators embedded inside.


what will they use if we taint the supply?
6/6/2007 10:14:15 PM EDT
[#3]
Basically because (a) we do not control when or where these 'altered' weapons would be used, and (b) we cannot be sure that any modifications would actually work...

So instead we just destroy all the weapons caches & shipments we discover...

The damage caused by the shipment getting through is far more than the 'benefit' that would come from sabotaging a few munitions....

The same goes for the GPS locator option, although I don't doubt that that has been considered - if not used - by SF...

Once again, it would take knowledge that someone 'important' is receiving the shipment to make bugging it worthwhile a/o demolition in place...
6/6/2007 10:21:30 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:
what will they use if we taint the supply?
That's the problem. They already have a supply on hand that could probably last for years. When the leftover ordnance from Saddam's regime is used up, they'll probably hit the new Iraqi Army for munitions.

They have the potential to import munitions from most Middle Eastern countries, along with being able to buy, manufacture, or capture enough to keep them going.

As long as there is worldwide support for the jihad, there will be a source of weapons. We could try to bug or sabotage their equipment but that is only successful for a limited period of time and they would figure it out and bypass it pretty quickly.

ETA: GPS-type transmitters were put to good use by the SAS in Northern Ireland, but they would have been much less effective if the IRA and the rest were able to resupply themselves with arms and ammunition without relying on what they already had on hand.
6/6/2007 10:23:42 PM EDT
[#5]
I would say something, but Cincinnatus has already corrected me, and rightly so.
6/6/2007 10:26:29 PM EDT
[#6]
I have a problem with the idea of "counter-terrorism".  To me, that implies that acting IN RESPONSE TO an attack that has already taken place.  I'd much prefer "anti-terrorism" in which our actions are preemptive in nature.