Posted: 7/29/2011 12:00:17 PM EDT
The official UK inquiry into the climategate affair has found that the "rigour and honesty of the scientists involved are not in doubt". But it also concluded that researchers at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), who were at the centre of the row, showed a "consistent pattern of failing to display the proper degree of openness." |
|
Quoted:
Climategate inquiry: no deceit, too little cooperation
The official UK inquiry into the climategate affair has found that the "rigour and honesty of the scientists involved are not in doubt". But it also concluded that researchers at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), who were at the centre of the row, showed a "consistent pattern of failing to display the proper degree of openness." No surprise there. "Climategate" was a hatchet job. But why are you bringing up a year old article? In other news, CRU has released almost all of the temperature records it used, having obtained consent to release from the national meterological bureaus that own the data. The only exception is Poland. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20739-ok-climate-sceptics-heres-the-raw-data-you-wanted.html |
|
They're still stonewalling on data.
http://climateaudit.org/2011/07/25/osborn-i-dont-have-any-core-measurement-data-and-therefore-have-none-to-give-out/ http://climateaudit.org/2011/07/23/building-trust-and-foi-refusals/ You'd think that after being caught urging the destruction of data in order to evade FOI requests would make responsible management more agreeable to releasing data. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Climategate inquiry: no deceit, too little cooperation
The official UK inquiry into the climategate affair has found that the "rigour and honesty of the scientists involved are not in doubt". But it also concluded that researchers at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), who were at the centre of the row, showed a "consistent pattern of failing to display the proper degree of openness." No surprise there. "Climategate" was a hatchet job. But why are you bringing up a year old article? In other news, CRU has released almost all of the temperature records it used, having obtained consent to release from the national meterological bureaus that own the data. The only exception is Poland. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20739-ok-climate-sceptics-heres-the-raw-data-you-wanted.html What they didn't release was the "adjustments" they they added to those. The formula's they used on the raw data that they applied is very important. BTW, Climategate was nothing like a hatchet job. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Climategate inquiry: no deceit, too little cooperation
The official UK inquiry into the climategate affair has found that the "rigour and honesty of the scientists involved are not in doubt". But it also concluded that researchers at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit (CRU), who were at the centre of the row, showed a "consistent pattern of failing to display the proper degree of openness." No surprise there. "Climategate" was a hatchet job. But why are you bringing up a year old article? In other news, CRU has released almost all of the temperature records it used, having obtained consent to release from the national meterological bureaus that own the data. The only exception is Poland. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20739-ok-climate-sceptics-heres-the-raw-data-you-wanted.html I thought it was 2011. |
yea, im going to believe people who believe in global warming after they say climate gate was a misunderstanding the CRU falsified data and then tried to cover their tracks not to mention laughable "peer review" practices that arre laid out in the emails. fuck them and every last AGW cultist. |