Posted: 3/17/2006 11:43:34 AM EDT
|
My company needs a digital SLR. I have narrowed it down to several choices, but I have been out of photography for some time (not by my choice Choices are: Nikon D1 Nikon D1X Nikon D1H Canon EOS1D Canon EOS1Ds All will be used and purchased from a reputable dealer. (KEH.com but I will take other suggestions) |
Well, the owners own several business' such as Construction, Real Estate and Private Investigations. It would be a mix of all 3. After we figure out which digital camera to get, I am getting a film SLR compatible with the lenses of the digital (EOS1D and EOS1 or D1X and F4) |
|
If you are going to be buying all new glass, go with Canon If you have some 2.8 long Nikkors around, get the Nikon platform. Canon is faster focusing, and better in other ways on the lens side. On the digital side, Canon has a bit better sensors. you could probably get away with a D60 or D10 as well, unless you are shooting sports/racing/news |
|
Not sure why you narrowed the list down to defunct models. Digital cameras are not something I would want to do that with. Each generation has provided significant gains in image quality. Especially with PI work, you will probably want to be able to shoot at high ISOs and even the new Rebels will blow away the cameras you listed with respect to noise at high ISOs. With Construction and Real Estate, you'll probably want to be able to shoot super wide angle, that means a full frame sensor. Of course you can always get the superwides made for smaller sensors (Canon's EF-S series, Nikon's DX) but then those won't work on your film camera. I would get the Canon 5D. It's about the same price as a used 1Ds but better in almost every way. The ergonomics is also much better than Canon's 1 series bodies (which has always been a nit pick by many pros), I've put 30,000 exposures through my 1Ds MkII and still hate the controls. For lenses, pick up a used Canon 17-35 f/4 and a 100-400. |
Do you need image verification (pi work)? That might be a factor in what bodies you get as well. |
|
Where are the options for the Nikon D2 series? A much better camera than the D1 series. I would go for a D2Hs, used if the new price is too high. Smaller file size due to 4 MP sensor, which for me translates into faster workflow. Excellent low light performance, probably the best out of all dSLRs. I like the 11 point AF better than the Canon 45 point AF. The Canon system is actually slower due to the fact that it has so many more sensors to process. I believe the manual suggests to turn some of the points off to improve focus speed. I like the ergonomics of Nikon (alot) better, so pick up the cameras and see which one you like. Both Nikon and Canon are good cameras and not one of them is clearly better than the other. It all boils down to a matter of personal preference, brand loyalty, and money. |
No! The 1.5x crop factor does not "turn" any lens into another. It merely crops the image off so that it appears to be taken with a longer focal length lens, but the DOF, etc. lens traits will still be of whatever lens you are using. |
|
I always found the reviews at this web site to be VERY worthwhile. Digital Photography Review |
Sounds like a medium format photographer defending 50mm lens. It is about the image capture area. In the case of the lens capturing "more" of the area than required, that is zoom. All other lenses are designed to give a frame size to exactly match that of the medium (optimal, all else is wasted). On this concept, an f 0.8 lens will be financially magnitudes less with a smaller, yet sensitive sensor (24mm) compared to a 35mm film lens. --ETA: Try to guess what a lens would cost for a large format (8" x10") phtoographer to achieve 10x distance amplification. Add that to media costs of 8x10 film, and you see the reason 35mm emerged as "The Choice" for every image you see in Sports Illustrated. If they can keep the same or better image quality at a lower price and faster shooting rate, I am all for "over-using" my lenses. |