Posted: 2/18/2013 11:43:08 AM EDT
|
We all watched Ron Paul speak to overflowing houses and packed stadiums for months, while Romney only managed to gather token groups of listeners and a chorus of chirping crickets. Yet he somehow lost the Republican Primaries. Of course, all the votes from entire towns were "misplaced" along the way, and the media consistently forgot to mention he was even a candidate......
Then we had the presidential elections, where people actually admitted to God and everyone that they voted twice for Obama. And the overseas Military vote was "unfortunately delayed" and therefore not counted. And the computerized voting machines helped by defaulting votes consistently to Obama. Oh yes, and somebody decided for all of us to count the votes in a foreign country....... This is CHICAGO POLITICS at it's finest, and I know because that was my home town. So, my question is this: Does anyone actually believe their votes will count for any federal positions in 2014? Will we all once again "be amazed" that the same asshats are given new terms in the Senate and House? Except for those rats who are a bit smarter than the rest, and are "retiring" to flee......errrr, I mean move to Patagonia with the Bushes and an increasing number of bankers? |
|
Quoted:
Oh yes, and somebody decided for all of us to count the votes in a foreign country....... Ah, no.
Your vote were counted in your county. My vote were counted in my county. It's done that way because the people who control how votes are counted - the state legislators - want people they know and trust counting the votes which determine the most important election (at least to them) - theirs. The FedGov has exactly nothing to do with counting votes. |
| The votes were counted correctly. We lost. It happens. Blaming it on fraud is just sounding like a spoiled three year old that didn't get to have McDonald's for lunch. Very few presidents are defeated when running for a second term. Ron Paul did not speak to overflowing stadiums. He had a small but very vocal minority supporting him. He attracted media attention because he was something different. |
|
Quoted:
We all watched Ron Paul speak to overflowing houses and packed stadiums for months, while Romney only managed to gather token groups of listeners and a chorus of chirping crickets. Yet he somehow lost the Republican Primaries. Of course, all the votes from entire towns were "misplaced" along the way, and the media consistently forgot to mention he was even a candidate...... Then we had the presidential elections, where people actually admitted to God and everyone that they voted twice for Obama. And the overseas Military vote was "unfortunately delayed" and therefore not counted. And the computerized voting machines helped by defaulting votes consistently to Obama. Oh yes, and somebody decided for all of us to count the votes in a foreign country....... This is CHICAGO POLITICS at it's finest, and I know because that was my home town. So, my question is this: Does anyone actually believe their votes will count for any federal positions in 2014? Will we all once again "be amazed" that the same asshats are given new terms in the Senate and House? Except for those rats who are a bit smarter than the rest, and are "retiring" to flee......errrr, I mean move to Patagonia with the Bushes and an increasing number of bankers? When we lose like 2008/2012 we were cheated but when we win like 2010 what? |
|
Quoted:
The votes were counted correctly. We lost. It happens. Blaming it on fraud is just sounding like a spoiled three year old that didn't get to have McDonald's for lunch. Very few presidents are defeated when running for a second term. Ron Paul did not speak to overflowing stadiums. He had a small but very vocal minority supporting him. He attracted media attention because he was something different. The votes here in King County, WA were not counted correctly. Who voted is public information, and my vote in the primary didn't count and neither did all of the other conservatives I know here. The main election in November was a little less fraudulent. While my vote didn't count again, I did find a few conservatives I know that had their vote counted.z |
| We were cheated and Ive stated before we will never see a republican president again. In Philahelphia there were over 20 some odd recincts were Romney did not get ONE vote. And there were similar results in Chicago. You cant tell me the fix isnt in when over 20,000 vote and not one voted republican. |
|
Quoted:
We all watched Ron Paul speak to overflowing houses and packed stadiums for months, while Romney only managed to gather token groups of listeners and a chorus of chirping crickets. Yet he somehow lost the Republican Primaries. Mostly because he's a total fucking loon. Next question. |
|
Quoted:
We were cheated and Ive stated before we will never see a republican president again. In Philahelphia there were over 20 some odd recincts were Romney did not get ONE vote. And there were similar results in Chicago. You cant tell me the fix isnt in when over 20,000 vote and not one voted republican. I suggest you locate those precincts and then take a drive around them if you have the intestinal fortitude for a dangerous adventure. You will easily believe that WMR did not receive a single vote there, once you've figured out the make up of the population. |
|
Ron Paul had a lot of very, very active supporters who showed up at campaign rallies, tried hard to become delegates, etc. Impressive. And I'm certain that nearly all of them voted. And that those votes were counted. The problem is, Romney had untold millions more who didn't do these things, but also voted. The fact of the matter is, Americans (as a group) don't want somebody like Paul to be President. It's not a conspiracy, it's just a fact of life. He (and I, and probably you) are FAR more libertarian leaning than the vast majority of the country. The only way you're getting a libertarian (or a reasonable facsimile of one) into that office, is by selling it as something it's not. Because if you straight up hit the American people with hard core libertarian ideas, they WILL reject it. The electorate is not libertarian in nature. Sorry, it just isn't. I wish it were different, but I'm not going to delude myself. His son may have a shot at it, because he's a much better politician. He knows how to sell it. He knows how the game is played.
|
|
The only vote fraud was Obummer scraping up 30% more black votes in places like Ohio than he got in 2008. Romney came into the primary race with 25% of the vote (more than Paul). Meaning he was half way there from the beginning. Wasn't my pick for the nomination btw.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
We all watched Ron Paul speak to overflowing houses and packed stadiums for months, while Romney only managed to gather token groups of listeners and a chorus of chirping crickets. http://cbsdenver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/red-rocks-romney.jpg http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/WashingtonPost/Content/Blogs/election-2012/Images/Romney_2012_066f1.jpg?uuid=oYhFumPpEeGtG4TnxGPaHQ https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A5HwS8RCYAEsGqp.jpg:large http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/romney-new-hampshire-rally-600x350.jpg Herp and derp from the first sentence. That reminds me of a picture I saw somewhere of some poor fella hanging out with crickets.....hm, let me see...oh! Found it. http://www.bagnewsnotes.com/files/bagnews/images/Ron-Paul.jpg I like your username, by the way. Are you a licensed pharmacologist or more of the amateur variety?
|




