User Panel
Originally Posted By victorgonzales: I have been on community notes from it's start. If your votes are accurate you get bumped up to being able to write notes as well. So don't abuse it by upvoting biased notes and bs and take the time to downvote biased notes and opinions. Then you get to submit notes as well and help make the system work View Quote I am playing it as straight as I can right now. |
|
|
BREAKING: @FreeBeacon has uncovered a confidential list revealing Media Matters' major contributors. Brace yourself for this shocking surprise — they're all Democratic megadonors. • Deborah J. Simon: $4,000,000 • Gill Foundation: $2,970,000 • Josh and Anita Bekenstein: $1,750,000 • Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation: $1,900,000 • Susan T. Buffett Foundation: $1,751,199 Media Matters, the brainchild of Clinton loyalist David Brock, calls itself a media watchdog but operates as a DNC front group orchestrating advertiser boycotts and suppressing free speech on social media. In a shocking federal lawsuit, a Media Matters employee obsessively refreshed a fringe video on @rumblevideo over 70 times until he found a Netflix ad that could be used as fodder for a public pressure campaign. Despite being the sole viewer of that Netflix ad next to the fringe video, Media Matters falsely insinuated in an article that Netflix ads frequently accompanied fringe content on Rumble, coercing advertisers to abandon the platform. On @X , Media Matters accessed accounts active for 30 days, bypassing ad filters for new users, and selectively followed accounts with fringe content and those owned by X's major corporate advertisers. After repeatedly scrolling and refreshing their timeline - 13 more times than an average user - they generated screenshots of fringe content next to X's top advertisers. Media Matters' defamation was so fabricated that IBM, Comcast, and Oracle had their ads appear next to fringe content for just one account—an employee of Media Matters—out of over 550 million active users on @X . Media Matters conveniently left out these details in their reporting, sidestepping the fact that their reporters manipulated the platform to create fringe content next to major corporate advertisers. Why are Democratic megadonors like @GillFoundation, @Josh_Bekenstein, and @BuffettScholars financially supporting these clearly deceptive, malicious tactics aimed at stifling free speech on the internet?
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey:
BREAKING: @FreeBeacon has uncovered a confidential list revealing Media Matters' major contributors. Brace yourself for this shocking surprise — they're all Democratic megadonors. • Deborah J. Simon: $4,000,000 • Gill Foundation: $2,970,000 • Josh and Anita Bekenstein: $1,750,000 • Stephen M. Silberstein Foundation: $1,900,000 • Susan T. Buffett Foundation: $1,751,199 Media Matters, the brainchild of Clinton loyalist David Brock, calls itself a media watchdog but operates as a DNC front group orchestrating advertiser boycotts and suppressing free speech on social media. In a shocking federal lawsuit, a Media Matters employee obsessively refreshed a fringe video on @rumblevideo over 70 times until he found a Netflix ad that could be used as fodder for a public pressure campaign. Despite being the sole viewer of that Netflix ad next to the fringe video, Media Matters falsely insinuated in an article that Netflix ads frequently accompanied fringe content on Rumble, coercing advertisers to abandon the platform. On @X , Media Matters accessed accounts active for 30 days, bypassing ad filters for new users, and selectively followed accounts with fringe content and those owned by X's major corporate advertisers. After repeatedly scrolling and refreshing their timeline - 13 more times than an average user - they generated screenshots of fringe content next to X's top advertisers. Media Matters' defamation was so fabricated that IBM, Comcast, and Oracle had their ads appear next to fringe content for just one account—an employee of Media Matters—out of over 550 million active users on @X . Media Matters conveniently left out these details in their reporting, sidestepping the fact that their reporters manipulated the platform to create fringe content next to major corporate advertisers. Why are Democratic megadonors like @GillFoundation, @Josh_Bekenstein, and @BuffettScholars financially supporting these clearly deceptive, malicious tactics aimed at stifling free speech on the internet? https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDG1pmgawAAnO9M?format=jpg&name=medium
View Quote Nice. Control the message, you control the people. That’s why I’ve said throuout this thread “freedom of the press” in the 1st amendment was specially referring to the printing press. The British were destroying and controllling the printing press. That’s what Twitter is. A modern day printing press. Control the press… control the people. |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote Now the timing of the recent WSJ article makes sense; it was battlefield prep for the government's next attack on Musk. |
|
The demand for racism has FAR exceeded the supply.
|
Originally Posted By kill-9: Now the timing of the recent WSJ article makes sense; it was battlefield prep for the government's next attack on Musk. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By kill-9: Originally Posted By RSG:
Now the timing of the recent WSJ article makes sense; it was battlefield prep for the government's next attack on Musk. Which, in an election year, is likely due to: He won't censor embarrassing but true stories they don't like. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Stars at Night are Big & Bright clap*clap*clap
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By mcantu:
View Quote I believe this case was over 5 years old and not Elon, X...but twitter. |
|
Redpilled
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG: Redpilled
View Quote And when some of us mocked and questioned "81 million votes" we were told by our resident leftist agitators that well of course, each year has more people voting because the population increases. Where is that country boy of ours to spin this? |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote |
|
McCarthy was right.
|
Fuck those so called experts and their assessment.
We have a dozen countries ditching the dollar, the Russia/Ukraine war, inflation around thr world, and these elitist leftist fucks spout this shit. Fuck them and their mothers for birthing them. |
|
|
No one cared who I was until I put on the mask
USA
|
Originally Posted By A_G: Fuck those so called experts and their assessment. We have a dozen countries ditching the dollar, the Russia/Ukraine war, inflation around thr world, and these elitist leftist fucks spout this shit. Fuck them and their mothers for birthing them. View Quote This was put out by the WEF. This isn't the list of top risks for the globe. This is the list of top global risks for the WEF'S AGENDA. Free speech is a danger to them. War isn't a top risk for the WEF because war and destruction is the keystone of their whole agenda! |
"It's dangerous to be right when the government is wrong"
|
Originally Posted By t75fnaco3pwzhd: This was put out by the WEF. This isn't the list of top risks for the globe. This is the list of top global risks for the WEF'S AGENDA. Free speech is a danger to them. War isn't a top risk for the WEF because war and destruction is the keystone of their whole agenda! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By t75fnaco3pwzhd: Originally Posted By A_G: Fuck those so called experts and their assessment. We have a dozen countries ditching the dollar, the Russia/Ukraine war, inflation around thr world, and these elitist leftist fucks spout this shit. Fuck them and their mothers for birthing them. This was put out by the WEF. This isn't the list of top risks for the globe. This is the list of top global risks for the WEF'S AGENDA. Free speech is a danger to them. War isn't a top risk for the WEF because war and destruction is the keystone of their whole agenda! And I’ll keep repeating that “freedom of the press” in our 1st amendment was the printing press. Control what people read, you control the people. That’s just history for hundreds of years. |
|
|
Originally Posted By spidey07: And I’ll keep repeating that “freedom of the press” in our 1st amendment was the printing press. Control what people read, you control the people. That’s just history for hundreds of years. View Quote Fifth column has been winning for a long time, and your so-called free press sucks off commies |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote That’s why they’re going after musk/twitter. They can’t control what people read. |
|
|
Originally Posted By spidey07: That’s why they’re going after musk/twitter. They can’t control what people read. View Quote
|
|
|
View Quote That's a catch phrase... Attached File Not the 1st time Elon has referenced ARFCOM's favorite psyop. |
|
|
Let’s talk about community notes. FYI, I’m a community notes contributor. What I am seeing is a direct attempt to silence, censor, de-prioritise, de-monetise, isolate & cast doubt against anyone that questions the current plans of Governments, Big Pharmaceutical & The Parasitic ruling classes. Enterprising Desert Raven, is the user name for a single Community Notes Contributor. Since joining Community Notes in March 2023 it has posted nearly 5000 community notes. A Bot? A Group of paid agenda activists? Or 3 Letter agencies? One thing is for sure, in my opinion, it’s impossible to be a single person. It is posting over 70 Community Notes per day, every day. Without rest. These notes have to be backed up with linked supporting evidence. It is just not possible to achieve this on a daily basis This is a relentless attack on anyone that dares to questions the things that have happened to us, or the plans they have in place for humanity. Community Notes works on a basis that when a Contributor sees a post and wishes to correct that post. They create a Note that provides information and links to data that support their note. When enough Contributors approve the Note, it goes live. If Contributors don’t agree with the note, they state why and can add counter information, it’s then not published, but left pending unless other contributors then agree with the original Note, then it goes live. Attached is a video all of the Community Notes that Desert Raven has added, both published and pending in just the last 10 days. This is from within the CN section so you will not normally get to see this. The vast majority of these notes are in pending waiting to go live. The video goes on forever! It’s only the last 10 days worth. Impossible for a single user to create. There is no doubt you will know someone in this video that they have attempted to censor. You will notice the recurring themes. Desert Raven protects the Jabs, Big Pharma, Current Government Regimes, Climate Change & the WEF. Anyone that questions what’s going on, that has a large follower base appears to be targeted, especially Blue Ticks. The Community Notes that have been approved, all appear to be supported by the same group of contributors. This is really bad and extremely concerning. I will individually contact every single person that has had an attempt to de-popularise their posts in this video. @elonmusk You urgently need to do a complete audit of community notes, especially targeting the most active contributors. They are either bots, or groups of bad actors working together to utilise a single account and push an agenda. IP and Mac Address access would easily identify this. I’m a community notes contributor and I am telling you that the system is compromised. |
|
|
The battle to control the signal wages on.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG: IP and Mac Address access would easily identify this. View Quote LOL no it wouldn't. MAC addresses don't make it off the local network, for starters. And there's literally nothing that prevents someone from changing their MAC address. IPs don't provide any reliable identification; VPNs are a thing. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
Let’s talk about community notes. FYI, I’m a community notes contributor. What I am seeing is a direct attempt to silence, censor, de-prioritise, de-monetise, isolate & cast doubt against anyone that questions the current plans of Governments, Big Pharmaceutical & The Parasitic ruling classes. Enterprising Desert Raven, is the user name for a single Community Notes Contributor. Since joining Community Notes in March 2023 it has posted nearly 5000 community notes. A Bot? A Group of paid agenda activists? Or 3 Letter agencies? One thing is for sure, in my opinion, it’s impossible to be a single person. It is posting over 70 Community Notes per day, every day. Without rest. These notes have to be backed up with linked supporting evidence. It is just not possible to achieve this on a daily basis This is a relentless attack on anyone that dares to questions the things that have happened to us, or the plans they have in place for humanity. Community Notes works on a basis that when a Contributor sees a post and wishes to correct that post. They create a Note that provides information and links to data that support their note. When enough Contributors approve the Note, it goes live. If Contributors don’t agree with the note, they state why and can add counter information, it’s then not published, but left pending unless other contributors then agree with the original Note, then it goes live. Attached is a video all of the Community Notes that Desert Raven has added, both published and pending in just the last 10 days. This is from within the CN section so you will not normally get to see this. The vast majority of these notes are in pending waiting to go live. The video goes on forever! It’s only the last 10 days worth. Impossible for a single user to create. There is no doubt you will know someone in this video that they have attempted to censor. You will notice the recurring themes. Desert Raven protects the Jabs, Big Pharma, Current Government Regimes, Climate Change & the WEF. Anyone that questions what’s going on, that has a large follower base appears to be targeted, especially Blue Ticks. The Community Notes that have been approved, all appear to be supported by the same group of contributors. This is really bad and extremely concerning. I will individually contact every single person that has had an attempt to de-popularise their posts in this video. @elonmusk You urgently need to do a complete audit of community notes, especially targeting the most active contributors. They are either bots, or groups of bad actors working together to utilise a single account and push an agenda. IP and Mac Address access would easily identify this. I’m a community notes contributor and I am telling you that the system is compromised. View Quote Interesting, that acct no longer exists. Wonder if it was false info or ??? |
|
"It's called 'peer pressure' and if applied in a swift kick to his 'nads, it works wonders!"
-Eric The (We Miss You) Hun |
Originally Posted By Ziess: Interesting, that acct no longer exists. Wonder if it was false info or ??? View Quote |
|
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.
Thomas Jefferson "He didnt punch anybody. He punched an idea." DrFrige |
Originally Posted By Ziess: Interesting, that acct no longer exists. Wonder if it was false info or ??? View Quote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Chokey:
View Quote lol! Comedy gold right there. |
|
|
Attached File
They took his funny-papers, they trans'd his kid, soooo he bought the psyop machine and real opposition to the leftie-borg groupthink started. The EU style migrants problem Brandon caused (The Obama-team pulling his strings, IIRC it's mostly the same people) wouldn't have been talked about, were it not for Twitter. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/ElonMusk_BeeBorder_jpg-3145172.JPG They took his funny-papers, they trans'd his kid, soooo he bought the psyop machine and real opposition to the leftie-borg groupthink started. The EU style migrants problem Brandon caused (The Obama-team pulling his strings, IIRC it's mostly the same people) wouldn't have been talked about, were it not for Twitter. View Quote |
|
"Makes me realize why there are warning labels on hemorrhoid cream about not using it orally" - Weomi
Save VA, Join or Donate to VCDL! https://www.vcdl.org/Donate |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote Well if he wasn't hated by those in power before... |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote Nice. Hopefully that will not be suppressed. |
|
"Some of the greatest dads I've ever seen weren't so much perfect as they were willing to work hard to overcome their failings. Does that make sense?"
Yes. Yes it does. |
The Stars at Night are Big & Bright clap*clap*clap
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote No need for investigative journalism. AI will tell the algorithms truth. |
|
Here, ^ millionaire news actors who live in gated communities are upset that voters have their own priorities not in line with the democratic party. They don't like that. Not. One. Bit. The leftie MSM is kid-gloving immigration, even as it causes problems in their blue cities/states - but the voters got the memo. IMHO this is because you're allowed to talk about it now on Twitter, pure and simple. For years and years we were so pissed because the media would lie at will, there was no check on it. "Can't fight the media" "Haha just make your own twitter!" And they shut down Parler and Gab. Faceberg and old twitter wouldn't LET the reply-talk circulate (they denied this. Now they say it's good and HAS TO happen ) New Twitter means they lost their air superiority, and that's not been something they've had to deal with in a looong looong time. The alternative media is built. Yes, the forces that are intent on psyoping people into digesting shitty policies are formidable, but this race is live. |
|
|
...Not coincidentally, the anti-TikTok legislation now being debated on the Hill would allow the federal government to force the sale of any social media platform that interferes in elections. Just so you know what’s coming in 2025.
|
|
|
Duh! He altered the algorithms to not be so lopsided controlled by fbi and democrats.
Twitter files showed .gov had complete control of content. That’s why they’re losing their shit. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
...Not coincidentally, the anti-TikTok legislation now being debated on the Hill would allow the federal government to force the sale of any social media platform that interferes in elections. Just so you know what’s coming in 2025.
View Quote This election is winner take all. If team red loses, Brandon's handlers will go for twitter. They want it now. After that it's off to 52 states, a packed SCOTUS, migrant voters and .mil, and them "passing" everything by EO, greenlight by Hawaii Judge and Co in DC. |
|
|
Attached File
Attached File Attached File Attached File Attached File We went from, "OMG ELON MUSK ("idiot" billionaire who has a startup car company that beat the big 3 to the EV market as a walk-on, and has a little NASA company too, who bought twitter with the change in his couch) IS SO DUMB, HE CAN'T POSSIBLY RUN TWITTER WITH 20% OF THE WORK FORCE - IT'S DONE IN A YEAR" to: "What's going on in there Kramer?" "....Elon Musk is redpilling the fuck out of people, Jerry." I think what we're witnessing is what I would call, "Speed on defense." The print media (located largely in one sphincter in NYC and another in DC, a bunch of people who went to the same schools, have the same friends, live in the same neighborhoods, and donated 95% to one party) was an elitist leftie one. It was hard to push back on the media, to find any other narrative you were left with what amounted to Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. The rise of San Fran's social media (a woke activist leftie version) pushed the pendulum even further left and held it in that spot. The greybars stated it was impossible that the NYC media (95% donates to 1 party), AND the SF crew were pushing agendas - and that wikipedia being edited in real time, the suspicious changes to google's search engine, the hashtags disappearing were simply nothing. They weren't happening. Google after all for years stated, IIRC, "oh oh this is THE ALGORITHM nothing's happening here haha". They had this, they could get narratives out so fast and gaslight you into thinking you were the ONLY one who noticed. You are the ONLY one who thinks something is off kilter - and you only think that due to some deficiency you have of course The grey_bars would practically start drooling explaining this ^ was the only possible truth. 2024: Nah it's all true. It was all true, they were fucking with all that ^ to push what they wanted. Now, as legacy media ratings keep falling, their influence shrinks. As they lost the ability to shadowban and astroturf hashtags (which was happening but they denied of course ) their way out of taking an L on any given narrative, we're tackling them in the backfield. They've always had unfair advantages, and now they're stuck playing fair with alllll the people they put on "Team bad guy" over the years. When it was just garden variety GOP voters, no one cared. Now that you can't work out at the fucking gym without a dude in the women's bathroom? With parts falling off of planes? And this gets covered whether the MSM (Who wanted all this ^ ) likes it or not. It gets seen, noticed, reported, spread, and discussed, and they're fucking powerless to stop it. |
|
|
We are free-range humans in a tax farm
|
Originally Posted By kill-9: Are you familiar with the TikTok ban legislation? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By kill-9: Originally Posted By Geralt55: they're fucking powerless to stop it. Yes - and this is the wildcard, Narrative wise they're getting beaten at their own game. In terms of megaphones, there aren't enough people who ACTUALLY believe what your elitist leftie neighbor (NYT-believing Blueanon bot) does to ignore what's going on. ..Which is why they're going to try to cheat to win and attack the 1st Amendment. I wonder if this is what Musk is setting up: a title fight on this. Perhaps Musk (world's richest man.) would sue on 1st Amendment grounds that the law is unconstitutional. From there, it's up to SCOTUS to destroy the backboard with a dunk. Either allow the censor-state, or end it. ETA: I could imagine his net worth of ~$192 Billion would buy a nice legal team. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Yes - and this is the wildcard, Narrative wise they're getting beaten at their own game. In terms of megaphones, there aren't enough people who ACTUALLY believe what your elitist leftie neighbor (NYT-believing Blueanon bot) does to ignore what's going on. ..Which is why they're going to try to cheat to win and attack the 1st Amendment. I wonder if this is what Musk is setting up: a title fight on this. Perhaps Musk (world's richest man.) would sue on 1st Amendment grounds that the law is unconstitutional. From there, it's up to SCOTUS to destroy the backboard with a dunk. Either allow the censor-state, or end it. ETA: I could imagine his net worth of ~$192 Billion would buy a nice legal team. View Quote As a partial backup plan, it'd be nice if he threw some money at developing a truly decentralized peer-to-peer social network / generalized data sharing protocol which would be more difficult to censor. But I don't think he'd be very interested in doing that because it would compete with X. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Yes - and this is the wildcard, Narrative wise they're getting beaten at their own game. In terms of megaphones, there aren't enough people who ACTUALLY believe what your elitist leftie neighbor (NYT-believing Blueanon bot) does to ignore what's going on. ..Which is why they're going to try to cheat to win and attack the 1st Amendment. I wonder if this is what Musk is setting up: a title fight on this. Perhaps Musk (world's richest man.) would sue on 1st Amendment grounds that the law is unconstitutional. From there, it's up to SCOTUS to destroy the backboard with a dunk. Either allow the censor-state, or end it. ETA: I could imagine his net worth of ~$192 Billion would buy a nice legal team. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By kill-9: Originally Posted By Geralt55: they're fucking powerless to stop it. Yes - and this is the wildcard, Narrative wise they're getting beaten at their own game. In terms of megaphones, there aren't enough people who ACTUALLY believe what your elitist leftie neighbor (NYT-believing Blueanon bot) does to ignore what's going on. ..Which is why they're going to try to cheat to win and attack the 1st Amendment. I wonder if this is what Musk is setting up: a title fight on this. Perhaps Musk (world's richest man.) would sue on 1st Amendment grounds that the law is unconstitutional. From there, it's up to SCOTUS to destroy the backboard with a dunk. Either allow the censor-state, or end it. ETA: I could imagine his net worth of ~$192 Billion would buy a nice legal team. He's also not afraid to drop a big old wad o' cash on something he thinks needs doing. |
|
|
Originally Posted By CleverNickname: As a partial backup plan, it'd be nice if he threw some money at developing a truly decentralized peer-to-peer social network / generalized data sharing protocol which would be more difficult to censor. But I don't think he'd be very interested in doing that because it would compete with X. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By CleverNickname: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Yes - and this is the wildcard, Narrative wise they're getting beaten at their own game. In terms of megaphones, there aren't enough people who ACTUALLY believe what your elitist leftie neighbor (NYT-believing Blueanon bot) does to ignore what's going on. ..Which is why they're going to try to cheat to win and attack the 1st Amendment. I wonder if this is what Musk is setting up: a title fight on this. Perhaps Musk (world's richest man.) would sue on 1st Amendment grounds that the law is unconstitutional. From there, it's up to SCOTUS to destroy the backboard with a dunk. Either allow the censor-state, or end it. ETA: I could imagine his net worth of ~$192 Billion would buy a nice legal team. As a partial backup plan, it'd be nice if he threw some money at developing a truly decentralized peer-to-peer social network / generalized data sharing protocol which would be more difficult to censor. But I don't think he'd be very interested in doing that because it would compete with X. After seeing how he's not only been redpilled, but is NOW at the point of tipping his hand and "taking sides" (from the middle perspective) - I would be FLOORED if someone with his IQ/ambition/tools has no ejector seat being built I say this as someone who is an EV skeptic who argued with "Musk fanboys" years ago, and many times over the years - so it's not like I believed then or believe now that he's some perfect guy or anything. I have a VERY high opinion of him now But I'm just saying, he's smart, he's got an insane work ethic (NASA startup, EV car startup that beat the big3 to that market, and then he bought twitter basically as a hobby because they cancelled his babylon bee), and he knows what he's looking at. At least for now, that's a comforting thought |
|
|
Originally Posted By midmo: He's also not afraid to drop a big old wad o' cash on something he thinks needs doing. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By midmo: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By kill-9: Originally Posted By Geralt55: they're fucking powerless to stop it. Yes - and this is the wildcard, Narrative wise they're getting beaten at their own game. In terms of megaphones, there aren't enough people who ACTUALLY believe what your elitist leftie neighbor (NYT-believing Blueanon bot) does to ignore what's going on. ..Which is why they're going to try to cheat to win and attack the 1st Amendment. I wonder if this is what Musk is setting up: a title fight on this. Perhaps Musk (world's richest man.) would sue on 1st Amendment grounds that the law is unconstitutional. From there, it's up to SCOTUS to destroy the backboard with a dunk. Either allow the censor-state, or end it. ETA: I could imagine his net worth of ~$192 Billion would buy a nice legal team. He's also not afraid to drop a big old wad o' cash on something he thinks needs doing. IIRC they trans'd his kid right? Isn't one of his children sucked into the woke mindvirus? Ask any parent about what would happen if people started messing with their children - and you watch their face turn colors as the old caveman wiring in the back of their brain momentarily fires up and switches off, going back to dormant. Now imagine you have "Buy And a satellite network. And your own space program. And a car company. And you just bought the derpstate psyop machine and converted it back into a social media platform. PS: You're one of the world's richest men, almost ~30x richer than Soros if you believe Google. Oh, and economically martyring Musk ^ increases the odds of a Camacho re-election, and closed ears at the watercooler when the "HURRR DRUMPF IS A DICTATOR FOR GIVING ELON BACK TWITTER REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" talk starts out of the BlueAnon-believer at the gym. |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: IIRC they trans'd his kid right? Isn't one of his children sucked into the woke mindvirus? Ask any parent about what would happen if people started messing with their children - and you watch their face turn colors as the old caveman wiring in the back of their brain momentarily fires up and switches off, going back to dormant. Now imagine you have "Buy And a satellite network. And your own space program. And a car company. And you just bought the derpstate psyop machine and converted it back into a social media platform. PS: You're one of the world's richest men, almost ~30x richer than Soros if you believe Google. Oh, and economically martyring Musk ^ increases the odds of a Camacho re-election, and closed ears at the watercooler when the "HURRR DRUMPF IS A DICTATOR FOR GIVING ELON BACK TWITTER REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" talk starts out of the BlueAnon-believer at the gym. View Quote Musk seems to slide more to the Right every day and he calls the left out . |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote |
|
We are free-range humans in a tax farm
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.