Posted: 3/28/2017 7:13:35 PM EDT
|
The left cant get over it. Jobs created people working the normality of it all is just to much for them to understand. They will continue to fight on until they get their way or go postal.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-energy-idUSKBN16Z1L6 |
|
what exactly are they taking to court?
If shit for brains had the authority as president to make those executive orders to put down restrictions, then Trump has the authority to undo them. Them going to court over everything is starting to make me lose my calm Fuck them. |
|
Quoted:
what exactly are they taking to court? If shit for brains had the authority as president to make those executive orders to put down restrictions, then Trump has the authority to undo them. Them going to court over everything is starting to make me lose my calm Fuck them. It's against tradition to undo previous EO's since President's generally dont want their EO's undone by the next guy.....but so what. If it's a bad EO, then Trump can undo it and I dont see where the legal challenge can come from? |
|
Quoted:
This...If Obama passed them as EO's, then Trump can sign new EO's undoing them. It's against tradition to undo previous EO's since President's generally dont want their EO's undone by the next guy.....but so what. If it's a bad EO, then Trump can undo it and I dont see where the legal challenge can come from? There was a law passed by congress, but the down and dirty details of actually administering and enforcing the law are left up to the regulating agencies to write. These regulations have the force of law because congress authorizes the agency to write those regulations under the umbrella of the original law. Trump is directing the agencies to remove some of these regulations. There is grounds for lawsuits, there will be lawsuits, this will drag on for years with no substantial changes. The next President can sign an EO directing the agency to put everything back the way it was, Then the energy industry will sue to not have so many regulations. Round and round we go, only the lawyers get rich. |
|
From the article:
"Trying to make fossil fuels remain competitive in the face of a booming clean renewable power sector, with the clean air and plentiful jobs it continues to generate, is going against the flow of economics," she said. Uh, if clean power is more cost effective, you don't need regulations to prevent coal from competing. If you truly believe that coal "is going against the flow of economics", you would shrug this off as irrelevant. If a socialist understood economics, they wouldn't be a socialist. |
