Epstein Files Press Conference - LIVE (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: Today 9:18:02 AM EST
[Last Edit: realwar][Edited]
 Epstein Files Press Conference - LIVE Breaking News Coverage Full Presser  Lawmakers, survivors of Jeffrey Epstein hold news conference: LIVE COVERAGE |
Joined:
Mar 2021
Posts:
38186
EE: 100% (7)
PRK
|
“survivor,” didn’t these females (girls at the time) accept money from Epstein? Victims, definitely. *I’m not saying Epstein didn’t do anything wrong, the guy was a creep, the Netflix doc made my skin crawl, and he and his whore definitely took advantage of young girls. But, it’s not like they kidnapped these girls or got them hooked on drugs and made them turn tricks, and they later escaped some brothel or cage. Also, why have no parents been held accountable? How are teenage girls flown to an island in the Bahamas, etc, by some creepy guy (if you ever watched him interviewed, he is a creepy dirtbag) and his henchwoman? I think everyone involved should burn, but there should be some honesty and reality too. ETA: Ah, she said modeling, visas, etc. I didn’t know that. |
Member
Joined:
Jan 2021
Posts:
19161
EE: 0% (0)
KS, USA
|
Originally Posted By Pallas: “survivor,” didn’t these females (girls at the time) accept money from Epstein? *I’m not saying Epstein didn’t do anything wrong, the guy was a creep, the Netflix doc made my skin crawl, and he and his whore definitely took advantage of young girls. But, it’s not like they kidnapped these girls or got them hooked on drugs and made them turn tricks. Also, why have no parents been held accountable? How are teenage girls flown to an island in the Bahamas, etc, by some creepy guy (if you ever watched him interviewed, he is a creepy dirtbag) and his henchwoman? I think everyone involved should burn, but there should be some honesty and reality too. ETA: Ah, she said modeling, visas, etc. I didn’t know that. The parent thing is a big problem , like you let your daughter get caught up in this shit ? |
Joined:
Mar 2025
Posts:
151
EE: 0% (0)
SC, USA
|
Originally Posted By Pallas: “survivor,” didn’t these females (girls at the time) accept money from Epstein? *I’m not saying Epstein didn’t do anything wrong, the guy was a creep, the Netflix doc made my skin crawl, and he and his whore definitely took advantage of young girls. But, it’s not like they kidnapped these girls or got them hooked on drugs and made them turn tricks. Also, why have no parents been held accountable? How are teenage girls flown to an island in the Bahamas, etc, by some creepy guy (if you ever watched him interviewed, he is a creepy dirtbag) and his henchwoman? I think everyone involved should burn, but there should be some honesty and reality too.  |
|
Every investigation, including civil lawsuits, has pretty much come to the conclusion there is no "list" of people who were flown to the island for the purpose of sexually abusing girls/kids. If you do a little research, the "Epstein List" was a misnomer for various client lists which had nothing to do w/ the abuse of girls/kids. Yes, Trump promissed to release "the list". However, at the times he said this, he could've believed there was a list, but later on learned there is no actual "Epstein List". How is signing a bill going to magically make "a list" appear when one never existed (using existing evidence that there isn't and never was "a list")? |
Joined:
Mar 2025
Posts:
152
EE: 0% (0)
SC, USA
|
Originally Posted By Morlawn66: The parent thing is a big problem , like you let your daughter get caught up in this shit ? Virginia Giuffre was sexually abused since she was 7, including by her dad. Her dad worked as a manager at Mar-a-Lago and got her a job working at the spa there when she was 14 where she was then "recruited" by Maxwell. |
|
Originally Posted By Morlawn66: The parent thing is a big problem , like you let your daughter get caught up in this shit ? I heard a podcast from a girl that was loosely affiliated with Epstein. She was a singer for Disney and a teen model. Never met him but was getting recruited by Maxwell. She went to one party and realized something was wrong and got out early. She was raped as a young child by her neighbor. Dad moved the whole family after that. She was then raped as a late teen by an industry executive. She said her mom would always encourage these "business" meetings that put her in bad situations because the mom was trying to live vicariously through her. Her dad was the complete opposite and probably ended up saving her from future abuse. |
Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By realwar:
|
|
All the international modeling agencies are cover for human trafficking especially from conflict nations... The globalist elite pay money to do all kinds of sordid things to the untermenchen. That is why that so called "Epstein" list had to be shelved and experts poured over to make sure the public gets the version most appropriate... imo |
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
Attached File
|
|
Originally Posted By Pallas: "survivor," didn't these females (girls at the time) accept money from Epstein? Victims, definitely. It's the manipulation of language. |
"As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
|
|
Originally Posted By User55645: Every investigation, including civil lawsuits, has pretty much come to the conclusion there is no "list" of people who were flown to the island for the purpose of sexually abusing girls/kids. If you do a little research, the "Epstein List" was a misnomer for various client lists which had nothing to do w/ the abuse of girls/kids. Yes, Trump promissed to release "the list". However, at the times he said this, he could've believed there was a list, but later on learned there is no actual "Epstein List". How is signing a bill going to magically make "a list" appear when one never existed (using existing evidence that there isn't and never was "a list")? You take a look at all of the investigations and write down a list of all known clients and associates. It really isn’t that hard. It’s hard if you don’t want to do it because the list would consist of a lot of powerful people that would rather not be publicly associated with someone they had no problem partying with for a decade. |
|
Originally Posted By Sparky: Why don't these women speaking at the news conference release names? I'm guessing the lawsuits would be epic without actual proof. As for the ones that they recognized? The same reason that many rapes don't get reported - the rapist is powerful, either monetarily or otherwise. Until pretty recently someone popping up and saying "so and so rich guy raped me" would get slapped with a lawsuit before the story was even published. And then there's Arkancide... |
"As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
|
Originally Posted By Morlawn66: The parent thing is a big problem , like you let your daughter get caught up in this shit ? Some number of parents use their kids for a variety of reasons, often for money. Imagine being the parent of a son who's a natural football player or an attractive daughter who could be a star model or a child actor. Lots of folks get dollar signs in their eyes. Their kid is a conduit to untold riches. Of course, there's lots of dysfunction behind folks who use their kids as objects, which creates broken children who are ripe for being used...especially girls. The shit breaks my heart, but all it takes to be a parent is to be fertile, fuck, and not abort. |
Johnson To Reporters: Ask Dems Why They Didn't Do 'A Darn Thing' On Epstein Files During Biden Era Johnson To Reporters: Ask Dems Why They Didn't Do 'A Darn Thing' On Epstein Files During Biden Era |
‘He Called Me a Traitor’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Fires Back at Trump Over Epstein Files ‘He Called Me a Traitor’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Fires Back at Trump Over Epstein Files |
|
Originally Posted By realwar: Johnson To Reporters: Ask Dems Why They Didn't Do 'A Darn Thing' On Epstein Files During Biden Era  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs8CSqwQNC8Fuck them but they're no longer in power, you are. |
|
Originally Posted By Sparky: Why don't these women speaking at the news conference release names? I'm guessing the lawsuits would be epic without actual proof. Good question. "I was raped by Bill Gates...." Another component that NEVER comes up.... what about the hours and hours of videos? |
|
Opinion column: But now that the real records are hitting the light of day? It turns out Donald J. Trump was the only major figure who actually cut ties, took action, and spoke out. He didn’t just distance himself — he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein behaved inappropriately toward a young woman. A decisive, documented action. And he did it long before Epstein’s crimes became a global scandal. In other words, the one man they wanted to portray as Epstein’s closest ally actually threw him out of the building and shut the door behind him. Meanwhile — and this is where the grenade pin pops loose — the newly revealed documents show a long list of Democrat power players who continued communicating with Epstein well after his 2008 conviction and who maintained cozy and strategic relationships that have nothing to do with “innocent social interaction” and everything to do with influence, fundraising, and elite protection networks. As Ed Morrissey notes in his HotAir analysis this week, the political class believed these files would detonate a mushroom cloud over Trump. Instead, Morrissey writes, “this is a hand grenade, and Democrats are the ones likely to get blown up.” They pulled the pin, but they were apparently too giddy and too blind to realize they were holding it. Unlike the swarm of suddenly-silent elites pretending they barely knew Epstein, Trump openly acknowledged the relationship when asked years ago — and openly condemned Epstein’s behavior. He didn’t bury it, deny it, or play dumb. He didn’t spin convenient amnesia just because the cameras were rolling. He acted, and then he walked away. When Epstein’s darkness came fully into the public eye, Trump had already separated. Meanwhile, others continued flying on his plane, attending his dinners, taking his meetings, and harvesting whatever benefits they thought he could provide. This isn’t about blind loyalty to Trump or refusal to hold him accountable for anything real. If he or anyone else on the Right were legitimately guilty of enabling Epstein, that evidence should come to light. But so far, the record shows the opposite: in a moment where a decent person would sever ties, Trump did just that — and the Democrats did not. The difference between banning someone from your property for preying on women versus continuing to meet with a convicted sex offender? That’s pretty stark. In fact, it may be the single most important political contrast of the current cycle. LINKAGE |
|
Originally Posted By realwar: Johnson To Reporters: Ask Dems Why They Didn't Do 'A Darn Thing' On Epstein Files During Biden Era https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs8CSqwQNC8That's a lie and Johnson knows it. There was an active trial for Ghislaine Maxwell so they couldn't make anything public at that time. Now, Trump has moved Maxwell to a comfy low security prison and indicated he might pardon her for sex trafficking minors. |
Something something of the something
Joined:
Jan 2001
Posts:
87103
EE: 0% (0)
CA, USA
| None of this matters. No one's opinion is going to change about anyone. People are going to believe what they are going to believe. The evidence doesn't matter, because no one knows what's true anyway. It's all too muddy at this point. I'm sure they are all guilty to some degree. |
Joined:
Mar 2025
Posts:
157
EE: 0% (0)
SC, USA
| Its going to pass the house, there is zero question. What remains is whether it will pass the Republican controlled senate, whether it will be vetoed by Trump, whether Trump will claim that the files cannot be released even if the bill passes due to "ongoing investigations", and whether, despite all that, evidence that used to be in the government's possession ultimately gets "lost." |
|
Originally Posted By Dazzler01: Its going to pass the house, there is zero question. What remains is whether it will pass the Republican controlled senate, whether it will be vetoed by Trump, whether Trump will claim that the files cannot be released even if the bill passes due to "ongoing investigations", and whether, despite all that, evidence that used to be in the government's possession ultimately gets "lost." Does this even go to the senate? Found my answer YES. https://justthenews.com/government/congress/house-vote-releasing-epstein-files |
| Most of them didn't "survive" shit. They were all willing participants getting paid for what they agreed to beforehand. Most were in their 20s and some were in highschool but they all knew they were going to be prostitutes for cash and connections. After the shit hit the fan, they all saw dollar signs if they played the victim card |
Joined:
Mar 2025
Posts:
158
EE: 0% (0)
SC, USA
|
Originally Posted By tnriverluver: Does this even go to the senate? Yes, but like anything else the Senate can sit on it, accept it as is, attempt to amend it, etc. Who does what in the Senate is going to be very telling. Mike Johnson, to nobody's surprise, is already calling for the Senate to amend it but its not yet clear if they will listen. |
|
Originally Posted By DmL5: That's a lie and Johnson knows it. There was an active trial for Ghislaine Maxwell so they couldn't make anything public at that time. Now, Trump has moved Maxwell to a comfy low security prison and indicated he might pardon her for sex trafficking minors. The jailers at Maxwell's old prison leaked a bunched of shit to the democrats about the interview and I read they got fired. Also she got death threats for being a snitch so that was the reason why they moved her out of the prison in the middle of the nights. The prison she was at was a low security prison and moved to another low security facility. Nothing special about that. Also the admin/DOJ has nothing to do with moving her that is solely up to the bureau of prisons. |
Member
Joined:
May 2022
Posts:
5102
EE: 0% (0)
NJ, USA
Browning Hi-Power, the side arm of the free world
Joined:
May 2003
Posts:
25420
EE: 100% (9)
AZ, USA
|
Originally Posted By Dazzler01: Its going to pass the house, there is zero question. What remains is whether it will pass the Republican controlled senate, whether it will be vetoed by Trump, whether Trump will claim that the files cannot be released even if the bill passes due to "ongoing investigations", and whether, despite all that, evidence that used to be in the government's possession ultimately gets "lost." pay attention, T$ already said he'll sign it |
1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual
Browning Hi-Power, the side arm of the free world
Joined:
May 2003
Posts:
25421
EE: 100% (9)
AZ, USA
|
Originally Posted By mcantu: Most of them didn't "survive" shit. They were all willing participants getting paid for what they agreed to beforehand. Most were in their 20s and some were in highschool but they all knew they were going to be prostitutes for cash and connections. After the shit hit the fan, they all saw dollar signs if they played the victim card and virginia guiffre continued recruiting girls after she aged out |
1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual
|
Originally Posted By Sparky: Why don't these women speaking at the news conference release names? I'm guessing the lawsuits would be epic without actual proof. Republican abuser, 40 year old event: "Must necessarily be believed. Democrat abuser, happened last week: "The lying bitch." |
|
To the simple minded, this is a simple problem. To people with a brain, the ethical and legal complications that will arise are manifold. The so-called "Epstein Files" is just a huge stack of stuff; not the product of any systemic or legal investigation. Innocent victims who have not come forward stand to be exposed. Names of people associated who did nothing wrong will be tarnished as the mob screams for their heads with no real evidence. |
KEEP CALM and let ME Carry On.
Attached File
Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By LibertyShip: To the simple minded, this is a simple problem. To people with a brain, the ethical and legal complications that will arise are manifold. The so-called "Epstein Files" is just a huge stack of stuff; not the product of any systemic or legal investigation. Innocent victims who have not come forward stand to be exposed. Names of people associated who did nothing wrong will be tarnished as the mob screams for their heads with no real evidence.  People expect some sort of list in Epstein's handwriting that reads: "Richard Cranium: had sexual intercourse with 14 year old girl named Sally Jane on 04/10/1998. Photos attached." A list of names means jack shit. A list of names with accusations means jack shit without actual evidence or a confession. The problem is the internet is ready to launch accusations at anybody who was ever in the same room with Epstein, depending entirely on which team they're on. The whole issue has been beat to death by conspiracy theorists and heavily politicized. No matter what happens, people are going to be pissed off and claim lies/coverups. There's nothing left with the Epstein case that can be trusted. Nothing. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
I haven't gotten far enough to know who yet. ETA Treasury Secretary Larry Summers First Democrat RESIGNS after EPSTEIN FILES BOMBSHELL!!! |
Attached File Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By realwar: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2025-11-18_at_09-59-54_Home__-3661165.JPG
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2025-11-18_at_10-01-59_Thomas-3661167.JPG Are we so easily forgetting the tactic used against Clarence Thomas, Trump, Kavanaugh, Elon, etc etc? Claim rape and force them to defend themselves as the media reminds people every 5 minutes what a horrible disgusting rapist they are. When it doesn't work, the victim vanishes back into obscurity and everybody moves on. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Name names. You don't go to the island and not know something. You don't fly on the jet several times and not know something. Let the friends of Epstein get the same criticism Trump has gotten. They only want to take down evil orange man. Give the victims their name and go after all the client list. It ruined |
|
Originally Posted By realwar:
https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2025-11-18_at_10-20-04_Home__-3661178.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/32274/Screenshot_2025-11-18_at_10-20-47_Open_S-3661179.JPG I suppose he isn’t going to try and explain why intel agency files would be part of a sex crime investigation. 
|
|
Originally Posted By Orrin: Name names. You don't go to the island and not know something. You don't fly on the jet several times and not know something. Let the friends of Epstein get the same criticism Trump has gotten. They only want to take down evil orange man. Give the victims their name and go after all the client list. It ruined Paging Ehud Barak |
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By Orrin: Name names. You don't go to the island and not know something. You don't fly on the jet several times and not know something. Let the friends of Epstein get the same criticism Trump has gotten. They only want to take down evil orange man. Give the victims their name and go after all the client list. It ruined I guarantee there were parties on the island where nothing happened with underage girls, and claiming anyone who attended those events knew about all of Epstein's proclivities is naive. That's like saying anyone who went to a party with Diddy knew he was such a sick fuck. Most of them only knew it was a big party with a bunch of rich people and jumped at the chance to associate with such people. |
Everything posted above is factual. Maybe.
|
Originally Posted By Dazzler01: Its going to pass the house, there is zero question. What remains is whether it will pass the Republican controlled senate, whether it will be vetoed by Trump, whether Trump will claim that the files cannot be released even if the bill passes due to "ongoing investigations", and whether, despite all that, evidence that used to be in the government's possession ultimately gets "lost." Ro Khanna (D-CA), who is behind the bill in the house (along with Thomas Massie) was complaining yesterday that several democrats in the Senate were trying to amend the bill to exclude certain portions of the records. My gut is, a paired down version of the bill will pass, with both sides blaming each other that it didn't go farther. Per Newsweek, "The bill, which will require a majority of two-thirds to succeed, would direct the DOJ to make “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” related to the Epstein case public, in a searchable and downloadable format, within 30 days of enactment. " That's a lot of wiggle room to keep stuff hidden. |
"Life is too serious to be taken seriously" - Ray Bradbury
KoW callsign 'Ribs'
KoW callsign 'Ribs'