Posted: 5/3/2017 8:10:21 PM EDT
|
The Russia "hacked" the election is in its death throes.
I'll post the summary here but it's important to go to the actual site so you can follow all of the links/evidence. http://g-2.space/ Guccifer 2.0: Game Over Metadata suggests it took only 30 minutes to go from a DNC tech/data strategy consultant creating documents to Guccifer2.0 tainting them - all occurring on a date that Guccifer2.0 claimed to be after he was locked out of the DNC Network - occurring on the same day that Guccifer2.0 emerged. Data found deeper in files now also demonstrates there was a misdirection effort, that, in its larger scope - seems to have been intended to discredit leaks by having leaks blamed on Russian hackers LATEST: An extremely rare pair of meetings has been discovered solely by following where Flood would likely have installed MS-Word (he worked for Biden at the White House for a year) and checking Biden's visitors on the 15th of June around 1:38pm. - Considering the attendees potential motives to frame Russia in both meetings, this is either a phenomenal coincidence or Guccifer 2.0's first batch of files came from the White House. INTRODUCTION There are individuals, who, in reality, have a higher likelihood of being linked to Guccifer2.0 than anyone in Russia. - The intention of this article is to inform readers, extensively about everything there is to know about Guccifer2.0 and from that, be armed with enough information to give motive and means the regard they deserve. To understand who Guccifer2.0 is likely to be - it is imperative to understand WHAT Guccifer2.0 is. - What did he do? - What did he say? - Are his claims now confirmed, debunked or yet to be verified? - What were the results of his actions? - What do any lies told and the likelihood of them being debunked or remaining secret really imply about his intent? - Was there anything misreported or omitted that may have been relevant? The answers to the above questions will probably be surprising to many considering what the USIC, CyberSecurity researchers and the MSM have repeatedly insisted over and over again. The first step is to catalog events - and then, retrospectively review the data. CONTENTS 1. Timeline - What Happened & When Did It Happen 2. Guccifer2.0's Claims Debunked & Discredited 3. 3rd Party Assessments - Assumptions & Conjecture vs Evidence & Facts 4. Actions, Consequences & Convenience For Anti-Leak Narratives 5. Rushing To Be Russian - The Donkey In A Bear Costume Made A Mistake 6. Language & Text Analysis 7. Recognizing Intent From Deceptions 8. With Motive & Means - Those More Likely Linked to G2 than Russians 9. Updates & Inquiries With Third Parties 10. 3rd Party Research & Further Reading 11. Frequently Asked Questions (8) With Motive & Means - Those More Likely Linked to G2 than Russians It seems like there's a good chance Warren Flood has involvement to some degree but even if that's true - he personally had nothing to lose due to the emails, so, who would really be behind such a scheme? The more thought I've given it, it seems most probable that one particular group would have been particularly desperate precisely at that time, for the emergence of a narrative about Russian hackers to discredit proper leaks / justify claims that all leaks are 'probably doctored' and they will have very likely known Flood too. That group is the Clinton Campaign. As of June 12th, they were in a position where Julian Assange had just announced WikiLeaks' upcoming release of Hillary's emails, she was still under FBI investigation, Trump was attacking Hillary for her use of a private server with his supporters frequently chanting "lock her up!" at rallies). The campaign was in a desperate position and really needed something similar to a Russian hacker narrative and one where they would be fortunate to have a seemingly clumsy hacker that leaves lots of 'fingerprints' tainting files and bringing the reputation of leaks into question... Sure enough, 2-3 days later, Guccifer2.0 - the world's weirdest hacker - was spawned and started telling lies in an effort to attribute himself to the malware discoveries, etc. ==================== Again clink link more detail/infographics http://g-2.space/jb/ White House Meetings on Ukraine Coincide With Time of Russian Fingerprint Fabrications - Pursuing Guccifer2.0's 'Warren Flood' Connections By Adam Carter --- April 29th, 2017 In my research to investigate the real identity of Guccifer 2.0, I discovered that the name Warren Flood applied to more documents than had originally been reported and highlighted the unusual nature of those documents both in terms of the metadata and the RSIDs (and Russian Stylesheet that existed in multiple documents even before the content in each document did) and explained that this demonstrates an effort to try to discredit Wikileaks by blaming leaks on Russian hackers. Considering where copies of Microsoft Word installed by Flood (highlighted in the photo above with Biden) might exist besides on computers he owns, I considered his past role as Sen. Joe Biden's Technology Director (as noted on his Linked-In profile) and thought one place to look for interesting activity would be computers residing in Biden's office or generally at the White House. So, I wondered who may have visited Biden that day around that time. I thought I'd check out visits to the White House hosted by Biden, wondering whether there'd be any interesting activity anywhere near 1:38pm on June 15th 2016. It turns out that Biden was hosting visits from a number of Ukrainians around that time, on that date. To see how frequent this sort of activity occurred I checked the whole of June. - It seems such visits were not a regular occurance. (Times below are appointment times, some individuals turned up before their 2pm appointment) An attempt to quickly identify visitors in June showed the folllowing had a Ukraine connection: While this doesn't prove anything, it certainly is a curious coincidence to stumble upon while looking for activity of people that might have had a motive (or helped with an effort) to frame Russia. US visitors that day also have ties back to events surrounding the Ukrainian 2014 revolution and/or reporting on it (with the exception of Kuklish who is an English-Ukrainian translator). I'm not going to get into speculation. I've let journalists who have written extensively on the Ukraine coup know about this and will leave this up to them to pursue, if they wish to. UPDATE: A closer look at the actual booking/arrival times, room numbers, other visits, etc. shows that, on the 15th, there were effectively 2 meetings. One of which had at least 18 individuals attending (Stoliarchuk is listed at 1:30pm and 2:00pm) and another with at least 4 attending. https://mobile.twitter.com/AnonScan/status/859135853322547201 |
|
CrowdStrike
-report funded by DNC -same report used by FBI in ODNI, not allowed by DNC to run their own forensics -founder Ukrainian and linked to Clintons -founder openly anti-Russia -original report shit on by private security experts/ex-NSA -original report revised not once, but twice I'm blown away the Dems went this far in an attempt to frame Russia and discredit the Wikileaks dumps before they were released |
| Who cares? Nothing will come of any of this. The MSM has their story of Trump/Russia ties and all the god damn retards in this country believe it. No one is going to jail nothing will change until the gene pool is cleansed of the low iq people kept alive by our technology and medical advances. |
|
Quoted:
CrowdStrike -report funded by DNC -same report used by FBI in ODNI, not allowed by DNC to run their own forensics -founder Ukrainian and linked to Clintons -founder openly anti-Russia -original report shit on by private security experts/ex-NSA -original report revised not once, but twice I'm blown away the Dems went this far in an attempt to frame Russia and discredit the Wikileaks dumps before they were released If they weren't, they wouldn't be dims. |
|
Quoted:
Congratulations, your post gave me a headache. Was this copied from Notepad? Can you post a screenshot? I'd hate for this to be skipped over because of poor formatting and people too afraid to click a link. |
|
Quoted:
It's all your nonsense was really worth giving. Here's the FBI Director saying otherwise. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-76cjPXgAAL8JJ.jpg:large We've never conversed, but I've followed your rhetoric in these type threads for quite a while. Your response is duly noted and I don't expect you to answer a single question I've posed. If you'd actually like to counter anything posted in the OP be my guest, I'm more than willing to discuss. Blanket dismissals and lack of rebuttal aren't compelling for your case. |
|
Quoted:
It's all your nonsense was really worth giving. Here's the FBI Director saying otherwise. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-76cjPXgAAL8JJ.jpg:large The "evidence" that he's Russian, should be understood in the following context: He CHOSE to name his computer account after the founder of the Soviet Secret Police. He CHOSE to create/open and then save documents so the Russian name was written to metadata. He CHOSE to use a Russian VPN service to cloak his IP address. He CHOSE to use public web-based email services that would forward his cloaked IP. He CHOSE to use the above to contact various media outlets on the same day. Note: Thanks to a 3rd party's further investigation, it now appears he may have used a single document as a Russian template (with Russian stylesheet data in), saved it as a set of blank 'pre-tainted' files and then opened them later under a different username - copying/pasting in content from original documents into each blank 'pre-tainted' document before saving again - as the specific process for creating documents (Stylesheet change RSIDs correlating across files certainly suggest it and the metadata fully corroborates it too). Guccifer2.0 covered himself and the files in the digital equivalent of "Made In Russia" labels while claiming to be a Romanian. (Giving cyber-security firms, journalists and others a flimsy veil they could easily pull off and find Russian "fingerprints" behind - not realizing that what they were revealing was a layer of misdirection that would actually prevent them from considering a 3rd possibility!) |
|
Quoted:
It's all your nonsense was really worth giving. Here's the FBI Director saying otherwise. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-76cjPXgAAL8JJ.jpg:large 
|
|
Quoted:
Yep, Comey is a super reliable source and totally wouldn't lie about anything. Quoted:
Quoted:
It's all your nonsense was really worth giving. Here's the FBI Director saying otherwise. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-76cjPXgAAL8JJ.jpg:large |
|
Quoted:
Do you really think that evidence is going to sway the people pushing the "election hacking" narrative, or the losers swallowing it up? Objective reality is a far-out theory to them This is the tactic they use. Remember it for next time. |
|
Quoted:
I feel like I needed to order some Super Male Vitality just to read the op, much less make sense of it. |