Posted: 10/1/2013 12:36:00 PM EDT
|
I like space movies so I'm curious how it is? Anyone seen a sneak preview yet?
I know it has clooney and Im not a fan of his at all, but is it even gonna be worthy of a rental ? |
|
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1454468/?ref_=nv_sr_3
Cast says "Ok"... Plot says "Mmmmkay"... Mehhh |
|
Quoted:
It hasn't even been released yet. How many people get access to the early previews? Quoted:
Quoted:
Imdb is 8/10 which is pretty high. Prob pick it up as a rental many months from now. It hasn't even been released yet. How many people get access to the early previews? Many of them are in the industry or published reviewers that get prescreen DVDs or closed house viewings. This will receive an academy award best picture and director nomination and could get Bullock another academy award for acting. Lots of technical nominations/awards coming as well. Better to see it on IMAX or biggest screen available. |
|
Read the review on FoxNews. They think very highly of it.
'Gravity' review: There has never before been a movie like this. The simplest way to sum up director Alfonso Cuarón’s “Gravity” is to say it’s a true, new experience. This mesmerizing, awe-inspiring and often frighteningly realistic exploration of space flight (we assume) harkens back to the birth of cinema when the mechanics of movie making were not widely understood by the audience and the images blew peoples’ minds. The first movies, like the Lumière’s “Arrival of a Train at La Ciotat” (1895) -- which simply shows a steam engine approaching a station – seemed like magic. Jumping forward to today, shots of Sandra Bullock and George Clooney drifting in orbit above our beautiful blue planet or clinging to dear life on splintering solar panels is almost stupefying, if not frighteningly, real – but it’s not. “Gravity,” for the time being, is like those early Lumière picture shows – it’s (movie) magic. Four and a half years in the making, combining computer animation, principal photography then re-animating and simply using basic physics as a storytelling device, Aflonso and son/co-writer Jonás Cuarón have created one of the tensest movies in years. Alfonso Cuarón opens the film with a nearly 20-minute single shot as astronauts Ryan Stone (Sandra Bullock) and Matt Kowalski (George Clooney) float in and out of frame doing maintenance work on a broken satellite. The affable banter between Clooney and Bullock quickly comes to a halt when debris from an exploded Russian satellite crashes into their shuttle, blasting them into space. With oxygen rapidly depleting and time running out, Ryan and Kowalski must use a combination of flight training, physics and luck to get them back to safety. But in orbit, as the saying goes, what comes around goes around: The two drifting astronauts have 90 minutes before they are bombarded again by the same debris. On a technical level, “Gravity” is cinema’s best achievement in years. There is really nothing else to compare it with based on the realism of its visual effects and real-world implications. The mechanizations of spaceflight and space survival seem impeccably real, as do the decisions Cuaron’s characters make. The computer animation combined with Emmanuel Lubezki’s photography is breathtaking and expansive, managing a sense of claustrophobia in the one place there’s plenty of space. Clooney and Bullock frantically fumble across satellites and space stations that are tangible yet icily lifeless. Andy Nicholson’s production design seamlessly blends those cold, gray sets with the deep black void of space then contrasts with the beautiful Earth in the background. This is certainly a feast for the eyes and ears, if not entirely healthy for the heart. Story-wise, though, “Gravity” is just your typical survival film which has been made aplenty, though, the elements are different in this setting with only a few broken spacecrafts and endless deep space. Survival films like “Gravity” are almost like one-off events, something that everyone should see at least once, but don’t often stand the test of time. The allure of a movie like “127 Hours” was to see how James Franco would cut off his arm, but can anyone remember the rest of the movie? And does anyone care to? Fortunately, “Gravity” does have more going for it than most survival films, which primarily, is the various layers of fear: the fear of the unfamiliarity of space, the obvious fear of time, and finally the fear of not just dying but the question of how will your end come? It takes more than just visual effects to hold a film together and Sandra Bullock is the pull in “Gravity.” For the majority of the film, Bullock is alone, and while acting in general is no easy feat, acting solo is an actor’s most challenging role and Bullock is effortlessly sensational. Her roller coaster of emotions from the start of the film to its final frame are riveting. The suspense in this film would be null without Bullock’s wonderful and relatable connection. The Cuaróns’ makes Ryan an "everyman," so watching her struggle to save and be saved is like having a sinking feeling of watching one’s self go through this traumatic ordeal. Bullock wasn’t the first choice to play Ryan, but Cuarón should count himself lucky that he landed a powerful, often beautiful, performance in the end. While “Gravity” gives audiences a sensational and unparalleled fictional view of the final frontier, Bullock says it best as her dread sets in: “I hate space.” For those who have always dreamed of becoming an astronaut or visiting the stars, this incredibly tense film might change your mind. Going in to the film knowing disaster will strike just makes the tension that much greater and when Cuarón unleashes hell upon Ryan and Kowalski, the suspense is relentless and exhausting. “Gravity” deserves the IMAX treatment more than most films. An already immersive experience is incredibly heightened by the big screen format. Check out on IMAX if possible. It will be worth the extra coin. It remains to be seen if “Gravity” will have a long shelf-life once every new science fiction movie hereafter copies everything from its realism to its naturalistic effects to Steven Price’s hypnotic and vertigo-inducing score. “Gravity” is definitely an experience – an event – and whether or not that lasts, as of right now, there’s just nothing else like it. And that is a rare treat at the movies. Warner Bros. Pictures. MPAA Rating: PG-13. Running time: 1 hour and 31 minutes. |
|
I saw it in IMAX 3D.
Cinematography was incredible. Story was meh. Probably will buy the bluray, just for the visuals. Click To View Spoiler 
|
|
I just saw Gravity in IMAX 3D and it was easily one of the best movie theater experiences I've ever had. If you like movies, you should go see this one.
Sandra Bullock did a great job, and so did Clooney (and I'm not a big Clooney fan). It was also the first 3D movie I've seen and I rather enjoyed it. The 3D is mostly subtle until certain climactic scenes. Music was really good. Story had a lot of underlying significance to it. And BUZZ ALDRIN liked the movie. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/gravity-review-by-astronaut-buzz-639883 |
|
This movie was amazing. There are scenes in this movie that are just... WOW. Some due to the cinematography (which was the most breathtaking ever put on the silver screen); but some due to the context.
Maybe a spoiler to those who haven't even seen a preview but: Click To View Spoiler |
|
Movie was good. It was like Blackhawk Down, in that, it's almost exhausting to the audience. The characters just go through so much on camera, non stop, you just want them to survive and for it to end for them. Not a lot of movie suck you in like that.
At the very end, as she's swimming to the surface, I leaned over to my wife and whispered "I would pay extra for this movie if she got eaten by a shark right now", and she said "or an alligator" |
|
Quoted:
Movie was good. It was like Blackhawk Down, in that, it's almost exhausting to the audience. The characters just go through so much on camera, non stop, you just want them to survive and for it to end for them. Not a lot of movie suck you in like that. At the very end, as she's swimming to the surface, I leaned over to my wife and whispered "I would pay extra for this movie if she got eaten by a shark right now", and she said "or an alligator" Or Aimless. |
|
Quoted:
Or Aimless. Quoted:
Quoted:
Movie was good. It was like Blackhawk Down, in that, it's almost exhausting to the audience. The characters just go through so much on camera, non stop, you just want them to survive and for it to end for them. Not a lot of movie suck you in like that. At the very end, as she's swimming to the surface, I leaned over to my wife and whispered "I would pay extra for this movie if she got eaten by a shark right now", and she said "or an alligator" Or Aimless. Click To View Spoiler |
)
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Movie was good. It was like Blackhawk Down, in that, it's almost exhausting to the audience. The characters just go through so much on camera, non stop, you just want them to survive and for it to end for them. Not a lot of movie suck you in like that. At the very end, as she's swimming to the surface, I leaned over to my wife and whispered "I would pay extra for this movie if she got eaten by a shark right now", and she said "or an alligator" Or Aimless. Click To View Spoiler 
|