Hard Time Voting Vivek (Page 8 of 8)
Indelible in the Hippocampus, the Sylvan
Joined:
Nov 2000
Posts:
102246
EE: 100% (7)
CA, USA
|
I'll trade Vivek for Gavin NewScum With any luck we might get Steve Hilton |
"We will always remember. We will always be proud. We will always be prepared so we may always be free." Ronald Reagan 1984
"Mitch the almost dead democrat bitch"
2026, the bigger better democrat election fraud
"Mitch the almost dead democrat bitch"
2026, the bigger better democrat election fraud
|
Originally Posted By RustedAce: He has a record as a human being though. He has lied to take advantage of the most vulnerable in our society to enrich himself. He has made it clear he hates Americans. Thats kinda a bad record. You are looking for human decency in politicians? You know what, I look around this place and some days I hate americans and my people have been since the founding. Stop looking for politicians that you want as a friend. The voters have allowed a system to be built that attracts the worst people in the society to politics. The only question is which one of the scumbags is more likely to fuck you and the country over the least in their self-serving narcissism. I stopped looking for politicians with whom I would have dinner a long time ago. And some of the locals I have told this to their faces. Yeah, I will vote for you even though you are corrupt and not very bright; but you stink less than the other pig. (Said to Wesley Bell when I told him I would support him over that disgusting sow Cori Bush. And yes, I called Bush a disgusting sow to her face at a campaign event. I was asked to leave, but I was ready to go anyway. You can only take so much of that filth at a time.) You can tell them what a piece of filth they are while voting for your interests. |
|
Originally Posted By Bigger_Hammer: The problem with continuing to vote for terrible candidates just because they are Republicans, is the party will just keep giving you even more and even worse terrible candidates. Originally Posted By Bigger_Hammer: The problem with continuing to vote for terrible candidates just because they are Republicans, is the party will just keep giving you even more and even worse terrible candidates. What a shitty way to make excuses for idiots not doing any homework before a primary to figure out who to vote for. Parties don't select, people VOTE. If people don't know who they are voting for before going into the polling location, then that's a messaging problem from the candidate or you are surrounded by dumbasses. Unless you can show me that the Ohio GOP was not taking qualifying paperwork and money from people, this is just a pathetic excuse. Originally Posted By LurchAddams: I couldn't vote for Vivek for two reasons: 2. He criticizes American workers, and wants to import cheap H-1B's. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/126713/Vivek_Laziness_jpg-3829272.JPG]] Anyone who's currently in a public school system knows exactly what Vivek is talking about here. I'm in a HS monthly for a mentorship program and my company has had a couple of interns from 2 of the local high schools. I have several friends as teachers in the local system. The county next door is now 20% asian and a median household income of ~$170k. The asians (pacific and Indian) own all the sciences/math/music programs. If there's ever a call home about a child's behavior, the Asian parents must beat their kids ass because it gets taken care of. White kids, like half the time the parents blame the teachers or school. Black kids, it's 100% the teachers/school fault. Hispanic kids, have a heck of a time getting a hold of their parents. The school I'm in on occasion, they had an Indian girl and she started fucking up. Like skipping class, talking back, etc. Her parents sent her ass to India to live with her grandparents for an entire semester. Pulled her from school, everything. She came back a new student. Never talked back, did her work, etc. There isn't a white set of parents on this entire continent that would do that so if you don't understand the mentality that's happening currently in your local school system, it's not Vivek's fault. |
|
Originally Posted By spmx7777: Here you go https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg_4fd8071a-32a8-4917-9423-d92ed2c5f93f No, I'm not going to copy it all here. If you don't like a Grok answer then skip it, I don't care. He knew how to push his drug as hard as possible while staying within legal boundaries. Legal? Yes. Unethical? Also yes. It took me a while to learn this lesson in life and business. Take it for what it’s worth... maybe it changes your perspective. Good guys often finish last. In my 50yrs on this earth and 15yrs in business running a multi million dollar company it took me a minute to learn this. I used to think that being good was the ticket to success. I can promise you it's not. Now, I am not advocating that you become a rip off artist, or even bend the rules. I am advocating that you learn the system and use every single advantage to your favor. I want people on my team who are smart enough to understand the rules, understand the system, and know how to use every legal advantage available to achieve the goal. I want accounts that get me the best returns on my taxes. I want lawyers that win every case in my favor. I want a team that knows how to win because they prepare better, identify weaknesses, make smarter decisions, and take advantage of every legitimate opportunity the game gives them. That is not unethical. That is competing. Those investors knew the risks of biotech, they took them, and they lost. I don't pretend to know how biotech or securites work, it's not my specialty, but I do know the guy was never charged, little alone convicted of any wrongdoing. So I can only deduce that he was competing in business. I don't have a problem with that. The same principle applies in politics. If a candidate supports stronger border enforcement, protects or even improves 2A rights, restricts abortion, supports deporting people in the country illegally, and understands how to navigate the system to actually accomplish those things... hell yes, I want that person on my team. You can demand a purity test and complain about every hardball tactic. But the real world does not reward the person who refuses to compete while everyone else is playing to win. There is a difference between breaking the rules and being smart enough to use them in your favor. I want the latter. |
What is a democrat? Someone who wants everything you have, except for your job.
Politicians should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we could see their corporate sponsors.
Politicians should wear uniforms like NASCAR drivers so we could see their corporate sponsors.
|
Originally Posted By ZW17: It took me a while to learn this lesson in life and business. Take it for what it’s worth... maybe it changes your perspective. Good guys often finish last. In my 50yrs on this earth and 15yrs in business running a multi million dollar company it took me a minute to learn this. I used to think that being good was the ticket to success. I can promise you it's not. Now, I am not advocating that you become a rip off artist, or even bend the rules. I am advocating that you I want people on my team who are smart enough to understand the rules, understand the system, and know how to use every legal advantage available to achieve the goal. I want accounts that get me the best returns on my taxes. I want lawyers that win every case in my favor. I want a team that knows how to win because they prepare better, identify weaknesses, make smarter decisions, and take advantage of every legitimate opportunity the game gives them. That is not unethical. That is competing. Those investors knew the risks of biotech, they took them, and they lost. I don't pretend to know how biotech or securites work, it's not my specialty, but I do know the guy was never charged, little alone convicted of any wrongdoing. So I can only deduce that he was competing in business. I don't have a problem with that. The same principle applies in politics. If a candidate supports stronger border enforcement, protects or even improves 2A rights, restricts abortion, supports deporting people in the country illegally, and understands how to navigate the system to actually accomplish those things... hell yes, I want that person on my team. You can demand a purity test and complain about every hardball tactic. But the real world does not reward the person who refuses to compete while everyone else is playing to win. There is a difference between breaking the rules and being smart enough to use them in your favor. I want the latter. In an ideal world, sure. We have an oligarchy now because the players influenced how the laws and regulations were written. You can't expect everyone else to just go along with getting screwed at every opportunity and not fight back. I say he's an unethical piece of shit, you say he's a tough competitor. We'll have to disagree. |
|
And that's why democrats always win and why you always have shit representation. I dunno if I can vote the republican candidate because he likes cats and I like dogs. Meanwhile, the other party candidate likes gerbils, Crisco and furries. Stay home. The gerbil people are counting on you. You are getting something much worse when you let other people decide for you. It's not the lesser of two evils, it's trying to stay out of hell. |
