Is Sig going to quietly drop the P320? (Page 2 of 2)
Joined:
Nov 2025
Posts:
3144
EE: 0% (0)
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By Evil_Ed: You mean, dropping a GI 1911 on it’s nose, not it’s hammer - the uncommanded discharges happen because the firing pin was heavier than the firing pin spring’s weight. Springfield had (has?) California-certified 1911s because they use titanium firing pins; very light, light enough so they won’t overpower the firing pin spring during the drop test. And, Series 70 Colts distinctly means the Accurizer barrel and collet bushing for Colt. Those, and larger sights, were really the only appreciable changes between the standard GI 1911A1 and the “Series 70” as Colt marketed it when they started selling them. Sorry, but people calling standard GI fire control groups “Series 70” drives me fucking nuts. Series 70 denoted a barrel/bushing, not a fire control group. Especially when people refer to shit that isn’t even a Colt as “Series 70”. It’s like calling every revolver a Python, or every polymer gun a Glock 40. The only reason the misconception exists is because Series 80 introduces the trigger activated firing pin blocking plunger. As you said, Series 70 introduces the collet bushing, but a lot of people don’t know what that is and erroneously assume it simply means “no firing pin block.” To make matters more confusing, Colt also has labeled both the DA/SA Double Eagle and some SAO Defender models as “Series 90” and the reintroduced Series 70 has a solid bushing. |
|
Looks like a new modular striker gun called the P385 is debuting later… Sorry for FB video but it’s all we got for now Got to be a quiet admission of … something. 
|
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
|
Here’s an article with some pics of the five launch guns. Looks nice, lower bore axis, uses 320 mags. https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/articles/sig-p385-duty-pistol How long until the 320 is department/mil-only?
|
Support the Firearms Policy Coalition and help save the Second Amendment: https://www.firearmspolicy.org
The opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer or their customers.
The opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer or their customers.
|
Originally Posted By anesvick: It's just a shitty design. They took the 250 and threw a half-baked striker fired design in the molds and sent it, then paid off the government to make it the military's next pistol like Beretta did in the 80s. Originally Posted By anesvick: Originally Posted By Porcupine55: Everyone talking about the P320 unintentional discharge issue and I've been grossed out by it's incredibly high bore axis from the very beginning. Seriously, it's 2026. How is the industry not past this? High bore axis guns should be something we remember from the 90's. Oh really. And yet the m9 lasted nearly 40years and didn't end up shooting people in the leg. |
Member
Joined:
Dec 2023
Posts:
12187
EE: 100% (7)
USA
|
Originally Posted By Findsman: Here’s an article with some pics of the five launch guns. Looks nice, lower bore axis, uses 320 mags. https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/articles/sig-p385-duty-pistol How long until the 320 is department/mil-only?  It looks like a proper striker fired pistol instead of a DAO POS with a striker duct taped into it. There are some smart design details here, too. This could be a really good gun. |
"Sometimes, the grass is greener because it's on a septic system."
"Sporterizing: The art of spending $700 on a $300 gun to make it worth $200." -GTwannabe
"Sporterizing: The art of spending $700 on a $300 gun to make it worth $200." -GTwannabe
|
Official Sig announcement: https://www.sigsauer.com/blog/introducing-the-all-new-sig-sauer-p385 Attached File Official product page: https://www.sigsauer.com/firearms/pistols/p385.html Attached File I've always had a high degree of proficiency with Glocks and lately have become a convert for the Springfield/HSP Echelon, so this isn't for me. Plus I hate Sig's business practices. These look like a huge improvement on the 320 though. |
Support the Firearms Policy Coalition and help save the Second Amendment: https://www.firearmspolicy.org
The opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer or their customers.
The opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer or their customers.
|
Originally Posted By GenYRevolverGuy: https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/images/articles/sig-p385-duty-pistol/sig-p385-mach3d.webp It looks like a proper striker fired pistol instead of a DAO POS with a striker duct taped into it. There are some smart design details here, too. This could be a really good gun. Originally Posted By GenYRevolverGuy: Originally Posted By Findsman: Here’s an article with some pics of the five launch guns. Looks nice, lower bore axis, uses 320 mags. https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/articles/sig-p385-duty-pistol How long until the 320 is department/mil-only? https://www.rifleconfigurator.com/images/articles/sig-p385-duty-pistol/sig-p385-mach3d.webp It looks like a proper striker fired pistol instead of a DAO POS with a striker duct taped into it. There are some smart design details here, too. This could be a really good gun. I SEE A HIDDEN DINGUS |
Let's Go Red Wings!
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Beautifying the world one logo at a time since 1993.
Soli Deo Gloria
Joined:
Sep 2026
Posts:
60
EE: 0% (0)
SC, USA
|
Originally Posted By CheemsK1500: That is the only reason it stays in production. Without contracts, it would disappear from the catalog and be forgotten or occasionally remembered as that weird gun that looked like a P250. This. I bet they try to quietly drop the 320 from the catalog while continuing to support .mil and LE contracts. Meanwhile, the lobbying and sales team start pushing the 385 for new contracts. All while denying there was ever a problem. Fuck Sig. |
|
Originally Posted By dSmith45: I posted that on their FB page. I would be down to trade up my M17 Bravo for a P385 Full, thumb safety. Originally Posted By dSmith45: Originally Posted By macman37: They should do a trade-up program. I'd take a look at it. That would involve acknowledging a problem with the 320. They aren't going to do that. |