Posted: 5/8/2005 4:56:55 PM EDT
| Or is shooting paper boring as hell compared to a reacting target. I can shoot my ARs and have fun (shooting paper), but if you give me a pellet gun and some GI Joes, that is what I call FUN. It brings more satisfaction for me to see the target react to getting hit. The GI Joes fall, break, etc....paper does nothing. Even a steel target that falls after being hit is better to me than paper. Am I the only one that is like this? |
It's not just you, it's you & I. I feel the same way. |
Well at least buy the Nazi army men, don't shoot at the green guys 
|
|
I would seriously doubt there's a single person out there that thinks punching paper is more fun than shooting reactive targets. My favorite is broken electronics. UMD throws out an amazing number of compputer stuff (tons of computers, stuff gets broken, out it goes). I've availed myself of this. It's great. |
Airsoft sucks ass for shooting anything but people at close range (past 10 yards accuracy sucks). But .177 pellet guns work great. It sorta helps real shooting too, it simulates shooting man sized stuff at long range, even if they are only bout 20 yards away. Its even better to call your shots and get it on video camera. |
Just paint their helmets blue! 
|
|
Yes, it's just you. To the rest of us think shooting paper targets is exicting as hell. Ignore all those imaginary posters who say Tannerite is fun to shoot at. They are all figments of your imagination. In fact, shooting is not fun. No one enjoys it we just shoot guns at paper because we got tired of using our guns toothpicks. |
Oh you be quiet  .
|
Sounds like stuff my dad says. He will only buy a rifle if it can be used to make itty bitty groups. In other words, Carbines, and most other semi-autos need not apply. |