Posted: 9/22/2016 4:58:26 PM EDT
|
When a person of any race takes the opinion of a black man over a white man simply because of the color of his skin? The opinion is 100% the same, but it's discounted when a white man says it. When a black man says it it's taken as gospel.
Poll inbound. |
|
Quoted:
Don't bring your commie friends here.  Quoted:
Quoted:
Bump for the evening crew, trying to prove a point to a commie  Don't bring your commie friends here. Family actually. I'd love to say "fuck it" but my 10yo nephew is growing up in an SJW, single parent environment. I'm trying to help him grow up into a normal and rational American citizen. |
|
Everything, literally every thought, deed, or object, is racist.
Asparagus is racist. HERE There is no logic in it, stop trying to look for it. |
|
Quoted:
When a person of any race takes the opinion of a black man over a white man simply because of the color of his skin? The opinion is 100% the same, but it's discounted when a white man says it. When a black man says it it's taken as gospel. Poll inbound. You didn't list "idiotic" as a choice. |
|
Quoted:
Any of the 3 legitimate no's feel like justifying your position? Preferably in rational, cohesive arguments.... Classical liberalism is dying and so is its language. Staying relevant means talking to people with common, modern definitions instead of obscure semantic hairsplitting from the ancient days. In modern language, racism is (more or less) something only whites (and occasionally Asians) can commit. It means indirect contribution to a civilization, and then indirectly reaping the benefits. In an economic sense, it could be described as: rightists consider wealth earned, leftists consider it taken. A racist refrains from smash-n-grabs on Nike stores. This small personal cost is contributed to the net value of the customs shared by a name brand or tribe. So long as they don't blatantly repudiate the brand, tribe members can enjoy the privileges of that pool of value, such as less attention from security guards. This happens even on the first visit to a store, despite not previously, personally demonstrating they are not a thief in front of that particular store. Hence, it is prejudice, and the guards will treat a tribe member and an outgroup member unequally, until they visit enough to be judged on the personal scale. Since the world is a big place and there just isn't enough time to judge everyone personally, brains autogenerate loose tribal tags to help identify trends better. One trend is that after sorting out and controlling for all external factors (such as income level), group B people do a lot more crime than group A people. Security guards are thus warier around them until evidence from personal experience outweighs evidence from group habits when judging that person. In this case, brains don't need a special abstract label such as a nationality or title. These groups already have easy visual markings, because DNA affects more than just 40% of human personality. |