Posted: 10/2/2008 7:45:40 PM EDT
|
is a classy guy. I disagree with most of his positions, but he is my favorite 'wrong' guy. That is all. HH |
Oh, no doubt. My folks and I love the guy, but we don't agree with his positions. Pretty unique if you ask me. No one can question his heart, no matter how wrong we think/know he is. The guy is truly unique. HH |
Sec of State would be good for him. Unfortunately he would be a HUGE priority target of those nutjobs in the middle east. Apparantly they are not fans of the Hebrews. |
Did you read the thread before posting? |
He opposes his own party to the point the nominated a whack job named Ned Lamont to run instead. He decided to run as an independant and the people of CT supported him. He realizes now that the democratic party is not the same party anymore. He is very strong on national defense. His foreign policy is good. He supports the GWOT. Most of his other view suck but he will be put into a cabinet position that will focus his strong point and eliminate all of his weak points. |
Too much effort....  HH |
sorry CTbuild, i caught all of your AWB posts in the CT forum but I missed the Lieberam thread  I was not very into politics until recently. Leiberman just seems as the lesser of 2 evils and got my vote during the elections. Am I the only person that votes for the lesser of 2 evils? In CT we dont have too much of a choice, dont you agree CT |
He's a lib who happens to be completely in the tank for Israel, to the point where all other considerations are secondary to what happens to be in Israels interest. I don't have any problem with supporting Israels interests, but that's hardly a solid basis for a cabinet position. And yeah I think he'll be chief of staff, I called that before McCain was even the presumptive nominee and I stand by it. Secstate maybe, can't think of any other position he'd fit very well. |
|
You had Slesinger as our Republican, he had a snowballs chance in hell. then you had Lamont-D and Leiberman-I. So yes it was the lesser of two evils. Lamont is a complete move-on.org style kook. Connecticut is very funny in the way we vote. There are many Republicans here and we usually have Republican governers. Yet we send a lot of Dems to the House and Senate. |
|
right, slessinger was the right vote. but knowing that his chance was nill, leiberman got my vote. i am finding that no politician is 100% my ideal candidate. and the candidates (if there are any) that are most in line with my ideals have no chance at being elected ETA: I dont like giving up, but I would rather give up than to give away votes to a person that wants to restrict or take away my rights (i.e. Lamont) |
There are plenty of Republicans here. I would not be suprised if CT goes McCain in the election. CT tends to lean left but it likes the center best of all. Most of our politicians, on both sides, tend to be more center then far left or far right. McCain is much closer to the center than Obama (understatement). It will be interesting to see. |
It's called playing the game Some people will completely write a candidate off over ONE issue. Some would rather stay home and not vote if their "perfect" candidate is not on the ballot. In reality you have to selct the best choice available and go for it. Anyone who doesn't vote McCain for POTUS is a fucking idiot in my opinion becasue the alternative is Barack Obama.
|
You know what though? I actually TRUST Joe Lieberman. He says what he thinks, and sticks to his guns. He is one of the only politicians I actually trust. I might not agree with him...but if he says, I intend to do XYZ, I won't question his integrity. That alone is a rare commodity. I would vote for him before McCain or Obama. -Ben |
|
He aint classy at all, he is a pathological lying sack of liberal shit, nothing more, nothing less I'd like to punch his father in the nuts for supplying the sperm that made him |