[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Just saw SULLY...wow (Page 2 of 3)
|
Quoted:
What does that have to do with this movie? Quoted:
Quoted:
This pic was taken after these two gents guzzled each others boners. https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Me7889e04109983eb38cefc03c9d110c8o0&pid=15.1 Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand |
|
Quoted: Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This pic was taken after these two gents guzzled each others boners. https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Me7889e04109983eb38cefc03c9d110c8o0&pid=15.1 Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? |
|
Quoted: You do realize with that mentality you would never be able to watch a movie ever again? Hollywood is full of libs and there is no way any movie will not be "supporting" at least one. Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This pic was taken after these two gents guzzled each others boners. https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Me7889e04109983eb38cefc03c9d110c8o0&pid=15.1 Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? |
|
Quoted: It is. I didn't find a dull moment in it to be honest. The NTSB investigation took 15 months and concluded finally that he made the right decision to ditch in the Hudson. Quoted: Quoted: The trailer makes it look like 3 minutes of water landing, then 87 minutes of fake NTSB drama. Is it better than that? It is. I didn't find a dull moment in it to be honest. The NTSB investigation took 15 months and concluded finally that he made the right decision to ditch in the Hudson. How about a spoiler alert here????? Jeeeeez....  |
|
Quoted: Yay, he survived on a deserted island. Oh wait, you meant Captain Sullenberger, who saved the lives of 158 people when he successfully landed his crippled aircraft in the Hudson river. Got it....  Quoted: Quoted: Yay he ditched an airplane. Yay, he survived on a deserted island. Oh wait, you meant Captain Sullenberger, who saved the lives of 158 people when he successfully landed his crippled aircraft in the Hudson river. Got it.... Yeah, pretty good pilot. What's Hanks done? |
|
Quoted:
You do realize with that mentality you would never be able to watch a movie ever again? Hollywood is full of libs and there is no way any movie will not be "supporting" at least one. Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This pic was taken after these two gents guzzled each others boners. https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Me7889e04109983eb38cefc03c9d110c8o0&pid=15.1 Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? The guy's just showboating. |
|
Quoted:
I've been done watching Tom Hanks play Tom Hanks for years. Don't hate the guy, but never saw him as a talented actor. Of course if you play a retard or fag you're gonna win some awards. Also not big into "fact-based" movies, at least recent ones. Give me a documentary, I don't need Hollywood's phony drama, politics, love stories, and revisionist history. Some movies I have NOT seen (and don't plan to): Ray Walk The Line the Stephen Hawking one? Pearl Harbor Red Tails United 93 "Truth" lol Fury W Snowden Titanic Camp X-ray Green Zone ...and many more I'll think of later Hanks, IMO, is one of the best of my generation. He a versatile actor. I hate his politics, then again, that goes for 95% of the entertainment industry. |
|
Quoted: I agree he is a good actor,still think he sucks Barry's cock About the same as Matt Damon.  Yeah im a grumpy old man who finds this shit out then wont watch these cocksuckers movies,just because  Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Fuck Tom Hanks,he licks FBHO boots http://d3lp4xedbqa8a5.cloudfront.net/s3/digital-cougar-assets/WomansDay/2014/12/08/43184/tom_hanks_obama.jpg Naw, he's a great actor. I agree he is a good actor,still think he sucks Barry's cock About the same as Matt Damon. Yeah im a grumpy old man who finds this shit out then wont watch these cocksuckers movies,just because |
|
Quoted: I honestly believe that a big reason why America isn't great anymore is that so many people think cynicism is Virtue. Congratulations on being part of the problem. I'm not saying Sully is JC or anything, but under extremely adverse conditions he did a HELL of a job and saved over 150 people. He deserves all the accolades and kudos he gets. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quoted: Quoted: Yay he ditched an airplane. I honestly believe that a big reason why America isn't great anymore is that so many people think cynicism is Virtue. Congratulations on being part of the problem. I'm not saying Sully is JC or anything, but under extremely adverse conditions he did a HELL of a job and saved over 150 people. He deserves all the accolades and kudos he gets. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand 
|
|
Quoted:
I've been done watching Tom Hanks play Tom Hanks for years. Don't hate the guy, but never saw him as a talented actor. Of course if you play a retard or fag you're gonna win some awards. Also not big into "fact-based" movies, at least recent ones. Give me a documentary, I don't need Hollywood's phony drama, politics, love stories, and revisionist history. Some movies I have NOT seen (and don't plan to): Ray Walk The Line the Stephen Hawking one? Pearl Harbor Red Tails United 93 "Truth" lol Fury W Snowden Titanic Camp X-ray Green Zone ...and many more I'll think of later How the hell do you have Fury in with those shitty movies? Your missing out bro. |
|
Quoted:
Great actor. He is an entertainer. Fuck his personal feelings. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck Tom Hanks,he licks FBHO boots http://d3lp4xedbqa8a5.cloudfront.net/s3/digital-cougar-assets/WomansDay/2014/12/08/43184/tom_hanks_obama.jpg Naw, he's a great actor. He is an entertainer. Fuck his personal feelings. Pretty much this. Show a picture of him with Obama...doesn't matter to me...he can vote whatever he wants, like whoever he wants... Only if he actively campaigns for Obama would I not see his movies... AFARR |
|
Holy shit |
|
Quoted:
Yay, he survived on a deserted island. Oh wait, you meant Captain Sullenberger, who saved the lives of 158 people when he successfully landed his crippled aircraft in the Hudson river. Got it....
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yay he ditched an airplane. Yay, he survived on a deserted island. Oh wait, you meant Captain Sullenberger, who saved the lives of 158 people when he successfully landed his crippled aircraft in the Hudson river. Got it....
I think the number was 155, but if you think about him turning back it would've likely killed many, many more. I suspect that the primary decision in landing zone was to prevent the loss of life of people not on the flight and that he likely didn't expect to survive the ditching. |
|
Quoted:
Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This pic was taken after these two gents guzzled each others boners. https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Me7889e04109983eb38cefc03c9d110c8o0&pid=15.1 Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Just because you posted this, I think I'm going to watch this movie this weekend and then make my girlfriend watch Apollo 13 and SPR. Where's my little red book? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
It is. I didn't find a dull moment in it to be honest. The NTSB investigation took 15 months and concluded finally that he made the right decision to ditch in the Hudson. Quoted:
Quoted:
The trailer makes it look like 3 minutes of water landing, then 87 minutes of fake NTSB drama. Is it better than that? It is. I didn't find a dull moment in it to be honest. The NTSB investigation took 15 months and concluded finally that he made the right decision to ditch in the Hudson. How does that take 15 months? all engines out? Check All passengers survived? Check I would think that after all engines out all bets are off. Case closed. |
|
Quoted:
Faux hero BS He did his job, one that is trained for repeatedly. He (they) performed it at a level that >99% of other ATPs would have done as well. Lastly, one is not a 'hero' if they are saving their own ass....and everyone else is simply along for the ride. Kden |
|
Seen the movie last Saturday. While I liked the movie, and I knew kind of what it would be (like a Flight part 2).
They did a good job with it, however; This CGI stuff is getting carried the fuck away. Some of the simple flight shots are CGI and they could have easily filmed these. This is a Tom Hanks/Eastwood movie after all. I would give it a solid 3.5 stars out of 5. It CAN wait until blue-ray. |
|
Quoted:
You do realize with that mentality you would never be able to watch a movie ever again? Hollywood is full of libs and there is no way any movie will not be "supporting" at least one. Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This pic was taken after these two gents guzzled each others boners. https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Me7889e04109983eb38cefc03c9d110c8o0&pid=15.1 Tom hanks is a POS and you people give your money to his films which make him stronger. He swings from Obammys dong and you clamor to see his movies. You're essentially supporting Communism/Marxism/ Socialism, you see as just a movie but its much more in the long run. Oh well right? Oh well...head in sand Also, by that logic, the movie was directed by Clint Eastwood. So it's kind of a wash, eh? In good conscience, I can no longer support Hollywood. The carbon foot print of each movie made is unmeasurable. From making the movies, travel, electricity used, fuel used by 100s of millions people driving to the theatre, plastic toys to promote the films, is there a industry that has a larger carbon footprint? If there is I can't think of any. Hollywood is destroying the planet and I will have no part in it. |
|
Quoted:
Just Lost all interest in seeing the movie Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck Tom Hanks,he licks FBHO boots http://d3lp4xedbqa8a5.cloudfront.net/s3/digital-cougar-assets/WomansDay/2014/12/08/43184/tom_hanks_obama.jpg Just Lost all interest in seeing the movie Ill only see it when it is free. |
|
Quoted:
When the movie takes longer to watch than the event, its a drama. Dramas usually are not my thing. ETA: not making light on the situation, obviously it was a very fortunate outcome to that event. The "event" was not only the crash emergency water landing but the 15 month long NTSB investigation. That's what the movie is about. 
But I did learn some new things about the actual landing itself from the movie. |
|
Quoted:
I don't get it, he crashed a plane in the river. My ex co worker crashed a Semi into a house. He got fired. No movie or hero title. Uhhhmmm... yeah.... Clearly you don't understand why what he did was so impressive. He actually landed a passenger jet on water without losing a single person in an aircraft with two disabled engines, which was unprecedented. He did all this with a 30-35 second window to make the correct decision to either attempt a return to LaGuardia, try for another airport or put it in the water. He's a fucking Jedi. Thanks for your contribution to the conversation. |
|
Quoted:
Great actor. He is an entertainer. Fuck his personal feelings. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck Tom Hanks,he licks FBHO boots http://d3lp4xedbqa8a5.cloudfront.net/s3/digital-cougar-assets/WomansDay/2014/12/08/43184/tom_hanks_obama.jpg Naw, he's a great actor. He is an entertainer. Fuck his personal feelings. Agree on the top two, but I would still never pay to see any liberal in a theater. |
|
Quoted:
How does that take 15 months? all engines out? Check All passengers survived? Check I would think that after all engines out all bets are off. Case closed. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The trailer makes it look like 3 minutes of water landing, then 87 minutes of fake NTSB drama. Is it better than that? It is. I didn't find a dull moment in it to be honest. The NTSB investigation took 15 months and concluded finally that he made the right decision to ditch in the Hudson. How does that take 15 months? all engines out? Check All passengers survived? Check I would think that after all engines out all bets are off. Case closed. SPOILER ALERT Well, if the movie is accurate (IF) there was an indication that the left engine was still operable. It was lost during the landing but after recovery it was found to be indeed damaged by the birds. Which means he made the right choice. That's the big reveal at the end of the movie. |
|
Quoted:
Faux hero BS He did his job, one that is trained for repeatedly. He (they) performed it at a level that >99% of other ATPs would have done as well. Lastly, one is not a 'hero' if they are saving their own ass....and everyone else is simply along for the ride. LOL! You have no fucking clue what you are talking about. Pilots never expect to survive crash landings as they often times don't. Thanks for contributing to the mediocrity of America. ETA - And from what I understand pilots DO NOT train for low altitude double engine failure water landings.
|
|
Quoted:
I believe you'll find ARF/GD a very congenial social media environment. My husband and I saw it in IMAX yesterday. Given that it was a feel-good movie about an actual event and not a documentary, I thought it was well done. Yeah, the flight crew vs NTSB angle was over simplified and starkly drawn, but it probably captured the tone of a fifteen month investigation as well as could be hoped for in fifteen minutes. My take-away from it was that, in a completely unforeseen and largely unforeseeable situation, a whole bunch of people, instinctively and competently, did the right thing. EOS. Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't get it, he crashed a plane in the river. My ex co worker crashed a Semi into a house. He got fired. No movie or hero title. I believe you'll find ARF/GD a very congenial social media environment. My husband and I saw it in IMAX yesterday. Given that it was a feel-good movie about an actual event and not a documentary, I thought it was well done. Yeah, the flight crew vs NTSB angle was over simplified and starkly drawn, but it probably captured the tone of a fifteen month investigation as well as could be hoped for in fifteen minutes. My take-away from it was that, in a completely unforeseen and largely unforeseeable situation, a whole bunch of people, instinctively and competently, did the right thing. EOS. Go read in cockpit voice records, both radio and off mic. They basically perfectly recreated the event. Was very intense to watch. |
|
Quoted:
How does that take 15 months? all engines out? Check All passengers survived? Check I would think that after all engines out all bets are off. Case closed. Understand that there's a bit more to it than that. The NTSB routinely takes months to years to issue reports on even the simplest of crashes. It's not just that the engines failed, it's why.... and that rabbit hole runs deep. Pretty much any high profile crash is going to review: The aircraft itself including manufacturing and maintenance data, interviews with maintenance personnel etc The pilots, including what they were doing before the flight (well rested? Illness? Drunk/on drugs?) their records, logbooks, checkride history, and in the case where the pilot(s) are deceased, interviews with family, fellow aviators, flight instructors, etc. Radar studies to observe the track of the aircraft Recordings from air traffic control and the cockpit voice recorder Review of flight data recorder Review of meteorological conditions at the time of the accident Study of human factors, and this is variable and can be things like cockpit visibility, or was the sun in the pilot's eyes, etc Survivability factors, such as how the aircraft's structure behaved in the crash, evacuation, fire, etc The goal of all of this is to determine why the accident occurred and what could prevent it from occurring again. The NTSB report for flight 1549 is over 200 pages long. I would encourage you to at least skim it. http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1003.pdf |
|
Quoted:
Go read in cockpit voice records, both radio and off mic. They basically perfectly recreated the event. Was very intense to watch. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't get it, he crashed a plane in the river. My ex co worker crashed a Semi into a house. He got fired. No movie or hero title. I believe you'll find ARF/GD a very congenial social media environment. My husband and I saw it in IMAX yesterday. Given that it was a feel-good movie about an actual event and not a documentary, I thought it was well done. Yeah, the flight crew vs NTSB angle was over simplified and starkly drawn, but it probably captured the tone of a fifteen month investigation as well as could be hoped for in fifteen minutes. My take-away from it was that, in a completely unforeseen and largely unforeseeable situation, a whole bunch of people, instinctively and competently, did the right thing. EOS. Go read in cockpit voice records, both radio and off mic. They basically perfectly recreated the event. Was very intense to watch. Yup. Almost word for word. |
|
Quoted:
How does that take 15 months? all engines out? Check All passengers survived? Check I would think that after all engines out all bets are off. Case closed. Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The trailer makes it look like 3 minutes of water landing, then 87 minutes of fake NTSB drama. Is it better than that? It is. I didn't find a dull moment in it to be honest. The NTSB investigation took 15 months and concluded finally that he made the right decision to ditch in the Hudson. How does that take 15 months? all engines out? Check All passengers survived? Check I would think that after all engines out all bets are off. Case closed. From what the Arfpilots have told us in other threads, pilots and NTSB like to pic apart EVERY millisecond of the flight and crash to try to find "lessons learned" to share with the aviation community. Did the movie indicate whether any of the NTSB investigators were pilots or prior pilots themselves? If they weren't, then you have a bunch of amateur armchair quarterbacks looking for any way possible to hang the pilots from the lamp-post, especially since it cost the airline a multimillion dollar jet (AFAIK, commercial passenger jets aren't designed for double-duty as submarines). |
|
Tom Hanks endorses Obama for President
https://youtu.be/68CKnirCxak Can't support a man financially who supports a man who purposely damages the USA every day. |
I know from personal experience when an agency like the NTSB, USCG, FAA, etc investigates you they do their damnedest to make your life hell and hang you out to dry no mater what you did. Even in Sully's case where everyone lived because he did everything right, they will still try to hang you.
|
|
Quoted:
I've been done watching Tom Hanks play Tom Hanks for years. Don't hate the guy, but never saw him as a talented actor. Of course if you play a retard or fag you're gonna win some awards. Also not big into "fact-based" movies, at least recent ones. Give me a documentary, I don't need Hollywood's phony drama, politics, love stories, and revisionist history. Some movies I have NOT seen (and don't plan to): Ray Walk The Line the Stephen Hawking one? Pearl Harbor Red Tails United 93 "Truth" lol Fury W Snowden Titanic Camp X-ray Green Zone ...and many more I'll think of later Fury was pretty good. |
|
Quoted:
Tom Hanks endorses Obama for President https://youtu.be/68CKnirCxak Can't support a man financially who supports a man who purposely damages the USA every day. The thing that set me off was when Hanks said FBHO should be elected a 3rd term if he could make it legal Fuck you Tom |
Tom Hanks? Don't give a shit! Hollywood elite, so no surprise he's an Obama lover. 
Regarding the incident: No one should try to second guess a pilot's decision in an emergency. He has only one chance in seconds to make a the right decision. ..............he made a gliding engines out landing to water in a jumbo jet from low altitude and everyone walked away without any serious injuries. His decision making process was correct and very few pilots could have pulled off what he did. Had he tried to return to the airport across the City with both engines out, all on the plane would certainly have died and countless numbers on the ground as well. |
|
Quoted:
Do you FSPR and FBoB too? Quoted:
Quoted:
Fuck Tom Hanks,he licks FBHO boots http://d3lp4xedbqa8a5.cloudfront.net/s3/digital-cougar-assets/WomansDay/2014/12/08/43184/tom_hanks_obama.jpg Do you FSPR and FBoB too? Tom Hanks was in BoB? |