Posted: 9/17/2006 8:01:53 PM EDT
|
It never fails... Start talking about the warror on terror or the war in Iraq and liberal "apologists" will come out of the wood work. Mention Nick Berg and they will foam at the mouth about the Crusades and Inquisition. When offered a choice between Bush or Osama many of them are in the Al Quida camp. They offer reasons such as Bush's campaign to create a Christian state, his illegal and immoral war against Muslims and his destruction of "freedom" with legislation such as the Patriot Act. Do they HONESTLY not understand who they are supporting? Do they honestly NOT KNOW what the Taliban/Al Quida would do to them? If given a chance Western liberals would be the FIRST people killed by Al Quida/Taliban types. You don't like Christians who want to pray in School? Under Islam you pray 5 TIMES EVERY DAY. You think Christians are hard on pornography? Imagine all the hot chicks at the beach covered in a Burka. You think Bush has a personal agenda against homosexuals? Quite simply they would be put to death in Islamic countries. Womens rights? How about not even the right to NOT be raped? Abortion? Guess how long the life expentency of an abortionist is in Islamic countries? Virtually every liberal issue is not only illegal in Islamic countries, most times you can be arrested or put to death for it. DU types would be the first ones to die. Ironically, they'd probably have a better chance of surviving the Inquisition than living in a modern Islamic state. |
What you just said is so fucking sick. And I couldn't have said it better myself... |
|
They dont think, thats just it. Its knee jerk reactionism and points of view based on feeling. Whether they are truely ignorant or wilfully ignorant via the head in the sand approach varries from liberal to liberal. They can't, don't understand or ignore logic arguments. |
+10,000 We want the America that was founded adn want to preserve or revert it to the ideals it was founded under. The liberal basically yearns to do away with the old and bring in a socialist government. they are Americans in name only. AINOs |
| Everybody likes the underdog. There's something noble about being the underdog. In the movies, the underdog eventually beats the odds, and his opponent, and wins. Liberals want the U.S. to be the perpetual underdog -striving to get people like Jimmy Carter in high office who will hamstring the country and let us get the shit kicked out of us all day long. Never victorius. Never safe. |
Well hell, since you put it like that, they dont sound too bad to me afterall. ![]() |
It's getting to the point where there is nothling left to say to these people and the only way to settle our differences is with a fight. Be ready. |
|
It's interesting, isn't it? But the hard core leftis revolutionary types have wholeheartedy embraced Islam as the new vital weapon against capitalism, liberalism, and the West. People like Carlos the Jackal, Lynne Stweart, George Galloway, Hugo Chavez all have advocated the far Left joining Islamist revolution to bring down civilization |
Got AK-47s? Check. Cases of Ammo? Check. |
That's because they don't have the means or the will to fight us, so like the Soviets they use proxies. The difference is that they are on the inside this time. |
Weren't we blaming the communists for everything last night? Oh wait.
|
Agreed, so what do we do? |
And this is what we need to understand. They don't THINK they FEEL. The JPFO has done some gret work in this area combating that and developing strategies agaist this. |
Liberalism being a mental disease is the only rational explaination. The muslims refer to them as "useful idiots". |
Ok I showed this thread to a super liberal friend of mine to get his thoughts...if you could call them thoughts anyway. 1. There is little difference between Fundamentalist Christians and the Taliban/Al Quida. And that if GWB had it his way the US would be run just like Iran. And the majority of Americans [me included] are just too stupid to see it. 2. Taliban/Al Quida only want the Middle East to be free of US control, But the evil Bush/oil companies are using the "WOT" as an excuse to take everybody who doesn't agree with them rights away. 3. Israel is nothing more then an invading army that illegally took land that didn't belong to them. And the US government is behind it all to keep the Middle East destabilized so it can be kept under the control of US oil companies. Now to understand why he thinks this way.......you have to understand that he believes that George Hearst in the HBO series Deadwood is a perfect example of President Bush and 90 % of capitalist in this country. |
Stoner? Shoot him like a lame horse. It's the only merciful thing to do.
|
I think she means with a gun Just for clarity purposes |
Oh I have a better punishment in mind.......his son is in the Navy. and wants to be a SEAL
|
Yes but they know Discretion is the better part of valor. They dare'nt show there faces on this thread! isnt that right? DOC.308? MUhahahahahahahahhahaha! ![]() Here is T-stox OFFICIAL AFRCOM "why do stoner hippies love Islamic Fundamentalists?" reading list. I have got a complete understanding now of why these Traitors say the things they do and do the things they do after reading these books. #1 UNHOLY ALLIANCE - Radical Islam and the AMerican left. by David Horowitz (<--neo con jew, right lefties? ) What can I say except this book pretty much sums it all up, READ IT! It pretty light reading actually and the chapters are small. I Love his exposure of the degenerate Traitor Noam Chomsky and also Howard Zinn. #2 Eurabia land of Dhimmitude - by Bat Y'eor (sp?) this one explains the BAFFLING support Terrorists have gotten from Europe in the last 20 years. Western Liberals in bed with OBL and the Muslim brotherhood!!! TRuly a sign of the coming apocalypse! #3 Clash of civilisations - Samuel P. Huntington. IF you read only one book this century READ THIS ONE! it will explain why things are the way they are and where we are heading. The only reason why i consider him so great is because he wrote the book in 1995 and basically predicted everythin that has happened in the last 10 years simply by using "cultural fault lines" as his guideline. |
Saw that this morning as well. I have serious trouble when I see vermin like this on the TV not envisioning the back of their heads exploding as a nicely-mushroomed .308 caliber bullet exits it. I see this image in slo-mo every time I look at another terrorist on TV threatening America or calling us "evil". And WHY is it that they always seem to have these scraggly beards and fat little faces? |
Ok i read it. What am i supposed to get out of it? IOW, do you think she is right or wrong? I think she is 100% wrong for essentially 100 reasons. The weird thing is, she seems to have written a book about Islam called "a short history of Islam"!! Short indeed! She must've stopped right at the point where Islam began its attempt at world conquest! Which is what? the day before Al-hegira?
|
I'd like to rewrite that article, date it 1938, and title it "We Cannot Afford To Maintain Prejudice Against Naziism" and show it to that twat. But then, she probably STILL wouldn't get it. |





) What can I say except this book pretty much sums it all up, READ IT! It pretty light reading actually and the chapters are small. I Love his exposure of the degenerate Traitor Noam Chomsky and also Howard Zinn.
Short indeed! She must've stopped right at the point where Islam began its attempt at world conquest! Which is what? the day before Al-hegira?