Posted: 5/1/2006 7:45:17 AM EDT
|
MAN! I know I am new here , but why do you guys post stuff you KNOW is gonna get locked??? I have seen 1/2 dozen or so already, IT AINT EVEN NOON YET! |
THIS has nothing to do with candy coating anything! ETA Heres the rule we are dealing with in case you are STILL having trouble with comprehension. 1.) Posting derogatory comments of a racial, religious, or sexual nature. This includes your username, signature line, and title. Site Staff and Moderators reserve the right to edit these items and to remove your ability to modify them in the future. |
You can say what you will, you don't have to candy-coat. Just ensure that you are in compliance with the CoC. Stay away, primarily, from personal attacks, advocating criminal behavior (don't say "kill 'em all") and avoid racial slurs like the devil. Simply re-word your message and that's not the same at all as candy-coating. |
it has nothing to do with racial, religious or sexual nature. Its and act commited by an alien. |
You are perfectly free to be "pissed" elsewhere. If--big "if" at this point--you are going to continue to have posting privileges on this site, then you are going to obey the simple rules contained in the Conduct Code. Choose soon--I have a busy day at work. Spelling edit. |
The "unmoderation" bear pit got shut down and now has different rules, so I guess the short answer is "No." I've never really underestood this either. Even if you absolutely hate (fill in the blank thing that you can't say bad things about because of the COC) I don't get why some people get so obsessed with it. I don't think a single (fill in hated racial, religous or ethnic group) ever got struck dead by a nasty post on a gunboard. |
One of your threads contained a shortened form of a word that is commonly viewed as a racial slur in the subject line. You did violate the CoC rule on derogatory comments by doing that. That's what got your thread locked, and trying to fight it out with mods/staff is not a good approach. |
Cool, glad someone is hosting that. Always like that particular banana. |
Advertisers don't make the rules.
Then say it was an act committed by an alien -or even an illegal alien- and you'll be ok. It is when you start using derogatory/racial/ethnic,blah,blah,terms that you need to question if you will reach your first aniversary here.
|
Whoops! Outsider just got OUTED.... Oh the Irony... Sorry...I'm easily amused.
|
![]() Seriously though tbk1, I'm with you guys 99.9% of the time and I understand the staff here does a hell of a job, but I just don't get why the lock came down on this one: www.jobrelatedstuff.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=460124 Is the G-word off limits too? (I didn't use it to avoid a possible lock here, not because I find it offensive.) |
A little confused there, too. That term is commonly used by Mexicans to refer to Americans and it is somewhat similar to "Carpetbagger", IIRC. To the best of my knowledge, "Carpetbagger" isn't a racial slur. |
Simple--"gringo" is a derogatory term for non-Hispanic whites, used by those of Hispanic descent. I for one am a little tired of the "you can say anything you want about whites around here" griping, so . . . Besides, there are at least a dozen existing threads where the point could have been made (sans the derogatory term). |
He used it here! BAN HIM! ![]() Just kidding, I really don't find it offensive, but I respect your decision. ETA: No, I don't want to see something funny.
|
I thought it had more to do with nationality than race. Yes, I agree that the term is not necessary to use in making a point. Thank you for the explanation. |
HAHAHA oh NO !!! ![]() for the outcome.... |
If anyone besides mods and staff actually read the Conduct Code, it all kind of makes sense--
It is simply not possible to offend me by calling me ANY name. That said, there is no reason to cast generalized slurs about in order to make a point. Anyone who simply lacks the vocabulary or intellect to make their point without derogatory slurs is just not someone we need to have here. Those who were familiar with the old "Full-Auto.com" and (to a slightly lesser extent) "Pre-Ban.com" will see my point.
|
fair enough. Previous post edited... |


!!!



for the outcome....
