User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 7:52:38 AM EST
[#1]
Don't worry! Scotus will fix this!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 7:52:53 AM EST
[#2]
Quoted: Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome’ Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake his life on the factual nature of his testimony. Piton revealed this weekend that he examined just over 9 million records in Pennsylvania and has identified 521,879 unique last names. In other words, these people have no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles or cousins who share the same last name (phantom voters). The myriad of ways the Democrats cheated in this election is almost impressive, imagine if they put all that creativity to work for the betterment of the country instead of themselves. The full court press they unrolled is quite impressive. Even more impressive is that they break bread with all those evil Rs from across the aisle before, while, and after doing so. I wonder what they know about those fiscally responsible, America loving conservatives? Or maybe its what we don't know about those "fiscally responsible, America loving conservatives"? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 7:54:33 AM EST
[#3]
Is it really a rigged election if you allow it?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 7:55:11 AM EST
[#4]
Quoted: Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome’ Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake his life on the factual nature of his testimony. Piton revealed this weekend that he examined just over 9 million records in Pennsylvania and has identified 521,879 unique last names. In other words, these people have no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles or cousins who share the same last name (phantom voters). The myriad of ways the Democrats cheated in this election is almost impressive, imagine if they put all that creativity to work for the betterment of the country instead of themselves. Seems legit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 7:57:28 AM EST
[#5]
I am one of those voters I moved to PA. Rest of the family lives in other states.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:00:36 AM EST
[#6]
According to the 2010 census, there's only 6.3M distinct surnames in the entire country, and the top 1000 make up a huge bulk of those. So to have 500K unique names in one state? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:00:39 AM EST
[#7]
How does this compare to previous elections or other states?
Oh and NOTHING will happen. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:03:43 AM EST
[#8]
How does that compare to states with similar demographics? Without context, the study is just click-bait.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:12:44 AM EST
[#9]
Ok. But why did he stop before his work was done though? All this tells us is that there are some people in Pennsylvania with unique last names. What he has to do now is start going down the list of these "suspicious names" and show that they are not authentic Pennsylvania voters. If he can do that, then he will have something.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:20:12 AM EST
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok. But why did he stop before his work was done though? All this tells us is that there are some people in Pennsylvania with unique last names. What he has to do now is start going down the list of these "suspicious names" and show that they are not authentic Pennsylvania voters. If he can do that, then he will have something. Either he's supper sloppy in his work, or the other half didn't support the conclusion he needed to reach. Either way; it's junk work. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:29:01 AM EST
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: According to the 2010 census, there's only 6.3M distinct surnames in the entire country, and the top 1000 make up a huge bulk of those. So to have 500K unique names in one state?  |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:43:48 AM EST
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: According to the 2010 census, there's only 6.3M distinct surnames in the entire country, and the top 1000 make up a huge bulk of those. So to have 500K unique names in one state? I think that is the point, to get that many in one State that are of voting age and casting votes I would think have to be computer generated names, thus why they are calling it so sophisticated. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:48:05 AM EST
[#13]
Quoted: Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome’ Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake his life on the factual nature of his testimony. Piton revealed this weekend that he examined just over 9 million records in Pennsylvania and has identified 521,879 unique last names. In other words, these people have no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles or cousins who share the same last name (phantom voters). The myriad of ways the Democrats cheated in this election is almost impressive, imagine if they put all that creativity to work for the betterment of the country instead of themselves. Unless I misread it, he only looked at the last names in PA records, which means the only person with that last name who lives in PA. That’s not the same as people having no relatives at all. It simply means no relatives that live in PA. Also, what records are they, and how far do they go back? They could be DMV records that go back 50 years of everyone who ever had a license in PA, whether they currently live in PA, don’t live there, voted or not, or are even alive. It’s a pretty explosive statement, but without knowing the source of the data, it’s pretty meaningless. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:48:49 AM EST
[#14]
No one that can do anything cares because they are complicit.
Nothing will be done |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:51:02 AM EST
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Don't worry! Scotus will fix this! This right here 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:51:03 AM EST
[#16]
So how would the study classify my wife. She has multiple scientific papers credited to her maiden name, she didn't want to lose credit and I supported her having that credit, so she hyphenated our names. The end result is a unique name(mine is same ,I have relatives, ect, she does not under her new name)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:51:12 AM EST
[#17]
Quoted: Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome’ Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake his life on the factual nature of his testimony. Piton revealed this weekend that he examined just over 9 million records in Pennsylvania and has identified 521,879 unique last names. In other words, these people have no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles or cousins who share the same last name (phantom voters). The myriad of ways the Democrats cheated in this election is almost impressive, imagine if they put all that creativity to work for the betterment of the country instead of themselves. Jamiroquai and Wuantravius are traditional family names in the precincts where Biden won big  Attached File |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 8:52:47 AM EST
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think that is the point, to get that many in one State that are of voting age and casting votes I would think have to be computer generated names, thus why they are calling it so sophisticated. Census shows a household of 4; all have the same last name. How many of those voted in the election? The answer is probably 1. The reason they call it "sophisticated" is because the "study" is way too narrow in scope to be of value. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:01:26 AM EST
[#19]
Joseph Bloseph isn't a real name ?
No way ! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:03:10 AM EST
[#20]
Gateway pundit
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:03:54 AM EST
[#21]
Listen and listen up good. NONE OF THIS MATTERS.
No one in power even wants to hear of it. The name of the game is cheat your ass off. - Get as many fake ballots as you can - Get anyone to mix them in with good ballots. Then kick back and just go "its up to you to prove it all" - oh and you have 6 weeks to do it in middle of a Holiday season. You cant get even the Govt return a voice mail in 6 weeks. Yet alone FIND fraud, DOCUMENT fraud, FILE in court, present all this evidence in a hearing and get the votes overturned. Thats the sad part of it all. Its physically impossible to do all this before inauguration. SO. Learn from your mistakes. Next time YOU be the guy with a semi trailer full of votes and kick back and tell them they have 4 weeks to prove all this. You got that ! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:06:09 AM EST
[#22]
Probably a decent percentage of those half a million are legitimate voters. People that moved into PA from out of state, or have hyphenated last names. Probably a decent percentage of them, though, truly are computer generated.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:06:31 AM EST
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok. But why did he stop before his work was done though? All this tells us is that there are some people in Pennsylvania with unique last names. What he has to do now is start going down the list of these "suspicious names" and show that they are not authentic Pennsylvania voters. If he can do that, then he will have something. Well, that's the reason it's so important to stop voter fraud before an election, than to try and uncover and prove it in the short time you have after an election. My prediction will be, that in a few years, we will know exactly what happened. It just takes time to uncover and figure out what appears to be a lot of individual schemes, by a lot of different people. And, time is what Trump doesn't have right now. I've investigated voter fraud as law enforcement officer. In every single case, we eventually figured out who was to blame, and charged them. But, it always comes way too late to change an election. And, once we have enough instances of voter fraud to get a conviction, we usually called it done, because it's so expensive and so time consuming to investigate it. You basically have to find every single fraudulent vote, and prove it's fraudulent, if you want to find the true totals of the votes. The really weird thing is how the mainstream media continues to put out this mantra that there is not voter fraud, ever. And, even weirder, that so many people buy it. When in truth, it's gets uncovered and prosecuted, on a pretty regular basis, all over the country. But, a lot of people have made the observation, that a lot of the vote numbers just don't make walking around sense. Of course, that's not proof of anything. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:08:36 AM EST
[#24]
Quoted: Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome’ Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake his life on the factual nature of his testimony. Piton revealed this weekend that he examined just over 9 million records in Pennsylvania and has identified 521,879 unique last names. In other words, these people have no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles or cousins who share the same last name (phantom voters). The myriad of ways the Democrats cheated in this election is almost impressive, imagine if they put all that creativity to work for the betterment of the country instead of themselves. I am not a mathematician but that doesn’t seem like a statistical anomaly. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:09:58 AM EST
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The full court press they unrolled is quite impressive. Even more impressive is that they break bread with all those evil Rs from across the aisle before, while, and after doing so. I wonder what they know about those fiscally responsible, America loving conservatives? Or maybe its what we don't know about those "fiscally responsible, America loving conservatives"? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Mathematician Bobby Piton Finds More Than 500,000 Unique Last Names in Pennsylvania: ‘Sophisticated State Actor Was Able to Optimize Desired Outcome’ Mr. Piton has done extraordinary work crunching data and his testimony pointed out blatant voter fraud through incontrovertible evidence, at one point claiming he’d stake his life on the factual nature of his testimony. Piton revealed this weekend that he examined just over 9 million records in Pennsylvania and has identified 521,879 unique last names. In other words, these people have no parents, siblings, aunts, uncles or cousins who share the same last name (phantom voters). The myriad of ways the Democrats cheated in this election is almost impressive, imagine if they put all that creativity to work for the betterment of the country instead of themselves. The full court press they unrolled is quite impressive. Even more impressive is that they break bread with all those evil Rs from across the aisle before, while, and after doing so. I wonder what they know about those fiscally responsible, America loving conservatives? Or maybe its what we don't know about those "fiscally responsible, America loving conservatives"? You forgot pro-gun
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:10:06 AM EST
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Listen and listen up good. NONE OF THIS MATTERS. No one in power even wants to hear of it. The name of the game is cheat your ass off. - Get as many fake ballots as you can - Get anyone to mix then in with good ballots. Then kick back and just go "its up to you to prove it all" - oh and you have 6 weeks to do it in middle of a Holiday season. You cant get even the Govt return a voice mail in 6 weeks. Yet alone FIND fraud, DOCUMENT fraud, FILE in court, present all this evidence in a hearing and get the votes overturned. Thats the sad part of it all. Its physically impossible to do all this before inauguration. SO. Learn from your mistakes. Next time YOU be the guy with a semi trailer full of votes and kick back and tell them they have 4 weeks to prove all this. You go it ! If anyone disagrees with this I would love to hear why? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:11:46 AM EST
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: According to the 2010 census, there's only 6.3M distinct surnames in the entire country, and the top 1000 make up a huge bulk of those. So to have 500K unique names in one state? I'd love to see how the number compares to a much larger state like Texas... "Just another massive inexplicable statistical outlier, come back when you have some proof!" |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:12:58 AM EST
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Totally believable. It's the Pennsylvania Dutch! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: According to the 2010 census, there's only 6.3M distinct surnames in the entire country, and the top 1000 make up a huge bulk of those. So to have 500K unique names in one state? So it's all the pencils registering their dutch wives to vote? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:19:33 AM EST
[#29]
debonked by the MSM and besides fraud is ok when you're trying to rid our country of the bad orangeman.
now let the healing begin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:21:05 AM EST
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, that's the reason it's so important to stop voter fraud before an election, than to try and uncover and prove it in the short time you have after an election. My prediction will be, that in a few years, we will know exactly what happened. It just takes time to uncover and figure out what appears to be a lot of individual schemes, by a lot of different people. And, time is what Trump doesn't have right now. I've investigated voter fraud as law enforcement officer. In every single case, we eventually figured out who was to blame, and charged them. But, it always comes way too late to change an election. And, once we have enough instances of voter fraud to get a conviction, we usually called it done, because it's so expensive and so time consuming to investigate it. You basically have to find every single fraudulent vote, and prove it's fraudulent, if you want to find the true totals of the votes. The really weird thing is how the mainstream media continues to put out this mantra that there is not voter fraud, ever. And, even weirder, that so many people buy it. When in truth, it's gets uncovered and prosecuted, on a pretty regular basis, all over the country. But, a lot of people have made the observation, that a lot of the vote numbers just don't make walking around sense. Of course, that's not proof of anything. if this guy took a random sampling of a couple hundred of the names from his list and checked them, those results should give a good idea whether his hypothesis is accurate or off the mark, right? With your investigative experience, how would you go about determining if a name on the list was an authentic voter or not in this case? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:24:20 AM EST
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok. But why did he stop before his work was done though? All this tells us is that there are some people in Pennsylvania with unique last names. What he has to do now is start going down the list of these "suspicious names" and show that they are not authentic Pennsylvania voters. If he can do that, then he will have something. Quote HistoryQuoted: Ok. But why did he stop before his work was done though? All this tells us is that there are some people in Pennsylvania with unique last names. What he has to do now is start going down the list of these "suspicious names" and show that they are not authentic Pennsylvania voters. If he can do that, then he will have something. Quoted: I am one of those voters I moved to PA. Rest of the family lives in other states. What you are saying is either 521,000+ single people with unique last names have moved to PA, registered to vote and voted, or 521,000+ families moved out of PA and left one family member in PA who voted, or some combination of those two. Do any of those scenarios sound reasonable to you? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:25:05 AM EST
[#32]
Just the fact that that they stopped counting votes on election night tells me everything I need to know.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:27:46 AM EST
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: if this guy took a random sampling of a couple hundred of the names from his list and checked them, those results should give a good idea whether his hypothesis is accurate or off the mark, right? With your investigative experience, how would you go about determining if a name on the list was an authentic voter or not in this case? You have to go find them and interview them. See who they voted for, (or if they even voted at all, which is what the case often turned out to be). That's how we investigated mail in (absentee ballot fraud). Or you make your case that they don't exist, based on your inability to find them, or any other record of their existence other than being registered to vote. The most frustrating, were the people in nursing homes, who were completely out of it, and you knew what had happened, but you couldn't prove it because they couldn't tell you anything. And, here is what really makes it difficult. In every single case, like most crime, there is an insider in the elections office. Either feeding names to the people doing it, and/or helping them register the fake voters. Why do they do it? Why does anyone commit a crime to get something they want? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:38:09 AM EST
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is it really a rigged election if you allow it? It's still rigged if you allow it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:38:18 AM EST
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Listen and listen up good. NONE OF THIS MATTERS. No one in power even wants to hear of it. The name of the game is cheat your ass off. - Get as many fake ballots as you can - Get anyone to mix them in with good ballots. Then kick back and just go "its up to you to prove it all" - oh and you have 6 weeks to do it in middle of a Holiday season. You cant get even the Govt return a voice mail in 6 weeks. Yet alone FIND fraud, DOCUMENT fraud, FILE in court, present all this evidence in a hearing and get the votes overturned. Thats the sad part of it all. Its physically impossible to do all this before inauguration. SO. Learn from your mistakes. Next time YOU be the guy with a semi trailer full of votes and kick back and tell them they have 4 weeks to prove all this. You got that ! I'm betting they finally fix it, but only so we can't do it next time. 87M new voters that are currently illegals plus PR, means we probably wont have the numbers. Guess we'll see |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:40:27 AM EST
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What you are saying is either 521,000+ single people with unique last names have moved to PA, registered to vote and voted, or 521,000+ families moved out of PA and left one family member in PA who voted, or some combination of those two. Do any of those scenarios sound reasonable to you? I don't have any basis to know whether it sounds reasonable or not. This doesn't strike me as the type of thing that a person can know out based on whether it sounds right to them or not. it would be nice to confirm it is all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:40:32 AM EST
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: How does that compare to states with similar demographics? Without context, the study is just click-bait. Maybe those states with similar fraud also use Dominion? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:43:12 AM EST
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You have to go find them and interview them. See who they voted for, (or if they even voted at all, which is what the case often turned out to be). That's how we investigated mail in (absentee ballot fraud). Or you make your case that they don't exist, based on your inability to find them, or any other record of their existence other than being registered to vote. The most frustrating, were the people in nursing homes, who were completely out of it, and you knew what had happened, but you couldn't prove it because they couldn't tell you anything. And, here is what really makes it difficult. In every single case, like most crime, there is an insider in the elections office. Either feeding names to the people doing it, and/or helping them register the fake voters. Why do they do it? Why does anyone commit a crime to get something they want? That's very interesting. thanks for explaining it. that does sound like it would take a long time to do and be difficult. the nursing home aspect never occurred to me but makes sense how it could be exploited |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:45:07 AM EST
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Maybe those states with similar fraud also use Dominion? No excuse for someone who calls themselves a mathematician to submit woefully incomplete and inconclusive work. That's simply unprofessional. " I couldn't be bothered to cross check my work with other sources because it might not support the conclusion I need to make." |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:46:03 AM EST
[#40]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:46:54 AM EST
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Just the fact that that they stopped counting votes on election night tells me everything I need to know. But they were tired...tired of counting Trump votes! |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 9:58:03 AM EST
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't have any basis to know whether it sounds reasonable or not. This doesn't strike me as the type of thing that a person can know out based on whether it sounds right to them or not. it would be nice to confirm it is all. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted:What you are saying is either 521,000+ single people with unique last names have moved to PA, registered to vote and voted, or 521,000+ families moved out of PA and left one family member in PA who voted, or some combination of those two. Do any of those scenarios sound reasonable to you?  Let me lay it out clearly for you — the basis (that you claim doesn't exist) is the stat from above that says there are only 6M+ unique last names in the entire country. So again, regardless of your non-gotcha circumstance, does 500,000 (nearly 10% of the entire nation's) unique last names in PA alone, make sense? I'll wait for the answer... |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:00:33 AM EST
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What you are saying is either 521,000+ single people with unique last names have moved to PA, registered to vote and voted, or 521,000+ families moved out of PA and left one family member in PA who voted, or some combination of those two. Do any of those scenarios sound reasonable to you? You didn’t read the article and OP only posted parts of it. The article says he found 521,000 TOTAL unique names among 9 million records which I assume is voter registration lists. Of those 521,000, 245,000 only occurred once. So out of 9 million voters 1 in 37 had a last name that only occurred once. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:02:15 AM EST
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Totally believable. It's the Pennsylvania Dutch! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: According to the 2010 census, there's only 6.3M distinct surnames in the entire country, and the top 1000 make up a huge bulk of those. So to have 500K unique names in one state? Big families. Half of a whole town in Lancaster County could be named Stoltzfus, it’s Amish for “Smith”. German, not Dutch. Pennsylvania Deutsch. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:05:06 AM EST
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes you do, but you conveniently chose to ignore the comment prior to your non-witty one-liner, all in the name of getting in your ... non-witty non-gotcha one-liner. Let me lay it out clearly for you the basis (that you claim doesn't exist) is the stat from above that says there are only 6M+ unique last names in the entire country. So again, regardless of your non-gotcha circumstance, does 500,000 (nearly 10% of the entire nation's) unique last names in PA alone, make sense? I'll wait for the answer... The number of unique names in the census bears virtually no relevance to the number of unique names on a given list. When people go to the polls, a lot are ineligible to vote. A lot just stay home. Bang! A big pile of "unique" names go through the polls that aren't counted as "unique" in the census. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:05:11 AM EST
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes you do, but you conveniently chose to ignore the comment prior to your non-witty one-liner, all in the name of getting in your ... non-witty non-gotcha one-liner. Let me lay it out clearly for you — the basis (that you claim doesn't exist) is the stat from above that says there are only 6M+ unique last names in the entire country. So again, regardless of your non-gotcha circumstance, does 500,000 (nearly 10% of the entire nation's) unique last names in PA alone, make sense? I'll wait for the answer... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted:What you are saying is either 521,000+ single people with unique last names have moved to PA, registered to vote and voted, or 521,000+ families moved out of PA and left one family member in PA who voted, or some combination of those two. Do any of those scenarios sound reasonable to you? Let me lay it out clearly for you — the basis (that you claim doesn't exist) is the stat from above that says there are only 6M+ unique last names in the entire country. So again, regardless of your non-gotcha circumstance, does 500,000 (nearly 10% of the entire nation's) unique last names in PA alone, make sense? I'll wait for the answer... I don’t think you understand the data; Smith is a unique name. So is Johnson. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:11:30 AM EST
[#47]
A couple things to look for.
How many of those unique last names share the same address? How many of those unique last names Are also unique in other Dominion states? |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:11:31 AM EST
[#48]
so is that normal or not? how did that look 4, 8, 12, 16 years ago? how does it look in other areas?
last time a family member looked there were a total of about 70 people in the US we could find who shared our last name. As far as we got there are only 3 distinct families. my name isn't super common like a smith or jones but its not rare or anything. i was pretty shocked, i would have guessed there were thousands of us. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:15:50 AM EST
[#49]
If WE allow it, WE deserve it
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2020 10:17:50 AM EST
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You have to go find them and interview them. See who they voted for, (or if they even voted at all, which is what the case often turned out to be). That's how we investigated mail in (absentee ballot fraud). Or you make your case that they don't exist, based on your inability to find them, or any other record of their existence other than being registered to vote. The most frustrating, were the people in nursing homes, who were completely out of it, and you knew what had happened, but you couldn't prove it because they couldn't tell you anything. And, here is what really makes it difficult. In every single case, like most crime, there is an insider in the elections office. Either feeding names to the people doing it, and/or helping them register the fake voters. Why do they do it? Why does anyone commit a crime to get something they want? I suspect Barr was correct when he said that there isn't evidence of fraud on a large enough scale to sway the election (yet). When you think of evidence as information that's admissible in court, and strong enough to produce a criminal conviction or a civil judgement, he's likely correct, and your explanation tracks with that. Our immediate gratification society doesn't like to acknowledge the idea that investigations take time and effort. Our justice system was designed to minimize wrongful conviction, rather than to punish every crime. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
