[ARCHIVED THREAD] - NORTH AMERICAN UNION??? (Page 1 of 2)
Posted: 6/9/2006 5:27:21 PM EDT
|
by Jerome R. Corsi Posted May 19, 2006 President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy. Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada. President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed. The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union: At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts. What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005: In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized. To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America. The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past. The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated: The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America. Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox. PLEASE TELL ME THIS STORY HOLDS NO MERIT!!! PLEASE!!! |
|
www.spp.gov/ www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=4552 www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050323-1.html www.fac-aec.gc.ca/spp/spp-menu-en.asp Just finding out about this ? Here's some more info for ya' |
|
I am tired and don't feel like posting all teh supporting info but this is as serious as a heart attack! The thing that really got the ball rolling was NAFTA This is why Bush is the way he is on immigration The goal is the ellimination of the middle class and return to the fuedal system |
So what? Don’t you realize the Demotards are on the same path? You actually think you have a choice when you vote? LOL! It's like asking a child if he wants to go to bed now or in 5 minutes. Either way he's going to bed pretty much when the parents want him to but he thinks he has some say. So what do you pick? Go to bed in five minutes?
That would be nice but wages will be reduced a lot because of absorbing Mexico. Plus they care less about their pesky rights, err....I mean privileges...so they will facilitate elimination of the American middle class. It's not "expansion", it's dilution of the American middle class. |
Well said!!! 
|
Sure it is, in fact a lot of America is already sold. It's all done in the name of 'capitalism", where the corporation and business robs what they can. How much land and buildings are owned by foreign interests in this country? How many laws are passed to benefit those foreign interests to the American citizens detriment? |
| In there quest to have it all ,they will lose alot. Ive been saying "break away republic" for a while and now it looks like it will start with Hawaii. Next will be atzlan ,the The state of Jefferson in the North West . Remember Rome is still there ,they just couldnt keep there realestate. |
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/20050323-1.html |
The sad thing is this topic has 2 pages, while the Jack Bauer Power Hour routinely gets 10 or so PER EPISODE  So, maybe we do need an "elite" to run the big things for us, if we have such short attention spans  Oh well, maybe being a technoserf won't be all THAT bad 
|
I wouldnt doubt it if the bots around here support this...you know becuase their hero Jorge is involved..the man of honor and integrity... |
I worked for the GOP and no I dont support this. If the Dems would have won we would be going there faster and with out ammo. |
Kinda like that "gut feeling", "intuition" etc...talking to you again.... So, here is the conundrum for the day....if George W. Bush is a devout, and by all accounts good christian, is it still possible for the Holy Spirit to be screaming at us, "Do not trust a damn word he says????" |
this is some f*cked up sheyit right here
|
|
I posted this crap last week with little response also. I was just as amazed when I read it. THAT is not the America I want to leave to my kids. I will not be a party to it. I am dead serious about that statement and all its ramifications. When Alex Jones starts to sound likea aprophet instead of a whacko, it's time to reconsider alot of things we take for granted - like politicians having our Nation's best interest in mind or that they really take the oath to Protect and defend the Constitution of the US seriously. Strange times I tell ya.... |
| I voted for George Bush twice. Between Kerry and Bush both are internationalist intent on destroying the sovereignty of this country. Jerome Corsi was on Coast To Coast talking about this last Monday. I wonder what part of the Oath Jorge Bush took to preserve and protect the United States of American he doesn't understand. Why will Bush not protect our borders??? Answer- He supports eliminating them. Here is a link to Corsi's new book which isn't released yet. www.amazon.com/gp/product/0977898415/sr=8-3/qid=1150009876/ref=pd_bbs_3/103-2606130-5695067?%5Fencoding=UTF8 |
|
I just quickly went over that website at the whitehouse and its stating they want to cooperate on certain issues such as security, economic prosperity etc... As a Canadian, I would think merging north america to be one nation would suck. We all have different cultures etc... and that just will not be the way it should be. Hopefully it will not happen.... |
There can be no immigration reform.
This requires the US Citizen to pay to educate and take care of Mexican Subjects.
Free migration of people. |
Good thing the Libertarians aren't in office or they would eliminate borders AND have no social programs.  Eliminating the borders WITH social programs galore under the Republican plan is so much better. |
yeah - that is how its starts....  any guess as to how it finishes??? +1 for the comments on the masses with their heads up their asses  - the frog is about parboiled
|
Sure. And the libs don't want to ban ALL guns...just "Saturday night specials"... then, "assault rifles"... then, "sniper rifles"... then... ? It's called INCREMENTALISM |
|
The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero' www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15017 by Jerome R. Corsi Posted May 22, 2006 The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity was a key agreement resulting from the March 2005 meeting held at Baylor University in Waco, Tex., between President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin. A joint statement published by the three presidents following their Baylor University summit announced the formation of an initial entity called, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). The joint statement termed the SPP a “trilateral partnership” that was aimed at producing a North American security plan as well as providing free market movement of people, capital, and trade across the borders between the three NAFTA partners: We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders. A working agenda was established: We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals. The U.S. Department of Commerce has produced a SPP website, which documents how the U.S. has implemented the SPP directive into an extensive working agenda. Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.” We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union. The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed: NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, will resolve problems. This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements. Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report “Building a North American Union.” Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that “a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.” The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from “irritating” and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body. Robert Pastor also advises the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. He has also called for the creation of a North American Customs and Immigration Service which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security. Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community” called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,” a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso. If President Bush had run openly in 2004 on the proposition that a prime objective of his second term was to form the North American Union and to supplant the dollar with the “Amero,” we doubt very much that President Bush would have carried Ohio, let alone half of the Red State majority he needed to win re-election. Pursuing any plan that would legalize the conservatively estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States could well spell election disaster for the Republican Party in 2006, especially for the House of Representative where every seat is up for grabs. |
|
The Elite are too used to life in their Ivory Towers if they think the American public would EVER accept some mexican-sounding trash like an "Amero" over the Dollar. Most Americans see Mexico as a joke, a country not to be taken seriously... certainly not one to abandon our honored traditions for. Bush is a fucking sick joke himself nowadays. |
Its by the same guy as the original piece. Any other source that anyone can cite? |