Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
12/14/2012 5:10:32 AM EDT
[#1]
Too busy.  Hard to see the hands.

ETA: if I'm going to spend $100,000 + on a watch.
It would be this.


12/14/2012 5:11:06 AM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
Too busy.  Hard to see the hands.


That.

And her knees are too pointy.
12/14/2012 5:12:43 AM EDT
[#3]
Why would someone pay that much for a watch that you have to concentrate for ten seconds to tell what time it is?
12/14/2012 5:14:52 AM EDT
[#4]



Quoted:


Too busy.  Hard to see the hands.

If it was not 100k I still wouldn't buy it.  

It is too busy

 
12/14/2012 5:16:24 AM EDT
[#5]
looks like some POS off chronoshark.

12/14/2012 5:18:51 AM EDT
[#6]
A $30 trac phone displays the time also... AND the date.
12/14/2012 5:21:09 AM EDT
[#7]



Quoted:


A $30 trac phone displays the time also... AND the date.


I like quality watches, but in this case I might choose the trac phone.

 
12/14/2012 5:23:09 AM EDT
[#8]



I prefer the looks of this watch much more. I don't have to concentrate to tell the time.
12/14/2012 5:23:32 AM EDT
[#9]
yeah, if I'm buying a $100k+ goofball watch like that, it would be a Richard Mille.  

That thing looks like something a car salesman who sells little bags of coke on the side would wear.
12/14/2012 5:24:48 AM EDT
[#10]
Kind of the aesthetic opposite of the Pilot Automatic, isn't it?
12/14/2012 5:26:55 AM EDT
[#11]
Meh... when I want to look at busy, I look at my $200 Citizen Eco Drive Nighthawk.
12/14/2012 5:28:25 AM EDT
[#12]
Quoted:
Why would someone pay that much for a watch that you have to concentrate for ten seconds to tell what time it is?


It's jewelry.  Guys won't buy bracelets, unless you make one that ostensibly serves a "tool" function.  Appealing to the gadget/techie/engineering side is an added bonus.
12/14/2012 5:38:18 AM EDT
[#13]
Lol at "I...III...V...VII...IX...XI..."
12/14/2012 6:12:14 AM EDT
[#14]
Quoted:

Quoted:
A $30 trac phone displays the time also... AND the date.

I like quality watches, but in this case I might choose 4,567 trac phones.  


Better now

12/14/2012 6:14:43 AM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Lol at "I...III...V...VII...IX...XI..."


12/14/2012 6:15:29 AM EDT
[#16]


Without a doubt.  That IS a loud watch, after all.
12/14/2012 6:17:30 AM EDT
[#17]
cheap..

you want expensive, here toy go..The Patek Caliber 89 - $5,120,000

12/14/2012 6:20:19 AM EDT
[#18]
If I was getting a Zenith, I'd find one of these





12/14/2012 6:21:47 AM EDT
[#19]
$137,000 is a house, not a watch.
12/14/2012 6:23:25 AM EDT
[#20]



Quoted:



Quoted:

Too busy.  Hard to see the hands.





That.



And her knees are too pointy.


FoHSS?

 
12/14/2012 6:23:56 AM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
$137,000 is a house, not a watch.


a 47 percenter thou are.........
12/14/2012 6:24:25 AM EDT
[#22]


12/14/2012 6:24:34 AM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
If I was getting a Zenith, I'd find one of these
http://wrist-watch.info/roger/zenith.jpg



That watch must be "5 better" than all of the normal watches with red marked bezels only to the 15 minute mark.

Good lookin' watch BTW.

And yeah... watches are the ONLY jewelry I'll wear besides my wedding band.
12/14/2012 6:26:08 AM EDT
[#24]
How the fuck are you supposed to tell the time at a glance?

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
12/14/2012 6:27:12 AM EDT
[#25]
Quoted:
If I was getting a Zenith, I'd find one of these



I would have to take a college type course to be able to use all those features.

12/14/2012 6:27:36 AM EDT
[#26]
Ugly at any price.
12/14/2012 6:29:05 AM EDT
[#27]
Quoted:
Quoted:
If I was getting a Zenith, I'd find one of these
http://wrist-watch.info/roger/zenith.jpg



That watch must be "5 better" than all of the normal watches with red marked bezels only to the 15 minute mark.

Good lookin' watch BTW.

And yeah... watches are the ONLY jewelry I'll wear besides my wedding band.


The cheapass vostok diver I have on now is 20 mins of red, and IIRC, my Seiko is as well.
12/14/2012 6:30:25 AM EDT
[#28]
Too much going on.


Looks kinda ghetto to me. I know it's high dollar man jewelry, but damn.
12/14/2012 6:32:53 AM EDT
[#30]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If I was getting a Zenith, I'd find one of these
http://wrist-watch.info/roger/zenith.jpg



That watch must be "5 better" than all of the normal watches with red marked bezels only to the 15 minute mark.

Good lookin' watch BTW.

And yeah... watches are the ONLY jewelry I'll wear besides my wedding band.


The cheapass vostok diver I have on now is 20 mins of red, and IIRC, my Seiko is as well.


My Vostok finally arrived yesterday by the way
12/14/2012 6:32:53 AM EDT
[#31]
12/14/2012 6:33:51 AM EDT
[#32]
For that sort of money I could buy 23 of these:












Speed

 
12/14/2012 6:35:26 AM EDT
[#33]
Admittedly I'm not much of  a watch kind of guy, but that thing is downright hideous
12/14/2012 6:42:54 AM EDT
[#34]


My watch for the day. Love my Vintage red
12/14/2012 6:53:12 AM EDT
[#35]
Looks like something you would buy at a mall kiosk for $30.
12/14/2012 6:55:18 AM EDT
[#36]
The REAL irony is that a $30 quartz Timex is more accurate. And much easier to read.



The tourbillion is a very expensive addition to very expensive mechanical watches that may have no effect on accuracy at.

all.



That watch is fugly.


 
12/14/2012 8:10:51 AM EDT
[#37]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
If I was getting a Zenith, I'd find one of these
http://wrist-watch.info/roger/zenith.jpg



That watch must be "5 better" than all of the normal watches with red marked bezels only to the 15 minute mark.

Good lookin' watch BTW.

And yeah... watches are the ONLY jewelry I'll wear besides my wedding band.


The cheapass vostok diver I have on now is 20 mins of red, and IIRC, my Seiko is as well.


My Vostok finally arrived yesterday by the way


Awesome!!

Opinions?