User Panel
|
|
Quoted: Reporting 24 sunspots this morning, 2 visible.https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/218810/Screenshot_20201114-082948_Mobile_Observ-1683839.JPG View Quote Disappointing news. Maybe I just need to move North. I keep trying to talk the wife into retiring in Alaska but I'm getting nowhere with that. @snakeyes711 |
|
|
How World Almost Ended in 2012 And Still Might Later! |
|
SOLAR ACTIVITY IS LOW... For the 10th day in a row, the sun is blank, without sunspots.
...BUT SURPRISES ARE POSSIBLE: On Jan. 8th, the sun was blank and spotless, with no chance of a solar flare. Suddenly, the biggest magnetic filament in years launched itself off the surface of the sun. At first it appeared the debris would miss Earth. But it didn't miss. On Jan. 11th, a shock wave arrived, sparking the brightest auroras of 2021. |
|
https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/sunspot-update-december-sunspot-activity-once-again-higher-than-predicted/ The uncertainty of science: It is time to once again take a look at the state of the Sun’s on-going sunspot cycle. Below is NOAA’s January 1, 2020 monthly graph, documenting the Sun’s monthly sunspot activity and annotated by me to show previous solar cycle predictions. The ramp up to solar maximum continued in December. Though there was a drop from the very high activity seen in November, the number of sunspots in December still far exceeded the prediction as indicated by the red curve. continued at the link. Looks like the Grand minimum isn't happening. |
|
Quoted: I think we all would like to see a 'Maunder Minimum' as it definitely would give us a brief respite from warming and also prompt many other positive happenings, such as reversing the Northward migration we are experiencing from Central and South America, locking up huge amounts of water in ice and reversing sea rise and hopefully giving us time to develop the science and technology we will need on the back side of it, because the heat will really be on at that time. IOW, the cool-down will be slow but the following warm-up will be fast and relentless. If we do luck out and the Grand minimum comes, we better come up with something fast. I mean we'll have maybe 35 years or so before it gets back to 'average' temps but then it will get hot fast. If we haven't figured this thing out by that time we'll be sunk. Now for the speculation; some think the sun's cooling is actually being engineered by aliens for the purpose of reversing warming on Earth and will actually be permanent. Can't say I don't like that idea but I sure won't be here to see if it stays cool after 30 years or so of cooling. And if the aliens screw it up and the earth goes back into 'snowball' mode like it has in the far past, we can all play 'Ice Planet Hoth'. View Quote Apparently you haven't studied this much, so this will probably blow your mind: the Antarctic ice cores show that temps there are still around 3° cooler than the peak of the last interglacial. Yeah, that's a fact, and everything the MSM has told you is a lie. There is NOTHING unusual about current temperatures or the rate of warming. The real threat is the cooling that is due to start at any time. There is absolutely no reason to believe that human CO2 is going to stave off the next glacial period, which will kill BILLIONS of people when it happens (read up on Milankovitch cycles, if you are unfamiliar). And it won't be quick and easy. Think WW3 over food and fuels, and those who aren't killed in war will starve and/or freeze. And unlike the prior world wars, it will involve everyone on the planet. I guarantee that most people at the UN and their IPCC actually know it's all bullshit, but they see an opportunity to implement global Communism AND reduce population, so they are "all in" with the carbon tax scam. They probably justify it (morally) by reminding each other if we do nothing, billions will die anyways when temps drop. There is no way you could study the science required to be on the IPCC, and not know that we are due for cooling soon. |
|
Quoted: Apparently you haven't studied this much, so this will probably blow your mind: the Antarctic ice cores show that temps there are still around 3° cooler than the peak of the last interglacial. Yeah, that's a fact, and everything the MSM has told you is a lie. There is NOTHING unusual about current temperatures or the rate of warming. The real threat is the cooling that is due to start at any time. There is absolutely no reason to believe that human CO2 is going to stave off the next glacial period, which will kill BILLIONS of people when it happens (read up on Milankovitch cycles, if you are unfamiliar). And it won't be quick and easy. Think WW3 over food and fuels, and those who aren't killed in war will starve and/or freeze. And unlike the prior world wars, it will involve everyone on the planet. I guarantee that most people at the UN and their IPCC actually know it's all bullshit, but they see an opportunity to implement global Communism AND reduce population, so they are "all in" with the carbon tax scam. They probably justify it (morally) by reminding each other if we do nothing, billions will die anyways when temps drop. There is no way you could study the science required to be on the IPCC, and not know that we are due for cooling soon. View Quote Great post. Thanks. |
|
|
Quoted: Great post. Thanks. View Quote Lol, it's an awful post. The only bit that's partly right is past interglacials appear to have occasionally peaked slightly higher than we are now, but VERY briefly. It's really a lie, using a datapoint to give a false impression. The Holocene isn't a typical interglacial and has much been warm much longer, likely largely due to the megafauna extinctions and the conditions that brought them about. Recent biological/sedimentary evidence has greatly strengthened the case that there hasn't been this little ice in the arctic in the last 2.5 million years, there's no warm water life in that column at all but just recently it's in the ocean. CO2 makes the atmosphere more opaque to infrared radiation, you can observe the phenomenon directly, it isn't made up. It changes the heat balance because the Earth has to radiate from a higher altitude, where it's colder. Desertification in the Holocene has significantly degraded our carbon sinks. The thermodynamics of a near ice free arctic aren't that complicated to understand at a basic level. Latent heat, albedo and gas emissions from permafrost loss are all measurable. The USN isn't lying to it's commanders about how much ice there is. The average of a trillion tons/yr over the last few decades, and increasing, is a significant amount of latent heat. |
|
the next grand minimum might start in 10 years or it might start in 10,000 years. We just don't currently have any way to know. The predictions we get are educated guesses based on past observations.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: You think the military wouldn't lie about this? They absolutely would! View Quote No, the military is part of the government, and I'm pretty sure, that the government never lies. In any country. How could they sleep at night if they lied to us? Naw, just can't happen. That's crazy talk. |
|
Quoted: Any updates? View Quote The new sunspot cycle, No. 25, is definitely starting. There was a spike in sunspots towards the end of 2020 to kickoff the new cycle. It's withdrawn some in early 2021; but that's normal. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression The official predictions for Cycle 25 are for a similar 'low' level cycle that we saw in Cycle No. 24 between 2009 and 2020. To be honest, we likely won't know for a couple of years where this cycle is headed. How that plays into a longer term trend won't be obvious for quite awhile. Being into ham radio, I follow the cycles pretty closely and I'm 'curious' at this point. But we'll see what happens; I can't say one way or the other... ETA: Current trajectory... |
|
.
In years past, at the winter solstice it was traditional to make a sacrifice to ensure that spring would follow. Somehow, usually, spring followed whether the sacrifice was made or not. . |
|
|
Hopefully, there will be clear skies this weekend and I'll be able to pull out the telescope and filter to take a peek at the sun.
|
|
|
Quoted: Did you get the telescope out yet? @exDefensorMilitas View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Hopefully, there will be clear skies this weekend and I'll be able to pull out the telescope and filter to take a peek at the sun. Did you get the telescope out yet? @exDefensorMilitas Not yet, it's been too cloudy and overcast whenever I've had some free time. A drawback to living close to the coast in the Panhandle, also an issue at around 10PM - 1AM for night time observation, the temperature changes lead to clouds. Most of my free time the last few weekends has been spent working on my car, which is just about done, so I should have more time. |
|
https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-sunspot-activity-continues-to-exceed-predictions/
The uncertainty of science: On May 1st NOAA updated its monthly graph to show the Sun’s sunspot activity through the end of April 2021. As I do every month, I have annotated it to show the previous solar cycle predictions and posted it below. In my sunspot update last month I reviewed in detail the range of predictions by solar scientist for the upcoming solar maximum, noting that based on the higher than expected sunspot activity that has been occurring since the ramp up to solar maximum began in 2020, it appeared that all of their predictions might be wrong. The continuing high activity that occurred in April continued that trend. April 2021 sunspot activity The graph above has been modified to show the predictions of the solar science community for the previous solar maximum. The green curves show the community’s two original predictions from April 2007 for the previous maximum, with half the scientists predicting a very strong maximum and half predicting a weak one. The blue curve is their revised May 2009 prediction. The red curve is the new prediction, first posted by NOAA in April 2020. As the dots on the black line show, since the low point in February, just above the red prediction curve, the number of sunspots in April continued upward at the same pace as in March. Since the beginning of 2020 the Sun’s sunspot activity has consistently exceeded the prediction. Does that mean we are heading for a very active solar maximum? No, not at these numbers. While the activity does exceed the prediction, it does not do so by much. If you extrapolate these numbers through 2025 (something I admit is a dangerous thing to do), it suggests the next solar maximum will be slightly more active than predicted, and only marginally more powerful than the previous very weak maximum in 2014. Such a maximum would still be very weak, and in fact would be a positive confirmation of the red curve prediction. Two weak maximums in a row would also continue past patterns, as shown by the historic solar cycle curves at the bottom of the graph. The first two maximums for the 1800s and 1900s were also weak. Having the first two maximums in the 2000s also be weak would simply continue that pattern. Why such a pattern happens however remains unknown. Though we know that the sunspot cycle is caused by fluctuations in the Sun’s dynamo, no one really understands that dynamo or the processes that cause it to fluctuate. Furthermore, my extrapolation above must be taken with a gigantic grain of salt. There is no guarantee activity will continue at this pace. It is just as likely that the Sun’s activity will ease in the coming year and begin to match the prediction. Or go up to further exceed it. Because we really don’t know why the activity fluctuates, we can’t make any meaningful predictions about what it will do next. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Going to be fun to see how the climate change folks spin this shit. "Sun may save us from man's mistakes!" Until Bill Gates pulls a Mr Burns and induces an artificial solar eclipse to freeze us to death. |
|
Quoted: Yep, this is all I've been getting since 2018. https://live.staticflickr.com/4852/44901333125_b9a4071925_b.jpgSun 20181110 by FredMan, on Flickr Back then I'd get these... https://live.staticflickr.com/1740/42314493362_734c5fcb5e_b.jpg+64 by FredMan, on Flickr https://live.staticflickr.com/4484/37862337226_3afaa43e97_b.jpgISS Solar Transit 20171024 Stack_Edit by FredMan, on Flickr https://live.staticflickr.com/4379/37366060586_776e50e933_b.jpgSun Spots 20170930 by FredMan, on Flickr https://live.staticflickr.com/4432/36186952024_711011fbc5_b.jpgSun Spots 20170904 by FredMan, on Flickr And that little green dot? That's the Earth, to scale. https://live.staticflickr.com/4398/36882472971_4cbaf96eb6_b.jpgSun Spots 20170904 by FredMan, on Flickr View Quote I always enjoy your posts and pictures! |
|
M3.9 Solar Flare erupted , but fortunately it wasnt Earth facing ....yet
Eyes on the Sun Solar Flare, Big Eruption, Preview the End of the World | S0 News May.8.2021 |
|
View Quote Thanks very much for the update!! Still got my fingers crossed for Global Cooling!! @Ramcharger_pilot |
|
A few weeks ago...
Sunspots 20210426 by FredMan, on Flickr Sunspots 20210426 Detail by FredMan, on Flickr |
|
Quoted: KP-7 Level Storm https://i.imgur.com/SmcXrY6.png " There is no reason this mild CME should have produced this geomagnetic storm to this extent. This is exactly what we've said to watch as the cycle progresses - how well earth's field holds up compared to previous cycles. This is not a good sign." Quicky, 2:36 long video update https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90EeTN2eXks View Quote Yeah, this is not good news. How the hell is a glancing blow hitting us this hard? Probably the reason no magnetic field measurements have been released in years. |
|
Two (more) Solar Eruptions, Earthquake Uptick, Climate Surprises | S0 News May.14.2021 Two Solar Eruptions, Earthquake Uptick, Climate Surprises | S0 News May.14.2021 https://spaceweathernews.com/ |
|
Quoted: Yeah, this is not good news. How the hell is a glancing blow hitting us this hard? Probably the reason no magnetic field measurements have been released in years. View Quote I noticed that....like I noticed they're late on the data with Earth's geomagnetic pole shift, too . Goddammit, I really loathe just about anything to do with most .gov agencies |
|
|
Awaiting CME Impact, Atlantis Evidence, China Weather | S0 News May.24.2021
Awaiting CME Impact, Atlantis Evidence, China Weather | S0 News May.24.2021 |
|
Quoted: Awaiting CME Impact, Atlantis Evidence, China Weather | S0 News May.24.2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MflBRbP9M28 View Quote What did I just watch? |
|
What round for cave bear?
New headline, “ man made global warming to save us all! “ |
|
Quoted: What did I just watch? View Quote This dude has a theory that the entire solar system travels through a magnetic zone in its orbit around the galaxy. The galactic magnetic sheet. Every 12k years or so we pass through this zone and bad shit happens. The sun micro-novas, the magnetic field flops, shit piles of energy get ported into the earth and the mantle disconnects from the core or the crust or something and the earth gets all wobbly and mega-quakey. Basically the movie 2012. When the earth wobbles, the oceans basically slosh. Think tsunamis a couple miles high. Atlantis got sloshed off the map, hence the legend that it sank into the sea. The eye of Africa was the supposed center of Atlantis and the CIA had a classified project that examined various point on earth that have unique magnetic features, paying particular attention the the eye of Africa. He also tracks the actually rapidly changing magnetic north pole and predicts where it will end up (hint: it's probably one the the places the CIA investigated) The guy is half nutter, half kinda right. He takes things that aren't in dispute and uses them to connect dots that most don't see. The CME and flares are having a bigger effect than they should on our magnetic field because the field is rapidly weakening in advance of it's reversal...which isn't really in dispute. Modern science just has never witnessed it. I hope he's just nuts and isn't anywhere near correct, because if he's even kinda right it's gonna be a bad time. |
|
|
Quoted: I feel like that is a specific reference to something.....but... help me out here. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: It will be an age undreamed of! help me out here. “Between the time when the oceans drank Atlantis, and the rise of the sons of Aryas, there was an age undreamed of. And unto this, Conan, destined to bear the jeweled crown of Aquilonia upon a troubled brow. It is I, his chronicler, who alone can tell thee of his saga. Let me tell you of the days of high adventure!” |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.