Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Page / 5
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:31:35 AM EST
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One of the coolest things we never should have made.
View Quote
You’re right.  It would have been better if we let the Germans get one first.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:32:02 AM EST
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I remember reading a story about some people driving on a road when that happened and one of the passengers was blind.
The story was that the flash was so bright that the blind passenger actually saw it.
View Quote
I doubt that’s true. Feynman watched it through the windshield of his truck. Everyone else had super thick glasses.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:33:01 AM EST
[#3]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not if they had not been invented.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The rest of the world would have had them anyway

Not if they had not been invented.


You’ve got to be trolling.

Nazi’s? They started in ‘39, same year we did.

We beat them to it, in no small part to the our allies sabotaging the nazi effort.

And because

‘Murica

Climb back in your yurt and cuddle your safety blanky
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:33:17 AM EST
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Not if they had not been invented.
View Quote
Sorry, but of those working on the bomb, we were fortunate to be the first. The bomb would have been invented anyway.  Hitler would have been happy to use it.  So would the Japanese (Germany was sending a U-boat, U-235,  that had uranium aboardship).   If the Japanese had it, bye bye 3rd (or 5th, depending on the admiral in command) Fleet.

While I agree it was bad that we used it, it was clearly the lesser of two evils.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:37:54 AM EST
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Maybe it did it’s job preventing another global war?

And it did it’s job stopping the madness the imperial Japanese started, saving several hundred thousand more American deaths in the process possibly.
View Quote
It did. Its been a long time since the world was at war of that scale. I would say they are serving their purpose very well.

I still cant believe people still think they will launch them all at once in a future conflict. Too many 80s scare movies.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:38:56 AM EST
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
One of the coolest things we never should have made.
View Quote
You mean other than the fact it saved millions of lives?
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:39:30 AM EST
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

How is what a question in my mind? Your statement and the inner workings of my mind do not correlate synonymously.

As impressive as a nuclear weapon is, eventually it is going to be very bad for the world.
View Quote
Well I disagree with you here.  Since two were dropped to end WWII they have SAVED LIVES.  Your eventuality has yet to materialize so cannot be proven.

So as of now they have definitely saved more lives than they taken given mutually assured distruction scenarios and the tensions that have risen between the U.S and Russia/USSR in particular.

The two dropped in WWII took fewer lives than alternative solutions were going to take.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:41:46 AM EST
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I guess it depends on your definition of the word.

If you were one of the 500,000 GIs who would have died during a mainland invasion I think the option would have the weight of being "forced".  We are still issuing purple hearts that were originally minted for that planned invasion.
View Quote
Allegedly and speculatively but thats a different conversation, forced means just that. Conventional bombings (may have been sufficient to level the entire country) and ground assault may or may not have yielded the numbers spoken of here but again thats a different conversation that I bet its too late to be certain of.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:45:57 AM EST
[#9]
A small piece of Trinitite is one of the coolest things I own. I'd like to get some Hiroshimite and Nagasakite to round it out.

My neighbor in the mid 2000's was a marine during the war. Fought at Iwo, and rode through the harbor at Hiroshima after the war. Said the city looked like a tornado made of fire hit it. It's amazing to have known someone that lived through and saw the things that he did. RIP Maurice.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:46:17 AM EST
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

The Japanese weren’t surrendering. Hell, they didn’t surrender after we dropped the first one.
View Quote
Exactly we are the only country in history to use a nuclear weapon in war... not once but twice.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:49:47 AM EST
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Why is that? Pretty much ended the wars of 10s of millions dying and pushed them into smaller scale conflicts
View Quote
Ending the war was surely a positive outcome there is no disagreement but having that amount of power at mans fingertips is eventually going to negate all those saved lives. It could be argued that those 10's of millions still died, just in smaller drawn out conflicts. One thing seems apparent, the wars and conflicts will continue.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:49:53 AM EST
[#12]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Allegedly and speculatively but thats a different conversation, forced means just that. Conventional bombings (may have been sufficient to level the entire country) and ground assault may or may not have yielded the numbers spoken of here but again thats a different conversation that I bet its too late to be certain of.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

I guess it depends on your definition of the word.

If you were one of the 500,000 GIs who would have died during a mainland invasion I think the option would have the weight of being "forced".  We are still issuing purple hearts that were originally minted for that planned invasion.
Allegedly and speculatively but thats a different conversation, forced means just that. Conventional bombings (may have been sufficient to level the entire country) and ground assault may or may not have yielded the numbers spoken of here but again thats a different conversation that I bet its too late to be certain of.
I greatly admire your determination to prove your ignorance. Applying the same level to a more useful purpose might result in a cure for cancer or some other equally desirable out come.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:51:15 AM EST
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Nuclear weapons were an inevitability.  Their potential was theorized decades before we actually built one.  We were fortunate to get there first and build that deterrent before some other country hostile to us did.
View Quote
Yeah I know.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:51:48 AM EST
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Allegedly and speculatively but thats a different conversation, forced means just that. Conventional bombings (may have been sufficient to level the entire country) and ground assault may or may not have yielded the numbers spoken of here but again thats a different conversation that I bet its too late to be certain of.
View Quote
Put down the cheetos and fleshlight and join the real world.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:52:17 AM EST
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Forget the invasion of Japan. Had the US and USSR not had MAD, we would've gone toe to toe with them multiple times in a conventional meat grinder.
View Quote
Unfortunately, we didn't have enough bombs to nuke the Soviets in 1945.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:52:31 AM EST
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Meh.  Someone was going to make it first. Better us than "them".
View Quote
Absolutely, but that's not what i was saying.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:53:26 AM EST
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

No, it was a choice between that or sending several hundred thousand US soldiers to invade Japan, which most certainly would have resulted in mass casualties on our side.
View Quote
Exactly.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:54:45 AM EST
[#18]
Efforts to impede the Nazi's and the Japs' efforts to build a nuclear weapon are detailed in this book, along with a lot of other unusual missions.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:54:57 AM EST
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



You’ve got to be trolling.

Nazi’s? They started in ‘39, same year we did.

We beat them to it, in no small part to the our allies sabotaging the nazi effort.

And because

‘Murica

Climb back in your yurt and cuddle your safety blanky
View Quote
I think there were some critical defections of scientists from Germany that played a hand too.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:55:36 AM EST
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Absolutely, but that's not what i was saying.
View Quote
What exactly are you saying?

That Nuke's will lead to humankinds destruction?
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 9:59:27 AM EST
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You proceed on the false assumption that other countries have them because we did first. The atomic genie was out of the bottle prior to WW2.

Pop quiz: is the human race better or worse off because of the invention of gunpowder?
View Quote
I do not assume that, we had history class where i went to school and I paid a bit of attention.

Pop quizzes should have a definitive answer not based on biased opinions but for the record I am happy with the invention of gunpowder, that shits fun.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:00:20 AM EST
[#22]
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:00:44 AM EST
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Maybe it did it’s job preventing another global war?

And it did it’s job stopping the madness the imperial Japanese started, saving several hundred thousand more American deaths in the process possibly.
View Quote
Possitive attributes without a doubt.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:01:18 AM EST
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Absolutely, but that's not what i was saying.
View Quote
I started the thread to celebrate the beginning of the Atomic Age. Can we stop with the historical hand wringing and just get on with the pictures of growing, glowing MUSHROOMS??
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:01:54 AM EST
[#25]
Made possible by beautiful plutonium made right here at the Hanford Site
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:02:45 AM EST
[#26]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

According to the letter that Albert Einstein wrote to FDR in 1939 the Nazis were already were working on them. Not as far along as they thought, but getting there.
View Quote
I can remember reading that. Not the letter, but that history.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:04:19 AM EST
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Trinity fireball
http://www.atomicarchive.com/Photos/Trinity/images/SB27.jpg

A subsequent nuclear test.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/2mt4P.jpg
The shot tower can barely be seen below the fireball. The bright protrusions coming from the fireball are the tower guy wires being vaporized by the intense X-ray radiation.
View Quote
I bet that second photo is how the origin of the universe sort of looks.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:04:27 AM EST
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

8/6/45
View Quote
Thats when we used it.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:05:55 AM EST
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yeah, we all know that but we certainly were not forced. We had a new weapon and we wanted to try it out, the Japanese just gave us a reasonable opportunity.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Yeah, we all know that but we certainly were not forced. We had a new weapon and we wanted to try it out, the Japanese just gave us a reasonable opportunity.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:07:02 AM EST
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

90% of the Japanese merchant marine was sunk so food from the continent was not forthcoming.   Considering we could have been more humane and defoliated that island; starving millions of Japanese indiscriminately, I think the bomb was more merciful.

We were also going to use poison gas if we invaded.  This was not to harm the Japanese military (they had gas masks) but the civilian infrastructure that supported the military effort.

Dropping the bomb was more humane.
View Quote
I agree completely, I think many people are reading more than what has been written.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:07:14 AM EST
[#31]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I think there were some critical defections of scientists from Germany that played a hand too.
View Quote
The whole killin Jews thing didn’t sit well with the Jewish science community in Germany
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:09:39 AM EST
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Stoner appears to be appropriate in more ways than one with some of the replies
View Quote
Do you know how foolish that sounds, and why?
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:11:08 AM EST
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

What was your grand plat to bring the war to the fastest conclusion with the least amount of casualties on both sides?  After being given the chance to surrender Japan mobilized it's entire population to fight the Allies to the last man, woman and child for their Emperor.  
View Quote
I didnt have one at the time, i didnt even have a time at that time.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:11:19 AM EST
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Made possible by beautiful plutonium made right here at the Hanford Site
View Quote
Hanford, another stop on the itinerary of an Atomic Tourist. Hanford Site Tours
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:11:57 AM EST
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You’re right.  It would have been better if we let the Germans get one first.
View Quote
Oh sure.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:13:27 AM EST
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



You’ve got to be trolling.

Nazi’s? They started in ‘39, same year we did.

We beat them to it, in no small part to the our allies sabotaging the nazi effort.

And because

‘Murica

Climb back in your yurt and cuddle your safety blanky
View Quote
I do not troll. Not invented means just that.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:14:10 AM EST
[#37]
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:15:07 AM EST
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Thats when we used it.
View Quote
Look at the big brain on Brad!
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:15:38 AM EST
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The rest of the world would have had them anyway

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

Oh sure, and now the rest of the world has them. Its only a matter of time before a despot comes to power and shit goes off like the 4th.
The rest of the world would have had them anyway

Correct.

It wasn’t some secret concept that nobody else ever dreamed up. The Germans also had an active nuclear program as did the Japanese and the Soviets. Nuclear weapons were going to happen with or without us. Being the first to the party undoubtedly spared us from being the victim of them.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:16:09 AM EST
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Do you know how foolish that sounds, and why?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stoner appears to be appropriate in more ways than one with some of the replies
Do you know how foolish that sounds, and why?
Can we just edit all of our responses to your comments to this exact quote?
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:16:21 AM EST
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not if they had not been invented.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The rest of the world would have had them anyway

Not if they had not been invented.
They are one of those things that once the technology and knowledge is there, they're going to be invented.    Might as well wish guns, swords, bows, and spears had never been invented while you're at it.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:16:25 AM EST
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Sorry, but of those working on the bomb, we were fortunate to be the first. The bomb would have been invented anyway.  Hitler would have been happy to use it.  So would the Japanese (Germany was sending a U-boat, U-235,  that had uranium aboardship).   If the Japanese had it, bye bye 3rd (or 5th, depending on the admiral in command) Fleet.

While I agree it was bad that we used it, it was clearly the lesser of two evils.
View Quote
I understand all that, by not invented I mean not invented. Nobody would have ever had one had it not been invented.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:16:36 AM EST
[#43]
The ATOMIC AGE brought to your living room window!  Fun times!  

Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:16:58 AM EST
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

You mean other than the fact it saved millions of lives?
View Quote
Yes, apart from that.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:18:40 AM EST
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I do not troll. Not invented means just that.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:



You’ve got to be trolling.

Nazi’s? They started in ‘39, same year we did.

We beat them to it, in no small part to the our allies sabotaging the nazi effort.

And because

‘Murica

Climb back in your yurt and cuddle your safety blanky
I do not troll. Not invented means just that.
But IT WAS going to be invented.

Period.

Man will always push to make shit that will destroy ourselves.

Have you not seen terminator?
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:19:51 AM EST
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Well I disagree with you here.  Since two were dropped to end WWII they have SAVED LIVES.  Your eventuality has yet to materialize so cannot be proven.

So as of now they have definitely saved more lives than they taken given mutually assured distruction scenarios and the tensions that have risen between the U.S and Russia/USSR in particular.

The two dropped in WWII took fewer lives than alternative solutions were going to take.
View Quote
That makes a lot of sense. You may be right and lets hope you are. That's a good assesment.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:19:53 AM EST
[#47]
There is some weapons grade derp in this thread.

My dad was at Parris Island when the bombs were used. He’d have probably bought the farm if they hadn’t been dropped.

The Japanese earned every last fission event that happened over their savage asses.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:21:13 AM EST
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not if they had not been invented.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

The rest of the world would have had them anyway

Not if they had not been invented.
Under what conceivable scenario were they not going to be invented even if not by us?

Do you have such a scenario or are pontificating on the impossible?
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:22:43 AM EST
[#49]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Im not disagreeing with any of that other than we had people on the project that absolutely wanted to see those bombs in operation.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:

NO, that is a decades-later modern Liberal interpretation. The truth is that even with the firebombing of Japanese cities, the Japanese would not give up.  The firebombing of Tokyo in March of '45 had, 88 to 97,000 people killed 40,000 to 125K were injured, and over a million residents lost their homes but they still would not surrender.  The atomic bombs gave us the one plane, one bomb, one city solution that saved valuable American lives and shortened the war.  THAT is the Truth.
ETA: better numbers.
Im not disagreeing with any of that other than we had people on the project that absolutely wanted to see those bombs in operation.
I'd have to imagine that any person doing weapons development in the context of the total war environment of WW2 would have wanted to see their projects make a difference on the battlefield.
Link Posted: 7/16/2019 10:22:57 AM EST
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I greatly admire your determination to prove your ignorance. Applying the same level to a more useful purpose might result in a cure for cancer or some other equally desirable out come.
View Quote
Well there.
Page / 5
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top