Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - PDW Selection (Page 1 of 2)

Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page
8/3/2007 9:10:30 AM EDT
Lets say that you had secured employment overseas doing telecom work that has high rates of kidnapping and other violence. You will be working alone or with small groups. You have "third world permit" for a weapon and the government is fairly stable. Your race makes you stick out. You will be traveling via light truck and having to go to remote areas. ammo resupply is not a given.

So the fictional person who is considering a fictional contract requires a weapon, because the fictional person dosen't like fictional butsecks and beheading nor being held for ransom


It must be compact/and provide a high volume of fire

Assume that fictional person has a CCW 9mm handgun as well
8/3/2007 9:15:20 AM EDT
[#1]
8/3/2007 9:16:13 AM EDT
[#2]
Why the 53?


ETA
The person has lots of time on M16A2's and some MP5 time as well but could figure out any platform

ETA2: I see a lot of votes for the krink...... but 5.45 is not that common and mag changes suck,
8/3/2007 9:16:59 AM EDT
[#3]
I would want a short barreled version (10 inches or so) of the 416.
8/3/2007 9:17:20 AM EDT
[#4]
im sent
8/3/2007 9:17:35 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
Why the 53?


A serious rifle caliber in a platform the size of an Mp5.
8/3/2007 9:17:50 AM EDT
[#6]
AR 10.5" or maybe 7.5"...in 6.8
8/3/2007 9:19:13 AM EDT
[#7]
Ak
8/3/2007 9:19:19 AM EDT
[#8]
I voted for the AR option simply to stick with what I know
8/3/2007 9:20:25 AM EDT
[#9]
No subgun calibers?
8/3/2007 9:20:30 AM EDT
[#10]
HK 51. 308 in basically the same size package as the 223 caliber 53, plus if the bullets don't kill them and they are close enough, you can always set them on fire with the muzzle flash.
8/3/2007 9:20:41 AM EDT
[#11]
Also extremely picky with changes in gr of ammo for the 53 though which sucks.



To be honest a 14.5" AUG or 14.5" F2000 would be a good choice as well.  



But a weapon chambered in the local terrorist caliber would not be a bad idea, IE a Krink in 762 or 545.  
8/3/2007 9:20:54 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Why the 53?


A serious rifle caliber in a platform the size of an Mp5.


How many moving parts? are they good to kick about and bounce on a sling and good to go with little maint? I don;t knwo much about them

Are they more G3 or more MP5ish?
8/3/2007 9:21:04 AM EDT
[#13]
krink me         , i will fit in.  
8/3/2007 9:21:42 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
No subgun calibers?


Nope Need to reach out and touch possibly
8/3/2007 9:22:19 AM EDT
[#15]
MK18. Although I know of at least one hard old dude who loved the HK53.  Of course he used it in the early 1990's, before SBR M4s came of age.
8/3/2007 9:22:22 AM EDT
[#16]
whatever you can get locally that works...unless you have unlimited ammo
8/3/2007 9:22:40 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:
HK 51. 308 in basically the same size package as the 223 caliber 53, plus if the bullets don't kill them and they are close enough, you can always set them on fire with the muzzle flash.




This guy is a wimp and can't make accurate burst fire in a compact .308
volume of fire may be teh difference between buttsecks and going home
8/3/2007 9:23:01 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
How many moving parts?


Beats me. Steyr would know.



are they good to kick about and bounce on a sling and good to go with little maint? I don;t knwo much about them

Are they more G3 or more MP5ish?


I've handled a couple, and they feel like a slightly more awkward MP5 thanks to the more awkward charging handle. Other than that they seemed good to go.
8/3/2007 9:23:14 AM EDT
[#19]
Is there such a thing as a 7.62mm Krink? I don't know, but I would want some kind of 7.62mm AK, regardless.
8/3/2007 9:23:42 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:
krink me         , i will fit in.  


Another good option if you are in that part of the world....and can find one.

Krinks are in high demand all over the place from what I understand.
8/3/2007 9:26:44 AM EDT
[#21]

Quoted:
Is there such a thing as a 7.62mm Krink? I don't know, but I would want some kind of 7.62mm AK, regardless.



The Yugos, my peoples lol, made a Krink in 7.62x39 as they never switched to 5.45mm.
8/3/2007 9:27:48 AM EDT
[#22]
"It must be compact/and provide a high volume of fire"

8/3/2007 9:28:44 AM EDT
[#23]
Magpul PDR

8/3/2007 9:29:27 AM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:
AR 10.5" or maybe 7.5"...in 6.8


Is 6.8 suited to short barrels better than 5.56 ?

How many can you stuff in a nato mag 20ish?
8/3/2007 9:30:27 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:
HK 51. 308 in basically the same size package as the 223 caliber 53, plus if the bullets don't kill them and they are close enough, you can always set them on fire with the muzzle flash.




This guy is a wimp and can't make accurate burst fire in a compact .308
volume of fire may be teh difference between buttsecks and going home


Then I would vote SBR AR or 53 depending on which system I was more familiar with.
8/3/2007 9:32:49 AM EDT
[#26]

Quoted:

Quoted:
AR 10.5" or maybe 7.5"...in 6.8


Is 6.8 suited to short barrels better than 5.56 ?

How many can you stuff in a nato mag 20ish?


Needs special mags, probably 4 in a regular mag

Does very well in short barrels...16" is almost too long if you compare velocities. I think the diff. between 16" and 22" was under 100fps or something...
8/3/2007 9:33:35 AM EDT
[#27]

Quoted:

Quoted:
AR 10.5" or maybe 7.5"...in 6.8


Is 6.8 suited to short barrels better than 5.56 ?

How many can you stuff in a nato mag 20ish?


There are 25 rnders out for the 6.8. They look almost identical to the standard STANAG 30 rounders. You cannot load 6.8 into 5.56 mags, it bows out the mag after 4/5 rounds.

6.8 was designed (as far as I know) to be a round that replaces 5.56 in CQ environments, so I would ASSuME that it will perform better, meaning more knockdown power (more is gooder?).

Check out 68forums.com or the 6.8 discussion thread in AR Varients section for more accurate info.

ETA: I vote for 10.5" AR until the Masada or Magpul PDR comes out.
8/3/2007 9:34:32 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
AR 10.5" or maybe 7.5"...in 6.8


Is 6.8 suited to short barrels better than 5.56 ?

How many can you stuff in a nato mag 20ish?


Needs special mags, probably 4 in a regular mag

Does very well in short barrels...16" is almost too long if you compare velocities. I think the diff. between 16" and 22" was under 100fps or something...


I thought that was the point of 6.8 that it would use nato mags and be a drop in upper conversion, educate me some more... what was the other one that was competing with the 6.8SPC
8/3/2007 9:35:40 AM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
Why the 53?


ETA
The person has lots of time on M16A2's and some MP5 time as well but could figure out any platform

ETA2: I see a lot of votes for the krink...... but 5.45 is not that common and mag changes suck,


Cycling isn't dependent upon gas system setup to barrel length compatability.

Less to go wrong.
8/3/2007 9:35:51 AM EDT
[#30]
You could always play A-team
8/3/2007 9:36:36 AM EDT
[#31]

Quoted:
I thought that was the point of 6.8 that it would use nato mags and be a drop in upper conversion, educate me some more... what was the other one that was competing with the 6.8SPC


6.5 Grendel? I think that needs special mags too. I have tried to get 6.8 into different AR mags, no such luck.


from DocGKR:

SSA 6.8 2nd generation SMK w/cannelure, 5 shot averages:

20” barrel: ave vel = 2561 fps; 10 fps extreme spread

16” barrel: ave vel = 2525 fps; 18 fps extreme spread -- lost 36 fps

12.5” barrel: ave vel = 2384 fps; 12 fps extreme spread -- lost 141 fps

10” barrel: ave vel = 2265 fps; 27 fps extreme spread -- lost 119 fps

7.5” barrel: ave vel = 2035 fps; 27 fps extreme spread -- lost 230 fps

Only bad part is cost, right now its about a buck a round. I need to get some 6.8 dies.
8/3/2007 9:41:26 AM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:

Quoted:
How many moving parts?


Beats me. Steyr would know.



are they good to kick about and bounce on a sling and good to go with little maint? I don;t knwo much about them

Are they more G3 or more MP5ish?


I've handled a couple, and they feel like a slightly more awkward MP5 thanks to the more awkward charging handle. Other than that they seemed good to go.


Have a part count similar to a FAL.

The reason you can't use a MP5 type charging handle is you have to break to rollers which keep the bolt locked up. And you need more leverage for .223 than you do 9mm.

The only reason I would take it over a Colt Commando is the potentially crappy AO might fuck with the shorty ARs gas system when it comes to cycling.

HK don't have a gas system so this consideration is eliminated.

Krinks aren't bad, but I prefer the accuracy of other choices, not to mention th easier mag changes with HK straight insert mags vs. Krink rock n lock.
8/3/2007 9:42:30 AM EDT
[#33]
I really go with one of these the best "krink" the Micro Galil
8/3/2007 9:43:27 AM EDT
[#34]
Good grief.  Not an HK-51.  I shot one once - the recoil was surprisingly light for a .308 with a fun switch, but it felt like my teeth were going to rattle out of my jaw from the muzzle blast.

Fictionally, I'd take a 10.5-11.5" AR.
8/3/2007 9:44:57 AM EDT
[#35]
thanks for all the info so far

Some more questions:

1. The HK 53 NAtO mags in 5.56 ?
2. 6.8 sounds cool, but too bleeding edge... I have to wonder what it can do that the 5.56 can't given the special mags and $1/shot won't really alllow a lot of training
8/3/2007 9:46:30 AM EDT
[#36]
I'd either have a high-end 7.62x39mm AK or an M-4.
8/3/2007 9:46:52 AM EDT
[#37]

Quoted:
I would want a short barreled version (10 inches or so) of the 416.



Is the 416 a hk upper rod AR?
8/3/2007 9:46:56 AM EDT
[#38]
How compact?



+


8/3/2007 9:49:52 AM EDT
[#39]
If this place is so dangerous why is said person traveling without security?  Also, is the person willing to leave gun there when they come back?  Because I wouldn't suggest trying to bring it back into the States.
8/3/2007 9:50:55 AM EDT
[#40]
Not that compact!


Showoff


Short enough to be handy in a vehicle long enough to hit out to 100-200M and still have some umph.

Short enough to throw on  the back while climbing towers  and exit a vehicle fireing but long enough to have traditional rifle ergonomics
8/3/2007 9:51:00 AM EDT
[#41]

Quoted:
Is the 416 a hk upper rod AR?


High quality piston driven takeoff of the AR design.

It's supposed to be the shizz....
8/3/2007 9:52:27 AM EDT
[#42]

Quoted:
If this place is so dangerous why is said person traveling without security?  Also, is the person willing to leave gun there when they come back?  Because I wouldn't suggest trying to bring it back into the States.


Oh yeah its a cost of doing business and will be destroyed or given to a worthy local when done, There will be others traveling with for secuirty but this person is old fashion and wants to have the ability to rely on himself This person is not working for a PMC nor in an active warzone, rather a more dicey third world place where kidnapping and the sort is rather commonplace. Think Lion King type of terrain
8/3/2007 9:56:34 AM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:
thanks for all the info so far

Some more questions:

1. The HK 53 NAtO mags in 5.56 ?



Nope. Proprietary magazine.

They did make a G41 which took NATO mags, but no 50 series version of it.
8/3/2007 9:58:46 AM EDT
[#44]
Nigeria, so you are putting up comm lines for the oil companies then.  





Id do a HK51 as G3 ammo and mags are plentiful in that shithole.
8/3/2007 10:04:00 AM EDT
[#45]
I'd choose the 10.5" AR, just because of the intimate familiarization I have with the platform. Nothing different to get used to means less likelyhood of mistakes and an ease of repairing any issues.  
8/3/2007 10:06:37 AM EDT
[#46]
Leaning towards AR for:
Familarity
Cost
Commonality


So is 4" worth the portability vs loss in velocity and less common parts?
8/3/2007 10:08:05 AM EDT
[#47]

Quoted:
2. 6.8 sounds cool, but too bleeding edge... I have to wonder what it can do that the 5.56 can't given the special mags and $1/shot won't really alllow a lot of training


Terminal performance at long range is better, and honestly I can barely tell the difference in recoil between 6.8 and 5.56...that said I still have plenty of 5.56weapons...just not 5.56 ammo
8/3/2007 10:08:12 AM EDT
[#48]
ARs are that small considering the buttstock does not fully collaspe or side fold.




A F2000 is smaller than a SBR AR.  
8/3/2007 10:08:33 AM EDT
[#49]

Quoted:
Leaning towards AR for:
Familarity
Cost
Commonality


So is 4" worth the portability vs loss in velocity and less common parts?


Depends, are you going in and out of lots of confined spaces?
8/3/2007 10:11:03 AM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Leaning towards AR for:
Familarity
Cost
Commonality


So is 4" worth the portability vs loss in velocity and less common parts?


Depends, are you going in and out of lots of confined spaces?


Not sure the biggest fear that my friend told me was the famous Africian roadblock.

My friend has no intention of going into a hostile building knowlingly, but might need to fight his way out of a hotel
Previous Page
/ 2
Next Page

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - PDW Selection (Page 1 of 2)