User Panel
|
|
Quoted: Not to throw shade, but when people complain about the tint on the RMR, it makes wonder if they are actually shooting both eyes open/target focus. If you use the phrase “looking through” when referring to optics on pistols it sounds like you are doing it wrong View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As long as it doesn’t look like I’m staring at the world through a windex bottle it solves my complaints about the RMR Not to throw shade, but when people complain about the tint on the RMR, it makes wonder if they are actually shooting both eyes open/target focus. If you use the phrase “looking through” when referring to optics on pistols it sounds like you are doing it wrong Yeah. Both eyes open, focused on the target, the dot gets superimposed. For whatever reason I’m super sensitive to it and the RMR is probably the worst RDS on the market when it comes to notch filters. I tried to run one as a primary on a carbine and couldn’t get past it. Switching to and eotech or Aimpoint t2 was the fix. I haven’t spent much time with a SRO but from what I remember it was better. My speculation is the ability to easily change batteries makes trijicon put less emphasis on battery life. I’d gladly take a big reduction in battery life for a clear window. |
|
Quoted: Yeah. Both eyes open, focused on the target, the dot gets superimposed. For whatever reason I’m super sensitive to it and the RMR is probably the worst RDS on the market when it comes to notch filters. I tried to run one as a primary on a carbine and couldn’t get past it. Switching to and eotech or Aimpoint t2 was the fix. I haven’t spent much time with a SRO but from what I remember it was better. My speculation is the ability to easily change batteries makes trijicon put less emphasis on battery life. I’d gladly take a big reduction in battery life for a clear window. View Quote Fair enough. If you wanted to for S&Gs, tape the front lens with blue painters tape and see if you can still target focus with both eyes open. Some people this just doesn’t work, you be one of those people where your eyes naturally focus on the dot/obscured area which the tint may force your eye to focus on. |
|
Quoted: It’s literally an RMR with SRO sized glass and all the top load, sealed bottoms, 06 type buttons we have been looking for…but wait there is more…coming…someone at Trijicon is listening View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: New retical, top mount battery, larger buttons and front facing light sensor. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2957-2888059.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2958-2888060.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2959-2888061.jpg Is this a super sized RMR? It’s literally an RMR with SRO sized glass and all the top load, sealed bottoms, 06 type buttons we have been looking for…but wait there is more…coming…someone at Trijicon is listening Gigitty |
|
Quoted: Fair enough. If you wanted to for S&Gs, tape the front lens with blue painters tape and see if you can still target focus with both eyes open. Some people this just doesn’t work, you be one of those people where your eyes naturally focus on the dot/obscured area which the tint may force your eye to focus on. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Yeah. Both eyes open, focused on the target, the dot gets superimposed. For whatever reason I’m super sensitive to it and the RMR is probably the worst RDS on the market when it comes to notch filters. I tried to run one as a primary on a carbine and couldn’t get past it. Switching to and eotech or Aimpoint t2 was the fix. I haven’t spent much time with a SRO but from what I remember it was better. My speculation is the ability to easily change batteries makes trijicon put less emphasis on battery life. I’d gladly take a big reduction in battery life for a clear window. Fair enough. If you wanted to for S&Gs, tape the front lens with blue painters tape and see if you can still target focus with both eyes open. Some people this just doesn’t work, you be one of those people where your eyes naturally focus on the dot/obscured area which the tint may force your eye to focus on. I’ll give it a shot. I’ve had good luck with a 3x ACOG and using the Bindon aiming concept but almost feel like that’s easier because each eye is seeing something totally different. Instead they see pretty much the same just through a blue haze and maybe that’s where my brain gets hung up. |
|
Quoted: Fair enough. If you wanted to for S&Gs, tape the front lens with blue painters tape and see if you can still target focus with both eyes open. Some people this just doesn’t work, you be one of those people where your eyes naturally focus on the dot/obscured area which the tint may force your eye to focus on. View Quote Couldn’t that just be a training issue? I’m sure any of us can retrain our eyes to focus differently. |
|
Quoted: I’ll give it a shot. I’ve had good luck with a 3x ACOG and using the Bindon aiming concept but almost feel like that’s easier because each eye is seeing something totally different. Instead they see pretty much the same just through a blue haze and maybe that’s where my brain gets hung up. View Quote Umm, what? It's the same as the ACOG, your non-dominant eye shouldn't be looking through the optic. Not even sure how that's possible. |
|
Quoted: I’ll give it a shot. I’ve had good luck with a 3x ACOG and using the Bindon aiming concept but almost feel like that’s easier because each eye is seeing something totally different. Instead they see pretty much the same just through a blue haze and maybe that’s where my brain gets hung up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Yeah. Both eyes open, focused on the target, the dot gets superimposed. For whatever reason I’m super sensitive to it and the RMR is probably the worst RDS on the market when it comes to notch filters. I tried to run one as a primary on a carbine and couldn’t get past it. Switching to and eotech or Aimpoint t2 was the fix. I haven’t spent much time with a SRO but from what I remember it was better. My speculation is the ability to easily change batteries makes trijicon put less emphasis on battery life. I’d gladly take a big reduction in battery life for a clear window. Fair enough. If you wanted to for S&Gs, tape the front lens with blue painters tape and see if you can still target focus with both eyes open. Some people this just doesn’t work, you be one of those people where your eyes naturally focus on the dot/obscured area which the tint may force your eye to focus on. I’ll give it a shot. I’ve had good luck with a 3x ACOG and using the Bindon aiming concept but almost feel like that’s easier because each eye is seeing something totally different. Instead they see pretty much the same just through a blue haze and maybe that’s where my brain gets hung up. When I'm dry firing targets "at further distances" (just smaller in reality) I've had issues at times with my focus shifting to the dot. I did dot occlusion for a week during dryfire and it definitely let's you know when you shift your focus. It can be a good training aid. |
|
|
Quoted: Couldn’t that just be a training issue? I’m sure any of us can retrain our eyes to focus differently. View Quote There is a small percentage of people who when the dominant eye sees the obscured lens the non-dominant automatically focuses on it. BAC does not work for them. Maybe less than 5% based on my experience. You can try working with them but it just isn’t going to happen. IMHO |
|
Quoted: When I'm dry firing targets "at further distances" (just smaller in reality) I've had issues at times with my focus shifting to the dot. I did dot occlusion for a week during dryfire and it definitely let's you know when you shift your focus. It can be a good training aid. View Quote Mine stays covered 100% of the time, even in matches. It works for me. My belief is that if you’re target focused like you should be, whether or not the front of the optic is covered is irrelevant. But for me I find it helps to “force” me to focus correctly. And even then sometimes I don’t. Still working on it. |
|
Quoted: There is a small percentage of people who when the dominant eye sees the obscured lens the non-dominant automatically focuses on it. BAC does not work for them. Maybe less than 5% based on my experience. You can try working with them but it just isn’t going to happen. IMHO View Quote I shoot with a guy like this. Right handed, left eye dominant. The slight head cant for the dominant eye to pick up the target/dot is just enough to bring his non dominant eye out of line enough this doesn't work for him. It took me forever to figure out why he couldn't pick up target focus with an occluded lens until he told me he was left eye dominant. |
|
Crawled out from under my rock today, and learned that Glock has been making optic-specific cuts at the factory.
Link to an article about the various cuts available Of course, as is typical of Glock, they're not for sale to dirty civilians, they're only selling them in bulk to agencies. |
|
Quoted: Crawled out from under my rock today, and learned that Glock has been making optic-specific cuts at the factory. Link to an article about the various cuts available Of course, as is typical of Glock, they're not for sale to dirty civilians, they're only selling them in bulk to agencies. View Quote It only makes sense, really. A department buying 500 pistols cut for the same optic is one thing. Distributors and dealers trying to stock 3-4 different optic cuts for a dozen different models is quite another. |
|
Quoted: It only makes sense, really. A department buying 500 pistols cut for the same optic is one thing. Distributors and dealers trying to stock 3-4 different optic cuts for a dozen different models is quite another. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Crawled out from under my rock today, and learned that Glock has been making optic-specific cuts at the factory. Link to an article about the various cuts available Of course, as is typical of Glock, they're not for sale to dirty civilians, they're only selling them in bulk to agencies. It only makes sense, really. A department buying 500 pistols cut for the same optic is one thing. Distributors and dealers trying to stock 3-4 different optic cuts for a dozen different models is quite another. Doesn’t need to be a standard stocked item, I’d just like the option of placing an order for whenever there’s a production run of the model in question. |
|
A standardized mounting footprint would literally solve all these problems
|
|
|
Quoted: A standardized mounting footprint would literally solve all these problems View Quote Hey-hey-hey! Don't you go making sense like that, you're gonna get someone in trouble. Like with Mlok vs Keymod, eventually one pattern will win out. I'm hoping for the Acro cut, or something similar to become standard, it's narrow enough to work on slimmer slides, avoids conflicting with different design internals, and a crossbolt/clamp makes more sense than the studs and screws. |
|
Quoted: Yep that’s why every competition shooter uses an RMR. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As long as your presentation is good, window size is not an issue. Yep that’s why every competition shooter uses an RMR. How well does a Delta Point Pro handle dropped? |
|
|
|
Quoted: It crumbles like a collage student exposed to a new opinion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How well does a Delta Point Pro handle dropped? It crumbles like a collage student exposed to a new opinion. Ask any garbage red dot owner to engage in a a drop competition until one fails and they quickly retreat back to China. We finish when one breaks, not until then. One foot at a time onto concrete or asphalt. |
|
|
Quoted: It crumbles like a collage student exposed to a new opinion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: How well does a Delta Point Pro handle dropped? It crumbles like a collage student exposed to a new opinion. Bigger window vs more durable/reliable? Yeah I will take durability and reliability every day of the week. |
|
Quoted: Ask any garbage red dot owner to engage in a a drop competition until one fails and they quickly retreat back to China. We finish when one breaks, not until then. One foot at a time onto concrete or asphalt. View Quote There’s a lot to like about the DPP, but in typical Leopold fashion they fucked it up. It has nice, clear glass and a large window. But….. The adjustment button is right in the way so you can’t just it and see the reticle. The Gen 1 had the battery connections secured with fucking tape. T A P E. On an application meant to deal with hundreds of G’s. Since been fixed but WTF? Durability is meh. I broke one dropping it onto a carpeted floor from like stomach height. Then again I dropped one onto gravel from chest height and it was fine. Reticles are ok. I really like the original “7.5 MOA” triangle for Steel Challenge. But that’s only because it’s not 7.5 MOA. The base of the triangle is 21” at 100 yards. |
|
Quoted: There’s a lot to like about the DPP, but in typical Leopold fashion they fucked it up. It has nice, clear glass and a large window. But….. The adjustment button is right in the way so you can’t just it and see the reticle. The Gen 1 had the battery connections secured with fucking tape. T A P E. On an application meant to deal with hundreds of G’s. Since been fixed but WTF? Durability is meh. I broke one dropping it onto a carpeted floor from like stomach height. Then again I dropped one onto gravel from chest height and it was fine. Reticles are ok. I really like the original “7.5 MOA” triangle for Steel Challenge. But that’s only because it’s not 7.5 MOA. The base of the triangle is 21” at 100 yards. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Ask any garbage red dot owner to engage in a a drop competition until one fails and they quickly retreat back to China. We finish when one breaks, not until then. One foot at a time onto concrete or asphalt. There’s a lot to like about the DPP, but in typical Leopold fashion they fucked it up. It has nice, clear glass and a large window. But….. The adjustment button is right in the way so you can’t just it and see the reticle. The Gen 1 had the battery connections secured with fucking tape. T A P E. On an application meant to deal with hundreds of G’s. Since been fixed but WTF? Durability is meh. I broke one dropping it onto a carpeted floor from like stomach height. Then again I dropped one onto gravel from chest height and it was fine. Reticles are ok. I really like the original “7.5 MOA” triangle for Steel Challenge. But that’s only because it’s not 7.5 MOA. The base of the triangle is 21” at 100 yards. Sir I'm trying to get people to destroy their trash voluntarily by issuing a challenge |
|
|
Quoted: Sir I'm trying to get people to destroy their trash voluntarily by issuing a challenge View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Ask any garbage red dot owner to engage in a a drop competition until one fails and they quickly retreat back to China. We finish when one breaks, not until then. One foot at a time onto concrete or asphalt. There’s a lot to like about the DPP, but in typical Leopold fashion they fucked it up. It has nice, clear glass and a large window. But….. The adjustment button is right in the way so you can’t just it and see the reticle. The Gen 1 had the battery connections secured with fucking tape. T A P E. On an application meant to deal with hundreds of G’s. Since been fixed but WTF? Durability is meh. I broke one dropping it onto a carpeted floor from like stomach height. Then again I dropped one onto gravel from chest height and it was fine. Reticles are ok. I really like the original “7.5 MOA” triangle for Steel Challenge. But that’s only because it’s not 7.5 MOA. The base of the triangle is 21” at 100 yards. Sir I'm trying to get people to destroy their trash voluntarily by issuing a challenge Sig Romeo 1 Pro Master Race |
|
Swapped the 507k for an EPS on the P-07.
No going back now. Holy shit that's a nice window. |
|
Quoted: All I have is what’s going around the internet. Looks like a compact holo. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2962-2888545.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2963-2888546.jpg View Quote I swear they continue to make optics uglier and gayer looking. They just can't stop. |
|
Quoted: I swear they continue to make optics uglier and gayer looking. They just can't stop. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: All I have is what’s going around the internet. Looks like a compact holo. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2962-2888545.jpg https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/371613/IMG_2963-2888546.jpg I swear they continue to make optics uglier and gayer looking. They just can't stop. I’m no fan of Eotech but this seems an odd thing to get worked up over…Aside from making the reticle a cock and balls, exactly how does an optic look “gayer”? |
|
|
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote Jesus fuck that thing is ugly. Can we stop putting CRT's on top of our pistols. The ACRO was a gay footprint. |
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote It looks like they took the RMR, uploaded a screenshot to ms paint, created new lines to make it enclosed, then tossed the battery on top. I'll take 2. Edit to add details: RMR footprint and deck height is unchanged, no need to change irons from your current rmr. CR2032 battery, six years battery life on setting 5 (10 total settings). Capstan Screw mounting system |
|
|
Quoted: I’m no fan of Eotech but this seems an odd thing to get worked up over…Aside from making the reticle a cock and balls, exactly how does an optic look “gayer”? View Quote Why is it an odd thing to get worked over? The optic is hideous. That would negate it from my armory already. I dont care how good something is if it looks bad. It should at least look decent, but the design they went with is the equivalent of some chinese boomer who watched too much future weapons and decided to try his hand at releasing an optic for the American market. Many new optics look ugly and it annoys me. Its just ugly ugly ugly, like new cars. All ugly. There is no sense of aesthetics anymore and it matters. Also I do not want to believe the guy I am discussing this with is the same guy with the one of the most aesthetically pleasing sig xfives ive ever seen (fucking love that thing). You of all people should know. |
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote What scripture is gonna be on it? I found what will be going on my rifle. |
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote #BULK |
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote W8bwtfwhen |
|
RCR…it is smaller than the Acro, and fits the RMR footprint.
Like was mentioned already same deck Height and they gave us battery on top as eequested |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote I’ll be a buyer. |
|
Keeping the RMR footprint is smart; people won't have to wait for plates to become available or for vendors to start cutting for it.
They seem to have learned from the RMRCC shitshow. Hopefully the screws aren't a failure point. |
|
Quoted: For discussion: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/241349/8ACDC9CA-28FD-4F17-BE5A-1673CDC4FC99_jpe-2896681.JPG View Quote Whoa… Real or deepfake? @45-Seventy |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.