Posted: 1/11/2013 8:50:35 AM EDT
|
Dear Mr. lhm1509 :
Thank you for writing me regarding the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Your taking the time to contact me is appreciated. I have always been a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights, and I will continue to ensure the rights of gun owners will not be further infringed upon. We must make certain that the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens are not unfairly impeded. I believe that the ability of sportsmen, hunters, gun enthusiasts and citizens concerned with their personal safety to own a gun, whether for sport or protection, is clearly defined in the Constitution and must not be compromised. In response to recent tragic and high-profile acts of violence, there is a renewed focus on government regulation of guns. It is likely that Congress will soon have an extensive and detailed conversation about all of the potential causes of these crimes, including mental health issues, depictions of violence in television, movies, and video games, and firearms. I know that dialogue regarding acts of violence will likely result in a wide range of legislative proposals seeking to address the underlying causes. As these pieces of legislation come before me in the Senate, I will keep your thoughts in mind. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I may be of assistance to you in the future. In the meantime, if you would like to receive timely e-mail alerts regarding the latest congressional actions and my weekly e-newsletter, please sign up via my web site at: www.chambliss.senate.gov . A form letter I know... but tried to let my voice be heard. Hope he means it! |
|
Quoted: Quoted: "We must make certain that the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens are not unfairly impeded." That statement is eerily Orwellian Should have ended with "....are not impeded." IMHO. Exactly. "Unfairly impeded" leaves the door open to interpretation. It is a political statement so as not to hem in the representative should the political mood change. Unfortunately, most people in Washington now think the constitution is up for fair or unfair interpretation. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"We must make certain that the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens are not unfairly impeded." That statement is eerily Orwellian Should have ended with "....are not impeded." IMHO. Exactly. "Unfairly impeded" leaves the door open to interpretation. It is a political statement so as not to hem in the representative should the political mood change. Unfortunately, most people in Washington now think the constitution is up for fair or unfair interpretation. It is from a politician... gotta have a little double speak.... I have always been a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights, and I will continue to ensure the rights of gun owners will not be further infringed upon. |
