AL, USA
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: "SAFE AND TESTED", the only viewpoint you could have without being cancelled. Meanwhile: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000151512_jpg-3781669.JPG |
|
Originally Posted By OG1: Remember the old days when the misinformation crew shared accounts round the clock to paint us as whack jobs for saying this? Originally Posted By OG1: Originally Posted By Geralt55: "SAFE AND TESTED", the only viewpoint you could have without being cancelled. Meanwhile: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000151512_jpg-3781669.JPG  I'm old enough to remember how quiet the GD greybars were when USAID got the plug pulled at first   IIRC: Say weren't they tracking "misinformation" people (Who were That's some 1984 garbage. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: "SAFE AND TESTED", the only viewpoint you could have without being cancelled. Meanwhile: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000151512_jpg-3781669.JPG
2020. Scott Pelley interviews Peter Daszak, the man whose company was being funded by Fauci and who was complicit in the virus being created and leaked from the lab in Wuhan. Pelley was already convinced that the virus occurred naturally. Pelley's focus was on Trump ending funding to Daszak's companies and the "danger" it might cause. Hey Scott Pelley, look at yourself. See what a fvcking idiot you are? 
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
2020. Scott Pelley interviews Peter Daszak, the man whose company was being funded by Fauci and who was complicit in the virus being created and leaked from the lab in Wuhan. Pelley was already convinced that the virus occurred naturally. Pelley's focus was on Trump ending funding to Daszak's companies and the "danger" it might cause. Hey Scott Pelley, look at yourself. See what a fvcking idiot you are? https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/2068111595683622912/img/KvgvXEgjdYL59gBx?format=jpg&name=small Originally Posted By RSG: Originally Posted By Geralt55: "SAFE AND TESTED", the only viewpoint you could have without being cancelled. Meanwhile: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000151512_jpg-3781669.JPG
2020. Scott Pelley interviews Peter Daszak, the man whose company was being funded by Fauci and who was complicit in the virus being created and leaked from the lab in Wuhan. Pelley was already convinced that the virus occurred naturally. Pelley's focus was on Trump ending funding to Daszak's companies and the "danger" it might cause. Hey Scott Pelley, look at yourself. See what a fvcking idiot you are? https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/2068111595683622912/img/KvgvXEgjdYL59gBx?format=jpg&name=small "Hurr duurrrr we're Real Journalists because we told you Drumpf had the hookerpee blackmail! No of course Fauci is a Saint it's dangerous to imply he isnt, herpderp" Attached File |
NC, USA
|
She knows . Disgusting display of avoidance of facts . Hang all of them .  Vaccine lies |
|
This is hardly encouraging: FDA Advisers Recommend Approving First mRNA Influenza Vaccine Epoch Times June 18, 2026 The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee in a unanimous vote advised the FDA to approve an mRNA flu shot from Moderna for adults aged 50 and older. Multiple committee members who voted in favor of approval have connections to Moderna, including El Sahly and Dr. Flor Munoz, who was a Moderna adviser from 2022 to 2024 and helped craft recommendations for pregnant women to receive COVID-19 vaccines. None of those members declared conflicts of interest on June 18. link (may be behind a paywall) |
|
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/ext_tw_video_thumb/1759987398409060353/pu/img/dEgH_V-xmpx5xOi1?format=jpg&name=small Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/ext_tw_video_thumb/1759987398409060353/pu/img/dEgH_V-xmpx5xOi1?format=jpg&name=small Great time capsule video Originally Posted By RSG:
I cannot imagine what the world would look like if Elon doesn't buy twitter, and if they drag Kamala over the finish line in '24. Very VERY different world. There hasn't been the COVID-reckoning that was needed, but this ^ was a blueprint, the censorship would have been the new normal. |
Attached File
|
 
   
|
🚨Fauci's diary says he privately put COVID's fatality rate at 0.2-0.3%. Under oath weeks later, he told Congress it was 10x the flu. The timeline: Feb 8, 2020 (private diary): case fatality rate "more like 0.2-0.3%." March 10 (Hannity): "The mortality for this is about 2-2.5%. It's probably lower than that, closer to 1%. But even if it's 1%, it's 10x more lethal than the seasonal flu." March 11 (Congress, under oath): "The stated fatality rate of this overall... is about 3%. If you count all the cases of asymptomatic infection, that probably brings the mortality down to 1%, which means it's 10x more deadly than the seasonal flu." March 27 (Daily Show): "The mortality of this is about 10x the flu. It's at least 1%." He wrote 0.2-0.3% in his journal — then told the public, over and over, a number 3 to 5 times higher. @RandPaul @DrJBhattacharya @RobertKennedyJr  
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
🚨Fauci's diary says he privately put COVID's fatality rate at 0.2-0.3%. Under oath weeks later, he told Congress it was 10x the flu. The timeline: Feb 8, 2020 (private diary): case fatality rate "more like 0.2-0.3%." March 10 (Hannity): "The mortality for this is about 2-2.5%. It's probably lower than that, closer to 1%. But even if it's 1%, it's 10x more lethal than the seasonal flu." March 11 (Congress, under oath): "The stated fatality rate of this overall... is about 3%. If you count all the cases of asymptomatic infection, that probably brings the mortality down to 1%, which means it's 10x more deadly than the seasonal flu." March 27 (Daily Show): "The mortality of this is about 10x the flu. It's at least 1%." He wrote 0.2-0.3% in his journal — then told the public, over and over, a number 3 to 5 times higher. @RandPaul @DrJBhattacharya @RobertKennedyJr https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOLE55oaUAAYX3M?format=png&name=smallhttps://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/2081442640093229056/img/HL20ZaCTU_vn3Q4D?format=jpg&name=small The people who got in the faces of the skeptics have nothing to fuckin say now, do they. Attached File Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: The people who got in the faces of the skeptics have nothing to fuckin say now, do they. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000170701_jpg-3801857.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000170826_jpg-3801883.JPG I guess we should thank him for being such a narcissist, otherwise he wouldn't have written all this stuff down? 
|
Wikipedia has now removed DEFUSE from its article on the origins of Covid. Even by Wikipedia’s grotesquely corrupt standards, that is an extraordinary act of historical vandalism. It's like writing about 9/11 while omitting the planes. (DEFUSE is the 2018 blueprint developed by Peter Daszak and his Wuhan lab collaborators for engineering the exact same kinds of coronavirus features that later appeared in Covid. It is the smokingest of smoking guns.) |
Dr Fauci and Mr. Science The Fauci files reveal not just a sociopathic narcissist, but also a pathological schizophrenic. For years, Fauci was assuring the public of Covid narratives that he either knew were untrue, or knew little about. He posed as a non-partisan, even as he collaborated with the leftwing cable news grandees and liberal columnists to hound his enemies and magnify his godhead. From the virus’s origins and effects of the lockdowns, to the efficacy of the mRNA vaccinations to the always changing 0/1/2 masks wearing protocols, Fauci used his massive government agency, and sycophantic media, to promote his always fluid narratives by punishing enemies and rewarding friends—on the basis of their loyalty to Dr. “I represent science”. He seemed to be obsessed with firing White House Covid advisor Scott Atlas, and demonizing Jay Bhattacharya, Sunetra Gupta and Martin Kulldorff—for the crimes of questioning the Fauci party line. These critics were not radical “let it rip” herd immunologists as the Fauci camp caricatured them, but circumspect, cost-to-benefit doctors and savvy health policy analysts. Their views, if embraced, might have avoided a multibillion-dollar global shutdown that wrecked economies—especially derailing the booming 4th quarter 2019 Trump economy—increased the death toll, destroyed millions of livelihoods, harmed perhaps permanently the education of millions U.S. children, and was hardly based on the “science”. And what exactly were the so-called extremist views of Atlas, Bhattacharya, and others? Healthy children were not at great risk from Covid—but keeping them isolated drained away key resources from the elderly and sick who certainly were vulnerable. And the nationwide school closures had profound negative effects on children and teens as did the lockdowns on the general population. Substance and familial abuse soared, small businesses were ruined, and children’s formative educational years were lost. 24/7 mask wearing was neither practical nor necessary as opposed to their beneficial use by health care workers in close proximities. The experimental mRNA vaccinations may have initially saved lives, but they were not, as billed by Fauci and the pharmaceutical companies, lasting protection from either infectiousness or being infected. And certainly the repeated booster regimens for some could pose serious health risks. Herd immunity was not some crank idea, as the Fauci school libeled these experts, but, along with the initial vaccinations, were time-tested medical realities that would mitigate the toxicity of the pandemic. We have seen a lot of obscene hoaxes recently that changed national events: the loony Jussie Smollett caper; the phony “Steele dossier”; the “51 intelligence authorities” and the Russian-produced Hunter Biden laptop con; and the media fabricated effigy of Joe Biden as “fit as a fiddle”. But Fauci’s effort to attribute the virus to a bat or pangolin publicly, while privately accepting from his own consultants that it likely was birthed in the Wuhan lab’s gain of function research—which he had helped to support via Peter Daszak—and the policies that resulted from that initial lie, proved literally for thousands a matter of life and death. |
|
Originally Posted By RSG: I guess we should thank him for being such a narcissist, otherwise he wouldn't have written all this stuff down?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOPJtWRW0AAbgt6?format=png&name=small Originally Posted By RSG: Originally Posted By Geralt55: The people who got in the faces of the skeptics have nothing to fuckin say now, do they. https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000170701_jpg-3801857.JPG https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000170826_jpg-3801883.JPG I guess we should thank him for being such a narcissist, otherwise he wouldn't have written all this stuff down?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOPJtWRW0AAbgt6?format=png&name=small Attached File Like a damn movie villain caught monologuing Attached File Remember, there were people everywhere in society who would talk down to you for being right. No amount of evidence they could see with their eyes would make them reconsider. "Wait, Israel's vaccination rate is incredibly high, why is covid still spreading? How would that end the pandemic by herd immunity, and then how do the mandates make sense?" Safe and Tested. "Don't you know how vaccines work?" The reason i kept the original post of the thread, shtick-heavy and with literal quotes: we were not just tracking the official-narrative parroting liars, but our neighbors who were tricked. It was to screencap the Official-Narrative smokescreen. The vindication feels good brothers, but it's bittersweet. They still tricked and harmed a lot of people we care about, some who are no longer with us. 
|
|
Originally Posted By Ender875: Everytime I see that fuckwads face............. One thing about the diary I havent seen anywhere, how did Rand Paul get a copy of it? Did Fuckwad have to turn it over for the hearings? I think he got it by subpoena as part of the Senate investigation. Here's Rand's thread where he mentions he discovered Fauci kept a diary. I think Fauci is supposed to testify about all this soon.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000171302_jpg-3802783.JPG
PAUL: "Dr. Fauci, would you like to at least answer this one question for us today...?" FAUCI: "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline..." PAUL: "The chairman has DENIED your assertion of privilege and directed you to ANSWER, but you nonetheless refuse and stand on privilege despite the existence of the pardon." "It's AGAINST THE LAW to obstruct an investigation of Congress. There will be repercussions to your refusal to testify today." 
|
|
https://x.com/AaronSiriSG/status/2082551339666771996 Four mistakes Fauci made when pleading the 5th today: 1. Once a witness opens the door to a topic, the witness cannot then plead the 5th with regard to that topic. And Fauci’s opening statement opened many doors widely, including when he claimed he had a “decades-long record of cooperating with Congress” including “during and after the Covid pandemic” when he “appeared multiple times for hearings in the Senate and the House.” That puts the question of whether he properly cooperated when responding to questions, including prior questions from Senator Paul, in all of those hearings directly at issue. Here are a few of his statements through which he opened the door broadly: •“I served at the NIH for over 54 years, 38 of those as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.” •“Over that period, I proved that I believe in and respect the value of legitimate congressional oversight. In fact, I testified before and/or briefed Senate and House committees well over 200 times over those 38 years.” •“During and after the Covid pandemic, I have appeared multiple times for hearings in the Senate and the House, usually under oath, and sat for several days-long, transcribed sworn interviews answering questions about the very issues that are now the subject of this hearing.” •“However, Given Senator Paul’s obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me, and recently, his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary, aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me, the only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something – anything – that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, ‘behind bars.’ Any reasonable person who has followed his unhinged obsession with me would readily come to the same conclusion.” •“Therefore, although it pains me to do so because of the respect I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades-long record of cooperating with Congress, under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the 5th amendment of the constitution to refrain from answering your questions.” 2. The 5th amendment can only be used when answering a question which would present real and appreciable danger. Thus, his use of the 5th during the hearing for questions that clearly don’t meet this standard, including about the color of his tie and what day of the week it is, reflects on its improper use during the hearing overall. 3. Since invoking the 5th is question specific, announcing before even hearing the questions that he would “refrain from answering [the committee’s] questions” under the 5th was itself improper. 4. Finally, ignoring the broad presidential pardon he received, as if it doesn’t exist, including for questions that would clearly fall within the parameters of that incredibly broad pardon, was a misstep that may come back to bite him later. |
|
Originally Posted By RSG: I think he got it by subpoena as part of the Senate investigation. Here's Rand's thread where he mentions he discovered Fauci kept a diary. I think Fauci is supposed to testify about all this soon.
Thanks. Wasn't sure if it was an offical part of the record. If it is/was then the things he wrote in it directly contradict his testimony before. He may have a pardon ( and that needs to be figured out in regards to the whole autopen thing) but its only for federal. Each State now needs to put his ass under warrant. |
|
Originally Posted By Ender875: Thanks. Wasn't sure if it was an offical part of the record. If it is/was then the things he wrote in it directly contradict his testimony before. He may have a pardon ( and that needs to be figured out in regards to the whole autopen thing) but its only for federal. Each State now needs to put his ass under warrant. Originally Posted By Ender875: Originally Posted By RSG: I think he got it by subpoena as part of the Senate investigation. Here's Rand's thread where he mentions he discovered Fauci kept a diary. I think Fauci is supposed to testify about all this soon.
Thanks. Wasn't sure if it was an offical part of the record. If it is/was then the things he wrote in it directly contradict his testimony before. He may have a pardon ( and that needs to be figured out in regards to the whole autopen thing) but its only for federal. Each State now needs to put his ass under warrant.
RFK Jr. just revealed how they gained access to Fauci’s diary. Fauci kept years of entries on his government computer and emailed the entire thing to himself so he could use it to write a book. “He was keeping a diary for the book that he intended to write about his life.” “At the end of his term, just before he was leaving, he emailed the entire diary to himself.” “Years and years of keeping this daily journal, he emailed it to himself so that he could write his book.” “That’s how we found it, through those emails.” “This is a government computer, a government laptop, on government time.” @glennbeck 
|
|
NC, USA
|
Originally Posted By Ender875: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgC7smbIAAhUEI?format=jpg&name=smalll They should have put that in a slide show during the hearings everytime he said "fifth" to the questions . "Per your diary , sir " |
NC, USA
|
Originally Posted By Ender875: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgC7smbIAAhUEI?format=jpg&name=smalll Oops * the case fatality rate could also be much less than 0.2-0.3 if uncounted positives factored in and less counting of covid shenanigans. |
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOjaGIYXQAACUHo?format=jpg&name=small
|
https://zenodo.org/records/8361577
|
I'm not adequately aluminumized for this thread. - gonzo_beyondo
CO, MI, OR - Please lobby your legislators to end discrimination against non-resident CCW permit holders
AL, USA
I can't believe these people still exist....not a troll btw, she is serious.
 Grok: She's still active as of today (August 4, 2026), posting/replying in the same style short comments, reaction images, political jabs, and continued defense of Fauci/healthcare workers from the COVID period. Recent examples include posts framing Fauci's advice favorably versus Trump-related claims, sharing about Fauci's diary/records, and general political content. The account shows ordinary ongoing activity rather than the patterns of a one-off troll or bot (no sudden creation date, no pure engagement-farming spam, consistent voice). |
|
Originally Posted By Gamma762:
https://zenodo.org/records/8361577
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
Originally Posted By RSG: Originally Posted By Gamma762:
https://zenodo.org/records/8361577
|
Fox News' John Roberts has a pacemaker. He's taken four COVID shits. Fucking FOUR! He admits to pericarditis after the first booster (third shot), then he went back for another one after that and his heart inflammation got worse. This is a level of admitted retardation, from his own mouth on national television, that I can't even comprehend. 
|
|
|
|
Court documents reveal emails between a senior US health official and British scientist Peter Daszak, including plans to work “behind the scenes” to counter the theory that Covid leaked from a Wuhan laboratory. Daszak also sent the official wine, thanking him for his “behind the scenes shenanigans” and promising further gifts. Read the full story 👇 
|
|
Originally Posted By mongo001: Prison would be too kind. Originally Posted By mongo001: Originally Posted By killingmachine123: This whole thing is unreal. I would have never imagined that we were so right the whole time. Fauci et al should go to prison. Prison would be too kind. |
|
NC, USA
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HRTYjLlW0AEtGpN?format=jpg&name=small I believe process 1 was pcr and relatively pure vs process 2 which was DNA plasmids , which had a massive contamination rate . |
When I was first assigned to cover some vaccine safety stories at CBS News around the 2002 time period, the crazy reality escaped me because it made so little sense. But I eventually came to understand it to be true. Vaccines not working? Problem defined as: Blame people who aren't vaccinated. Answer: Give everyone more vaccines. Vaccines not preventing disease? Problem defined as: Blame the people who aren't vaccinated. Answer: Give everyone more vaccines and boosters, too. Vaccines injure a vulnerable child? Problem defined as: Crazy parents. Answer: Controversialize and attack them; give everyone more vaccines. No matter what happens, or what the question is, or what the danger is: the answer of the vaccine industry and their propagandists in the medical health establishment, media, and government is: More vaccines. 
|
|
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/vaccines-all-injected-biologics-are The 19th century doctors recognized that cancer was caused by vaccines - William Tebb In this post I am republishing a booklet written in 1892. Mass vaccination, especially of children and women, and laws mandating vaccines have begun in earnest in mid 1800’s. By the end of the century, it was recognized at least by some doctors that vaccines induce cancer which had already begun it’s unstoppable rise in “civilized” populations, in perfect correlation with increasing “access to modern medicine”. Cancer is reported to be increasing not only in England and the Continent, but in all parts of the world where vaccination is practised. Dr. H. McAul Alston, Acting Resident Surgeon, Colonial Hospital, Port of Spain, Trinidad, in the Annual Report to the Surgeon General, dated 5th of April, 1887, says (p. 7):— “A noticeable feature of the diseases of patients admitted is the increasing number of the cases of cancer.” Sir James Paget observes :— “The richest and poorest alike seem to be subject to it; so do the worst and best fed; those that are living in the best conditions of the atmosphere, and those that are immured in the worst; those that are cleanly, and those that are foul; those of all temperaments and of all occupations; those that appear healthy, and those that are diseased. We can hardly lay our hands upon any of the various circumstances of life in the various orders of society in this country, to which we can refer as rendering one more or less liable than another to the acquirement of the cancerous constitution.” It is claimed that cancer is hereditary and is occasionally due to local injury, but is it not obvious that there must be some antecedent constitutional taint or diathesis to give rise to the development, of the disease? To what, then, is this condition really due? Sir James Paget also says cancer is due to a morbid condition of the blood, and some of your readers will have little difficulty in pointing out one cause of the morbidity. It is allowed by physicians that cancer may be caused by impregnating the blood with impure matter. Dr. Joseph Jones, President of the Louisiana Board of Health, a well-known pathologist, says that, this disease is inoculable; that cancer may be propagated by inoculation, or by the injection of cancerous matter into the veins. He adds: “We will have accomplished our purpose in recording these facts if we succeed in directing the attention of the profession to the necessity of greater attention to the condition of the subjects selected for the propagation of the vaccine disease.” |
|
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-measles-message-was-ready-before The Measles Message Was Ready Before the Deaths Were Announced How an unresolved medical announcement became an election-year weapon before the evidence was public What Remains Medically Unresolved The political certainty surrounding the deaths has moved considerably faster than the public medical evidence. Pennsylvania later clarified that it uses the term “measles-associated” when laboratory or epidemiological evidence of measles is present—even when measles is not assessed by the medical certifier or coroner as the immediate cause of death. One of the deceased has been reported to be an infant whose death remains under review by the Lancaster County coroner. The coroner was not investigating the second death. A county commissioner said the coroner had reported no death certified as caused by measles and described the infant as having died with measles while apparently dying from another cause. |
|
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/vaccinations-killed-my-nephew-giovanni Vaccinations killed my nephew, Giovanni Miller, when he was only two months old Because it’s sadly relevant to the propaganda war on Trump and RFK, Jr. over their revision of the US childhood vaccination schedule, I’m reposting this piece from a year ago Here, again, for those who didn’t see it, or did but then forgot it, is my own story of going through what countless families have suffered thanks to the childhood vaccination cult that has been wreaking havoc for well over a century, but especially since Congress passed, and Reagan and then Clinton signed, legislation radically expanding the menu of childhood vaccination shots, while shielding the cartel of corporate poisoners from liability. Thus the state, the medical colossus and—especially—the media came up with the nitwit slander of “vaccine denialism,” which, ChatGPT tells us, “is the rejection of proven science showing that vaccines are safe and effective.” Thanks to that evil lie (there is no such “proven science”), millions think that skepticism vis-a-vis childhood vaccination has put “our children” at grave risk, when it’s those toxic shots that have killed and/or badly sickened them, and that are doing so today, and will do so until our “healthcare system” finally pays attention to the proven science that vaccines—and the COVID “vaccines” above all—are unsafe, and “effective” only as a sure means of depopulation. |