Congress Gave Big Pharma Immunity. Vaccine Victims Got the Bill

The compensation system built to fail Americans

Two Americans can suffer serious injuries after receiving federally protected vaccines and find themselves in two entirely different systems of justice. One may enter a compensation program that has paid roughly half of the petitions it has adjudicated. The other may enter a program that has compensated fewer than one in a hundred decided COVID-19 vaccine claims. Neither person chose the system. Neither person was likely told there were two very different systems for vaccine injuries before rolling up a sleeve. Congress chose what compensation they would encounter if injured, years before either was injured. But neither are they told during the informed consent process that they would not be able to sue for damages in a regular court of law.

Those percentages are not abstract. Behind every petition is a person whose life may have divided into a before and an after: before the neurological injury, before the cardiac damage, before the chronic pain, before the inability to work, before a spouse became a full-time caregiver or parents began wondering who would care for their disabled child after they died. These people do not disappear because an agency rejects their claims. Their medical bills continue. Their lost income remains lost. Their marriages and families absorb the strain. The government merely moves them from a column labeled “pending” into one labeled “denied,” and Washington congratulates itself on having provided a remedy.

This is the story of a bargain Congress made with the American people in 1986 and quietly gutted in 2005. The original bargain was not perfect, but it recognized a basic moral fact: if government protects an industry by taking away an injured person’s ordinary right to sue, government assumes a corresponding duty to provide a fair and meaningful alternative. In 2005, Congress retained sweeping immunity for big pharma, while substituting a narrower, harsher, less transparent program effectively beyond the reach of any court. The manufacturers kept the protection. The injured were left to bear the loss.

Erica Samp did what the government told Americans to do. In 2021, facing an employer mandate, she received two doses of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. She reports that her health deteriorated after the first dose and became dramatically worse after the second. She was subsequently diagnosed with encephalopathy and suffered serious vascular problems, vision and hearing loss, and debilitating headaches. Her medical bills eventually reached hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Samp also did what the government told injured people to do. She filed a claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program in February 2022, within the program’s one-year deadline. HRSA denied her claim in 2024, concluding that there was insufficient evidence that the vaccine directly caused her injuries. There was no appeal to an independent court, no discovery, and no jury.

So Samp did something else. She sued.

On May 19, 2026, Samp filed Samp v. Kennedy in federal court, seeking to force HHS to create the COVID-19 Countermeasures Injury Table required under the PREP Act. Such a table could fundamentally change the causation problem that defeated her CICP claim by establishing a presumption that specified injuries occurring within defined periods were caused by the covered countermeasure. HHS is now moving forward with that rulemaking, and the federal court has paused Samp’s lawsuit while it does so.

Her case brings us directly to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., because the Secretary Samp is suing is the same man who, before the election, promised to end the vaccine liability shield altogether.

On July 29, 2026, Anthony Stephen Fauci sat down at a witness table under subpoena. He invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination one hundred eleven times.

A man who spent forty years explaining himself to the American public, in more television appearances than anyone can count, declined to explain himself under oath. Days earlier, Senator Rand Paul had released 1,141 pages of Fauci’s private diary to the world. Something in those pages made silence the better option.

Peter Navarro has read all 1,141 pages. He has also read the earlier volume, the one Fauci emailed to himself from a government server on July 11, 2015, covering the anthrax letters, the smallpox scare, the bird-flu wars, and Ebola. Why Fauci MUST Rot in Prison is what he found.

I should tell you at the outset that I am not a neutral reader of this book. Navarro asked me to review the manuscript before publication, specifically the sections concerning me and the sections concerning Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko. I went at those sections the way I would go at a paper I had been asked to referee. I will come back to what happened when I did.

BREAKING: Leaked Data Show Israel Covered Up HUNDREDS of COVID Shot Deaths and Hospitalizations Within Weeks of Vaccine Rollout

The cover-up of COVID-19 “vaccine” deaths, injuries, and disabilities appears to have been a coordinated GLOBAL OPERATION.

A newly published peer-reviewed study has exposed an internal Israeli Ministry of Health pharmacovigilance dataset documenting 531 hospitalizations and 67 deaths within weeks of mass COVID-19 “vaccine” rollout.

Nearly half of all hospitalization reports involved myocarditis or pericarditis. Among people under 30, that figure surged to 151 of 211 (71.6%), including 48 patients under 18.

But the most important revelation was how early Israeli authorities had this information. By March 25, 2021, barely three months into the vaccine rollout, Israel had already reported to Pfizer 46 deaths, 157 hospitalizations, and 65 myocarditis/pericarditis cases. These were not retrospective estimates assembled years later; they came from an operational Ministry of Health pharmacovigilance dataset used to document serious events considered relevant enough to report directly to the manufacturer. The median reported interval from vaccination to death was just 3 days.