User Panel
[#1]
Originally Posted By glock27bill: Congrats on surviving. My teaching hospital (University of Virginia) was refusing transplants to those who refused the shot. There was a story about a guy who refused the shot, so he did not get his heart transplant. It blows my mind that transplant doctors will require someone to get a shot that modifies their immune system!!! It makes zero sense (assuming their motive is pure.) UVA is still pushing the "Your 6 month old baby needs to get vaccinated" position. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By glock27bill: Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: I was dealing with old rusted metal a few months ago. I still got a tetanus shot but it was interesting the nurse brought the vile and loaded it right in front of me and put the vile where I could read it way before she stuck me. i didn’t ask for this treatment either. My PCP doc is fine with me refusing the jab, he says that’s okay and kinda gives me a nod but really can’t say anything negative as everything is recorded in each room. Now my transplant docs freaked the hell out and were “oH mY gOsH” how could you. Unfortunately transplant docs are harder to source and they did do me right before kung flu came in the picture. Now that I lived they accepted my choice and are fine with it. I think transplant docs are judged how long the patient lives after, if I only made it a couple years it might make them look bad. Not really sure if this is bragging rights or actually counted after the first year (the first year is HUGE for the patient to live….this is where 87% of the survivability stats come from.) If you read the stats for say a kidney transplant then that hospital has a 95% survival rate, this means 95% of the people lived a year after transplant. Doesn’t matter if they got ran over by a bus before the year was over, still a death and counted in that stat. Now you can dig in the weeds a bit and get better info but usually won’t be the first stat you run across and usually digging is not easy. For example, teaching hospitals usually have a much lower rate of success on average using this number. They might have tried triple transplants (no living success stories when I looked, rejection drugs are REALLY high right after and too many bad side effects take them out from my understanding) and other things that might have reduced the survivability ratio but the patient was going to die in the next few days regardless. For a “standard one organ deal” they usually rank higher than others. Teaching hospitals might do things untraditionally such as, helped them find out things like Hep C positive donors can be used and then treated successfully after the transplant opening up the donor pool and giving more people a chance to live. Congrats on surviving. My teaching hospital (University of Virginia) was refusing transplants to those who refused the shot. There was a story about a guy who refused the shot, so he did not get his heart transplant. It blows my mind that transplant doctors will require someone to get a shot that modifies their immune system!!! It makes zero sense (assuming their motive is pure.) UVA is still pushing the "Your 6 month old baby needs to get vaccinated" position. I would have been under that same mandate, not sure what I would have done at that point. Fortunately I got my organ well before a jab was on the market. On that note can anyone find where they tested a nice group of transplants in the trials..... How did they know the outcome.....like what you suggested and another reason I said "fuck you fire me." Technically for me it still would have been under an EUA I believe after it got fully approved due to this same factor. This part is hard to find, I had it somewhere but after SCOTUS saved my bacon I deleted a bunch of stuff as I was pissed but didn't need the info anymore. I was going to take my case as far as it would go....appeal all unless the verdict came back in my favor for my salary and compensation for the rest of my life. |
|
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand. 87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note) |
[#2]
Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: I would have been under that same mandate, not sure what I would have done at that point. Fortunately I got my organ well before a jab was on the market. On that note can anyone find where they tested a nice group of transplants in the trials..... How did they know the outcome.....like what you suggested and another reason I said "fuck you fire me." Technically for me it still would have been under an EUA I believe after it got fully approved due to this same factor. This part is hard to find, I had it somewhere but after SCOTUS saved my bacon I deleted a bunch of stuff as I was pissed but didn't need the info anymore. I was going to take my case as far as it would go....appeal all unless the verdict came back in my favor for my salary and compensation for the rest of my life. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: Originally Posted By glock27bill: Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: I was dealing with old rusted metal a few months ago. I still got a tetanus shot but it was interesting the nurse brought the vile and loaded it right in front of me and put the vile where I could read it way before she stuck me. i didn’t ask for this treatment either. My PCP doc is fine with me refusing the jab, he says that’s okay and kinda gives me a nod but really can’t say anything negative as everything is recorded in each room. Now my transplant docs freaked the hell out and were “oH mY gOsH” how could you. Unfortunately transplant docs are harder to source and they did do me right before kung flu came in the picture. Now that I lived they accepted my choice and are fine with it. I think transplant docs are judged how long the patient lives after, if I only made it a couple years it might make them look bad. Not really sure if this is bragging rights or actually counted after the first year (the first year is HUGE for the patient to live….this is where 87% of the survivability stats come from.) If you read the stats for say a kidney transplant then that hospital has a 95% survival rate, this means 95% of the people lived a year after transplant. Doesn’t matter if they got ran over by a bus before the year was over, still a death and counted in that stat. Now you can dig in the weeds a bit and get better info but usually won’t be the first stat you run across and usually digging is not easy. For example, teaching hospitals usually have a much lower rate of success on average using this number. They might have tried triple transplants (no living success stories when I looked, rejection drugs are REALLY high right after and too many bad side effects take them out from my understanding) and other things that might have reduced the survivability ratio but the patient was going to die in the next few days regardless. For a “standard one organ deal” they usually rank higher than others. Teaching hospitals might do things untraditionally such as, helped them find out things like Hep C positive donors can be used and then treated successfully after the transplant opening up the donor pool and giving more people a chance to live. Congrats on surviving. My teaching hospital (University of Virginia) was refusing transplants to those who refused the shot. There was a story about a guy who refused the shot, so he did not get his heart transplant. It blows my mind that transplant doctors will require someone to get a shot that modifies their immune system!!! It makes zero sense (assuming their motive is pure.) UVA is still pushing the "Your 6 month old baby needs to get vaccinated" position. I would have been under that same mandate, not sure what I would have done at that point. Fortunately I got my organ well before a jab was on the market. On that note can anyone find where they tested a nice group of transplants in the trials..... How did they know the outcome.....like what you suggested and another reason I said "fuck you fire me." Technically for me it still would have been under an EUA I believe after it got fully approved due to this same factor. This part is hard to find, I had it somewhere but after SCOTUS saved my bacon I deleted a bunch of stuff as I was pissed but didn't need the info anymore. I was going to take my case as far as it would go....appeal all unless the verdict came back in my favor for my salary and compensation for the rest of my life. As I recall, one of the prohibitions in the trial pool was folks who had transplants and those who were on anti-rejection drugs (or immunosuppressants in general). So, no, no transplant patients were tested prior to approval. |
|
|
[#3]
Originally Posted By planemaker: As I recall, one of the prohibitions in the trial pool was folks who had transplants and those who were on anti-rejection drugs (or immunosuppressants in general). So, no, no transplant patients were tested prior to approval. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By planemaker: Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: Originally Posted By glock27bill: Originally Posted By Scoobysmak: I was dealing with old rusted metal a few months ago. I still got a tetanus shot but it was interesting the nurse brought the vile and loaded it right in front of me and put the vile where I could read it way before she stuck me. i didn’t ask for this treatment either. My PCP doc is fine with me refusing the jab, he says that’s okay and kinda gives me a nod but really can’t say anything negative as everything is recorded in each room. Now my transplant docs freaked the hell out and were “oH mY gOsH” how could you. Unfortunately transplant docs are harder to source and they did do me right before kung flu came in the picture. Now that I lived they accepted my choice and are fine with it. I think transplant docs are judged how long the patient lives after, if I only made it a couple years it might make them look bad. Not really sure if this is bragging rights or actually counted after the first year (the first year is HUGE for the patient to live….this is where 87% of the survivability stats come from.) If you read the stats for say a kidney transplant then that hospital has a 95% survival rate, this means 95% of the people lived a year after transplant. Doesn’t matter if they got ran over by a bus before the year was over, still a death and counted in that stat. Now you can dig in the weeds a bit and get better info but usually won’t be the first stat you run across and usually digging is not easy. For example, teaching hospitals usually have a much lower rate of success on average using this number. They might have tried triple transplants (no living success stories when I looked, rejection drugs are REALLY high right after and too many bad side effects take them out from my understanding) and other things that might have reduced the survivability ratio but the patient was going to die in the next few days regardless. For a “standard one organ deal” they usually rank higher than others. Teaching hospitals might do things untraditionally such as, helped them find out things like Hep C positive donors can be used and then treated successfully after the transplant opening up the donor pool and giving more people a chance to live. Congrats on surviving. My teaching hospital (University of Virginia) was refusing transplants to those who refused the shot. There was a story about a guy who refused the shot, so he did not get his heart transplant. It blows my mind that transplant doctors will require someone to get a shot that modifies their immune system!!! It makes zero sense (assuming their motive is pure.) UVA is still pushing the "Your 6 month old baby needs to get vaccinated" position. I would have been under that same mandate, not sure what I would have done at that point. Fortunately I got my organ well before a jab was on the market. On that note can anyone find where they tested a nice group of transplants in the trials..... How did they know the outcome.....like what you suggested and another reason I said "fuck you fire me." Technically for me it still would have been under an EUA I believe after it got fully approved due to this same factor. This part is hard to find, I had it somewhere but after SCOTUS saved my bacon I deleted a bunch of stuff as I was pissed but didn't need the info anymore. I was going to take my case as far as it would go....appeal all unless the verdict came back in my favor for my salary and compensation for the rest of my life. As I recall, one of the prohibitions in the trial pool was folks who had transplants and those who were on anti-rejection drugs (or immunosuppressants in general). So, no, no transplant patients were tested prior to approval. I am more looking for the blurb I believe I found that said something like: Since no transplant patients (or not enough to warrant a trial result) were in the trials these individuals are still under a EUA even though the fully FDA approved |
|
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand. 87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note) |
[#4]
|
|
|
[#5]
View Quote We do have a |
|
|
[#6]
— Rothmus \uD83C\uDFF4 (@Rothmus) June 15, 2024
I tried telling people this! When I talked to doctors in Wuhan after the first wave hit China, their top recommendation was to avoid using intubated ventilators for extended periods at 100% O2, as it damages the lungs. https://nhlbi.nih.gov/health/ventilator/risks#:~:text=Lung%20damage%20can%20result%20from,infections%20in%20childhood%20and%20adulthood. I got the “you’re not a doctor” bullshit from utter idiots in response. Yeah, I’m not a fucking doctor, but I do oversee the design of spaceships with life support systems that keep astronauts alive and healthy in a goddam vacuum! |
|
|
[#7]
Originally Posted By RSG: — Rothmus \uD83C\uDFF4 (@Rothmus) June 15, 2024 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQJBndqWMAAXmow?format=jpg&name=small
I tried telling people this! When I talked to doctors in Wuhan after the first wave hit China, their top recommendation was to avoid using intubated ventilators for extended periods at 100% O2, as it damages the lungs. https://nhlbi.nih.gov/health/ventilator/risks#:~:text=Lung%20damage%20can%20result%20from,infections%20in%20childhood%20and%20adulthood. I got the “you’re not a doctor” bullshit from utter idiots in response. Yeah, I’m not a fucking doctor, but I do oversee the design of spaceships with life support systems that keep astronauts alive and healthy in a goddam vacuum! View Quote I can't find any reference to this report, just a list of possible complications on the .gov website. |
|
|
[#8]
Interesting talk on cancer
IgG4 role in cancer - Dr. Raszek new publication (IgG4 part 17, update #147) |
|
|
[#9]
Ah yes, the wild and inexplicable phenomenon where the unvaxxed somehow died much harder in 2021 than they did in 2020.
|
|
|
[#10]
Originally Posted By RSG: Ah yes, the wild and inexplicable phenomenon where the unvaxxed somehow died much harder in 2021 than they did in 2020.
View Quote I had to have died several times at this point..... I am looking forward to another winter....not sure about anyone else.... |
|
RIP CeCe and FCSD you will be missed
Mike_314..If there was communism in the desert, there would soon be a shortage of sand. 87% shit posting - 13% I am caught in a rule change RSM 20/21 RSL 4522: we will shit on your pillow.. (3613 note) |
[#11]
Originally Posted By RSG: Ah yes, the wild and inexplicable phenomenon where the unvaxxed somehow died much harder in 2021 than they did in 2020.
View Quote That's some bullshit . I think they miss named "gaslight" . |
|
|
[#12]
I just sent an email to Mark Gordon, the governor of Wyoming:
The state of Kansas recently became the 2nd state to sue Pfizer for misrepresentation of the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer's covid-19 "vaccine". Do you have plans to join their suit? If not, why not? Thank you, We need to hammer our elected leaders about this. |
|
|
[#13]
Gates foundation funding |
|
|
[#14]
Originally Posted By RSG: — Rothmus \uD83C\uDFF4 (@Rothmus) June 15, 2024 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GQJBndqWMAAXmow?format=jpg&name=small
I tried telling people this! When I talked to doctors in Wuhan after the first wave hit China, their top recommendation was to avoid using intubated ventilators for extended periods at 100% O2, as it damages the lungs. https://nhlbi.nih.gov/health/ventilator/risks#:~:text=Lung%20damage%20can%20result%20from,infections%20in%20childhood%20and%20adulthood. I got the “you’re not a doctor” bullshit from utter idiots in response. Yeah, I’m not a fucking doctor, but I do oversee the design of spaceships with life support systems that keep astronauts alive and healthy in a goddam vacuum! View Quote Did some digging on this. Headline is less than accurate, but NIAID provided some of the funding, so take it with a grain of salt. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/170682 |
|
|
[#15]
1:800 . Relative risk vs absolute risk .
Vaccine reanalysis and excess deaths |
|
|
[#16]
I thought this was interesting in light of the GD thread on ivermectin and cancer treatment;
Cancer types post mRNA vaccines (update #148) |
|
|
[#17]
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: The MRNA rsv shot has been cleared by the fda . Set for release 2024-2025 season . View Quote Well, something else to refuse. Glad I got my shingles shots before this mess since I've seen reports of them working on mRNA versions of it as well. Example: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/is-the-shingles-vaccine-an-mrna-vaccine#shingrix-vaccine |
|
|
[#18]
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Well, something else to refuse. Glad I got my shingles shots before this mess since I've seen reports of them working on mRNA versions of it as well. Example: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/is-the-shingles-vaccine-an-mrna-vaccine#shingrix-vaccine View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: The MRNA rsv shot has been cleared by the fda . Set for release 2024-2025 season . Well, something else to refuse. Glad I got my shingles shots before this mess since I've seen reports of them working on mRNA versions of it as well. Example: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/is-the-shingles-vaccine-an-mrna-vaccine#shingrix-vaccine It brings to mind two people ; Rudolph Steiner and Yuval Harari . |
|
|
[#19]
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Well, something else to refuse. Glad I got my shingles shots before this mess since I've seen reports of them working on mRNA versions of it as well. Example: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/is-the-shingles-vaccine-an-mrna-vaccine#shingrix-vaccine View Quote Same here...both Shingrix and the newer one. I also got the old guy Pneumonia vax. But it seems like they've come out with a new pneumonia vax (which I shan't be getting.) I'm surprised my doctor is not more aggressive with this stuff. Ten years ago his practice was bought by a large regional "Get your kids vaxxed at 6 months or you're a neglectful parent" teaching hospital affiliated with a university. They denied a guy his heart transplant because he would not get the vax (gotta love the logic of messing with your immune system to prepare for a transplant.) Maybe my doctor has other patients propping up his stats. |
|
|
[#20]
Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Well, something else to refuse. Glad I got my shingles shots before this mess since I've seen reports of them working on mRNA versions of it as well. Example: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/is-the-shingles-vaccine-an-mrna-vaccine#shingrix-vaccine View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By sandboxmedic: Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: The MRNA rsv shot has been cleared by the fda . Set for release 2024-2025 season . Well, something else to refuse. Glad I got my shingles shots before this mess since I've seen reports of them working on mRNA versions of it as well. Example: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/is-the-shingles-vaccine-an-mrna-vaccine#shingrix-vaccine Ain't getting any mrna shots and advising my kids not to. |
|
|
[#21]
|
|
|
[#22]
View Quote According to the Cleveland Clinic the more shots their 51,000 employees got the more often they caught it and the worse the outcome. So I guess we have the sheep to thank for this still spreading like it is........ |
|
|
[#23]
|
|
|
[#24]
🚨What does overturning Chevron mean? Let's consider an actual case involving FDA - Bruesewitz v. Wyeth Background: The case involved Hannah Bruesewitz, who suffered seizures & developmental problems after receiving a DTP vaccine manufactured by Wyeth, now a part of Pfizer. The family sued Wyeth, claiming the vaccine was defectively designed. Legal Context: The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 established a no-fault compensation program for vaccine injury claims & removed the liability of vaccine manufacturers. The FDA's role in approving vaccines & its interpretation of safety standards were central to the case. Court's Decision: In 2011, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Wyeth, holding that the NCVIA preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by vaccine side effects. Chevron Deference Aspect: The court acknowledged FDA's expertise & regulatory authority in approving & monitoring vaccines. The court implicitly deferred to the FDA's judgment that vaccines are safe & effective when they meet regulatory standards, thus preempting state law claims based on design defects. What are the implications of overruling Chevron Deference: Courts would independently interpret the NCVIA & other relevant laws without automatically deferring to the FDA's expertise. WIN!! Plaintiffs might be more likely to challenge FDA approved vaccines in court, arguing that the FDA's safety standards or approval processes are insufficient or flawed. WIN!! Courts would scrutinize FDA decisions more closely, likely leading to different outcomes in cases involving vaccine injuries or side effects. WIN!! Vaccine manufacturers will face more uncertainty regarding liability & regulatory standards impacting vaccine development & availability. WIN!! |
|
|
[#25]
|
|
|
[#26]
2024 excess deaths |
|
|
[Last Edit: 9D1Alpha]
[#27]
When Lying Crosses The Line And Lives Are Lost - Peak Prosperity It's notable because you can talk about it on YouTube without getting canceled now . It's out of the barn . |
|
|
[#28]
'Redacted' interview with Dutch researcher , legislator, and vax injured on happenings overseas;
SHOCKING DUTCH COVER-UP: THEY KNEW ABOUT VACCINE INJURIES AND HID THE DATA | w Clayton Morris |
|
|
[#29]
|
|
|
[#30]
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GR86BBoa0AI9RMz?format=jpg&name=small https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GR86BBbaIAADVT-?format=jpg&name=small https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GR86BBkbMAASeSv?format=jpg&name=small View Quote Everybody should . |
|
|
[#31]
|
|
What is written is my opinion, and my opinion only.
|
[#32]
|
|
|
[#33]
Recent Korean study showed 22% increase in Alzheimers 3 months post mrna injection over unvaccinated. Perfectly understandable too once you know the mechanism of action ; neutrophil elastace causes amyloid fibrils to form from spike protein .
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/alzheimers-disease-covid-vaccines-john-campbell/ |
|
|
[#34]
Originally Posted By 9D1Alpha: Recent Korean study showed 22% increase in Alzheimers 3 months post mrna injection over unvaccinated. Perfectly understandable too once you know the mechanism of action ; neutrophil elastace causes amyloid fibrils to form from spike protein . https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/alzheimers-disease-covid-vaccines-john-campbell/ View Quote Not at all surprising considering mRNA was invented as a delivery method to cross the blood-brain barrier. Turning those cells into spike proteins is going to have consequences |
|
|
[#35]
|
|
|
[#36]
Firing up the Prep Act for Bird Flu. Round and round way we go.......................
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/24/2024-16247/declaration-of-emergency-pursuant-to-the-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act
|
|
|
[#37]
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote
|
|
|
[#38]
Originally Posted By Mr_Woodsy: Firing up the Prep Act for Bird Flu. Round and round way we go....................... https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/07/24/2024-16247/declaration-of-emergency-pursuant-to-the-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act
View Quote |
|
What is written is my opinion, and my opinion only.
|
[#39]
|
|
|
[#40]
Originally Posted By RSG: Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 28, 2024 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GTiNBB-WgAAOSdn?format=jpg&name=small View Quote Wild that Twitter is a free space now, and the guy who bought it of all people basically took Trump's place as the biggest troll of the leftie-elite on the platform |
|
|
[#41]
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Wild that Twitter is a free space now, and the guy who bought it of all people basically took Trump's place as the biggest troll of the leftie-elite on the platform View Quote Someone on GD was commenting on how Musk has ungagged those who disagree with The Narrative, at least on that platform. The member was specifically referring to politics, but it equally applies to this topic. The .gov is not done with us yet. |
|
|
[#42]
Originally Posted By glock27bill: Someone on GD was commenting on how Musk has ungagged those who disagree with The Narrative, at least on that platform. The member was specifically referring to politics, but it equally applies to this topic. The .gov is not done with us yet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By glock27bill: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Wild that Twitter is a free space now, and the guy who bought it of all people basically took Trump's place as the biggest troll of the leftie-elite on the platform Someone on GD was commenting on how Musk has ungagged those who disagree with The Narrative, at least on that platform. The member was specifically referring to politics, but it equally applies to this topic. The .gov is not done with us yet. No sir, if they could thanos snap our voices out of the digital dialogue, they would. For years, they did, and Faceberg and the others pretended they weren't. "noo we don't shadowban!" |
|
|
[#43]
Originally Posted By glock27bill: Someone on GD was commenting on how Musk has ungagged those who disagree with The Narrative, at least on that platform. The member was specifically referring to politics, but it equally applies to this topic. The .gov is not done with us yet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By glock27bill: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Wild that Twitter is a free space now, and the guy who bought it of all people basically took Trump's place as the biggest troll of the leftie-elite on the platform Someone on GD was commenting on how Musk has ungagged those who disagree with The Narrative, at least on that platform. The member was specifically referring to politics, but it equally applies to this topic. The .gov is not done with us yet. This topic directly relates to politics as this was a bio weapon released for the administrative state to seize power. .gov is administrative state . There are only dinos and rinos |
|
|
[#44]
Covid subsided , the excess deaths did not .
Global excess deaths |
|
|
[#45]
|
|
|
[#46]
|
|
|
[#47]
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GUvUe51b0AAC1LS?format=jpg&name=small View Quote |
|
|
[#48]
|
|
|
When the Tide is out you can see who swims naked
AZ, USA
|
[#49]
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote maybe next time |
- Official ARFCOM Nickname: Hardware
- Originally Posted By elcope: Er ist ein Bier leener |
[#50]
Originally Posted By RSG:
View Quote Almost like the jab increases your propensity for infection. |
|
What is written is my opinion, and my opinion only.
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.