Posted: 6/3/2006 3:15:59 AM EDT
|
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5042036.stm
-Foxxz |
|
Civilians, sitting in arm chairs, 7,000 miles from the battlefield, should not be second guessing the actions of soldiers engaged in warfare. US Soldiers dont need an ethics class, or sensitivity training. What they need is the lattitude to get the job done effectively. If that include collateral damage so be it. We started this war with the intent of protecting America....not Iraq. I would offer the following to the Iraqi people.... We can continue to wage this campaign as we see fit and at the end when we leave we hand you your vey own sovereign nation. Alternative - we leave today and restore Saddam to his former position. I hate to sound like an uncaring prick but frankly I dont beleive in nation building, and i dont believe in liberating the oppressed. If you want to sell me the story that the US was defending its interests in Iraq, then fight to fucking win. If killing the enemy makes America safe then do it....I dont need to know about 'hearts & minds'. Hearts & Minds arent war.....thats politics. Let the soldiers take care of the war part....and let the politicians do whatever it is that they do. Incidentally, I raq is contesting the findings that our guys are in the clear. If they push the issue, if it were my decision, I would close up shop and let them deal with their own security nightmare. I see no reason to continue to risk American lives for thier emancipation just so that they can second guess our actions. Sorry...I just cant find a happy ending in any of this until our guys are home and the middle east religious empires fall. |
Yeah, become oppressors, by allowing non-combatants to be killed, or civilian property to be destroyed. Alienate the populace with heavy handed tactics, and the populace will rise up. |
The populace is going to rise up anyhow,WE ARE the occupying force.We are the invading army.The only way for our boys to win this is to apply overwhelming force wherever it is neccesary.War is not a clean and tidy affair.Does anyone honestly think no american civilians would be injured if the tables were to be turned? The only way to win a war is by beating the populace into submission,that is reality,polititians and teh gay save da children crowd don't seem to be able to understand that,WAR is the LAST step in diplomacy,to be used when all other recorces(sp)fail. When the locals start HELPING to deal with the insurgents,everything will be better.UNTIL MORAL IMPROOVES,THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE!! If you don't like war,don't put people in charge that are so willing to get into one.Once our boys' are comitted,let them win,When people remmember what a war is,there will be peace.
|
That's the stategy the Nazi's tried in occupied Europe............................... |
Yes (as mentioned in the articel) the is the second incident that the military was looking into, in Ishaqi from March of this year, NOT the supposed massacre by a unit of Marines in Haditha from November of last year that's been in the news a lot lately. Hopefully, the Haditha thing will turn out to be nothing the Marines did wrong as well. Fingers crossed. |
|
|
Haditha is the incident that Bush spoke about earlier this week. news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5033648.stm |
If the populace were to actually rise up, we'd be slaughtered. If US soldiers act in a humane and professional manner, maybe just maybe the average Iraqi will side with us instead of the militias, who act in the exact manner that you suggest. |
| I really believe the "average iraqi" does like the idea of our troops running the show.I agree that if the populace over there decided we gotta go,it would happen.However,to view our troops as humanitarians is just unrealistic.When jihad joe pops off AK rounds and everyone in his immediate area pays the price it goes alot further in making sure his cousin akmed doesn't try to pull the same shit on the next block.Has there ever been a war won by winning the hearts and minds of the enemy??? To win a war,you have to make the repercussions of negetive actions so horrific that the enemy looses the will to fight.Or,the accepted leaders of said people are forced to come back to the diplomatic table.Unforunatly it is no different than a bully on the playground,until he gets stopped,he will continue to be a bully.I'm not saying I'm a fan of war,I'm saying the reality of what a war is has escaped the average american.Our boys are starting to figure it out now,the hard way.Give them the right to win.And there is only one way to do that. |
+1 |
um.. kinda the way the population rose up and removed sadum from power... ![]() |
The only way to win a war is by beating the populace into submission,that is reality,polititians and teh gay save da children crowd don't seem to be able to understand that,WAR is the LAST step in diplomacy,to be used when all other recorces(sp)fail. When the locals start HELPING to deal with the insurgents,everything will be better.UNTIL MORAL IMPROOVES,THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE!! If you don't like war,don't put people in charge that are so willing to get into one.Once our boys' are comitted,let them win,When people remmember what a war is,there will be peace.
