UPDATE - Mistrial declared! Lindsay Clancy Killed her Kids - I’m having second thoughts. (Page 36 of 36)
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
Attached File |
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSdPExfX0AAUFja?format=jpg&name=small Shocked. Oh, wait. Not shocking. The irony of the Tuey-Rodriguez charge is that the foreperson seemed to be using it as a punch list to guide her own bad conduct. Right there in front of her: each juror's decision must be his own ... and she's just giddy about putting words in his mouth. If anything the T-R charge should make it more apparent that a foreperson should favor a hung jury rather than having a holdout or holdout jurors relent to a verdict they did not agree with. A verdict is preferable but the jurors' conclusions are to be their own, and they are to be respected for it. That's the heart of that jury instruction, and the woman was just too unprofessional to read it for what it is and take corrective measures. She even seemed to double down on the offending behavior - offending, meaning behavior running counter the judicial expectation of conduct in a jury room. |
|
"We all worked together. And I don't know if it was to convince him to start with," Devlin told "CBS Mornings" co-host Gayle King. "We all worked together to convince ourselves once we got to that point where it was 10 to 2. I felt very bad for them because they felt attacked. And there is no way to not do that." Uh, there is a way to not do that. It's called objectivity, professionalism, and/or leadership. |
|
Originally Posted By L_JE: Shocked. Oh, wait. Not shocking. The irony of the Tuey-Rodriguez charge is that the foreperson seemed to be using it as a punch list to guide her own bad conduct. Right there in front of her: each juror's decision must be his own ... and she's just giddy about putting words in his mouth. If anything the T-R charge should make it more apparent that a foreperson should favor a hung jury rather than having a holdout or holdout jurors relent to a verdict they did not agree with. A verdict is preferable but the jurors' conclusions are to be their own, and they are to be respected for it. That's the heart of that jury instruction, and the woman was just too unprofessional to read it for what it is and take corrective measures. She even seemed to double down on the offending behavior - offending, meaning behavior running counter the judicial expectation of conduct in a jury room. Originally Posted By L_JE: Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSdPExfX0AAUFja?format=jpg&name=small Shocked. Oh, wait. Not shocking. The irony of the Tuey-Rodriguez charge is that the foreperson seemed to be using it as a punch list to guide her own bad conduct. Right there in front of her: each juror's decision must be his own ... and she's just giddy about putting words in his mouth. If anything the T-R charge should make it more apparent that a foreperson should favor a hung jury rather than having a holdout or holdout jurors relent to a verdict they did not agree with. A verdict is preferable but the jurors' conclusions are to be their own, and they are to be respected for it. That's the heart of that jury instruction, and the woman was just too unprofessional to read it for what it is and take corrective measures. She even seemed to double down on the offending behavior - offending, meaning behavior running counter the judicial expectation of conduct in a jury room. It really is incredible how they've been so casually admitting to all of this in public, over and over and over We all pretty much knew from how it played out in the jury room, IMHO it was obvious that this is who these people were and what their motivations were. But there are brainlets who don't like pattern recognition who would have denied it. After a full week of "post-game" press conferences by the feminist crabs it confirmed just about everything the "stereotypes" suggested. Wild. |
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: https://www.ar15.com/media/mediaFiles/144599/1000187847_jpg-3828976.JPG Evil confused stupid Massachusetts Libtard women. Can't even provide justice for three murdered children because they have no connection to reality. No wonder the Massachusetts Congressional delegation is composed of bat shit crazy Leftists like Pocahontas. Morons like these shitheads vote them into office. God bless the one guy that the courage to just say no to those crazy bitches. Piss on the two Beta males that went along with the Harpies. |
|
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/amplify_video_thumb/2101812521933942786/img/PwpSsnbQliOKnoHm?format=jpg&name=small  ETA:
|
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: ETA:
I can understand that forgiveness is as much or more for him than for her. I am familiar with things you can't get past and how they eat you alive over time. But I seriously doubt I could forgive that. |
Joined:
Jun 2025
Posts:
3948
EE: 100% (57)
UT, USA
he must be a strong dude.
|
One of the old lady jurors stated that the women jurors planned on having a joint press conference so they could start a conversation about post-partum. They were still deliberating yet planning on a not guilty verdict and press conference to START A FUCKING NATIONAL CONVERSATION. That’s fucked up. These ladies are poisonous |
Joined:
Jun 2025
Posts:
3957
EE: 100% (57)
UT, USA
|
Originally Posted By flyhack72: One of the old lady jurors stated that the women jurors planned on having a joint press conference so they could start a conversation about post-partum. They were still deliberating yet planning on a not guilty verdict and press conference to START A FUCKING NATIONAL CONVERSATION. That’s fucked up. These ladies are poisonous It's very sad to take the 10,000ft view and really unpack the Hoe J. Simpson trial: - Woman guilty of triple homicide of her own children in her own home - Attempts "not guilty by reason of insanity", trying to escape jail for what she did - Tiktok feminist crabs try to turn the case into a "who-done-it" when not even her ^ lawyer is debating that - "Expert astrologists" explaining a fabricated version of the case on social media - They take to social media with "me too Lindsey" videos - They raise a million dollars for her on a gofundme - Many millions of women trying a "Well akshullllly" conversation about PPD, not realizing what precedent they're setting - "Rightwing" commentators playing defense attorney for team woman because they're all in on Gender team-politics > holding criminals accountable - Case ends up being one juror away from her effectively walking, something we shouldn't know - Media assists in doxxing the juror, making their identity known but leaving out their race (at first) so the digital rocks get thrown for a week. - The jury feminists start a media tour more or less admitting they walked in trying to let her off the hook and furious at the one juror who didn't - Media caught asking ^ one of them the same question twice to get the desired result (About re-trial) - Patrick finally gets on camera, Lindsey never asked for forgiveness  The implications of the gamefilm are, just awful |
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: It's very sad to take the 10,000ft view and really unpack the Hoe J. Simpson trial: - Woman guilty of triple homicide of her own children in her own home - Attempts "not guilty by reason of insanity", trying to escape jail for what she did - Tiktok feminist crabs try to turn the case into a "who-done-it" when not even her ^ lawyer is debating that - "Expert astrologists" explaining a fabricated version of the case on social media - They take to social media with "me too Lindsey" videos - They raise a million dollars for her on a gofundme - Many millions of women trying a "Well akshullllly" conversation about PPD, not realizing what precedent they're setting - "Rightwing" commentators playing defense attorney for team woman because they're all in on Gender team-politics > holding criminals accountable - Case ends up being one juror away from her effectively walking, something we shouldn't know - Media assists in doxxing the juror, making their identity known but leaving out their race (at first) so the digital rocks get thrown for a week. - The jury feminists start a media tour more or less admitting they walked in trying to let her off the hook and furious at the one juror who didn't - Media caught asking ^ one of them the same question twice to get the desired result (About re-trial) - Patrick finally gets on camera, Lindsey never asked for forgiveness The implications of the gamefilm are, just awful Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By flyhack72: One of the old lady jurors stated that the women jurors planned on having a joint press conference so they could start a conversation about post-partum. They were still deliberating yet planning on a not guilty verdict and press conference to START A FUCKING NATIONAL CONVERSATION. That’s fucked up. These ladies are poisonous It's very sad to take the 10,000ft view and really unpack the Hoe J. Simpson trial: - Woman guilty of triple homicide of her own children in her own home - Attempts "not guilty by reason of insanity", trying to escape jail for what she did - Tiktok feminist crabs try to turn the case into a "who-done-it" when not even her ^ lawyer is debating that - "Expert astrologists" explaining a fabricated version of the case on social media - They take to social media with "me too Lindsey" videos - They raise a million dollars for her on a gofundme - Many millions of women trying a "Well akshullllly" conversation about PPD, not realizing what precedent they're setting - "Rightwing" commentators playing defense attorney for team woman because they're all in on Gender team-politics > holding criminals accountable - Case ends up being one juror away from her effectively walking, something we shouldn't know - Media assists in doxxing the juror, making their identity known but leaving out their race (at first) so the digital rocks get thrown for a week. - The jury feminists start a media tour more or less admitting they walked in trying to let her off the hook and furious at the one juror who didn't - Media caught asking ^ one of them the same question twice to get the desired result (About re-trial) - Patrick finally gets on camera, Lindsey never asked for forgiveness The implications of the gamefilm are, just awful Yet, not a single one of those horrible opinions will change because so few are completely, 1000% incapable of being objective. |
|
Originally Posted By RSG:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HSdPExfX0AAUFja?format=jpg&name=small I'm pretty sure I've asked this before, but, how did Reddington pretty much echo the parole/acquit/forgive/release Clancy crowd before the trial was judged a mistrial? Was he in contact with the "Save Lindsay" crowd ex parte before the trial ended? How did he know so much about what was supposedly going on in the deliberations? |
Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one's thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down. They know its power. F. Douglass
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: It's very sad to take the 10,000ft view and really unpack the Hoe J. Simpson trial: - Woman guilty of triple homicide of her own children in her own home - Attempts "not guilty by reason of insanity", trying to escape jail for what she did - Tiktok feminist crabs try to turn the case into a "who-done-it" when not even her ^ lawyer is debating that - "Expert astrologists" explaining a fabricated version of the case on social media - They take to social media with "me too Lindsey" videos - They raise a million dollars for her on a gofundme - Many millions of women trying a "Well akshullllly" conversation about PPD, not realizing what precedent they're setting - "Rightwing" commentators playing defense attorney for team woman because they're all in on Gender team-politics > holding criminals accountable - Case ends up being one juror away from her effectively walking, something we shouldn't know - Media assists in doxxing the juror, making their identity known but leaving out their race (at first) so the digital rocks get thrown for a week. - The jury feminists start a media tour more or less admitting they walked in trying to let her off the hook and furious at the one juror who didn't - Media caught asking ^ one of them the same question twice to get the desired result (About re-trial) - Patrick finally gets on camera, Lindsey never asked for forgiveness The implications of the gamefilm are, just awful  |
|
Originally Posted By AlvinYork: I'm pretty sure I've asked this before, but, how did Reddington pretty much echo the parole/acquit/forgive/release Clancy crowd before the trial was judged a mistrial? Was he in contact with the "Save Lindsay" crowd ex parte before the trial ended? How did he know so much about what was supposedly going on in the deliberations? |
|
Originally Posted By Justinandfreyja: https://iili.io/nunsDyN.md.jpg That man is a fucking legend. I get called racist here all the time by the mind-virus infested moderns that plague the world. If I could deport every white person that "supports" Lindsay, and keep that man, I would. We would be vastly better off for it. I have aggregate statistical awareness, but I also know good and evil when I see it, and in individuals those things are based on actions. |