UPDATE - Mistrial declared! Lindsay Clancy Killed her Kids - I’m having second thoughts. (Page 10 of 37)
|
Originally Posted By BlackbirdRider: My wife..who is normally not a raving leftist... when we started discussing this she asked me if I had followed how the husband was guilty....because he was having an affair...  Yea, my wife has a million reasons on why either she's not guilty, or the husband is in on it. |
Watching the kids shoot Pieeater's 1919 was great. Nothing warms the heart more than seeing a little kid kneeling in a pile of brass and links.-Pthfndr after the Nov 13th NorCal shoot
Here we go.
|
when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness
Professional Skater (as in being lazy)
Joined:
Apr 2016
Posts:
7736
EE: 100% (3)
TX, USA
|
Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? |
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
Joined:
Apr 2023
Posts:
3347
EE: 100% (10)
NH, USA
|
Originally Posted By TripleC: Here we go.
Absolutely horrible. |
|
Originally Posted By -Blue-: Yea, my wife has a million reasons on why either she's not guilty, or the husband is in on it. That is insane. |
C co 2/325th AIR 91-96 11B1P
Father of 6 un-socialized homeschoolers and grandfather to 2 awesome little boys and the most beautiful granddaughter in the world.
Father of 6 un-socialized homeschoolers and grandfather to 2 awesome little boys and the most beautiful granddaughter in the world.
|
Originally Posted By BlackbirdRider: My wife..who is normally not a raving leftist... when we started discussing this she asked me if I had followed how the husband was guilty....because he was having an affair... |
|
Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? That would be the only good thing if that happened. |
American by birth. Southern by the grace of God.
Any opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect upon any agency or organization with which I may be employed or affiliated.
Any opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect upon any agency or organization with which I may be employed or affiliated.
|
Originally Posted By Bama-Shooter: That would be the only good thing if that happened. Originally Posted By Bama-Shooter: Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? That would be the only good thing if that happened. Would a PPD diagnosis = automatically being "red-flagged" at that point? This really does look like a "last straw" of feminist shit-testing. That evil bitch committed triple-homicide of her own children whom she killed by strangulation, confessed to it- and idiots are still making excuses for her.
|
|
Originally Posted By Hi-Vel: A husband having an affair tends to make a woman insanely jealous and angry. Did it play a part in things? Did she want to get back at him and his side squeeze? Maybe. But she's still wrong for killing innocent children. There is no credible evidence showing that Lindsay Clancy's husband, Patrick Clancy, cheated on her. Public speculation claimed Patrick had an affair with Dr. Rachel Danis before the murders, but no facts support this. Multiple outlets emphasize that internet sleuths have created conspiracy theories about Patrick despite surveillance footage, phone records, receipts, witness testimony, and Lindsay's own defense clearing him of wrongdoing. Authorities and attorneys repeatedly affirm that Patrick is not a suspect, and no evidence links him to any misconduct, marital or criminal. |
Pain is inexhaustible. It's only people who get exhausted.
Professional Skater (as in being lazy)
Joined:
Apr 2016
Posts:
7738
EE: 100% (3)
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Would a PPD diagnosis = automatically being "red-flagged" at that point? This really does look like a "last straw" of feminist shit-testing. That evil bitch committed triple-homicide of her own children whom she killed by strangulation, confessed to it- and idiots are still making excuses for her.
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By Bama-Shooter: Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? That would be the only good thing if that happened. Would a PPD diagnosis = automatically being "red-flagged" at that point? This really does look like a "last straw" of feminist shit-testing. That evil bitch committed triple-homicide of her own children whom she killed by strangulation, confessed to it- and idiots are still making excuses for her.
"If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict because the law loves precedent. From that day forward:Job application: "Are you currently hormonal?""I'm a woman.""Thank you. I think we'll be going in a different direction." No female police officers. Sorry, we can't hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, "My hormones were acting up." No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.One bad hot flash and BOOM! And women definitely can't be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people? No female politicians either. You can't be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government. And custody hearings?"Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary."Kids go to Dad.Dad doesn't know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are but apparently he's the safe option now." |
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
|
Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Expanded hypothetical from X: "If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict because the law loves precedent. From that day forward:Job application: "Are you currently hormonal?""I'm a woman.""Thank you. I think we'll be going in a different direction." No female police officers. Sorry, we can't hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, "My hormones were acting up." No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.One bad hot flash and BOOM! And women definitely can't be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people? No female politicians either. You can't be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government. And custody hearings?"Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary."Kids go to Dad.Dad doesn't know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are but apparently he's the safe option now." Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By Bama-Shooter: Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? That would be the only good thing if that happened. Would a PPD diagnosis = automatically being "red-flagged" at that point? This really does look like a "last straw" of feminist shit-testing. That evil bitch committed triple-homicide of her own children whom she killed by strangulation, confessed to it- and idiots are still making excuses for her.
"If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict because the law loves precedent. From that day forward:Job application: "Are you currently hormonal?""I'm a woman.""Thank you. I think we'll be going in a different direction." No female police officers. Sorry, we can't hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, "My hormones were acting up." No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.One bad hot flash and BOOM! And women definitely can't be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people? No female politicians either. You can't be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government. And custody hearings?"Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary."Kids go to Dad.Dad doesn't know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are but apparently he's the safe option now." We already have enough evidence to support your thesis. And the women protesting in support of Lindsey have provided even more. |
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Nononono bigot. She 👏 Asked 👏 For 👏 HelpTMTMTMTM 👏 Brain chemistry is as simple as fixing a dishwasher dontchaknow.  This is the fault of everyone around her that tried to help. The Husband who worked damn hard to fund this help, AND a nanny for his stay-at-home-not-quite-a-mom-but-also-mom-by-title, AND a psychiatrist trying to fix what was apparently a hard case - that's all THEIR fault. No way she pre-meditated this, looking up how long the husband would be out of the house, and apparently taking a goddamn phonecall DURING this "psychotic episode".  That's a good point - if we can take away 2A rights on hearsay, then clearly ^ this is fine if PPD really is that dangerous. Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By SturmgeschutzIII: So if you take a psych med, you are devoid of all accountability and any actions you take are your doctor's responsibilty? Nononono bigot. She 👏 Asked 👏 For 👏 HelpTMTMTMTM 👏 Brain chemistry is as simple as fixing a dishwasher dontchaknow. This is the fault of everyone around her that tried to help. The Husband who worked damn hard to fund this help, AND a nanny for his stay-at-home-not-quite-a-mom-but-also-mom-by-title, AND a psychiatrist trying to fix what was apparently a hard case - that's all THEIR fault. No way she pre-meditated this, looking up how long the husband would be out of the house, and apparently taking a goddamn phonecall DURING this "psychotic episode". What are we doing? The fix for this is easy. If you are diagnosed with PPD/PPP/whatever the fuck words they want to use: you lose custody of your kids for their safety. And ban SSRIs. I reckon these same women won't like that though. That's a good point - if we can take away 2A rights on hearsay, then clearly ^ this is fine if PPD really is that dangerous. I believe all SSRI/SNRI should be yanked from the shelves. Far too many murders and acts of extreme violence were "He was being treated for depression" (IOW SSRI/SNRI) same for anything, they fuck with your brain a lot and people that haven't takeen them should try it. The "I'm not depressed" excuse doesn't matter, they give them to people how aren't depressed, give it 2 weeks and see if your temper and emotiosn change. Shootings parental and marriage violence and so much more. If people want to ban somebody from guns due to SSRI, I can almost agree, except they're talking about the wrong thing to ban. This has been a known issue for over 20 years and all they're doing is changing slightly and rolling the dice, over and over with a new acronym and same results. As far as this bitch innocent and hung jury ()I don't even want to see what it turned into), I'm guessing there's some chicks without kids or chicks that had abortions or dads that don't give a shit on the jury. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
|
Originally Posted By jvmcd: If this wasn’t an election season, none of this virtue signaling about her would be going on. This is just another social media campaign to enrage and motivate women to vote left to protect their rights from being taken away by conservative men. I am sure if you went back and look at who started this support campaign, you would find it being financed by leftist groups. Time for it to happen. They want no accountability but all the benefits. Akin to children and should be treated as such. |
|
Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? You already found the post that already said what many others were thinking. I am not sure what would happen because feminism, Title IX, "girl power," and all of that, aside from the law, says one thing, while "my hormones were acting up and I have postpartum depression, so I'm not criminally liable for premeditated murder of my own children" says something very different. What I want to know is what happened in the last 25 years. Andrea Yates had *some* sympathizers. This woman has an alarming number, orders of magnitude more. |
Professional Skater (as in being lazy)
Joined:
Apr 2016
Posts:
7742
EE: 100% (3)
TX, USA
|
Originally Posted By FS7: You already found the post that already said what many others were thinking. I am not sure what would happen because feminism, Title IX, "girl power," and all of that, aside from the law, says one thing, while "my hormones were acting up and I have postpartum depression, so I'm not criminally liable for premeditated murder of my own children" says something very different. What I want to know is what happened in the last 25 years. Andrea Yates had *some* sympathizers. This woman has an alarming number, orders of magnitude more. |
If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.
 Female TikTok Psychosis: The Lindsay Clancy Cult |
|
I’ve been waiting for this. |
|
Just because your crazy doesn’t mean the you are innocent by reason of insanity (There is a whole lot of legalese wrapped up in this defense) Do I think she is nuts? Yes Do I think she meets the criteria for an insanity plea? NOPE But I’m not there and I have been ignoring the lawyers doing their thing |
|
Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Expanded hypothetical from X: "If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict because the law loves precedent. From that day forward:Job application: "Are you currently hormonal?""I'm a woman.""Thank you. I think we'll be going in a different direction." No female police officers. Sorry, we can't hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, "My hormones were acting up." No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.One bad hot flash and BOOM! And women definitely can't be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people? No female politicians either. You can't be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government. And custody hearings?"Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary."Kids go to Dad.Dad doesn't know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are but apparently he's the safe option now." Yep, that thread's gotten traction It's simple: If their hormones can make them unaccountable, then they cannot have authority. |
|
Originally Posted By brass: I believe all SSRI/SNRI should be yanked from the shelves. Far too many murders and acts of extreme violence were "He was being treated for depression" (IOW SSRI/SNRI) same for anything, they fuck with your brain a lot and people that haven't takeen them should try it. The "I'm not depressed" excuse doesn't matter, they give them to people how aren't depressed, give it 2 weeks and see if your temper and emotiosn change. Shootings parental and marriage violence and so much more. If people want to ban somebody from guns due to SSRI, I can almost agree, except they're talking about the wrong thing to ban. This has been a known issue for over 20 years and all they're doing is changing slightly and rolling the dice, over and over with a new acronym and same results. Originally Posted By brass: I believe all SSRI/SNRI should be yanked from the shelves. Far too many murders and acts of extreme violence were "He was being treated for depression" (IOW SSRI/SNRI) same for anything, they fuck with your brain a lot and people that haven't takeen them should try it. The "I'm not depressed" excuse doesn't matter, they give them to people how aren't depressed, give it 2 weeks and see if your temper and emotiosn change. Shootings parental and marriage violence and so much more. If people want to ban somebody from guns due to SSRI, I can almost agree, except they're talking about the wrong thing to ban. This has been a known issue for over 20 years and all they're doing is changing slightly and rolling the dice, over and over with a new acronym and same results. This ^ has to get talked about. But because it's a money printer for pharma, even if the skeptics are right, the pharma-captured regulators won't touch it. There are still people who believe As far as this bitch innocent and hung jury ()I don't even want to see what it turned into), I'm guessing there's some chicks without kids or chicks that had abortions or dads that don't give a shit on the jury. That jury needed to be sequestered, apparently they couldn't keep the pink wearing women off of tiktok. |
|
Originally Posted By BlackbirdRider: My wife..who is normally not a raving leftist... when we started discussing this she asked me if I had followed how the husband was guilty....because he was having an affair... |
Have you joined Knife Rights yet? Go to: www.KnifeRights.org
Protecting your Right to own and carry the knives YOU choose.
Protecting your Right to own and carry the knives YOU choose.
|
Wow. That's an excellent one from.. Is that Boxxy? Anyway, the trial is NOT about if she is guilty or not. The trial is about her going to prison for murder or to the mental excuse. So all these women trying to say "Not Guility" on her part are reading a lot into the mouthpieces funded by some deep pocket women's org (like one of the pro abortion ones, even after birth types). Time to look at money trail, it won't be surprising, but I don' have that access, who has non profits quick search and linking access? --ETA: Also - Why doe she have a $2 Million FundMe? Who the hell needs $2million? It's not like there's kids or husband left to support. This is all a mess. That alone should pull out the Guilty Verdict tomorrow. |
The person who complains most, and is the most critical of others has the most to hide.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
 
|
|
Originally Posted By brass: Wow. That's an excellent one from.. Is that Boxxy? Anyway, the trial is NOT about if she is guilty or not. The trial is about her going to prison for murder or to the mental excuse. So all these women trying to say "Not Guility" on her part are reading a lot into the mouthpieces funded by some deep pocket women's org (like one of the pro abortion ones, even after birth types). Time to look at money trail, it won't be surprising, but I don' have that access, who has non profits quick search and linking access? --ETA: Also - Why doe she have a $2 Million FundMe? Who the hell needs $2million? It's not like there's kids or husband left to support. This is all a mess. That alone should pull out the Guilty Verdict tomorrow. Originally Posted By brass: Wow. That's an excellent one from.. Is that Boxxy? Anyway, the trial is NOT about if she is guilty or not. The trial is about her going to prison for murder or to the mental excuse. So all these women trying to say "Not Guility" on her part are reading a lot into the mouthpieces funded by some deep pocket women's org (like one of the pro abortion ones, even after birth types). Time to look at money trail, it won't be surprising, but I don' have that access, who has non profits quick search and linking access? --ETA: Also - Why doe she have a $2 Million FundMe? Who the hell needs $2million? It's not like there's kids or husband left to support. This is all a mess. That alone should pull out the Guilty Verdict tomorrow. What about a mistrial. |
Joined:
Apr 2023
Posts:
3349
EE: 100% (10)
NH, USA
|
Link to a Matt Walsh video. He discusses some of the issues that have been brought up in this thread but it’s really about how the Jury System is pretty much done for right now. I don’t know how to embed so my apologies for just the link. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Faklso2MFPA&ra=m |
|
It is a FB reel about a “Dawn Light” harassing / trying to run up on the jurors leaving the courthouse: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/14mNTDC6J1P/ |
|
Originally Posted By -Blue-: Yea, my wife has a million reasons on why either she's not guilty, or the husband is in on it. Originally Posted By -Blue-: Originally Posted By BlackbirdRider: My wife..who is normally not a raving leftist... when we started discussing this she asked me if I had followed how the husband was guilty....because he was having an affair... Yea, my wife has a million reasons on why either she's not guilty, or the husband is in on it. My wife says "it isn't worth explaining" to me about what evidence convinced her the husband did it and why she believes that once she's found not guilty (not due to lack of criminal responsibility, completely not guilty), the judge will announce the husband's charges and his trial will immediately begin. TikTok programming is real.
|
|
My wife at dinner the other night “the more I look into this Clancy trial, I’m starting to think….” I told her to stop. I didn’t want us arguing about some crazy bitch that murdered her kids. She hasn’t said a word to me about it since. 
|
What kind of dystopian hellscape have we built?
|
Originally Posted By Kharn: My wife says "it isn't worth explaining" to me about what evidence convinced her the husband did it and why she believes that once she's found not guilty (not due to lack of criminal responsibility, completely not guilty), the judge will announce the husband's charges and his trial will immediately begin. TikTok programming is real. Originally Posted By Kharn: Originally Posted By -Blue-: Originally Posted By BlackbirdRider: My wife..who is normally not a raving leftist... when we started discussing this she asked me if I had followed how the husband was guilty....because he was having an affair... Yea, my wife has a million reasons on why either she's not guilty, or the husband is in on it. My wife says "it isn't worth explaining" to me about what evidence convinced her the husband did it and why she believes that once she's found not guilty (not due to lack of criminal responsibility, completely not guilty), the judge will announce the husband's charges and his trial will immediately begin. TikTok programming is real. That is both sad and scary to hear. I would divorce my wife if I knew she was that crazy. |
|
Originally Posted By joemama74: Strangled 3 kids. After the first one it was easier? Nothing clicked in there that said, hey, this isn't right, between 2 and 3? The second one of the older ones must have died terrified. The littlest one wouldn't have understood being strangled to death, but either of the older kids would have probably watched one or two of their siblings murdered by their mom. Kid would have been screaming for her to stop and in the most terrified, confused moments of that childs short life. I haven't followed the case other than the reaction to it, because I really don't want to. Maybe she killed some in their sleep, so the kids didn't see their mom murdering them. If this was 1926 she'd be hanging already. Short rope, maybe not with not so long a drop. |
|
Originally Posted By brass: Wow. That's an excellent one from.. Is that Boxxy? Anyway, the trial is NOT about if she is guilty or not. The trial is about her going to prison for murder or to the mental excuse. So all these women trying to say "Not Guility" on her part are reading a lot into the mouthpieces funded by some deep pocket women's org (like one of the pro abortion ones, even after birth types). Time to look at money trail, it won't be surprising, but I don' have that access, who has non profits quick search and linking access? --ETA: Also - Why doe she have a $2 Million FundMe? Who the hell needs $2million? It's not like there's kids or husband left to support. This is all a mess. That alone should pull out the Guilty Verdict tomorrow. Nah, that's Shoe0nHead. She started off years ago as fairly liberal but after she became a mom has become a raging lefty-hater. It's been a fun evolution to watch 
|
|
Originally Posted By Echd: You can have a bad life and have bad things happen to you and still be capable of doing irredeemably evil shit that regardless of your temporary mental state means you should be dragged behind an 18 wheeler until you're a smear on the pavement. I don't think that was the OP's point; I think we are all in agreement with your statement. However, we often focus on the trigger puller, but rarely look to the financier, groomer, planner, and prodder who get a whacko to commit some heinous act. The same in this situation is that we give the medical community a pass when they simply medicate the signs of dangerous depression and then move onto the next patient. No, I don't want Minority Report, but there comes a time when you need to take more serious action (family and courts) to avoid tragedies like this. When society doesn't take responsibility, nobody will. ROCK6 |
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - Thomas Jefferson
|
Originally Posted By Hi-Vel: A husband having an affair tends to make a woman insanely jealous and angry. Did it play a part in things? Did she want to get back at him and his side squeeze? Maybe. But she's still wrong for killing innocent children. Let's re-phrase that: "A woman IMAGINING that a husband is having an affair tends to make a woman insanely jealous and angry." Especially if she is having mental issues to begin with. Insecure people are damn dangerous! "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned", even it only happened in their twisted minds. Many people have no clue as to what is going on in their own heads. Their brain is not processing facts correctly which leads them to act out their feelings. The results are sometimes horrific, as seen with Lindsey Clancey. |
|
Originally Posted By Sirveaux: The second one of the older ones must have died terrified. The littlest one wouldn't have understood being strangled to death, but either of the older kids would have probably watched one or two of their siblings murdered by their mom. Kid would have been screaming for her to stop and in the most terrified, confused moments of that childs short life. I haven't followed the case other than the reaction to it, because I really don't want to. Maybe she killed some in their sleep, so the kids didn't see their mom murdering them. If this was 1926 she'd be hanging already. Short rope, maybe not with not so long a drop. These were extremely violent murders. For you poor guys whose wives caught the mind virus, I’m sorry. There are more wives out there who want the death penalty and would be happy to carry it out. |
|
Originally Posted By -Blue-: Yea, my wife has a million reasons on why either she's not guilty, or the husband is in on it. Mine is strongly in the wood chipper camp. |
Taste the biscuit . . . . .
Taste the goodness of the biscuit . . . .
Taste the goodness of the biscuit . . . .
|
The pattern of women being brainwashed over this whole thing is startling and concerning. I don't understand why this whole thing resonates with them, other than perhaps the liberal media is framing the news to push the agenda (highly likely). But the fact that a significant number of women have succumbed and aligned is very concerning for society as a whole. |
|
Originally Posted By Some_Beach: The pattern of women being brainwashed over this whole thing is startling and concerning. I don't understand why this whole thing resonates with them, other than perhaps the liberal media is framing the news to push the agenda (highly likely). But the fact that a significant number of women have succumbed and aligned is very concerning for society as a whole. Social media. Honestly if it wasn’t for social media most people wouldn’t even know that this was happening. Watching women come up with conspiracy theories about this case reminds me of this place during the Q era. |
|
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Would a PPD diagnosis = automatically being "red-flagged" at that point? This really does look like a "last straw" of feminist shit-testing. That evil bitch committed triple-homicide of her own children whom she killed by strangulation, confessed to it- and idiots are still making excuses for her.
Originally Posted By Geralt55: Originally Posted By Bama-Shooter: Originally Posted By thesquidliest: Not checking 10 prior thread pages, but has anybody opined on the veracity of the point that feminism and the wimmenz equality movement will be set back by like 100 years if Clancy is found not guilty due to raging hormones? More specifically, the private sector may start barring or not hiring wimmenz for high stress jobs or other jobs that can affect the lives of others due to potential liability from hormones on the part of that female employee? That would be the only good thing if that happened. Would a PPD diagnosis = automatically being "red-flagged" at that point? This really does look like a "last straw" of feminist shit-testing. That evil bitch committed triple-homicide of her own children whom she killed by strangulation, confessed to it- and idiots are still making excuses for her.
Well 25% of females walking around have murdered their own child in the womb. |
American by birth. Southern by the grace of God.
Any opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect upon any agency or organization with which I may be employed or affiliated.
Any opinions expressed are my own and do not reflect upon any agency or organization with which I may be employed or affiliated.