Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 3
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 9:54:40 AM EDT
[#1]
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 9:55:24 AM EDT
[#2]
I like all of them from 10.5-12.5

Next will be a pinned 13.7 with a NOX
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 9:56:33 AM EDT
[#3]
I know there is a difference in ballistics and dwell time is a thing.  But this bitch just runs and runs and runs.....

Link Posted: 9/8/2019 9:58:29 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

12.5 is the best length
View Quote
I subscribe to this theory.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:02:46 AM EDT
[#5]
I have no clue, other than it’s for looks.  Even then, it’s only an inch.  It’s hardly noticeable by 99% of people.  But, since people take more glamour shots of their guns than shots at the range, it has to look just so.

My anecdotal experience?  My brother in law built a 10.5 (he wanted that extra inch for cool factor) and I built an 11.5 after looking into dwell times, ammo interchangeability, etc.  He has had a lot of problems with cycling and ejection - has to use one specific ammo.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:06:23 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
looks cooler
View Quote
Disagree

11.5 is best .5

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:06:42 AM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Probably because it's similar to the military's Mk18, which has a 10.3" barrel. Also supposedly if you go shorter than that, 5.56 rounds start having trouble maintaining acceptable velocity out to common engagement distances. And about as short as you can go on a carbine gas system before introducing major issues.

Of course, there are shorter gas lengths than carbine available. But I suspect a pistol-length gas system on a 5.56 carbine would introduce its own host of issues.

I really wish 11.5" uppers were more commonly available from places like Palmetto, if only because that puts the overall length of the rifle above 26" from end of bare muzzle to end of buffer tube, therefor allowing you to legally put vertical foregrips on it without having to weld the muzzle device in place. But also because of the whole "40% more dwell time for only an extra inch of length" thing.
View Quote
PSA 11.5" 5.56 NATO 1/7" NITRIDE UPPER WITH BCG & CHARGING HANDLE

Your wish has been answered!

I have two 10.5 PSA and one BA 11.5 and a BA Hanson in 11.3 I am building.  I like the bit of extra velocity and ballistics, but also, the uncorking pressure is easier on cans, little more powder burnt up to not sand blast the cans as much.  I usually run brakes on them to help too.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:10:46 AM EDT
[#8]
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:11:05 AM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Shortest you can go on a carbine gas system.
View Quote
Not quite. Colt Canada 10" rifle used by snow Mexicans and the Brits.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:12:31 AM EDT
[#10]
When I converted this from 10.5" to 11.5" it's been flawless, however my 10.5" pistol has been 100% so far but only about 4-500 rounds so far.
Attachment Attached File

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:15:52 AM EDT
[#11]
Where are all these 'issues' with 10.5" barrels.

I know mine doesn't have any....

its a smooth shooter with an A5 buffer system
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:20:34 AM EDT
[#12]
I have one 11.5"   I love it.  Price of 10.5 barrels is so absurdly low though, I cant stop from buying them over the more expensive 11.5 barrels.   Its the center one in the pic.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:21:33 AM EDT
[#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Shortest you can go on a carbine gas system.
View Quote
Au contraire 10.3” is the shortest.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 10:29:18 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Au contraire 10.3" is the shortest.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Shortest you can go on a carbine gas system.
Au contraire 10.3" is the shortest.
Negative. Colt Canada makes a 10".
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 11:04:26 AM EDT
[#15]
I have two 10.5 no issues with either.

I’ll get a 11.5 one day but it’s not a priority.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 11:27:22 AM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

I really wish 11.5" uppers were more commonly available from places like Palmetto, if only because that puts the overall length of the rifle above 26" from end of bare muzzle to end of buffer tube, therefor allowing you to legally put vertical foregrips on it without having to weld the muzzle device in place.
View Quote
Looking at it from  the other direction, a 10.5" upper is a safer option for people using it on a pistol lower, in situations where they want to avoid questions of it no longer being a handgun.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 11:40:17 AM EDT
[#17]
In which caliber?

My .300 has a 10.5" barrel and runs like a Swiss watch, suppressed or nah.

My 5.56 has an 11.5" barrel, and also runs fine (although I did have to put in a heavier spring and buffer to get it to run right suppressed).

For what most of us do with our rifles - short range outings, and posing them for glamour photos - either one will work just fine.  Just make sure that you've run it enough to know that it'll be reliable when you need it.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 12:53:15 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I like my 12.5.
View Quote
This.  I went from 10.3 to 12.5 and live it.  Less concussion, more velocity and similar handling.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 3:51:19 PM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I have no clue, other than it's for looks.  Even then, it's only an inch.  It's hardly noticeable by 99% of people.  But, since people take more glamour shots of their guns than shots at the range, it has to look just so.

My anecdotal experience?  My brother in law built a 10.5 (he wanted that extra inch for cool factor) and I built an 11.5 after looking into dwell times, ammo interchangeability, etc.  He has had a lot of problems with cycling and ejection - has to use one specific ammo.
View Quote
That is true, there's an awful lot of gun porn pics on this site!
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 3:56:57 PM EDT
[#20]
There is no difference in reliability, IME.  Don’t buy garbage parts and you won’t have problems.

FWIW, I think the shortest possible barrel makes the most sense when used in conjunction with a suppressor.  If I didn’t have them, I’d probably stick with 11.5”-12.5”.

ETA:  I’ve owned probably 4-5 different configurations of 10.3”-10.5” barrels and all of them ran great with all ammo types, suppressed and unsuppressed.  Still own 2 of them (10.3” Colt and 10.5” PSA CHF) and they both keep chugging along.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 4:07:26 PM EDT
[#21]
Go small or go home?
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 4:36:39 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
There is no difference in reliability, IME.  Don’t buy garbage parts and you won’t have problems.

FWIW, I think the shortest possible barrel makes the most sense when used in conjunction with a suppressor.  If I didn’t have them, I’d probably stick with 11.5”-12.5”.

ETA:  I’ve owned probably 4-5 different configurations of 10.3”-10.5” barrels and all of them ran great with all ammo types, suppressed and unsuppressed.  Still own 2 of them (10.3” Colt and 10.5” PSA CHF) and they both keep chugging along.
View Quote
This. I've currently got three 10.3s (two DD 10.3", one Andro/BA "Crane Spec" 10.3") and they all run perfectly with any ammo I want to use, suppressed or unsuppressed.

Actually, I suppose you could technically say I have five - if you count the unassembled Colt 10.3" and another DD 10.3", lol. Did I mention I like 10.3"?

Quoted:
I have no clue, other than it’s for looks.  Even then, it’s only an inch.  It’s hardly noticeable by 99% of people.  But, since people take more glamour shots of their guns than shots at the range, it has to look just so.

My anecdotal experience?  My brother in law built a 10.5 (he wanted that extra inch for cool factor) and I built an 11.5 after looking into dwell times, ammo interchangeability, etc.  He has had a lot of problems with cycling and ejection - has to use one specific ammo.
View Quote
You're assuming you can't do both. I take glamour shots all the time; I also have 14k through the gun in the photo below.

Link Posted: 9/8/2019 4:42:05 PM EDT
[#23]
I have both.  I reach for the 10.3(Mk18) way more than the 11.5(KAC).  If I'm trying to stretch out for range/accuracy the 14.5 Socom profile(Colt/SOPMOD) gets the job done better than either.  I have noriced no reliability issues in the 10.3 vs. the 11.5.
Link Posted: 9/8/2019 4:46:32 PM EDT
[#24]
I like 11.5
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 8:53:02 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Not quite. Colt Canada 10" rifle used by snow Mexicans and the Brits.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/200145/87E137F1-960C-4E89-A9F3-0B1AA7932995_jpeg-1083137.JPG
View Quote
I'll see your 10" and drop it down to 9.2"

https://specialopstactical.com/product/9-2-nitride-premium-siphon-agp-w-nickel-boron-carbine-length-barrel/
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 8:53:18 AM EDT
[#26]
It looks sexier
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:05:40 AM EDT
[#27]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

This. I've currently got three 10.3s (two DD 10.3", one Andro/BA "Crane Spec" 10.3") and they all run perfectly with any ammo I want to use, suppressed or unsuppressed.

Actually, I suppose you could technically say I have five - if you count the unassembled Colt 10.3" and another DD 10.3", lol. Did I mention I like 10.3"?

You're assuming you can't do both. I take glamour shots all the time; I also have 14k through the gun in the photo below.

http://wkd.site.nfoservers.com/CQBR/CQBR.072219.Old.Ranch.Door-RS-08.jpg
View Quote
I'm very aware you can do both.  95% of gun owners don't have 14k rounds through their rifles (90% don't even have 500 rounds through their rifles), but they have entire folders on their computer devoted to gun glamour shots.  I personally think it's odd.  YMMV.

The glamour shots are all the same thing, guns posed on "outdoorsy" or "tactical" or "military themed" backgrounds.  It's just the weird mentality of showing off guns on social media - yes Arfcom is social media.  Would you take that picture of your gun and walk around your city showing the picture to random people?  Asking them if they like it?
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:10:01 AM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I feel like it's much like the myths surrounding the M4 Sherman that say it's a bad tank. Someone said at one point "yeah 10.3/10.5 sucks and is unreliable" and everyone just went with it. If you actually look at the numbers, you're losing what, ~200 fps? And in what way, exactly, is it "less reliable?"
View Quote
Some of these guys and their reliability issues...I wonder if they are factory guns or home builds, or if it is just stuff they hear. I’ve built 15-20 ARs from 4.75” to 20” and had precisely zero reliability issues.

Now there is one guy in the home build forum with issues but he dropped it off for an FFL to put together who seemingly knows little about ARs.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:13:00 AM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I have no clue, other than it’s for looks.  Even then, it’s only an inch.  It’s hardly noticeable by 99% of people.  But, since people take more glamour shots of their guns than shots at the range, it has to look just so.

My anecdotal experience?  My brother in law built a 10.5 (he wanted that extra inch for cool factor) and I built an 11.5 after looking into dwell times, ammo interchangeability, etc.  He has had a lot of problems with cycling and ejection - has to use one specific ammo.
View Quote
If he has to use one specific type of ammo then there is something wrong with his configuration.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:16:08 AM EDT
[#30]
Never had an issue with any of my 10.5" builds.

Also in Communist Maryland I need 10.5" in order to legally build an SBR so every caliber gets that length barrel.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:17:56 AM EDT
[#31]
My 10.5 LMT runs great on M855.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:37:03 AM EDT
[#32]
Best length for a carbine gas system is 14.5.  The actual orginal carbine design was based on that ( or so I understand).

I built one like that years back with a fixed extended A2 flash hider as short as possible legal rifle.

So when I built a pistol I went 10.5, because there isn't much difference between 11.5 or 12.5 and 14.5.

Buy decent parts and they seem to work fine at 10.5 and up.  Build what you like, it's a black bun paradise out there right now.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:40:07 AM EDT
[#33]
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 6:41:45 PM EDT
[#34]
To the guys running suppressed.
If your gas ports are at 0.070" does it get over gassed when the suppressor goes on the gun?
I have a Micro MOA govnah on my 11.5 and the ejection pattern definitely changes when I slide the plate.
It goes from about 1 o'clock to about 3:30 on the smaller setting.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 6:47:25 PM EDT
[#35]
11.5 master race checking in. Need to put my new muzzle device on it.  Waiting for my Form 1...

@NYshooter thanks for the barrel bud, its fantastic!

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 6:50:40 PM EDT
[#36]
Palmetto 10.5" kits are way more common and cheaper. Their 11.5" uppers are barely in stock.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 7:48:12 PM EDT
[#37]
I’m a fan of 11.5

If I get another ill go 12.5 - seems to be the best balance of length/range if you want something short.

Doc Gary was asked what ammo for a 10.5 and he said well get 11.5 if you could. So I did.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 7:58:30 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Some of these guys and their reliability issues...I wonder if they are factory guns or home builds, or if it is just stuff they hear. I’ve built 15-20 ARs from 4.75” to 20” and had precisely zero reliability issues.

Now there is one guy in the home build forum with issues but he dropped it off for an FFL to put together who seemingly knows little about ARs.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I feel like it's much like the myths surrounding the M4 Sherman that say it's a bad tank. Someone said at one point "yeah 10.3/10.5 sucks and is unreliable" and everyone just went with it. If you actually look at the numbers, you're losing what, ~200 fps? And in what way, exactly, is it "less reliable?"
Some of these guys and their reliability issues...I wonder if they are factory guns or home builds, or if it is just stuff they hear. I’ve built 15-20 ARs from 4.75” to 20” and had precisely zero reliability issues.

Now there is one guy in the home build forum with issues but he dropped it off for an FFL to put together who seemingly knows little about ARs.
May be some quality of parts issues, with some of the home builds.

A guy asked me for some help with an AR he had put together from a stripped receiver and a plain brown box of parts (no indication of who made them) that he had bought at a gun show as a "just add your stripped lower receiver" kit.

When he tried to put the upper on the lower, the pivot pin was difficult to push in, and the takedown pin wouldn't budge.  Tried a couple of my uppers on his lower, and both pins needed some effort to push them in, but they did go in.  Tried his upper on one of my lowers, and the takedown pin wouldn't go in.

His pins were a hair oversize, and the upper receiver was out of spec on the spacing between the two pin holes (aft hole was off).  I told him what we could try, he agreed, and his AR finally went together with the aft pin hole in the upper receiver slightly elongated.

I cringed at the thought of what else could go wrong when he took it to the range to try it out, but he didn't ask me for any more help with it, so I guess it worked well enough for him.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 8:11:52 PM EDT
[#39]
I personally think 11.5 is the sweet spot
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 8:19:45 PM EDT
[#40]
PSA basically flooded the market with 10.5’s
They could do the same with 11.5’s if they wanted to
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 8:30:17 PM EDT
[#41]
11.5 is best .5 because it’s supposed to be 10.3 not filthy peasant 10.5

The answer to the question is both
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:17:39 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
11.5 is best .5 because it’s supposed to be 10.3 not filthy peasant 10.5

The answer to the question is both
View Quote
He's right you know
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:32:31 PM EDT
[#43]
11.5 is master race.

10.5 is fake news.

10.3 is ok but 11.5 is more betterer
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:39:00 PM EDT
[#44]
Ballistics advantages with 11.5" makes me wonder as well
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:48:41 PM EDT
[#45]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Why the chin weld?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
1.93 isn't super high
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 9:56:29 PM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

PSA 11.5" 5.56 NATO 1/7" NITRIDE UPPER WITH BCG & CHARGING HANDLE

Your wish has been answered!

I have two 10.5 PSA and one BA 11.5 and a BA Hanson in 11.3 I am building.  I like the bit of extra velocity and ballistics, but also, the uncorking pressure is easier on cans, little more powder burnt up to not sand blast the cans as much.  I usually run brakes on them to help too.
View Quote
I was going to say because psa sells the 10.5 and not the 11.5 and then I saw your post.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 10:14:55 PM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Shortest you can go on a carbine gas system.
View Quote
Back in the day everyone started to get a 14.5 in barrel M4, operators went to some local shop and asked "How short can you make this barrel?".  The guy with the hacksaw said, "I guess I can cut it off about.. here".  The operator said, "do it"  and the rest was history.
Link Posted: 9/9/2019 10:25:14 PM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Back in the day everyone started to get a 14.5 in barrel M4, operators went to some local shop and asked "How short can you make this barrel?".  The guy with the hacksaw said, "I guess I can cut it off about.. here".  The operator said, "do it"  and the rest was history.
View Quote
nope

the short barrels started during the Vietnam war.

years later the 14.5" was developed







after Vietnam...14.5"Colt 653



Link Posted: 9/9/2019 10:30:56 PM EDT
[#49]
Dunno. Love my 10.5 and it runs perfectly suppressed and unsuppressed.

Link Posted: 9/10/2019 5:28:25 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'll see your 10" and drop it down to 9.2"

https://specialopstactical.com/product/9-2-nitride-premium-siphon-agp-w-nickel-boron-carbine-length-barrel/
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not quite. Colt Canada 10" rifle used by snow Mexicans and the Brits.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/200145/87E137F1-960C-4E89-A9F3-0B1AA7932995_jpeg-1083137.JPG
I'll see your 10" and drop it down to 9.2"

https://specialopstactical.com/product/9-2-nitride-premium-siphon-agp-w-nickel-boron-carbine-length-barrel/
That's pretty neat actually
Page / 3
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top