Posted: 12/10/2010 8:03:00 AM EDT
|
I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a
Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? |
|
Quoted:
I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? Glenn, is that you? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? Glenn, is that you? It's a serious question, I'm not pumping beck I'm just curious to what people think, and do you honestly think that our .gov is beyond this kind of tactic. |
|
Quoted: I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? That's what they want you to think. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? That's what they want you to think. Actually they want you to think that's what they want you to think. It's all a very, very deep conspiracy. The lack of evidence obviously proves it. |
|
Yes it is a conspiracy.
You would be surprised. Anyone here remember the "Mohammud cartoon riots"?? Yup, it was a false flag. Make Muslims look bad then have an excuse to bomb them. In fact the guy who discovered it was all a fraud was killed for being a whistleblower! 
Straight from WIKI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko Alexander Valterovich Litvinenko was an officer who served in the Soviet KGB and its Russian successor, the Federal Security Service (FSB). In November 1998, Litvinenko and several other FSB officers publicly accused their superiors of ordering the assassination of Russian tycoon and oligarch Boris Berezovsky. Litvinenko was arrested the following March on charges of exceeding his authority at work. He fled with his family to London and was granted asylum in the United Kingdom, where he became a journalist and writer.
According to Litvinenko, the 2005 controversy over the publication in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten of editorial cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad was orchestrated by the FSB to punish Denmark for its refusal to extradite Chechen separatists. He was later Assassinated in London when someone slipped Polonium-210 into his food. The REAL truth is all those pictures with thousands of angry muslims are really Puerto ricans who were hired in Miami beach as movie extras by a guy named Schlomo Goldberg. (freaking mossad!) 
The crowds were made big with CGI movie effects. We are through the looking glass here people! Hide your fucking dog!!!
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? That's what they want you to think. Actually they want you to think that's what they want you to think. Ah, I see you fell for their ruse. Sheeple  |
|
Quoted: Yes it is a conspiracy. You would be surprised. Anyone here remember the "Mohammud cartoon riots"?? Yup, it was a false flag. Make Muslims look bad then have an excuse to bomb them. In fact the guy who discovered it was all a fraud was killed for being a whistleblower! Straight from WIKI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Litvinenko Alexander Valterovich Litvinenko was an officer who served in the Soviet KGB and its Russian successor, the Federal Security Service (FSB). In November 1998, Litvinenko and several other FSB officers publicly accused their superiors of ordering the assassination of Russian tycoon and oligarch Boris Berezovsky. Litvinenko was arrested the following March on charges of exceeding his authority at work. He fled with his family to London and was granted asylum in the United Kingdom, where he became a journalist and writer. According to Litvinenko, the 2005 controversy over the publication in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten of editorial cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Muhammad was orchestrated by the FSB to punish Denmark for its refusal to extradite Chechen separatists. He was later Assassinated in London when someone slipped Polonium-210 into his food. The REAL truth is all those pictures with thousands of angry muslims are really Puerto ricans who were hired in Miami beach as movie extras by a guy named Schlomo Goldberg. (freaking mossad!) The crowds were made big with CGI movie effects. We are through the looking glass here people! Hide your fucking dog!!!I believed you up to these points in red here...  Got anything to back that up or is this sarcasm? Speed |
|
Normally I'd be likely to dismiss this as little-green-men stuff, but I'm not this time because of the free pass that vindictive little twinkle-toes (Manning) is getting.
An American citizen and American soldier who swore / affirmed an oath to this Nation handed all this info over to an enemy of the USA, and we are focusing on the effete internet guy? Yeah that right there is pretty f#$%ed up. If we dealt with Manning like we should (instead of giving him carte blanche because he's gay) then I'd be likely to scoff this off as unlikely. But radical activist homosexuals like Manning have a lot in common with those who would see our Nation destroyed at every opportunity, so to me it is still completely within the realm of possibility. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know if his has been covered before? From what I have seen some sensitive military information has been released, but most of it as far as I can tell has been diplomatic cables that embarrass people more than show truly sensitive state information. Who thinks this is a attempt to push for further regulation over information overall as far as Internet, news and free flow of information. Now I would Agree that the wikileaks guy is a douche and the people who actually leak information should be held accountable to the letter of the law. It just seems that this a Is a way to further control the people. What does the hivemond say? That's what they want you to think. Actually they want you to think that's what they want you to think. Ah, I see you fell for their ruse. Sheeple
Son, you are messing with powers you cannot comprehend. Psychopoliticians make the Illuminati look like a church quilting bee.
|