Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
6/5/2006 8:09:11 AM EDT
The U.S.-Mexican War (1846-1848)

So, the US had a war against Mexico for, essentially property. After the war ended, the US paid Mexico for the land that was "won".  Since the US "won" the land in the war, and even moreso, since the US "paid" Mexico for the land - we, the USA "own" that land - RIGHT??!!!

So, how is it that protesters like these guys, and many others, all espouse the "stolen lands" argument?







The U.S.-Mexican War—(1846-1848):

The Mexican-American War was the first major conflict driven by the idea of "Manifest Destiny"; the belief that America had a God-given right, or destiny, to expand the country's borders from 'sea to shining sea'. This belief would eventually cause a great deal of suffering for many Mexicans, Native Americans and United States citizens.

Following the earlier Texas War of Independence from Mexico, tensions between the two largest independent nations on the North American continent grew as Texas eventually became a U.S. state. Disputes over the border lines sparked military confrontation, helped by the fact that President Polk eagerly sought a war in order to seize large tracts of land from Mexico.

Manifest Destiny did not necessarily call for violent expansion. In both 1835 and 1845, the United States offered to purchase California from Mexico, for $5 million and $25 million, respectively. The Mexican government refused the opportunity to sell half of its country to Mexico's most dangerous neighbor.

Texas, and now the United States, claimed the border at the Rio Grande River. Mexico claimed territory as far north as the Nueces River. Both nations sent troops to enforce the competing claims, and a tense standoff ensued. On April 25, 1846, a clash occurred between Mexican and American troops on soil claimed by both countries. The war had begun.

On February 2, 1848, The Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo was signed, later to be ratified by both the U.S. and Mexican Congresses. The treaty called for the annexation of the northern portions of Mexico to the United States. In return, the U.S. agreed to pay $15 million to Mexico as compensation for the seized territory.



Despite early popularity at home, the war was marked by the growth of a loud anti-war movement which included such noted Americans as Ralph Waldo Emerson, former president John Quincy Adams and Henry David Thoreau.

Another interesting aspect of the war involved the fate of U.S. Army deserters of Irish origin who joined the Mexican Army as the Batallón San Patricio (Saint Patrick's Battalion). This group of Catholic Irish immigrants rebelled at the abusive treatment by Protestant, American-born officers and at the treatment of the Catholic Mexican population by the U.S. Army. At this time in American history, Catholics were an ill-treated minority, and the Irish were an unwanted ethnic group in the United States. In September, 1847, the U.S. Army hanged sixteen surviving members of the San Patricios as traitors.


6/5/2006 8:13:10 AM EDT
[#1]


6/5/2006 8:14:03 AM EDT
[#2]
Nazi like SOS?  Is that like ...---... but with a zig heil at the end?


It's SS!  Like Super Sport, or Sammy Sanchez.
6/5/2006 8:20:24 AM EDT
[#3]
"So, how is it that protesters like these guys, and many others, all espouse the "stolen lands" argument?"

Cause they are a bunch of morons from Mexico and you don't need brains to protest.  What kind of education do you think these people have had?  Most of them would flunk a 8th grade test on the history of their own country.

edit:  I would bet about 75% of the population is atleast 50% SPANIARD.  By their own protest, they should kick themselves out of Mexico.
6/5/2006 8:31:52 AM EDT
[#4]
Indigenous?  Oh, really?

As far as talking about the Nazi-like  etc.'s , anyone who has read "Mein Kampf" would appreciate the irony seeing what these animals who are doing the protesting have done here.
6/5/2006 10:53:30 AM EDT
[#5]
If they were productive people, they'd be working.