Could You Have Stopped This? Vegas Shooting Analysis with Attorneys on Retainer

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - 442 vs 642, differences no internal lock?

Posted: 10/26/2008 7:06:17 AM EDT

is the differences just the finish color?

I was looking also on their website and they list it without the internal lock, does that mean they are producing new revolvers without the locks? or are those left overs and all the new ones will have the locks?

Posted: 10/26/2008 2:38:25 PM EDT

[#1]

pretty much.

Exactly same size, weight and action.

The current 642s w/o locks have SS barrels and cylinders on alloy frames.

Whereas, the current 442s w/o locks have SS barrels, Carbon steel cylinders on alloy frames.

Posted: 10/26/2008 3:52:47 PM EDT

[#2]

Quoted:

is the differences just the finish color?

Price, too........

Posted: 10/27/2008 2:08:27 AM EDT

[#3]

Quoted:

I was looking also on their website and they list it without the internal lock, does that mean they are producing new revolvers without the locks? or are those left overs and all the new ones will have the locks?

Who knows. That's why you should get them while you can.

Posted: 10/27/2008 2:27:09 PM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:
is the differences just the finish color?

Price, too........

Price should be the same.

Posted: 10/27/2008 4:57:11 PM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
Price should be the same.

There's usually $20-30 difference that I've seen.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - 442 vs 642, differences no internal lock?

Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Warning

Confirm Action

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - 442 vs 642, differences no internal lock?

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - 442 vs 642, differences no internal lock?