Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
3/27/2005 1:09:44 PM EDT
What are the major differences besides the kimber being 100 bucks cheaper and having night sights?
3/27/2005 1:40:36 PM EDT
[#1]
Reason #1:  Kimber uses MIM parts where the Colt uses forged.

Reason #2:  Colt is selling the name 'Colt'.

other than that, I don't have a clue.  

3/27/2005 4:05:13 PM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
Reason #1:  Kimber uses MIM parts where the Colt uses forged.



Actually no, Colt uses MIM as well and has for some time now unless they have made a major change recently.
3/27/2005 6:08:31 PM EDT
[#3]
Kimber uses more MIM than Colt and has the roundly despised Series II FP safety (whereas the Colt has the sullenly tolerated FP safety).  The Colt will hold its value better.

Kimbers are good guns, I've been tempted by the TLE myself.  But they have no soul and in the end, will never be a Colt.
3/27/2005 6:21:47 PM EDT
[#4]
XSE.  You won't regret it....the hundred bucks difference will be the best 100 bucks you have ever spent.
3/27/2005 6:56:57 PM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
Kimber uses more MIM than Colt and has the roundly despised Series II FP safety (whereas the Colt has the sullenly tolerated FP safety).  The Colt will hold its value better.

Kimbers are good guns, I've been tempted by the TLE myself.  But they have no soul and in the end, will never be a Colt.



Oh horseshit.  No "soul" my ass.  The fact is, my Kimber Classic Stainless II is more accurate in my hands than any non-Gold Cup Colt I've ever owned.  And I've had zero problems with the series II safety.
3/27/2005 7:17:45 PM EDT
[#6]
 It's true, rik! Kimber sold the rights to their 1911's souls when they gave 'em that "soft" look!    
3/27/2005 7:31:22 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
 It's true, rik! Kimber sold the rights to their 1911's souls when they gave 'em that "soft" look!    



And that ghey-assed flowery script rollmark....  :D
3/27/2005 7:34:21 PM EDT
[#8]
If you buy the Colt you won't have to buy razor blades for a while.  Just pop off the slide, lather your self up and shave away.  That could save you $100.00

I bought a basic Colt Commander and it was dangerously sharpin more than one spot.  It's stainless so I was able to fix it without ruining the finish.  I do like the pistol but I was afraid to touch it until the edges were fixed.  That aside I don't think you could go wrong with either one.
3/27/2005 7:52:38 PM EDT
[#9]

Quoted:
If you buy the Colt you won't have to buy razor blades for a while.  Just pop off the slide, lather your self up and shave away.  That could save you $100.00

I bought a basic Colt Commander and it was dangerously sharpin more than one spot.  It's stainless so I was able to fix it without ruining the finish.  I do like the pistol but I was afraid to touch it until the edges were fixed.  That aside I don't think you could go wrong with either one.



"Colt... keeping pistolsmiths in business since 1911."

The XSE was Colt's way of trying to escape the ass-kicking that Kimber and other competitors were handily giving them in the semi-custom 1911 market.  I don't particularly think the XSE package itself is all that attractive; I actually prefer the way Kimber does some things.  But at the end of the day, when you get the Colt set up like you want it, it will be the genuine article and not a copy.

If you just want a gun that has the popular features out of the box, go for the TLE.  It will shoot well and more than likely be a great gun.  If you ever plan to have it truly customized, though, go for the Colt.

3/27/2005 7:54:44 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
If you buy the Colt you won't have to buy razor blades for a while.  Just pop off the slide, lather your self up and shave away.  That could save you $100.00





 Ahh, you have just given away the secret to a great shave!!!
3/28/2005 3:14:28 AM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
 But at the end of the day, when you get the Colt set up like you want it, it will be the genuine article and not a copy.



No, what you get is a gun that is lower quality, has more sharp edges and is not as accurate as a Kimber.
3/28/2005 3:30:46 AM EDT
[#12]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Reason #1:  Kimber uses MIM parts where the Colt uses forged.



Actually no, Colt uses MIM as well and has for some time now unless they have made a major change recently.



really?  hmm.....Live and learn.  After dealing with their customer service a few years ago, I didn't really need another reason not to buy a Colt again, but I just got one.
3/28/2005 4:57:19 AM EDT
[#13]
First off, A stainless TLE around here goes for about 850 to 900 bucks.  I bought my stainless XSE Gov for under 800 out the door.  The only thing I did not like about the XSE was the grip safety which I swapped out myself.  Others seem to like the stock one.   I had a bad experience with a Kimber series II.  I will not own one now.  I have never had a series 80 fail.  All of my Series 80 have good trigger pulls. Colt uses far less MIM than any maker this side of Wilson, high end guys. My XSE has a perfect barrel fit and shoots 1.5 off a machine rest. The new Colts have a dimble throat job and will feed anything. I am very happy with the XSE, but then I must be lucky, I have 4 Colts I am very happy with. If you are hung up on a tight slide to frame fit (which has very very little to do with accuracy) then get a Kimber.  

Here is my XSE bef


After the GS swap

3/28/2005 5:26:25 AM EDT
[#14]

Quoted:
Colt uses far less MIM than any maker this side of Wilson, high end guys.



I don't believe that to be true.
3/28/2005 5:54:37 AM EDT
[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
 But at the end of the day, when you get the Colt set up like you want it, it will be the genuine article and not a copy.



No, what you get is a gun that is lower quality, has more sharp edges and is not as accurate as a Kimber.



I disagree, twice.  Having both I can say there is no appreciable difference in accuracy from my experiences. Any accuracy difference will be small enough not to be noticed by 98% of shooters. And the Colt's quality, at least now, is equal to the Kimber.   I suggest you check out the new Colts in person instead of making assumptions.
3/28/2005 5:57:55 AM EDT
[#16]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Colt uses far less MIM than any maker this side of Wilson, high end guys.



I don't believe that to be true.



Believe what you want, a lot of top pistolsmiths disagree with you.
3/28/2005 5:58:45 AM EDT
[#17]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
 But at the end of the day, when you get the Colt set up like you want it, it will be the genuine article and not a copy.



No, what you get is a gun that is lower quality, has more sharp edges and is not as accurate as a Kimber.



I disagree, twice.  Having both I can say there is no appreciable difference in accuracy from my experiences. Any accuracy difference will be small enough not to be noticed by 98% of shooters. And the Colt's quality, at least now, is equal to the Kimber.   I suggest you check out the new Colts in person instead of making assumptions.



I suggest you not assume so much.  I have not only "checked out" new Colts, I have owned several.  Not one of them was as accurate as any Kimber I have owned.
3/28/2005 6:37:13 AM EDT
[#18]

Quoted:
I suggest you not assume so much.  I have not only "checked out" new Colts, I have owned several.  Not one of them was as accurate as any Kimber I have owned.



Good for you.  Looks like our experiences vary.
3/28/2005 6:49:41 AM EDT
[#19]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted:
Colt uses far less MIM than any maker this side of Wilson, high end guys.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




I don't believe that to be true.




Mine had 2, sear and disconnect.  The last Kimber and SA had more than that.
3/28/2005 7:45:23 AM EDT
[#20]

Quoted:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted:
Colt uses far less MIM than any maker this side of Wilson, high end guys.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




I don't believe that to be true.




Mine had 2, sear and disconnect.  The last Kimber and SA had more than that.



I'll bet you the Colt had a couple more than that.
3/28/2005 8:05:34 AM EDT
[#21]
Nope, not the XSE, not the 1991 NRM Command, Not the CCO, nor the ORM Gov.  All had non mim slide stops, hammers, bushings. I did not even see any MIM marks on the mag catches....
3/28/2005 8:07:48 AM EDT
[#22]
I have had my XSE for about a year and a half now and I love it!!!
3/28/2005 8:19:17 AM EDT
[#23]
BOTH!

i have yet to get my hands on a colt, so i will have to say kimber

but colt sure looks a heck of a lot better
3/28/2005 8:32:20 AM EDT
[#24]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Mine had 2, sear and disconnect.  The last Kimber and SA had more than that.



I'll bet you the Colt had a couple more than that.



I'm sure the grip safety was MIM, and more than likely the thumb safety was MIM or cast.  I haven't done a part-by-part examination of my Colts so I can't say one way or the other what's MIM and what's not.
3/28/2005 8:36:53 AM EDT
[#25]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Mine had 2, sear and disconnect.  The last Kimber and SA had more than that.



I'll bet you the Colt had a couple more than that.



I'm sure the grip safety was MIM, and more than likely the thumb safety was MIM or cast.



That sounds about right.
3/28/2005 8:54:04 AM EDT
[#26]
I will look for MIM marks on the GS, I almost 100% there were none on the thumb safety.
3/28/2005 9:17:17 AM EDT
[#27]
I could not care less about which one has less MIM. Both have it and I consider this a negative. It's certianly not the end of the world, just a "Minus" for both pistols. No way would I pay one dime more for a Colt.
3/28/2005 10:20:43 AM EDT
[#28]
Here is the thing, by my looking, the Kimber and the Colt are pretty close in price in my neck of the woods.  Some dealers try and make an extra buck on the Colt. If you or I don't buy it, I am sure someone will.  If you like Colt Fine, if you like Kimber fine.  I had bad luck with Kimber, good with Colt.  What gets me is people that want to drive Colt into the ground.   The day that happens, Kimber can raise their prices to whatever they want.  And yet these people that pick appart a $700 gun, keep buying $25,000 GM, or Ford or whatever product that get more recall notices than they should stand.  

Go look and shoot them both if you can.  And if you get one you don't like, introduce yourself to GunBroker and go buy another one.  

3/28/2005 11:30:28 AM EDT
[#29]

Quoted:
Here is the thing, by my looking, the Kimber and the Colt are pretty close in price in my neck of the woods.  



Not here.  Colts here go for at least $200 more than the equivalent Kimber.
3/28/2005 2:03:32 PM EDT
[#30]
I like both, however I would go with the Colt solely based on it having an internal (ORIGINAL) extractor design. None of the other things bother me as I NEVER leave any of my 1911's stock. They all get special Lovin from me  
3/28/2005 5:33:53 PM EDT
[#31]
Kimber