Warning

 

Close
Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Cancel Confirm
AR15.COM
2/9/2007 1:10:48 PM EDT
I'm getting ready to have a new 1911 built for carry.

I'd like to go commander slide / officer's frame and do something fairly lightweight.  
I've done some digging and haven't come up with much aside from Caspian & Essex for the recievers.  Caspian makes a titanium frame, which would be fantastic if it wasn't more than twice the price of steel.
Any other manufacturers I could look into and does anyone offer stripped aluminum frames?  I know Colt makes some aluminum commander frames but I doubt they sell components like that new on the open market.  

Also, while I'm on the subject, thoughts on the life span of a lightweight frame vs. steel and differences in actual weight?

And before you ask, no, I'm not feeling cocky enough to build it myself from scratch, not for carry.

Thanks,

Z
2/9/2007 5:28:51 PM EDT
[#1]
The baby 1911s in a LW frame can be battered easier than their steel framed OACP brothern, obviously. The slide on these smaller versions are a good bit "snappier" than the full sized models, thus more potential for frame damage.

The way to off-set that is change the recoil springs pretty often, IMO. My current CCL is the Springfield Micro, a 3" bbl 1911 with an alloy frame. I've been told to change the recoil spring(s) anywhere from 500rds to 2K rds. No doubt the truth lies somewhere in between, but a recoil spring is darn cheap insurance @ $10 per spring or so.    

As for weight, there's no contest there. Aside from my S&W Model 19, I doubt I'll ever CCL a steel framed pistol again. Plumber's butt ain't my idea of a chick magnet..............      

My .o2